Skip to main content

Many of you probably enjoy the crew talk features of Lionel and MTH engines.  I'll tell you from the beginning that it annoys me and I try to avoid hearing it. What bothers me is the unrealistic scripting and conversations that are broadcast.  I'm sure it's entertaining to those who do not know better.

 

However, always wanting to offer a solution when mentioning a problem, I have a suggestion to offer both manufacturers.  Hire Wyhog, Hot Water and Big Jim to script and speak realistic dialogue that is still entertaining to those who really go for the talk features, while remaining realistic enough for those who would like to see it match the level of visual realism built into today's models.  Different voices, correct terminology and slang, an entertaining comment here and there, but mostly professional dialogue -- I think realism has to go beyond handrails and rivets.

 

They're toys, I realize, but the extra cost of hiring railroad professionals who are also O gauge model railroaders is not that significant, when spread over numerous model locomotives.  Anybody else think this is a worthy idea?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Spence:

Didn't Lionel use our publisher's voice several years ago!!!

Yes they did, in the NKP Berkshire. I recorded some new lines for the new release that's coming out soon.

 

I agree with Tom, however. Much of the conversation in the MTH and Lionel cab audio is stilted and not realistic at all.

 

What we need in the steam engines is the engineer yelling at the fireman complaining about the water level being too low, too much smoke and not enough steam! 

Last edited by Rich Melvin

A person brought in to the Lubbock, TX hobby shop a large steam locomotive to run on the test track.  And it featured crew talk.  I don't remember any of the jabber except one transmission from the hogger to the DS saying something like, "we need to get this train going..."

The DS flatly replies, "X-####, you need to wait for my signal"

That cracked me up, since I have witnessed that a time or two.

Have radio talk of an engineer telling the roadmaster why he needs to get past the red flag, or some such, and you have the REAL thing.

Originally Posted by OGR Webmaster:
Originally Posted by Spence:

Didn't Lionel use our publisher's voice several years ago!!!

Yes they did, in the NKP Berkshire. I recorded some new lines for the new release that's coming out soon.

 

I agree with Tom, however. Much of the conversation in the MTH and Lionel cab audio is stilted and not realistic at all.

 

What we need in the steam engines is the engineer yelling at the fireman complaining about the water level being too low, too much smoke and not enough steam! 

You mean you guys didn't sit there and discuss Plato and Socrates?

 

Rusty

Originally Posted by OGR Webmaster:
 

What we need in the steam engines is the engineer yelling at the fireman complaining about the water level being too low, too much smoke and not enough steam! 

Right you are, Rich.  Complaining, mostly at the Fireman, but also about the train crew and the Train Dispatcher, and about delays, and about the engine, was constant with many crabby old steam Engineers.

 

However, there is ample opportunity for in-cab conversations about block signals, train order signals, upcoming meets, how much water is left in the tank, where to take water, where to go to beans, use of the injector, etc.  Different crew talk when stopped than when running (but also containing complaining).

 

For diesels when running, add radio calls to Maintenance of Way Foremen to get authority to pass through limits of his main track authority, radio calls to the Dispatcher (not "Dispatch") trying to avoid taking siding (with proper reply and answer), etc, and when stopped, 2-person radio conversations about being ready to move, in cab conversation about good beaneries, moaning and groaning about last trip, griping about the Trainmaster, etc. And of course, all the railroaders on this Forum will want the most realistic crew talk of all - the Train Dispatcher telling the Engineer, "I'll dispatch the railroad.  Just proceed on signal indication.  Out".

Last edited by Number 90
Rich, I know you're only one person most likely doing above and beyond what any person is reasonably expected to do with their time, but for those of us who do enjoy "talk" coming from our trains, it would be great if you'd ever team up with ERR or some other 3rd party to make such a talk chip available for our trains (providing of course that such a chip would be technically feasible and doable.)
Originally Posted by OGR Webmaster:
Originally Posted by Spence:

Didn't Lionel use our publisher's voice several years ago!!!

Yes they did, in the NKP Berkshire. I recorded some new lines for the new release that's coming out soon.

 

I agree with Tom, however. Much of the conversation in the MTH and Lionel cab audio is stilted and not realistic at all.

 

What we need in the steam engines is the engineer yelling at the fireman complaining about the water level being too low, too much smoke and not enough steam! 

 

Here's one that didn't make it into production:

I was sitting in on a recording session for an MTH diesel, and at one point I had to "big hole" the recording when my friend (who has done a lot of the subway sets) addressed the brakeman by title as if using the radio...as part of a conversation where said crewman is sitting right across the cab from him.

Yes, he was going to go "engineer to brakeman" to someone sitting in the cab with him. (insert facepalm here)

Now, the guy is a fountain of knowledge that went into crafting the subway sets, but his voiceovers sounded like he was a probationary conductor making his first announcements with the head of the transit agency, all his foremen, a pack of lawyers and the FCC standing right behind him .   


---PCJ

Last edited by RailRide
Originally Posted by RailRide:

Here's one that didn't make it into production:

I was sitting in on a recording session for an MTH diesel, and at one point I had to "big hole" the recording when my friend (who has done a lot of the subway sets) addressed the brakeman by title as if using the radio...as part of a conversation where said crewman is sitting right across the cab from him.

Yes, he was going to go "engineer to brakeman" to someone sitting in the cab with him. (insert facepalm here)

Now, the guy is a fountain of knowledge that went into crafting the subway sets, but his voiceovers sounded like he was a probationary conductor making his first announcements with the head of the transit agency, all his foremen, a pack of lawyers and the FCC standing right behind him .   


---PCJ

Data didn't understand  human nature again?

What about the dog barking sound bite?!?!?!  I've only had it on one of my steam files and did a double take when I heard it.  It could have been the engineer "barking" at the fireman but I don't think so.  How bout some female engineers in modern diesels?

 

Wyhog has some great suggestions, plus I'm sure they talked about other things other than the job at hand like "What's for dinner?" or company/union policies, or "I remember when...".  Crew talk could definitely be more realistic, but then someone would complain about some of the language if it got too spot-on.

I have been saying for a long time that there are scanners out there that can monitor the RR radio channels. Too bad the manufacturers are too cheap to make use of them to learn how real conversations play out over the radio.

 

There is so much really stupid talk programmed into these engines, but, the one that makes me cringe is when the dispatcher tells the engineer to "Take the green". Never happened!

 

And here is another one.

I watched the Lionel N&W Y3 review Eric had posted. Listening to that chatter really showed how they don't care what is said, only that a voice comes out of the speaker. The engineer asking the dispatcher if he could start his steam engine up was one of the stupidest conversations I have ever heard!!! Did I put enough exclamation marks in there?

 

Once again I say that, early on many people were complaining about not being able to understand the crew talk. Now, the sound it is like everyone is sitting around a table and the conversation is clear as a bell (which I suppose they really are). What a bunch of hooey!  

 

You sound folks know what I'm speaking of. I don't know the correct term for the sound quality/tone/whatever. I don't know how to explain it other than there is no distance in the sound. And, there is no background noise.

 

Putting all of these stupid sounds into the lofty premise of "Vision" or "Premiere" does nothing but beat those two words down into the vulgar gutter!

 

I make no apologies if I have stepped on any toes. Suck it up boys! Go learn how to do your job and do it right!

 

 

All realistic dialog, with realistic appearing locomotives, with voices of Professionals who have been there and done that, sounds great to me.

I'm from an era when you listened to your Seniors, no matter how the Senior said it,

so's that the new kid, or man did not to get anyone killed, injured and to properly learn the job 'RIGHT!'

Just like in the Armed Forces!

It may sound rough, but for the most part, that's really how one learns.

Later on, once everyone is established, then a more gentle CONVERSATION can be exchanged.

Ralph

Last edited by RJL

I quite like the crew talk in my Legacy locomotives, but there are times when I wish it could be disabled when using the sequence control feature. I use sequence control quite a lot, and think that it is a great feature, but the excess chatter when switching etc. can be annoying at times.

There are two sets of crew talk on MTH engines that have it. The random chatter that pops up is scripted studio talk for sure. All engines have the same voices saying almost the same thing. Then there is the PFA sequence talk. For the steamers that is a set of station announcements for an arriving train. For the diesels every one is completely different and sure sounds authentic to me! Sure don't see how the PFA dialogues can be made to sound more realistic in MTH PS2 and 3 diesels.

Originally Posted by clem k:

Good morning

 

How about an-off- button?

 

Clem

I'm all for this.  There was once a switch to turn off RailSounds but keep the horn/whistle and bell, why not now put a switch that turns off the chatter?  Then I can keep it off when I run trains, but my 10 year old can turn it on when he runs.  That's the one thing I am dreading about getting the new Lionel Big Boy, it's all the chatter it'll have.

THATS MORE LIKE IT!My Grandpa and my uncles worked on the NYC They talked THIS nice on a GOOD day.Originally Posted by Wyhog:

Conductor to engineer: "Geeze Jack what are you doin up there? The slack action is so rough you moved our grips from one end of the caboose to the other!"

Engineer: "Well hang on and I'll move em back for you."

or how about,

"That'll do...  That'll do... THAT'LL DO! STOP! Oh sh--".

 

or,

"Yeehaw. On the main, let them ponies eat".

 

or,

Dispatcher: "Dispatcher to Extra 6789 West. I'm putting you in at Lariat to meet five. It'll be a while so you can go eat if you want."

Engineer: "Dispatcher have you ever been to Lariat?" then off air to brakeman. "Nothing but sagebrush and prairie dogs for 50 miles and he tells us to go eat."

 

or,

Engineer: "121 to foreman Wentworth, we are stopped at your red flag."

Track foreman: "Foreman Wentworth to 121's train, I'll get back to you, we'll be out of your way in about 10 minutes."

Engineer: "Is that 10 minutes real time or 10 minutes track foreman time?"

 

or,

Dispatcher: "Dispatcher to number 76, going in at Lodge Grass for 2."

Engineer: "Train 76 to Dispatcher, you know we only have 2 hours to work?"

Dispatcher: "Yes I'm aware of that."

One hour later the 2nd train goes by.

Twenty minutes later...

Dispatcher: "Dispatcher to number 76, going in at Parkman for one coming up the hill."

Engineer: "You know we only have 40 minutes to work don't you?"

Dispatcher: "Yes I'm aware of that."

Twenty minutes later the meet goes by.

Dispatcher: "76 here comes your signal. Do you have time to make the terminal?"

Engineer: "No. Do you want us to stay here or die on the main at Kleenburn?"

Dispatcher, disgustingly: "Go as far as you can, I'm calling a dogcatch crew right now."

Engineer, off radio to brakeman: "Freakin idiot." (or something close to that).

 

 

 

 

Last edited by rockstars1989

Just gotta point out, In DCS you CAN turn off the chatter.

Also, there is No chatter while in motion except PFA which you have to trigger by pushing a button.

I'll agree, a lot of the voices are repeated in far to many engines.

But they did PFA right in both the Imperial big Boys I have had.

One is a Flag stop, one is a switching operation.

Both are correct for the Era as far as I can tell, No radios, just a very convenient phone and conversation between Engineer & Dispatch, then Eng & Fireman.

The other is just conversation between Eng & Fireman during a switching stop to drop some cars.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by k-liner:

all true. Nobody said "Roger that!" in the 1940s and fifties.

True, because MANY railroads didn't even have radios anyway in the 1940s and 1950s. 

And that's what I hate about crew talk. It's anachronistic. Almost no one had radio communication until after WWII. Listening to modern slang coming from an old steam engine drives me bonkers.

Originally Posted by Number 90:
Originally Posted by OGR Webmaster:
 

What we need in the steam engines is the engineer yelling at the fireman complaining about the water level being too low, too much smoke and not enough steam! 

Right you are, Rich.  Complaining, mostly at the Fireman, but also about the train crew and the Train Dispatcher, and about delays, and about the engine, was constant with many crabby old steam Engineers.

 

However, there is ample opportunity for in-cab conversations about block signals, train order signals, upcoming meets, how much water is left in the tank, where to take water, where to go to beans, use of the injector, etc.  Different crew talk when stopped than when running (but also containing complaining).

 

For diesels when running, add radio calls to Maintenance of Way Foremen to get authority to pass through limits of his main track authority, radio calls to the Dispatcher (not "Dispatch") trying to avoid taking siding (with proper reply and answer), etc, and when stopped, 2-person radio conversations about being ready to move, in cab conversation about good beaneries, moaning and groaning about last trip, griping about the Trainmaster, etc. And of course, all the railroaders on this Forum will want the most realistic crew talk of all - the Train Dispatcher telling the Engineer, "I'll dispatch the railroad.  Just proceed on signal indication.  Out".

How bout Cal's famous saying on the Cajon Sub? "Well nobody told me"

 

The dispatchers are NOT allowed to tell the crew what the signal indication is, but on the Cajon Sub we have one that says "Come on down, the waters fine" or "Come on down and take a look"

 

And another crew favorite required by the rule....

 

conductor: "BNSF 7780 Cajon Sub, stopped all red at Cajon over!"

 

dispatcher: "Train ahead, Cajon Sub DS OUT!" 

Yea at the most you may have had a loud speaker hooked up to a FEMCO.And that was not aboard a train.Originally Posted by RoyBoy:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by k-liner:

all true. Nobody said "Roger that!" in the 1940s and fifties.

True, because MANY railroads didn't even have radios anyway in the 1940s and 1950s. 

And that's what I hate about crew talk. It's anachronistic. Almost no one had radio communication until after WWII. Listening to modern slang coming from an old steam engine drives me bonkers.

 

Last edited by rockstars1989

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×