Skip to main content

Originally Posted by balidas:

 

Super O is also an option. It's vintage, tubular, beautiful & readily available.

I run some S.O. and love it.

  Readily available is another story.

Sure you can find it, but, its not "super easy".   

I had it as a kid for a while, but it got replaced with 0-27.

I kept puncturing my thumbs and fingers with the thin flat track pins.

It is my favorite track hands down.

K-line Supersnap is another I like.

I have not owned it, or even put two pieces together.

But I have run on it.

Its quiet, looks great, like black Super O vs brown.

On astroturf it is about the quietest I've ever heard.

Or is that not heard 

As many of our O gauge followers are aware, I mentioned a few weeks ago that we have plans to produce tubular track. As a rule, we never pre announce products until they are produced and ready to ship but it would seem prudent to do so for this product. We are excited to announce that this fall, we plan to offer the following O gauge tubular options!

 

10" Straight

30" Straight

O-31 Curved

O-36 Curved

O-42 Curved

O-54 Curved

O-72 Curved

O-96 Curved

 

I assure you, the price will be "right!" However, in keeping with our somewhat conservative sales policies, we will not accept orders until the product has been inspected and ready to ship. Production is underway and we are excited to pass along more details as we receive them!

 

Thank you,

Mark The Menards Train Guy

K Line and it's Supersnap has "extra" ties and looks/runs great.  I do have some on my layout where it comes in best for the fit.  I am placing extra ties from 3R Plastics, as well.  Right now they are only on my outside main line, checking for the looks and feel.  All told, I have tubular (Lionel and K Line, maybe some Am Flyer Prewar later), Atlas and Gargraves.  The Atlas is an upper level all it's own, with the classification yard, but tied into the inner main line.  Gargraves is on lower level for the passenger tracks/sorting yard and the engine facilities/roundhouse/service tracks. I use tubular on my five main lines because it is user friendly for elevation changes, 072 curved grades and long runs over lower tracks.  It all matches up, runs good, each in a proper location.

Totally Tubular, Man!

 

With less than an hour to go in the month, here are 6 Christmas in July photos of my tubular track in action.  Three from my 2012 layout and 3 from running on the floor tiles in July 2013.

 

Christmas Layout 2012 013

Christmas Layout 2012 021

 

Christmas Layout 2012 029

 

 

DSCF3651

DSCF3652

DSCF3657

 

 

I've done my Christmas layouts with FasTrack, Atlas and Tubular.  They go best with Tubular!

 

Attachments

Images (6)
  • Christmas Layout 2012 013
  • Christmas Layout 2012 021
  • DSCF3651
  • DSCF3652
  • DSCF3657
  • Christmas Layout 2012 029
Last edited by Amfleet25124
Originally Posted by Menards:

As many of our O gauge followers are aware, I mentioned a few weeks ago that we have plans to produce tubular track. As a rule, we never pre announce products until they are produced and ready to ship but it would seem prudent to do so for this product. We are excited to announce that this fall, we plan to offer the following O gauge tubular options!

 

10" Straight

30" Straight

O-31 Curved

O-36 Curved

O-42 Curved

O-54 Curved

O-72 Curved

O-96 Curved

 

I assure you, the price will be "right!" However, in keeping with our somewhat conservative sales policies, we will not accept orders until the product has been inspected and ready to ship. Production is underway and we are excited to pass along more details as we receive them!

 

Thank you,

Mark The Menards Train Guy

 

O-36 Curved Tubular?  

 

I can't wait to order some!

Originally Posted by Adriatic:
Originally Posted by balidas:

 

Super O is also an option. It's vintage, tubular, beautiful & readily available.

I run some S.O. and love it.

  Readily available is another story.

Sure you can find it, but, its not "super easy".   

I had it as a kid for a while, but it got replaced with 0-27.

I kept puncturing my thumbs and fingers with the thin flat track pins.

It is my favorite track hands down.

K-line Supersnap is another I like.

I have not owned it, or even put two pieces together.

But I have run on it.

Its quiet, looks great, like black Super O vs brown.

On astroturf it is about the quietest I've ever heard.

Or is that not heard 

I guess "readily available" could be relative. I see a constant supply on e-bay. Just recently I acquired a pretty good amount from one seller. The 3 pairs plus 2 left hand remote switches alone were more then worth the price I paid. These I'll use to introduce my grandkids to the hobby.

 

K Line Supersnap does look real nice. But I think that track is less readily available & at decent prices then Super O.

 

 

Last edited by balidas

I like 027 Tubular because its lower profile than O tubular, cut some popsicle sticks, paint them brown like the metal ties add ballast and you really have a nice looking track!

 

I like Gargraves because I like flex track.

 

I like O Tubular for that traditional look!

 

Dont care much for the the plastic base types of track.

 

 

Originally Posted by Andrew B.:

While my Christmas layout won't be permanent, it will be tubular, with cardboard putz houses on one side, and Plasticville on the other. "Angel Hair" will be used for snow, and the tree above it will be Shiny-Brite ornaments and large glass bulbed lights, with tinsel. I'm thinking of throwing some vintage toys around it as well. I didn't grow up in that time, but I have a nostalgia for it as well.

Then you're going to need to go to Ebay and track down old fashioned lead tinsel. It hangs straight something the mylar stuff they make nowadays won't. There is a company called Stannoil that used to make tinsel but I'm not sure they are still around.

Lead tinsel

Lead tinsel 2

It does tend to be pricey.

 

Jerry

Last edited by baltimoretrainworks

On the Menard's track, just wondering whether it will mirror Lionel tubular with the tie spacing.  Or, may it have more numerous ties as some K Line has / had and be more prone to Hi Rail ?  And, as we know Menard's for, this may lead to more track products.  I, for one, would welcome another reputable source for quality quantities of O Gauge track.  because, we all know, you can never have enough! 

Originally Posted by Adriatic:

Cool. A six loop line.

Maybe one more little info slip?

 

Is that measured center to center, outside rail, outside ties?

or inside dimensions just to drive us nuts?

Adriatic,

 

Sorry for the late reply, I had to confirm. The measurement is outside rail to outside rail.

 

-Mark the Menard Train Guy

An additional point:  if you like the 027 rail height but need a radius between 027 and 042, find some Mark 034.  It's not hard to find in good condition, has matching switches and crossings, and has 14" straights, too.  A very versatile track completely compatible with 027.
 
Originally Posted by BillP:

I like 027 Tubular because its lower profile than O tubular, cut some popsicle sticks, paint them brown like the metal ties add ballast and you really have a nice looking track!

 

I like Gargraves because I like flex track.

 

I like O Tubular for that traditional look!

 

Dont care much for the the plastic base types of track.

 

 

 

palallin,  you are so correct about the Marx track.  I have a good bit of it from when my Dad and I had our layouts in Houston back in the '70s.  One thing we really liked, and used, were the longer straights and the wider radii of their switches.  Also, the Marx switches are easy to work on and should you ever need a selanoid (sic) for anything operational, they always worked very well for us.  I do not use a lot of 027 any more, but have quite a bit, even some new I picked up from Puff-N-Stuff when they went out of business.  But, the low profile and longer radii you can get now, it would work well for a "light gauge line" on any layout expansion, or a complete layout itself. 

  Knowing some of the OP's design ideas, there is an option not really made that he might have used. Me too.

  It likely wont take the hobby by storm. But how many with 0-27 loops wish there was a smaller turn just for trolleys, critters, etc..

 I think I was told 0-15" was runnable but ????

 

Menards,

  Thanks. That does change depending on who's track  

 Since we seem to have your attention, so there's a little idea to kick around the room.

I keep wondering when your going to run a holiday trolley, and a 22" O.R.Dia. curve

 Hey, they modeled the Jawn Henry in my lifetime, I didn't get one, but why not keep hopin'.

Originally Posted by Adriatic:

  Knowing some of the OP's design ideas, there is an option not really made that he might have used. Me too.

  It likely wont take the hobby by storm. But how many with 0-27 loops wish there was a smaller turn just for trolleys, critters, etc..

 I think I was told 0-15" was runnable but ???? 

 

Hi Everyone!

 

       I would like to see at least an O24 (measured to outside of the tie) 3 rail tinplate sectional track.  Most O27 stuff will handle the O24 curve.  It is the knuckle coupler (truck mounted, ridged) that is the limiting factor.  I have done O24 in flexible GarGraves and re-bent O27 to O24.  Works fine with a lot of stuff.

 

Take care, Joe.

Last edited by Joe Rampolla
rdeal,   my opinion,  since I have transition from using tubular (K-Line 0-72 hi rail tubular) to Atlas O solid rail with 0-90 curves,  is to go solid rail.   You have read and heard all the reasons for both so I won't go into detail.  Since you do not have a bunch of switches (Atlas O main negative is switches IMO),  Atlas should work well for you,  it has for me now 2 years running.  In my 12x14 loop I only have one contact in each corner of the curve,  4 total.  No issues conventional (run some MTH no sound early releases) or command control locos. 
 
Mark

The train project (permanent Christmas layout) is progressing on schedule – basement room/cleaned - carpet installed – drop ceiling/almost finished – wall painting/almost finished – all plywood moved to basement – need to decide layout height before mid august – all is on “GO”

 

BUT, ONE HURDLE THAT SO FAR I HAVE NOT BEEN UNABLE TO CROSS – I CAN NOT GET MY MIND SETTLED ON WHICH OF THE VARIOUS TRACK OPTIONS TO CHOOSE.

 

Before I began this project – a year or so ago my plan was two pronged – 1) paint table – bright Christmas red – smooth, slick, and high gloss – 2) use tubular track as my layout was in the late ‘40’s and mid ‘50’s – (the a 5x9 plywood painted green)

 

Later as I began – I discovered the (I think) the ease and simplicity of Lionel’s Fastrack. But I just can not get the original plan out of my mind. And, this morning “Mark the Menards Train Guy” posted the following: Hi Everyone, In the fall, we plan to alleviate your O gauge tubular track anxieties! If you have any upcoming tubular track needs, it may be worth it to wait a few months. I can't say more, except to tell you that the price will be right! Thank you, Mark the Menards Train Guy

 

Would I be – out of bounds – a complete nut – to use all tubular track – REMEMBER – for me and the layout – only two switches for the loop to loop – no sidetracks – no switching – just running three trains, two hand cars and one trolley

 

What is your thinking?  I do need your help – You can even raise your voice

 

rdeal

 

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×