Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

@T1Titan_ZachF posted:

 

 

Speaking of the F-40 does anyone know how the cabbage unit will work as a push pull unit in lash ups?

I see no reason to think they wont work like any other legacy lashup. 

Program the cabbage as the lead unit so the lights and sounds work, then program the powered unit as the trailing unit in reverse. 

Put them on either end of the train and go.

The real question is whether the kinematic coupler mechanism has a strong enough spring to be shoved against without doing something odd to the train handling. The kinematic couplers dont seem to like to be pushed around curves. 

AmtrakNickFilms posted:

@Dave Olson Hello! It has now been around two weeks since you last posted about the F40PH arriving at your docks, since it has been around two weeks. Do you have any updates on the status of these locomotives? Thanks

Hi Nick. These were actually just received in yesterday. A couple more days for sorting and paperwork, and they'll ship back out!

20170315_092319

Ryan and I are planning on doing a video for these engines as there are a couple of cool features to them, including a lash-up feature where the CrewTalk will come from whichever unit (powered or cabbage) is leading the train. More details to come!

Attachments

Images (1)
  • LionelF40PHWarehouse

@Dave Olson Hello! it has now been about a week since you mentioned the arrival of the Legacy F-40ph at your warehouse and I just wanted to know the current status of the engine and If it shipped back out to dealers. Also I remember you mentioned you and Ryan Kunkle are making a video about the Loco and the Cabbage Loco´s cool features, how is that coming along?

Thanks for your help!

Last edited by @T1Titan_ZachF

I still have the Lionel F40PH Legacy on my bucket list. I did not do the built to order.  I would like to see this loco, some dealers always order extras. Below is a K-Line F40PH, I would guess about 15 years old.  I wonder if Lionel has the molds that made this locomotive. TMCC

I did watch the YT video from Train World, that was posted yesterday. Very helpful. 

K-Line Amtrak F40PH Train Room GaryL-Line Amtrak F40PH MTH-DCS Controller

Gary

Attachments

Images (2)
  • K-Line Amtrak F40PH Train Room Gary
  • L-Line Amtrak F40PH MTH-DCS Controller
@T1Titan_ZachF posted:

Did anyone else order their Legacy F40ph from Legacy Station? Because its been awhile since Lionel shipped them out from their Concord warehouse and mine hasn't arrived yet and I know some others have gotten theirs already........

Full distribution takes time.  I haven't gotten called about mine either (not from LS). 

Boilermaker1 posted:
@T1Titan_ZachF posted:

Did anyone else order their Legacy F40ph from Legacy Station? Because its been awhile since Lionel shipped them out from their Concord warehouse and mine hasn't arrived yet and I know some others have gotten theirs already........

Full distribution takes time.  I haven't gotten called about mine either (not from LS). 

Same here also not from LS

VistaDomeScott posted:
trainroomgary posted:

About 20 miles from my train room, I can still catch a; F40PH.

Windsor, Ontario • Canada  /  VIA Rail to Toronto / This will be Lionel's next F40PH.

Gary

Gary

  I have often thought about driving up to Windsor and taking VIA to Toronto for the weekend.  Have you ever left your car in Windsor to do this and is there safe parking?

Scott

Hi Scott

There is a lot of free parking, and you are in Canada.  A crime free zone.  You will not need a passport, I have a Michigan Enhanced Driver's License  /  which is a passport to Canada.  They have the same thing in Ontario, to come to Michigan.  This was done to keep up tourism on both sides of the border. 

If you have children, with you / must have proof, they are your children.

Safe Travels: Gary

Does anyone know what is the normal Amtrak engine speed run # is for the F40PH? I read somewhere it normally is set at Run #8 for travel   I have the newest  MTH Amtrak F40PH  and while I believe engine & horn sound is dead on perfect, especially the horn, at run#8 it sounds like the screaming motor will explode.   I just can't believe this engine could take more then a few minutes running at that high RPM level...

Joe 

Last edited by JC642
JC642 posted:

Does anyone know what is the normal Amtrak engine speed run # is for the F40PH? I read somewhere it normally is set at Run #8 for travel   I have the newest  MTH Amtrak F40PH  and while I believe engine & horn sound is dead on perfect, especially the horn, at run#8 it sounds like the screaming motor will explode.   I just can't believe this engine could take more then a few minutes running at that high RPM level...

Joe 

Apparently you are not familiar with the EMD 16 cylinder, turbocharged 645E3 engine series. Also, since the HEP (Head End Power) generator is mechanically connected to the main diesel, thus in order to provide 60hz, 480 volt three phase electrical power for the attached passenger cars, the main diesel engine MUST operate at a constant 908 RPM, regardless of the load or Engineer's throttle position, in order maintain that 60hz. 

MTH F40PH  /  2016 Volume 2  /  They have the VIA Rail F40PH

MTH F40PH Locos 2016 Vol 2

Need Passenger Cars for your Lionel Legacy F40PH, Check out MTH, 2016 Volume 2

MTH Passenger Cars for F40PH 2016 Vol 2

Use the MTH Product Locator to find these F40PH & Passenger Cars 

http://mthtrains.com/product_locator

The old story which is a better ride; The Bowtie or The Oval?  I always go with the "Oval"

When it comes to Model Trains the same thing;  Orange or Purple.  I will go with the "Purple" - most of the time but I do also run the Orange.  This is a toss up, not Black & White. lol 

Trainroomgary Pan Shot OGR Signature A

Attachments

Images (3)
  • MTH F40PH Locos 2016 Vol 2
  • MTH Passenger Cars for F40PH 2016 Vol 2
  • Trainroomgary Pan Shot OGR Signature A
Hot Water posted:
JC642 posted:

Does anyone know what is the normal Amtrak engine speed run # is for the F40PH? I read somewhere it normally is set at Run #8 for travel   I have the newest  MTH Amtrak F40PH  and while I believe engine & horn sound is dead on perfect, especially the horn, at run#8 it sounds like the screaming motor will explode.   I just can't believe this engine could take more then a few minutes running at that high RPM level...

Joe 

Apparently you are not familiar with the EMD 16 cylinder, turbocharged 645E3 engine series. Also, since the HEP (Head End Power) generator is mechanically connected to the main diesel, thus in order to provide 60hz, 480 volt three phase electrical power for the attached passenger cars, the main diesel engine MUST operate at a constant 908 RPM, regardless of the load or Engineer's throttle position, in order maintain that 60hz. 

LOL, I guess I'm not.  What I know is, I've heard F40PH's sitting at the station wailing away but didn't know they still keep those high RPM's  when running.   Almost like flooring a car still in neutral  Amazing the motors don't blow up.

joe 

Last edited by JC642
JC642 posted:
Hot Water posted:
JC642 posted:

Does anyone know what is the normal Amtrak engine speed run # is for the F40PH? I read somewhere it normally is set at Run #8 for travel   I have the newest  MTH Amtrak F40PH  and while I believe engine & horn sound is dead on perfect, especially the horn, at run#8 it sounds like the screaming motor will explode.   I just can't believe this engine could take more then a few minutes running at that high RPM level...

Joe 

Apparently you are not familiar with the EMD 16 cylinder, turbocharged 645E3 engine series. Also, since the HEP (Head End Power) generator is mechanically connected to the main diesel, thus in order to provide 60hz, 480 volt three phase electrical power for the attached passenger cars, the main diesel engine MUST operate at a constant 908 RPM, regardless of the load or Engineer's throttle position, in order maintain that 60hz. 

LOL, I guess I'm not.  What I know is, I've heard F40PH's sitting at the station wailing away but didn't know they still keep those high RPM's  when running.

If they are providing Herad End Power, that they MUST run like that.

  Almost like flooring a car still in neutral

No. Not even close, as there is a load in that engine.

 Amazing the motors don't blow up.

First they are NOT "motors", they are engines. Second, that is what they are designed to do, and thus are classed as medium speed diesel engines. That speed of 900 RPM is really no big deal, as the engine in your automobile is capable of 5000 RPM.

joe 

 

Hot Water posted:
 

 Amazing the motors don't blow up.

First they are NOT "motors", they are engines. Second, that is what they are designed to do, and thus are classed as medium speed diesel engines. That speed of 900 RPM is really no big deal, as the engine in your automobile is capable of 5000 RPM.

joe 

 Hot Water, thanks for the information, appreciated.   I must say, you respond similar to Sister Agnella, my fifth grade teacher.  This nun was so cruel my hands can still feel the pain of her wooden pointer when I made a mistake..... 

joe

 

Last edited by JC642
Hot Water posted:
SPSF posted:

Still using the Incorrect 710 prime mover sounds

OK, how does a turbocharged EMD 16-645 with an exhaust silencer, sound different than a turbocharged 16-710 with an exhaust silencer?

The 710 sounds more refined / toned down.   The 645 sounds different.  Lionel is using a one size fits all chip - like they did with their SD40

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0BI6y4xM4Y

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ngARGn6Spk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FatYZDYeDDM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE5Z68fzAvA

SPSF posted:
Hot Water posted:
SPSF posted:

Still using the Incorrect 710 prime mover sounds

OK, how does a turbocharged EMD 16-645 with an exhaust silencer, sound different than a turbocharged 16-710 with an exhaust silencer?

The 710 sounds more refined / toned down. 

That is your opinion.

  The 645 sounds different. 

Not in my opinion, having dealt with EMD 567, 645, and 710 engines for more than 40 years. For what it's worth, the absolute LOUDEST diesel unit EMD ever produced was the DDA40X, with twin 16-645F3 engines and NO EXHAUST SILENCERS.

Lionel is using a one size fits all chip - like they did with their SD40

Just my opinion but, unless you have spent a lifetime working on and around EMD turbocharged engines, it really doesn't matter.

 

 

Not opinion. If you cannot distinguish between the two, you are tone deaf.  I have photographed just about ALL Santa Fe SD40, SD45, SD45-2, F45, FP45 and remember when the GP60 came out it had a Different sound.   It wasn't in my head, It is a different sound.  I saw these both at idle and accelerating.

Tell me that these sound the same:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lavPKAsDlp4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dViB5ckrRdE

SPSF posted:

Not opinion. If you cannot distinguish between the two, you are tone deaf.  I have photographed just about ALL Santa Fe SD40, SD45, SD45-2, F45, FP45 and remember when the GP60 came out it had a Different sound.   It wasn't in my head, It is a different sound.  I saw these both at idle and accelerating.

Tell me that these sound the same:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lavPKAsDlp4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dViB5ckrRdE

If I looked at it from the non- railroad side, the first thing I would demand is that the same equipment be used to record each engine in the exact same conditions, same exact location. That would also include facts like rpm and such, at idle.

 That might not seem like much. After handling audio equipment for years I have noticed quite some differences. Now, with mics built into phones and cameras, it might seem to level the field. I would not trust them to be the same.

 So comparing 3 idling engines recorded from overhead, to a more modern one at trackside, without even knowing what was used, seems ridiculous to a person like me.

SPSF posted:

Not opinion. If you cannot distinguish between the two, you are tone deaf.  I have photographed just about ALL Santa Fe SD40, SD45, SD45-2, F45, FP45 and remember when the GP60 came out it had a Different sound.   It wasn't in my head, It is a different sound.  I saw these both at idle and accelerating.

Tell me that these sound the same:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lavPKAsDlp4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dViB5ckrRdE

You are trying to compare sounds of a 40/45 series units, without exhaust silencers, to Dash-2 series units WITH exhaust silencers, to a 710 with a different/larger exhaust silencer. Not to mention the fact that earlier EMD units equipped with 645 engines had much higher idle speeds, than the later Dash-2 series units, and then finally the 710 engines with the VERY low idle speed. 

When comparing the full load exhaust sound of any Dash-2 series unit (with exhaust silencer) to the full load exhaust sound of the 710 equipped units (again with exhaust silencer), they all sound pretty much the same.

On the other hand, I may very well be "tone deaf", after more than 40 years of diesel and steam locomotive exhausts! That said, comparing them at idle is a waste of time, in my opinion, as there are way too many designs differences.

Hot Water posted:
SPSF posted:

Not opinion. If you cannot distinguish between the two, you are tone deaf.  I have photographed just about ALL Santa Fe SD40, SD45, SD45-2, F45, FP45 and remember when the GP60 came out it had a Different sound.   It wasn't in my head, It is a different sound.  I saw these both at idle and accelerating.

Tell me that these sound the same:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lavPKAsDlp4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dViB5ckrRdE

You are trying to compare sounds of a 40/45 series units, without exhaust silencers, to Dash-2 series units WITH exhaust silencers, to a 710 with a different/larger exhaust silencer. Not to mention the fact that earlier EMD units equipped with 645 engines had much higher idle speeds, than the later Dash-2 series units, and then finally the 710 engines with the VERY low idle speed. 

When comparing the full load exhaust sound of any Dash-2 series unit (with exhaust silencer) to the full load exhaust sound of the 710 equipped units (again with exhaust silencer), they all sound pretty much the same.

On the other hand, I may very well be "tone deaf", after more than 40 years of diesel and steam locomotive exhausts! That said, comparing them at idle is a waste of time, in my opinion, as there are way too many designs differences.

I think if this is the biggest issue with these, then we can safely say lionel did a GREAT job on them

BigJohn&theWork posted:
Hot Water posted:
SPSF posted:

Not opinion. If you cannot distinguish between the two, you are tone deaf.  I have photographed just about ALL Santa Fe SD40, SD45, SD45-2, F45, FP45 and remember when the GP60 came out it had a Different sound.   It wasn't in my head, It is a different sound.  I saw these both at idle and accelerating.

Tell me that these sound the same:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lavPKAsDlp4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dViB5ckrRdE

You are trying to compare sounds of a 40/45 series units, without exhaust silencers, to Dash-2 series units WITH exhaust silencers, to a 710 with a different/larger exhaust silencer. Not to mention the fact that earlier EMD units equipped with 645 engines had much higher idle speeds, than the later Dash-2 series units, and then finally the 710 engines with the VERY low idle speed. 

When comparing the full load exhaust sound of any Dash-2 series unit (with exhaust silencer) to the full load exhaust sound of the 710 equipped units (again with exhaust silencer), they all sound pretty much the same.

On the other hand, I may very well be "tone deaf", after more than 40 years of diesel and steam locomotive exhausts! That said, comparing them at idle is a waste of time, in my opinion, as there are way too many designs differences.

I think if this is the biggest issue with these, then we can safely say lionel did a GREAT job on them

MY POINT EXACTLY!!!!!

Maybe Lionel has to put future F40PH, back on the drawing board.

Start working on Siemen’s, New SC-44 Charger - Amtrak and several other road names and California Department of Transportation.

Sieman SC-44 Charger Loco

Who will bring us the New Siemens, SC-44 Charger Locomotive, built at Sacramento, California, Top speed of 125 Miles Per Hour and 4400 HP  /  Lionel • MTH  or Atlas?

Gary

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Sieman SC-44 Charger Loco
Peter Araujo posted:

Or maybe even the Amtrak P42DC, as well as other paint schemes.   This would be a total best seller.  And while we're at it, maybe even some 21" Superliner cars to go with them.

Hi Peter: If you can make MTH work on your layout, they have several paint schemes. Some are in stock.

MTH Catalog 2017 Vol 1 Amtrak

Gary

Attachments

Images (1)
  • MTH Catalog 2017 Vol 1 Amtrak
trainroomgary posted:
Peter Araujo posted:

If Lionel would do it, they would give them the Kinematic pilots.

Hi Peter: You have Mike Wolf in your OGR Forum Avatar - Hit him up with an e-mail or a phone call.  Just ask him for kinematic pilots on MTH, •  MTH also has the 21' Super-liners.

Screen Shot 2017-03-29 at 12.45.17 PM

Trainroomgary Pan Shot OGR Signature A

 

This doesn't mean I only collect MTH, I also collect Lionel, Atlas, and a little bit of Weaver Models.  I don't think MTH will want to do something like that to the pilots.  Also their Superliner cars are actually 18" in length, not 21".  That would be cool though, but it's best not to bother so they can stay in business.

The GN Man posted:

If Lionel ever brings back the (K-Line) Bombardier commuter cars, I hope they add sound and the "PAIR" feature to the cab control cars. 

I am glad you posted this. I have wondered how I could respond  to Lionel's use of the word "pair" in the 2017 Signature catalog.

I do not like the use of the word " pair" as Lionel has used it in their most recent catalog.  This use is reserved for wine and food. Please ,Lionel, do not continue to use the word "pair" in this context anymore for the sake of the King's English.

Fred

 

 

 

Atlas's first release Comet and Horizon cars had a similar function for the upgraded cab cars.  By setting the dipswitch the correct way on the AEM7 or ALP44 locomotive and the corresponding cab car, the strobes and the horn would work on which ever end of the train was leading.  Yes, old technology but not bad for 1999 when they were first released.  Yes, I know the horn sounded terrible on those, but the tooling is still excellent nearly 20 years later.

BobbyD posted:
trainroomgary posted:

 

Sieman SC-44 Charger Loco

Who will bring us the New Siemens, SC-44 Charger Locomotive, built at Sacramento, California, Top speed of 125 Miles Per Hour and 4400 HP  /  Lionel • MTH  or Atlas?

Gary

Gary, even if they bring it, we have aesthetic standards to adhere to on purchases!  

gunrunnerjohn posted:

That is one ugly locomotive!

Hi: Bob & John

Here is the deal, An Amtrak Siemens, came close to my train room last week, took my two grandson down to see this locomotive.  Guess What?  My two grandson's want to see grandpa add this locomotive to the layout.

This Siemens is going to replace the Amtrak Genesis - Who ever builds this first, Lionel or MTH. I will add this loco to my roaster. We always talk about ways to grow the hobby on the OGR Forum.  Lionel and MTH should be building locos that kids can see go by there homes and ride on.  Just like we did as kids, with American Flyer and Lionel.

Gary:  Still a big kid......

trainroomgary posted:
BobbyD posted:
trainroomgary posted:

 

Sieman SC-44 Charger Loco

Who will bring us the New Siemens, SC-44 Charger Locomotive, built at Sacramento, California, Top speed of 125 Miles Per Hour and 4400 HP  /  Lionel • MTH  or Atlas?

Gary

Gary, even if they bring it, we have aesthetic standards to adhere to on purchases!  

gunrunnerjohn posted:

That is one ugly locomotive!

Hi: Bob & John

Here is the deal, An Amtrak Siemens, came close to my train room last week, took my two grandson down to see this locomotive.  Guess What?  My two grandson's want to see grandpa add this locomotive to the layout.

This Siemens is going to replace the Amtrak Genesis - Who ever builds this first, Lionel or MTH. I will add this loco to my roaster. We always talk about ways to grow the hobby on the OGR Forum.  Lionel and MTH should be building locos that kids can see go by there homes and ride on.  Just like we did as kids, with American Flyer and Lionel.

Gary:  Still a big kid......

Gary,

The SC-44s are not replacing the Genesis, at least not yet. The F59PHIs however, are gone. A handful of the P40s will be retired, but only a few.

As for this topic, I picked my Cabbage unit up a little while ago, and I have to say it is by far one of my favorite engines in my collection. It runs great with my Lionel Amtrak Dash 9, and the horn is incredible! My CSX one is at Nicholas Smith, so I think I will get it after York, if I am not bankrupt.

Maxrailroad posted:
trainroomgary posted:
BobbyD poste

 

Gary,

The SC-44s are not replacing the Genesis, at least not yet. The F59PHIs however, are gone. A handful of the P40s will be retired, but only a few.

As for this topic, I picked my Cabbage unit up a little while ago, and I have to say it is by far one of my favorite engines in my collection. It runs great with my Lionel Amtrak Dash 9, and the horn is incredible! My CSX one is at Nicholas Smith, so I think I will get it after York, if I am not bankrupt.

Max, glad to see I'm not the only one on the border of chapter 11.......Lol

TrainGuyMcGee posted:

I just watched all the posted videos in this thread on the Lionel FP40.  Is it me, or do the engine sounds sound exactly like the SD60e's?  Are they supposed to?  The horn is different but the engine is identical.

Not a lot of differences in full load exhaust sounds between various EMD turbocharged diesel prime movers. All domestic EMD units since the Dash-2 series came out in 1972, have exhaust silencers on the turbochargers, thus they all pretty much sound the same under heavy load.

My F40PH showed up, and it looks like they're all not perfect!  What do you suppose is wrong with this picture?  This is really basic stuff folks, we shouldn't be getting these like this!

Number board not lit, hatch cover so tight that it's almost impossible to get it off, and apparently the conductor took a walk, I hear him rattling around in the engine, but he's not in view!

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
Last edited by gunrunnerjohn

I'm not keen on shipping it back, but if that's the only way to get it fixed...  I don't want to open it up and then have Lionel deny warranty coverage.  I'm not a "factory trained" tech for Lionel, primarily because they don't hold schools any more, so I can't really open them up and maintain any warranty coverage. 

I suspect the number board isue is not super complex, and of course gluing the conductor back in shouldn't be a challenge.

OTOH Mark, if they can't ship them and get them to the destination in good condition, they either need to improve the packaging or get into another business!  I used to ship 75 pound video generators all around the world 25 years ago, and we never had a shipping damage issue.  Packing something that weighs 5-6 pounds so it won't get damaged in shipment should be fairly easy.

Hi John - When it comes to a F40PH / I am old school.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zelcdJP8gQQ&t=3s - Video from my YT - Channel

In my old age, I remember this story, like it was yesterday.  At the time, I owned a teen driving school and I drove the company car, to a K-Line Super Store in Indianapolis, Indiana.  I did remove the roof sign.  They are held on with three strong magnets.

This loco is a K-Line • Lionel Cab #1 / TMCC and can also be controlled with my MTH-DCS. Still runs great.

Gary:  Old school, F40PH - for about 15 years........

Last edited by trainroomgary

I was all set to bite the bullet and open it up to fix the number board light and glue the conductor in, but then I turned it over and looked a bit closer...

Say what?  Only one of the wheels is grooved for a traction tire, the other is a plain wheel!

F40PH incorrect wheels on truck

The other truck has the correct wheels, they just forgot to install the traction tires!

That explains why it was wobbling a bit on the track...

F40PH missing traction tires

This has to have been a Monday morning build!

Mark Mcclung posted:

I am surprised they arrive in as good of condition as they do considering the rough handling that happens during shipping. I cringe every time something is shipped to me or if I ship something. 

 This ain't shipping damage!

Attachments

Images (2)
  • F40PH incorrect wheels on truck
  • F40PH missing traction tires
Last edited by gunrunnerjohn
Dj'sOgaugetrains posted:
Trainlover9943 posted:
gunrunnerjohn posted:

My F40PH showed up, and it looks like they're all not perfect!  What do you suppose is wrong with this picture?  This is really basic stuff folks, we shouldn't be getting these like this!

You've got to be kidding me! That sucks. 

No fun at all!

Apparently, Quality Control is an issue across the industry.. One of my new MTH N&W C30-7s showed up missing a number board, at least it runs properly.. I will fabricate my own number board.. One more project..

I could have fixed the number board, fixing the wrong wheel is above and beyond.  

I've made a few number boards, once you work out a technique, they're not too difficult.  I print them white on black in high density on my laser printer in the correct size.  I use clear parts cement to stick them to clear plastic, instant number board.

Last edited by gunrunnerjohn

Apparently, Quality Control is an issue across the industry.. One of my new MTH N&W C30-7s showed up missing a number board, at least it runs properly.. I will fabricate my own number board.. One more project..

I would disagree with this statement.  We only hear about the bad experiences on here and this forum doesn't speak for the mass majority of the market.  Yes there are quality control issues and it is I feel for those who have had bad experiences recently, but that is not industry wide.  Without getting into specific manufacturers, there are several you rarely if ever hear about quality control concerns in the O scale market. 

Well all 3 of my f40ph'S were perfect right out of the box! I was very happy about that... sometimes the new trains arrive perfect. Sometimes they don't. My legacy y-3 steamer had to go back to Lionel because it didn't respond to legacy, and back to Harry Heike because the weathering was peeling off the drivers. In my experience It's hit or miss and that's why we have Warrantees. 

My powered and cabbage units arrived today and look terrific - nothing broken or missing and all couplers look fine. The powered unit runs and sounds great.

Unfortunately, the cabbage unit has a dead short when powered up.

I called Charles Ro this morning and was told that I will be sent a return FedEx shipping document and I was promised that the engine will either be repaired or replaced. Update: already received return shipping documents this afternoon and the cabbage is on it's way back!

It's nice to deal with a reputable dealer!

Last edited by stangtrain
GG1 4877 posted:

To add a little brevity to the thread .....

We all know that conductors can get unglued every now and then.    Ba-bump-bump.....

Good one Jonathan, except in passenger service the Conductor is BACK IN THE PASSENGER CARS. In commuter service, there is nobody else in the locomotive, or cab car, with the Engineer. In Amtrak service, there MAY be an "assistant Engineer", but that is only on long distant runs. Thus, if the "Conductor is loose" in the cab of these units, then simply take him/her out and place him/her back in the passenger cars.

Last edited by Hot Water
Hot Water posted:
GG1 4877 posted:

To add a little brevity to the thread .....

We all know that conductors can get unglued every now and then.    Ba-bump-bump.....

Good one Jonathan, except in passenger service the Conductor is BACK IN THE PASSENGER CARS. In commuter service, there is nobody else in the locomotive, or cab car, with the Engineer. In Amtrak service, there MAY be an "assistant Engineer", but that is only on long distant runs. Thus, if the "Conductor is loose" in the cab of these units, then simply take him/her out and place him/her back in the passenger cars.

True.  Begs the question then why there are two crew members in the cab.  I have a friend who is an engineer on the "Southwest Chief" from La Junta to Kingman.  I'll ask him what the cab crew is typically.  I like the idea of having the conductor in a passenger car.  For the long distance trains, there is also the train chief to consider too.  I find them interesting to chat with when they aren't going crazy managing "hotel" staff.  Usually after the passengers head to bed is the best time.

John Quogue RR posted:

Nice! Any hatch problem? Conductor glued in?

No issue I got an Amtrak phase 3.   And both csx units.    No issues I can find at least in reference to what I've seen listed.   No loose crew or unlighted number boards.   No missing boxes under the chassis.   Great horn on these that's for sure.   The csx units are very attractive in person.   Only gripe would be the hatch I'm honestly afraid to even try to remove it. Deafinetely poorly thought out. 

Hot Water posted:
GG1 4877 posted:

To add a little brevity to the thread .....

We all know that conductors can get unglued every now and then.    Ba-bump-bump.....

Good one Jonathan, except in passenger service the Conductor is BACK IN THE PASSENGER CARS. In commuter service, there is nobody else in the locomotive, or cab car, with the Engineer. In Amtrak service, there MAY be an "assistant Engineer", but that is only on long distant runs. Thus, if the "Conductor is loose" in the cab of these units, then simply take him/her out and place him/her back in the passenger cars.

New rule.  According to the Amtrak folks on my eastbound Empire Builder last month, there are now always two people in the cab on long distance trains.

I just got my two power Phase 3 Amtrak engines.  One runs good, but the hatch is so hard to lift off, and the other the hatch is not so hard to get off, but it shorts out the track.  I cannot get it to run and it is scheduled to go back to Lionel for repair or replacement.  First time I have ever had an issue with a Lionel engine out of the box.

I P/U my Amtrak #207 from Great Lakes Hobby. Out of the box I did not have any issues that have been posted above. The hatch came off if I wiggled it from side to side using the fans for leverage. On the track it ran well. Both couplers opened. No signs of pitting on the couplers.  Both number boards illuminated. I like the sound of the horn and bell.  As far as smoke I would not know because I turn off the smoke units on all my diesels. Just my preference. But I smoke my steamers to the hilt. Still using the generic crew talk. I would like to see Lionel go back to calling out the road number of the engine. I will give her a good work out at the Blue Water Train Show in Port Huron, MI  on April 23, 2017.

Victor

 

As I mentioned on the other F40PH tread, the powered unit lacks weight. The pilot and truck castings are very thin. I can see lots of broken truck side frames and shattered pilots in the future due to the thin castings. Definitely these components will not take a fall to the ground as what sometimes happens. The lack in heft is a disappointment in what is otherwise a well done unit with some interesting features.

The constant cost cutting and "cheapening" seems to be a persistent constant of frustration with Lionel.  JLC always looks for ways to cut costs and that corporate philosophy is still part of Lionel to this day. Lionel saved 1/2 pound in material costs (whatever that 1/2 pound in materials cost) in the design chosen for the F40PH. It is difficult to argue with the practice since Lionel is still here when so many others have perished. Having said that, I still want my units to have the heft that is not present on the F40PH. 

Thinner side frames on the trucks and a thinner pilot are so much more prototypical.  I'd see that as a positive feature for scale enthusiasts.  That is the major complaint I've had about most cast locomotive trucks.  Athearn had this issue in HO until they finally started doing the side frames in plastic.  More flexible, less likely to break and more scale.  Many two railers will mill off the inside edge of truck side frames to make them look better. 

For added weight, the old practice was to add aftermarket weights.  Once the warranty has expired, not a hard thing to do.  I agree that a heavier locomotive provides better traction.  Based on the photos' I've seen, these look nice enough to 2 rail. 

Well add one of my three to the list on going back to Lionel.   My amtrak 388 phase 3 unit died in spectacular fashion today.   i was attempting to lash it up with one of my csx units to try out the pair feature and i always test the speeds of both locos before coupling them.  I know its not necessary just a habit i guess.  i noticed when doing the test before coupling them together that the amtrak units slow speed operation was very choppy.  It just didn't seem very happy at all.  All the of the f40 i received all seem to be in desperate need of lubrication they just don't run very smoothly.  I had ran the csx unit a bit the other night so i thought maybe the amtrak unit needed a bit of breaking in.  So i set it to medium speed and just let her roll. on the second go around of small loop of track she proceeded to burst in a shower of sparks and which tripped the breaker on my power master.  i thought the unit had just derailed it had just passed through a switch.  so while im attempting to reset the breaker i begin to smell a very strange smell and look over and its lost in a cloud of white smoke coming out the smoke exhaust and under front an rear of the frame by the trucks.  I was pretty surprised to say the least.  Ive seen some units die but never quite in this spectacular fashion.  luckily my office is right across from the restroom so i could turn on the exhaust fan to remove the smoke.  after letting the room air out i started some investigating. No derailment appears to be some kind of electrical failure. The shell of the loco was very warm to the touch for at least 5 minutes after this happened. It probably wouldn't have burned my hand but definitely warmer than i wanted to be handling.  I gave it a minute to cool down and I removed the shell just to see what could have gone wrong.  To my surprise which I'm no gunrunner john or any of our other technicians around here, but nothing appeared burned or charred.  No obvious failures at least that my untrained eye could find.  The smell of burnt electronics was very overwhelming.  I"m sure the Lionel tech will love to open this return.   I did try to repower the unit with the with body removed and its just kind of sizzles.  no movement or response. Breaker trips after a few seconds.  So off to Lionel she will go tomorrow.   I really love these units.   I hate that their have been so many issues.  I would never bash Lionel.  I hope y'all don't have the same issue and like always im sure Lionel will make it right.  The reason I've never had harsh words for Lionel is the've always made it right.  When they don't let the bashing begin.

 

audi posted:
gunrunnerjohn posted:

If I find the weight to be too obnoxious, I'll correct it.   Here's my way of adding an extra pound to my HHP-8, did wonders for the pulling power.

45 acp?

But of course.

@T1Titan_ZachF posted:

With these so hard to find these days, where did you get your hhp8? I just saw one on ebay but it quickly was sold. 

 Believe it or not, I did find it on eBay.  I just put in a search for this specific model, the one with cruise, larger motors, and Railsounds 5.  I got it for $240 from Trainz a while back.

Last edited by gunrunnerjohn

I am so sorry to have to join this discussion. My 364 has been running great. See "Weekend at the Movies." Then, while doing some early Sunday morning running before the grandkids got here for an Easter Egg hunt,  it stopped short. And, the short light showed on the TMCC lockon. Remove locomotive from rails,  no short. A careful inspection of the trucks and pick-up rollers shows nothing amiss that I can see. Put locomotive back on rails: short.

I tried putting in "program," still short. Check the passenger cars, they were not the problem. Looks like I have an internal short of some kind. Will be calling Dealer (RO) today for further instructions.

I was hoping to take it to our show this week, and show it off, especially since some Amtrak folks will be there with an Operation Lifesaver presentation.  Then again, they are probably used to this.......

 

What is going on with Lionel.  That last few engines to be released have had numerous problems, and now the F40PH.  It is starting to make me re-think whether I want to purchase anything in the future.  Jeremy--My one F40 that does run also was a little choppy running.  I lubricated and oiled everything and ran them a lot for the grandkids all weekend.  I wouldn't say it is perfect, but it is better.

base11 posted:

What is going on with Lionel.  That last few engines to be released have had numerous problems, and now the F40PH.  It is starting to make me re-think whether I want to purchase anything in the future.  Jeremy--My one F40 that does run also was a little choppy running.  I lubricated and oiled everything and ran them a lot for the grandkids all weekend.  I wouldn't say it is perfect, but it is better.

When I first ran mine around the layout, it sounded a little rusty, I guess the factory doesn't lubricate the trucks well before they ship out the locomotives. But after some persistent running the "rustiness" subsided. 

base11 posted:

What is going on with Lionel.  That last few engines to be released have had numerous problems, and now the F40PH.  It is starting to make me re-think whether I want to purchase anything in the future.  Jeremy--My one F40 that does run also was a little choppy running.  I lubricated and oiled everything and ran them a lot for the grandkids all weekend.  I wouldn't say it is perfect, but it is better.

I plan on getting my two csx units oiled up tonight they both seem to operate very well they are just really dry.   I hope it helps that really bothers me.

I'm going to add my CSX 9999 to the list of engines that are dead. Didn't even get to start it up. Was programming the remote and went to change the engine # and as soon as I turned power on the red short light came on. I also have CSX 9998 and it is running fine so far. No blinking light, runs smooth, so far so good. Has been running about 15 to 20 minutes so far

I'm hoping this is a one-off  issue and we can return to sanity soon.  I got a notice that my Cabbage unit is on it's way back, hopefully I'll see it before York.  I'm really eager to get the powered unit as well and put it through it's paces.  I will admit, I'll probably risk the warranty issues and open it up and inspect it myself to make no silly stuff is waiting to bite me.  I've been waiting for this one for some time, I'd like to actually get to run it without holding my breath!  I have a bunch of Amtrak cars that are eagerly waiting for power.

Last edited by gunrunnerjohn
gunrunnerjohn posted:

I'm hoping this is a one-off  issue and we can return to sanity soon.  I got a notice that my Cabbage unit is on it's way back, hopefully I'll see it before York.  I'm really eager to get the powered unit as well and put it through it's paces.  I will admit, I'll probably risk the warranty issues and open it up and inspect it myself to make no silly stuff is waiting to bite me.  I've been waiting for this one for some time, I'd like to actually get to run it without holding my breath!  I have a bunch of Amtrak cars that are eagerly waiting for power.

What kind of Amtrak cars do you have?

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×