Skip to main content

 

OGR Forum Member
 
1 hour ago

Perhaps one of you guys should start a new thread for this topic.  This is pretty far from talking about the separate sale Berks.  You may collect more conversation about your topic. 

 
 
 
Like Like (0 likes)
PermalinkDelete PostEdit PostView Printer Friendly FormatMulti-quoteReply With Quote Now
OGR Forum Member
 
1 hour ago

Originally Posted by leikec:

 

 

It's perfectly fine to label S scale a craftsman's scale. It has certainly worked out well in TT scale, a craftsman scale where all ten modelers feel very exclusive...

 

Jeff C

 

That was my biggest complaint about S when I got in 30 years ago.  The "scratch builders" mindset.

 

There seemed (and sometimes still seems) to be a lack of comprehension by some in S that folks can be craftsmen and scratch builders in other scales and don't need a scale exclusively dedicated to do it.

 

Even with Lionel's brief excursion into the scale side of S, I sensed and unspoken "how dare they" attitude from a segment of the scale-minded brethren.  There was a potential with Lionel, but I fear it's a potential lost.

 

Rusty

 
 
 
Like Like (0 likes)
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

"S Scale is a Craftsman's Scale & has a Scratch builder's mindset"

 

    That don't mean we like it that way, it just means no one will build stuff for us to buy. I'd rather have tons of ready to run stuff available that be forced to make everything myself. The fact is S is a size that is very handy to work with and there's no reason products would sell just as well as they do in the less handy sizes if someone would just start producing them. HO, N, and more recently On30 scales started from nothing so why can't S grow from it's modest base? ......DaveB 

The crack about ten modelers in TT cracked me up.  There is a whole lot of stuff NOT

made in O, as well as in S, TT, of course, the narrow gauge versions of about any

scale, and in HO when I was in it, and, I bet now, when so much of HO is now current

trains, with a lot less steam era available.  If scratch building is of interest, or, worse yet, not, there is still plenty of it required in any scale, depending on your interest.

Originally Posted by colorado hirailer:

The crack about ten modelers in TT cracked me up.  There is a whole lot of stuff NOT

made in O, as well as in S, TT, of course, the narrow gauge versions of about any

scale, and in HO when I was in it, and, I bet now, when so much of HO is now current

trains, with a lot less steam era available.  If scratch building is of interest, or, worse yet, not, there is still plenty of it required in any scale, depending on your interest.

Obviously not every single thing that ever ran on rails has been made, even in HO scale. Perhaps we can agree on that and move on--without trying desperately to dredge up more examples of a classic false equivalence argument?

 

Jeff C

It isn't necessary to scratchbuild anything in S if you are willing to work within the constraints of what is available.  

 

It is perfectly easy to build a branchline operation with an SHS Consolidation and rolling stock appropriate for the late 1940's and 195O's and appropriate scenic elements are easily available.  You can do a creditable job with mainline railroads of the 40's and 50's as long as you are selective as to what aspect of the railroad you want to model.  (Model a few depots , some towers along the mainline and a few lineside industries, put a staging yard on each end, model everything in between as sparsely populated countryside, run mostly through freights, through passenger trains and a once or twice a day local and it is doable-you can fill your basement with the NY Central between Rochester, NY and Syracuse, NY )

 

You have to scratchbuild only if you start out with a concept which requires a product that doesn't exist in S or if you are unwilling to put up with "close enough".

 

If you tailor your concept to what is available, it is not that hard, and the good part is that you can change your concept as new product becomes available.

 

My way may not work for you, but it keeps me sane and it also keeps me from overspending on my hobby.

Little Tommy

 

Originally Posted by LittleTommy:

It isn't necessary to scratchbuild anything in S if you are willing to work within the constraints of what is available.  

 

 

And you can substitute ANY other scale for "S" and that statement is equally true.

 

A thread about not being able to scratch build is the silliest thing I've ever heard of!

 

Simon

Originally Posted by LittleTommy:

It isn't necessary to scratchbuild anything in S if you are willing to work within the constraints of what is available.  

 

 

Little Tommy

 

The problem is the constraints are much tighter in S. 

 

There is really only one "open stock" company in S today, and that's American Models.  Even at AM, some items have been out of stock and are not likely to reappear. (USRA Pacific's, for one.  The SD60's may not get a chance for a second run either.)

 

Sure there's the secondary market of "da bay" and various S events, but that's not a way for a scale to grow.

 

I've been fortunate that over the past 30 years, I've gotten most of what I needed and a lot that I didn't need from the primary sources. 

 

However, if you told me as a shiny new person I'd have to get what I need mostly from the secondary market, I'd have stayed in HO.

 

Rusty

"However, if you told me as a shiny new person I'd have to get what I need mostly from the secondary market, I'd have stayed in HO."

 

   Yeah, it's hard for newbies to learn the special charms of S scale size models when they can't easily see or buy anything locally. When I got interested in S it was because SHS had just made their new PS2 hopper models and my local train shop stocked a few. At that time seeing the new S stuff from AM and SHS  we thought it was inevitable that S would grow. It's still hard to believe that somehow a scale like the fanciful On30 could be created from nothing and prosper while S couldn't, I guess the difference was Bachman has deep pockets and was not afraid to make models to create more demand instead of making folks pre-order and wait for them......DaveB  

daveb said:

 

"I'd rather have tons of ready to run stuff available that be forced to make everything myself."

 

Here here! That's ONE of the primary reasons for me going back to HO: Time vs projects. 

 

Sure, I WANT some "do it yourself" projects... but not for almost ALL of the desired engines to require a good deal of kitbashing, repowering, etc, just to have an engine that was fairly common in the prototype world.  I already have a bunch of "do it yourself" kitbash/paint/decal engine projects stockpiled in HO... but I have far more HO RTR engines that just needs some weathering thrown on 'em to make 'em layout ready.

 

Colorado hirailer said:

 

"I bet now, when so much of HO is now current trains, with a lot less steam era available."

 

Not actually. I've been blown away with the QUALITY steam that's been recently made available and more on the way. Some of Broadway Limited's stuff is jaw dropping, as is MTH's steam offerings. 

 

As for "modern era": The "Transition" and "Classic" era's are still the biggest markets.
 

Rusty said:

 

"The "scratch builders" mindset."

 

True that. When I broke the news to the Yahoogroups S scale list that I was going to make the return to HO, I was pretty much hastily ushered out the door with a "Hmmph. REAL modeler's model in S scale."  

 

Ah well... I'm having a lot of fun again with model trains now that I'm back in HO... and the fun factor is the bottom line for me, not the scale.

 

Play nice, now everybody!

Somewhere around 1986-87 I started building this reefer. 

 

I gave up on it loooooong before SHS tantalized us with their wood reefers:

cSBR 080415 001

cSBR 080415 002

cSBR 080415 003

I'm surprised I haven't liberated the couplers off of it.  Even more surprised it hasn't fallen apart by now...

 

I really don't have a scratchbuilder's gene.  Fortunately, there were other things in S at the time to occupy my interests (like AM) otherwise my tenure in S would have ended early.

 

Rusty

Attachments

Images (3)
  • cSBR 080415 001
  • cSBR 080415 002
  • cSBR 080415 003
Last edited by Rusty Traque
Originally Posted by laming
 
 Time vs projects. 
 
True, true. I have tried scratchbuilt here and there,for something unique I guess, but no prize stuff.
I am also a great admirer of the tool-and-diemaker's art, though. These days (in HO) I can order a series of models that gives me an almost exact replica of the branch line train I rode as a kid. A modeler several decades ago might have started scratchbuilding rolling stock if the same result was desired. If the skills were good, then that modeler would probably try selling these models of things not widely available at the time. (Isn't that how Alco Models got started; building Alco models?)

"The "scratch builders" mindset."

 When it comes to S scale, I had designs on scratch building after seeing some of those great drawings in MR mag. I also admired the wonderful work of John Bortz; beautiful S scale models. Even had a few started projects like Rusty's. However, I also appreciate seeing a re-furbished American Flyer junker back up and running.

Time vs projects once again. To each his own, but for now my tinplate-ish messing around with 3-rail O and Flyer is a good time/project balance.

 

Am I the only one to notice that Lionel tooled up a es44ac AND sd70ace in a scale with NOTHING for them to pull.
 
In the case of these locos, zero percent of what has been on the rails (in terms of rolling stock) has been made.
 
 
How is that "desperately dredging" up examples.
 
 
Ya'll got your heads in the sand...
 
 
Originally Posted by Tom Stoltz:
Originally Posted by leikec:
 

Obviously not every single thing that ever ran on rails has been made, even in HO scale. Perhaps we can agree on that and move on--without trying desperately to dredge up more examples of a classic false equivalence argument?

 

Jeff C

Very well said Jeff.  Thanks.

 

Tom Stoltz

in Maine

 

Originally Posted by Martin H:
Am I the only one to notice that Lionel tooled up a es44ac AND sd70ace in a scale with NOTHING for them to pull.
 
In the case of these locos, zero percent of what has been on the rails (in terms of rolling stock) has been made.
 
 
 

That had not gone unnoticed, although S Scale America/Des Plaines Hobbies has cars that are acceptable era-wise.

 

Rusty

Originally Posted by daveb:

"S Scale is a Craftsman's Scale & has a Scratch builder's mindset"

 

    That don't mean we like it that way, it just means no one will build stuff for us to buy. I'd rather have tons of ready to run stuff available that be forced to make everything myself. The fact is S is a size that is very handy to work with and there's no reason products would sell just as well as they do in the less handy sizes if someone would just start producing them. HO, N, and more recently On30 scales started from nothing so why can't S grow from it's modest base? ......DaveB 

Don Thompson tried very hard to do exactly what you asked--and I wonder where S scale would be today if he hadn't been derailed by the Great Tooling Debacle...

 

Product drives the hobby market. If a manufacturer suddenly decided to release a line of high quality American TT product tomorrow, it would change everything about that scale--and TT would experience unprecedented growth. 

 

Think about it. Suddenly the big negative about TT scale, the fact that it is stuck right in the middle between HO and N scale, would become a positive--because the scale would grow by picking off modelers from both of those established scales. It would still be a minority scale, but at least for a time there would be rapid growth. On30 provides a case study for this.

 

There is no reason that the same thing couldn't happen in S scale. 

 

 

Jeff C

Originally Posted by Martin H:
Originally Posted by Martin H:

Rusty, I hope you are not referencing the husky stack cars.  48ft wells were a short flash-in-the pan of the early 1990's.  By the time the sd70ace and es44 were introduced, they had not been manufactured in over a decade, and 48ft containers had become an uncommon sight on the rails.

 

 

 

I didn't say they were a perfect fit.  

 

Along with the CoalPorters, Pullman Standard and FMC boxcars, they are closer era-wise to the SD70's and ES44's than almost anything else currently available in S.  And a lot closer to the era than the Flyonel cylindrical hoppers and cancelled 57' mechanical reefers.

 

 

The SSA cars sure beats pulling wood billboard reefers or recycled Gilbert behind the SD70's & ES44's.

 

Rusty

Last edited by Rusty Traque

"Somewhere around 1986-87 I started building this reefer."

 

   Haha, your post reminded me that I have one too. Can't recall what year I started it but it's old school cardboard sides that I had a print shop reduce from O scale to S scale. I'll probably finish it one of these days, especially if I decide to model the 50's on my new layout...DaveB 

pfecardboard

Attachments

Images (1)
  • pfecardboard

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×