Skip to main content

Are there any modelers out there that model entirely the more modern era? I put these dates in there to get more modern era modelers,not modelers from the 50s&60s with absolutely no offense to those or any era,just trying to strike up conversations in the eras I model.

Thank you.

Alan Hummel

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Alan,

I only have scale models of contemporary trains, mainly twin-stack intermodal & a few modern Atlas-O grain hoppers. All 4 of my locomotives are models of modern AC-traction locomotives.

Moving to a different topic. I thought you were getting out of O-Scale last Fall since you were unable to sell your HO trains & you were unhappy with the lack of double-shelf couplers in O-Scale. What made you change your mind?

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

Originally Posted by naveenrajan:

Alan,

I only have scale models of contemporary trains, mainly twin-stack intermodal & a few modern Atlas-O grain hoppers. All 4 of my locomotives are models of modern AC-traction locomotives.

Moving to a different topic. I thought you were getting out of O-Scale last Fall since you were unable to sell your HO trains & you were unhappy with the lack of double-shelf couplers in O-Scale. What made you change your mind?

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 

Oh,it's a tussle hr to hr what scale to go with. I had to spend $7300 on my wife's home we been trying to sell,plus she had to have over $11,000 worth of dentist work put in her mouth,so that all cripples my O scale efforts more.

I managed to find 4 Family Lines grain hoppers through O scalers & online hobby shops plus have 9 CSX 4750s that make a great looking grain train.

On the coupler problem,I think I can make the upper&lower safety shelfs from materials from my local hobby shop,the problem there is how to keep them fastened to operating Protocraft couplers with the impact of coupling.

If there's not enough responses then it will probably be an exit out of O scale,just thought if I could find enough modelers in that rough time frame,maybe we could help each other out in areas,for example the shelf couplers. All modeling regardless of scale modeled,is built on help & bending manufacturer's ears 'till it huts many times.

Thanks,

Al Hummel

 

Alan,

I also want modern couplers but I prefer the AAR Type-F safety couplers. I have a BNSF line, less than a mile from my home & an UP line less than 2 miles away. Both have predominantly unit coal trains. All the locomotives on both UP & BNSF seem to have Type-F not the safety shelf couplers. I assume that the couplers between the cars are rotary couplers, which visually seem closer to Type-F than Type-E shelf couplers.  Even though Type-F (with interlocking) or Type-E with (single or double safety shelfs) have different safety features, I learnt through Google that all AAR couplers must be capable of operating together.

I have collected the documentation on these type-F couplers & I plan to make detailed 3D CAD models as time allows. I will make it in 1:1 scale & will scale it down to O-Scale when complete. I also need to look into the reasonable level of detail & manufacturing options as I get further along in this project.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

Originally Posted by naveenrajan:

Alan,

I also want modern couplers but I prefer the AAR Type-F safety couplers. I have a BNSF line, less than a mile from my home & an UP line less than 2 miles away. Both have predominantly unit coal trains. All the locomotives on both UP & BNSF seem to have Type-F not the safety shelf couplers. I assume that the couplers between the cars are rotary couplers, which visually seem closer to Type-F than Type-E shelf couplers.  Even though Type-F (with interlocking) or Type-E with (single or double safety shelfs) have different safety features, I learnt through Google that all AAR couplers must be capable of operating together.

I have collected the documentation on these type-F couplers & I plan to make detailed 3D CAD models as time allows. I will make it in 1:1 scale & will scale it down to O-Scale when complete. I also need to look into the reasonable level of detail & manufacturing options as I get further along in this project.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 

A great breath of FRESH air!! HA! Ha!

I want the F&E couplers. The F couplers are on most all modern coal trains as you correctly stated.

The BNSF runs MANY coal as well as Ethanol trains on the CSX double tracks that run from the east coast to at least Chicago. This line runs through my hometown of Bremen,IN.

The F couplers come built with the lower safety shelf as I understand it,&from the drawings I've seen as well as you also correctly stated,they've got the interlocking feature. The SF couplers are the dbl shelf couplers only built in the F coupler style that have the interlocking feature for extra safety.

The E couplers with the upper and or lower safety shells or without any shelfs at all,couple with the F couplers. I see the BNSF also seems to use the F couplers with lower shelf on their modern diesels,too.

Are you hoping to build a Kadee type coupler or a working model such as protocraft offers? Protocraft's model has no shelfs & isn't the type E model such as San Quan makes plastic models of. I think Protocraft's model is closer to what history calls a "Sharon" type design. It performs the same function as all couplers but just a different design on the "thumb" side of the coupler.

I like the idea of using cut levers on my couplers to uncouple with. I have to use a magnet on my HO Sergent couplers,but HO's smaller & would be harder to use cut levers on. O scale is larger & would be easy for cut levers.

If you haven't already seen Sergent's website,it's a great place to give you a great close up of all couplers including the type H coupler used on passenger cars.

I'm hoping to group modelers that model the modern together,maybe even make a group out of.(?)

Here's my email if you'd like to stay in touch that way:ahummel72@yahoo.com

Thanks again,

Al Hummel

 

Originally Posted by rdunniii:

Generally I prefer contemporary, 25 years old or less.  But there are older things I like, like streamlined passenger trains.

 

Oh I completely understand. There's probably cars I like that doesn't fit the dates thrown out here. This was an effort to draw modelers with similar interests together.

So far we're a group of about 4. This is a 2 rail group,I should've broadened it for 3 rail also. I've nothing against 3 rail,2 rail's my own personal preference as shelf couplers & ground throw switchstands with turning targets on the top of the stands are. The other purpose,the main purpose of this mini survey,is to show where the future of modern O scale is going which I'd say by the few responses received,is not far,if manufactuers get ahold of this post. They are,as I would also,going to concentrate their marketing dollars,where the greatest amount of modelers are,be it steam,transition era,or more modern day.

Thank you for replying,

Al Hummel

 

Originally Posted by d tuuri:
Hi

I have a CSX layout and I model modern trains. My current layout has Boyce's around as far as actual the actual road I model but I think I has settled into modern CSX.  I love modern trains. 

My current layout is 2-rail and about 32' by 14' with staging in an adjacent room.

Don

Don
Don,I've got about40'x25' but I've got shelves all around which I plan to use some of for a yard & maybe a few Industries. I've also got appliances to work around. I'm 2 rail. My obstacle is my 30 years in HO has to fund my o scale which won't be easy. I've got 9 CSX 4750 cvd hoppers as well as 4 LN/Family Lines 4750s which look impressive hooked together. No diesels yet can't find any but can't afford them yet either so guess it's not important yet.
Al

 

Alan, i was 2 rail and when i moved to Tn had no basement so i went 3 rail now that i'm in Ohio and have over 1100 sf i went back to 2 rail. i sold much of my 3 rail and put it on the bay and let it go.  my advice to you is figure out what you want and then do what you have to to maximize your hobby. think about it you want the o scale therefore you don't want the ho sell it let it go. ask anybody that owned a boat or race car and wanted to get out of that most didn't make any money on it, and most lost a ton. no one wants to lose money but determine what you want and then accomplish it.

my era is late steam 1st gen diesel and i'm content with the kds but if you want the modern couplers there are plenty super modelers who can help you accomplish it.

My layout will feature only modern freight cars and a few other bits (more of that later).  I say will as I built the layout, a portable shunting style layout on four 1m x 0.6m baseboards based around a Repair-in-Place facility then I got posted to the other side of the world for a few years so the layout was put in storage before I could finish the scenery.  The RIP track concept  provides the opportunity to shunt basically any sort of modern freight rolling stock from all companies.  Must get one of those new Lionel looooong boxcars and two rail it!

 

As to the other bits, On the back edge of the layout there are two sidings to store Private varnish passenger coaches and a couple of short sidings to hold private cabooses (its my world and I'll do it my way).

 

Paul

I think 69nickeycamero hit it on the head!   If you have stuff but it's not what you are wanting to do. Sell it!  Everything sells on eBay. It's not worth it life is too short. I was in n-scale for many years.  I sold it all and switched to Ho a while back.  Then to 2-rail.  I have thought about switching back a couple times but once 2-rail is what you are used to, it's hard to back to a smaller scale. It is for me anyways.  I also think for the same square footage layout, it's cheaper over all to o-scale than n or Ho. N-scale is a total money pit!  You are always buying new Lagos or atlas locos.  

Anyways, I think his advise is great. I look at it as a hobby, not an investment.  I budget so much money every month for my hobby and if I sell something down the road for less than I paid for it or have to pay eBay fees to sell something, it's just part of the process. I find a good cleaning out of stuff I don't use really helps clear your focus also.

For what it's worth
Originally Posted by 69nickeycamaro:

Alan, i was 2 rail and when i moved to Tn had no basement so i went 3 rail now that i'm in Ohio and have over 1100 sf i went back to 2 rail. i sold much of my 3 rail and put it on the bay and let it go.  my advice to you is figure out what you want and then do what you have to to maximize your hobby. think about it you want the o scale therefore you don't want the ho sell it let it go. ask anybody that owned a boat or race car and wanted to get out of that most didn't make any money on it, and most lost a ton. no one wants to lose money but determine what you want and then accomplish it.

my era is late steam 1st gen diesel and i'm content with the kds but if you want the modern couplers there are plenty super modelers who can help you accomplish it.

Thank you great advice! It's just the getting to doing something instead of the big picture thinking of,"can I?"

Thanks to everyone for their motivation,it's much appreciated,wish we could all get together,but living in this O Scale desert,makes that not possible.

Thanks again,

Al Hummel

 

Alan, also consider bartering your HO trains. 

Over the years I traded my PW lionel for HO, then traded my HO for a hydropolane that went for a '57 Chevy rag top flipped that into serial  Corvette trades then over a dozen limited and offshore race boats.  Even to today, before I buy any new toys, I float a trade possibility.

 

You may wish to consider going to a large multi-scale train show and place your stash on a table.  Sell what you can but keep a keen eye out for potential 0 appropriate  swaps in the show's waning minutes.  

 

For trades a good path may well be multi-scale dealers.

 

Many train shows are called "Swap Meets", for a reason.

 

What ever you do, IMO, think about moving out the physical toy clutter, I find it dulls productivity.

 

 

 

Last edited by Tom Tee

Joe,

 

That is a great shot, indeed.

 

I model exclusively in this era. Far and away my interest is Santa Fe operations during the "Superfleet" era, 1989-90. I also have some more contemporary equipment and every now and then switch things up with contemporary BNSF, UP and some foreign road power.

 

My layout presently is "Three rail scale." I started in O in three-rail. Were I starting today, and knowing what I know now, I would be exclusively two-rail. As it is, I've converted a fair number of diesels to fixed pilots and collected a fair amount of two rail equipment. Many of my freight cars are factory two-rail or are my own two-rail conversions. So i kind of have a foot in both camps. If I make the jump, I likely will just try to convert my Atlas TMCC engines to two-rail operation and use TMCC and DCS.

 

Alan,

 

May I make one gentle request: If you "reply with quote," start your response underneath the shaded area with the quoted text. It will make your posts easier to read. (And I do pay close attention to the posts by you and my fellow modern-ear modelers).

 

 

100_1388 [2)

100_0799

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 100_1388 (2)
  • 100_0799
Originally Posted by Rich Montague:

 

I model exclusively in this era. Far and away my interest is Santa Fe operations during the "Superfleet" era, 1989-90. I also have some more contemporary equipment and every now and then switch things up with contemporary BNSF, UP and some foreign road power.

 

My layout presently is "Three rail scale." I started in O in three-rail. Were I starting today, and knowing what I know now, I would be exclusively two-rail. As it is, I've converted a fair number of diesels to fixed pilots and collected a fair amount of two rail equipment. Many of my freight cars are factory two-rail or are my own two-rail conversions. So i kind of have a foot in both camps. If I make the jump, I likely will just try to convert my Atlas TMCC engines to two-rail operation and use TMCC and DCS.

 

Alan,

 

May I make one gentle request: If you "reply with quote," start your response underneath the shaded area with the quoted text. It will make your posts easier to read. (And I do pay close attention to the posts by you and my fellow modern-ear modelers).

 

 

100_1388 [2)

100_0799

I got a lot of inspiration to move forward from pictures like these. Rich's shots are awesome.

 There are so many gifted talented modelers here that it's hard to get all the names in. Most are into older eras. I wish they could all post pictures here. I don't care as much about a middle rail as I do about the total effect. I'm starting to drift into the older eras myself. I prefer modern. I got a lot of influence looking at top notch three rail layouts. I just didn't know of the two rail ones or where to see them.

 Now when Rick T's engines are ready we may get some new modern inspiration!

I am slowly transforming my layout that has been stuck in the 40's and move it into the  80's right up to the present. It is going to take some time to complete. I am not sure if I will change any of my buildings or the cars and trucks.

I hope to be able to find some Amtrak Dash 8's and maybe some passenger cars this year at York .

 

 

 

 

 

 

Originally Posted by Tom Tee:

Alan, also consider bartering your HO trains. 

Over the years I traded my PW lionel for HO, then traded my HO for a hydropolane that went for a '57 Chevy rag top flipped that into serial  Corvette trades then over a dozen limited and offshore race boats.  Even to today, before I buy any new toys, I float a trade possibility.

 

You may wish to consider going to a large multi-scale train show and place your stash on a table.  Sell what you can but keep a keen eye out for potential 0 appropriate  swaps in the show's waning minutes.  

 

For trades a good path may well be multi-scale dealers.

 

Many train shows are called "Swap Meets", for a reason.

 

What ever you do, IMO, think about moving out the physical toy clutter, I find it dulls productivity.

 

Thank you Tom,wish I had some in my area or if I could just get a few modelers in my basement for even 1 item,they might see other things & away we go. Then the word of mouth spreads. You've got the best idea as these days you can't be too careful with people.

Thanks again,

Al Hummel

 

 

 

Originally Posted by Rich Montague:

Joe,

 

That is a great shot, indeed.

 

I model exclusively in this era. Far and away my interest is Santa Fe operations during the "Superfleet" era, 1989-90. I also have some more contemporary equipment and every now and then switch things up with contemporary BNSF, UP and some foreign road power.

 

My layout presently is "Three rail scale." I started in O in three-rail. Were I starting today, and knowing what I know now, I would be exclusively two-rail. As it is, I've converted a fair number of diesels to fixed pilots and collected a fair amount of two rail equipment. Many of my freight cars are factory two-rail or are my own two-rail conversions. So i kind of have a foot in both camps. If I make the jump, I likely will just try to convert my Atlas TMCC engines to two-rail operation and use TMCC and DCS.

 

Alan,

 

May I make one gentle request: If you "reply with quote," start your response underneath the shaded area with the quoted text. It will make your posts easier to read. (And I do pay close attention to the posts by you and my fellow modern-ear modelers).

 

 

100_1388 [2)

 

 

Great shots!! If I could figure out how to post pic's I'd shoot 1 of my 13 car CSX&Family Lines 4750s coupled in a train. It looks neat.

Thank you for correcting my mistake in posting. As long as I been here,I was never sure I was posting in the correct area.

Thanks again.

Al Hummel

NAVEENRAJAN:

Looking back on conversations of O Guage interest,I found our conversation on F&E shelf couplers. Have you made any progress in development of the F couplers? I want E&F and H would be great for passenger cars. f couplers are seen heavily on BNSF&UP as wellas CN&CP. The F coupler has a lower safety shelf unless it's an SF then it has a top safety hood for tankers.

We need these in modern O scale. There has to be new blood in this hobby to keep it going & that new blood won't all be centered in the 30's to 50s with no disrespect to that or any era.

I've bought a lot in O scale,but discouragement over new products has me about down to leaving O scale,because of prices on RTR equipment as well as lack of new products from manufacturers. I think there's a good market for our couplers & the 1st manufacturer to come out with these will win the prize so-to-speak.

Personally,I like the Protocraft couplers as they work as the prototype but can be magnetically operated for those modelers that don't care about that much realism. After much work,these couplers mate with Atlas as well as Kadee with best results using some 5 fingure assisting.

Have sold well over $2,000 in hO&N scale this past year but am at that crossroad of getting out of or staying in O scale,finding myself buying both scales which has got to stop.

Would be willing to invest in these couplers. What do you think?

As Always,

Al Hummel

Alan Hummel posted:

NAVEENRAJAN:

Looking back on conversations of O Guage interest,I found our conversation on F&E shelf couplers. Have you made any progress in development of the F couplers? I want E&F and H would be great for passenger cars. f couplers are seen heavily on BNSF&UP as wellas CN&CP. The F coupler has a lower safety shelf unless it's an SF then it has a top safety hood for tankers.

We need these in modern O scale. There has to be new blood in this hobby to keep it going & that new blood won't all be centered in the 30's to 50s with no disrespect to that or any era.

I've bought a lot in O scale,but discouragement over new products has me about down to leaving O scale,because of prices on RTR equipment as well as lack of new products from manufacturers. I think there's a good market for our couplers & the 1st manufacturer to come out with these will win the prize so-to-speak.

Personally,I like the Protocraft couplers as they work as the prototype but can be magnetically operated for those modelers that don't care about that much realism. After much work,these couplers mate with Atlas as well as Kadee with best results using some 5 fingure assisting.

Have sold well over $2,000 in hO&N scale this past year but am at that crossroad of getting out of or staying in O scale,finding myself buying both scales which has got to stop.

Would be willing to invest in these couplers. What do you think?

As Always,

Al Hummel

Alan,

My wife recently allowed me to have the perimeter of the basement & so my focus is now on building an O-Scale 2-rail layout instead of running a loop on the floor as I have been doing until now. So I have not done anything about the Type-F coupler since last year.

I understand your disappointment with lack of modern O-Scale couplers but for me, I am not going to let this affect my choice to enjoy the models I currently have. Like you I also favor modern trains & more important to me than the modern coupler is concrete ties. But I made arrangements to pick up like 72 ft of Micro-Engineering flex-track at this weekend’s O-Scale meet in Chicago, even though the tracks have simulated wood ties. There is a lot of modern O-Scale equipment currently offered some of which I already bought & I plan to keep enjoying them until someone comes up with modern couplers, concrete ties or until when I can complete the designs & get some made.

I also just got into DCC, having bought an ESU ECoS Command station recently. So after work, family & pumping iron in the gym, the time I have left for trains is spent getting familiar with this DCC control, at this time.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×