Skip to main content

Besides the modernistic Pennsy T-1 locomotive Raymond Lowery, the industrial designer, is credit with...

full-afo-707-747[1]

The news article can be found here.

 

http://www.aiga.org/air-force-...the-graphic-history/

 

Enjoy.

 

Jan

 

Thanks! Corrected my spelling.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • full-afo-707-747[1]
Last edited by Jan
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The article is OK (for a generic article of that type; he had no connection with "Penn Central", for example), but let's not forget that he did not design passenger aircraft; he designed the -appearance- of items. Much of "his" work was done by employees of

his company.

 

Henry Dreyfuss was in much the same situation (he did, among other things, telephones, Hoover vacuums, typewriters, John Deere tractors and 3 well-known locomotive designs - the Mercury 4-6-2, among them) - much was done by employees in his office.

 

But, without both men's actual work and inspiring taste, much of the above would have

never been done, even if it was "only" approved by them, sometimes. 

It's just as well that the detail work on designs by Loewy, Dreyfuss, etc. was done by staff and the star player stuck to 'big picture' design. That way the details were filled in by people who knew what they were doing. Star architects and designers are almost invariably artists, not engineers; their designs often need major rework to become functional. Frank Lloyd Wright's buildings are notorious for maintenance problems, especially leaky roofs. He should have employed more and better staff. 
 
Originally Posted by D500:

The article is OK (for a generic article of that type; he had no connection with "Penn Central", for example), but let's not forget that he did not design passenger aircraft; he designed the -appearance- of items. Much of "his" work was done by employees of

his company.

 

Henry Dreyfuss was in much the same situation (he did, among other things, telephones, Hoover vacuums, typewriters, John Deere tractors and 3 well-known locomotive designs - the Mercury 4-6-2, among them) - much was done by employees in his office.

 

But, without both men's actual work and inspiring taste, much of the above would have

never been done, even if it was "only" approved by them, sometimes. 

 

Just like I don't think Walt Disney hand drew all of the animation of his movies I don't think Loewy did all of the designs attributed to him. Because he had his name on the design company he did have the final producer credit over the work from his company. 

 

Here are are a few more transportation pictures attributed to him. While he did not design this UP engine scheme it copies the Air Force one paint scheme he did design.

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

Attachments

Images (7)
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image

Industrial Designers are 50% artist and 50% engineer otherwise they would have no idea if their designs can be practically manufactured.

Raymond Lowey directed a design firm and as such he had talented people working under him. You can bet when soliciting business, It was Lowey, not one of his subordinates, that was making the presentation.

Last edited by Richard E
Originally Posted by Joe Hohmann:
Originally Posted by servoguy:

I believe he did the '53 Studebaker.

Robert Bourke, a head designer at Loewy, did it. The '53 Starliner hardtop was selected by the Museum Of Modern Art in New York as one of the best car designs of all time. As great as it was, it translated poorly into the sedan models.

You're absolutely correct, the 53 coupe was designed primarily by Robert Bourke.

The 53 sedan designs were close to the coups, but Studebaker management wanted a more conventional design. The original production was to be 20% coups and hardtops and 80% sedans. demand was exactly the opposite.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×