U.P. 844 sports a Big Boy whistle

Negative? Who's being negative? I'm telling you they all sound the same. Maybe Ed Dickens, Manager of the Steam Program, got tired of the "raspy sounding" whistle that HAD been on 844, and went with a NEWER Manning, Maxwell, & Moore whistle off 3985, or any one of the 4000 class locomotives. Besides, the UP Steam Shop has quite a few original UP "Big Three" whistles to choose from, if and when one of them on either 844 or 3985, wears out!
quote:
Originally posted by AMCDave:
THAT'S how you run a steam loco!!!! Thanks


You got that right. I have to say the man that filmed it (Skip Weythman) is good...this guy has alot of great pacing shots of the 844 and the 3985. Always nicely done and steady...hopefully someone else is driving... Smile

    Chris

 

Help support the Operation & Preservation of N&W Class J 611

& donate to the Fireup611 group.  Also come see my videos.

 

 

quote:
You got that right. I have to say the man that filmed it (Skip Weythman) is good...this guy has alot of great pacing shots of the 844 and the 3985. Always nicely done and steady...hopefully someone else is driving...

Well, I'll say he IS good! But, if it's the guy I think it is, I have watched him pace alongside both 3985 and 844, for many many years, with NOBODY ELSE in the vehicle. I have had a pretty good view of him, over the years, and he "sure gets thru traffic", I'll say THAT.
quote:
Originally posted by Hot Water:
I much preferred the original Reading T-1 freight whistles, however.


Hot Water
I remember on at least one occasion, with double headed T1's the following engine had the shrill freight whistle.
You can hear both on a souvenir record the READING provided on one of the trips. you remember those 33 1/3 records?!? Smile

 Charlie

South Jersey

 

 

quote:
You can hear both on a souvenir record the READING provided on one of the trips. you remember those 33 1/3 records?!?

Yes. I have all of them. The Ralbar records, the "official Reading Company" boxed record, and the Semaphore recordings. I was on the the very first Reading Ramble, with 2124.
quote:
Originally posted by Hot Water:
Well, I'll say he IS good! But, if it's the guy I think it is, I have watched him pace alongside both 3985 and 844, for many many years, with NOBODY ELSE in the vehicle. I have had a pretty good view of him, over the years, and he "sure gets thru traffic", I'll say THAT.


Oh brother....so he is part kamikaze??....Great news for the other folks around.... Roll Eyes

    Chris

 

Help support the Operation & Preservation of N&W Class J 611

& donate to the Fireup611 group.  Also come see my videos.

 

 

quote:
Originally posted by Big Jim:
Too bad that video wasn't of a bit better quality. Those rods were jumping all over the place, maybe even backwards sometimes.


The video is better if you watch it off youtube directly, when you link them here they seem to be a bit jumpy.

But if it's speed you like...and who doesn't...

    Chris

 

Help support the Operation & Preservation of N&W Class J 611

& donate to the Fireup611 group.  Also come see my videos.

 

 

quote:
Originally posted by mlavender480:
Over 70 MPH on a steam locomotive... that's something I wish I could experience just once before I die...


Me too. In fact, I'd even sacrifice a major body part (maybe even one of my own Wink) for the opportunity!

Andy

TCA, LRRC, LCCA, Atlas Golden Spike (Charter Member), MTHRRC, LOTS, Pittsburgh Independent Hi-Railers - "Diesels represent the job, steam represents the adventure!"

quote:
What is the maximum speed UP allows with steam these days?

Someplace in the UP timetable (special instructions), lists 844 as limited to 84MPH. Obviously that would be only in cab signal territory where the track speed limit is high enough, i.e. OVER 79MPH.
quote:
Originally posted by Andy Hummell:
quote:
Originally posted by mlavender480:
Over 70 MPH on a steam locomotive... that's something I wish I could experience just once before I die...


Me too. In fact, I'd even sacrifice a major body part (maybe even one of my own Wink) for the opportunity!

Andy

Sometimes it isn't as much fun as you may think. A whole lot depends on the condition of the track! Back in 1977 on the Amtrak Transcontintal Steam Excursion (returning 4449 back to Portland, OR after the American Freedom Train Tour), we where southbound on the ICRR double track main line. One of the IC supervisors made the mistake of asking McCormack, "How fast wil this old thing go?". WRONG THING TO SAY!!!!

Doyle held up three fingers to me, which indicated that I had better keep her at 300 pounds no matter what. Since we where currently at a station stop, when we got the hi-ball over the radio, Doyle made pretty much a full throttle start and just kept accelerating. The track was so rough, that when we where above 70MPH, you could hardly read the gauges due to all the dust flying out of the backhead and the vibration was so bad the gauge needles kept moving. Past 85MPH it was was down right unbearable! The IC supervisor finally chickened out and hollered at Doyle, "OK, OK,,,,DON'T LET HER GO ANY FASTER!!!". Doyle applied the air and eased off the throttle a bit, befor she made 90MPH, and we settled back to a more comfortable 70MPH.

On the other hand, 80+MPH speeds on the UP main line, or some of the original SP main lines, are/where quite nice!
quote:
Originally posted by Hot Water:
quote:
Originally posted by Andy Hummell:
quote:
Originally posted by mlavender480:
Over 70 MPH on a steam locomotive... that's something I wish I could experience just once before I die...


Me too. In fact, I'd even sacrifice a major body part (maybe even one of my own Wink) for the opportunity!

Andy

Sometimes it isn't as much fun as you may think. A whole lot depends on the condition of the track! Back in 1977 on the Amtrak Transcontintal Steam Excursion (returning 4449 back to Portland, OR after the American Freedom Train Tour), we where southbound on the ICRR double track main line. One of the IC supervisors made the mistake of asking McCormack, "How fast wil this old thing go?". WRONG THING TO SAY!!!!

Doyle held up three fingers to me, which indicated that I had better keep her at 300 pounds no matter what. Since we where currently at a station stop, when we got the hi-ball over the radio, Doyle made pretty much a full throttle start and just kept accelerating. The track was so rough, that when we where above 70MPH, you could hardly read the gauges due to all the dust flying out of the backhead and the vibration was so bad the gauge needles kept moving. Past 85MPH it was was down right unbearable! The IC supervisor finally chickened out and hollered at Doyle, "OK, OK,,,,DON'T LET HER GO ANY FASTER!!!". Doyle applied the air and eased off the throttle a bit, befor she made 90MPH, and we settled back to a more comfortable 70MPH.

On the other hand, 80+MPH speeds on the UP main line, or some of the original SP main lines, are/where quite nice!




Hot Water,great story! know anything about that loco derailing when it got into town? I was a mere 5 years old at that time, but the memory of riding in the car while my dad paced that loco along rt. 50 are some of my most vivid.
quote:
know anything about that loco derailing when it got into town?

You'll have to be a bit more specific, i.e. which Freedom Train Locomotive, which town, and what month & year.

AFT 4449 didn't derail upon arrival from the west on BN, then into EMD, on July 2, 1975. I don't recall any derailments in the Chicago area either, but then that was 37 years ago. I do however, remember that the former Reading locomotive (AFT 1), which brought the train into Chicago, derailed trying to get to the AFT display area down at Navy Pier.
quote:
Originally posted by Hot Water:
quote:
know anything about that loco derailing when it got into town?

You'll have to be a bit more specific, i.e. which Freedom Train Locomotive, which town, and what month & year.

AFT 4449 didn't derail upon arrival from the west on BN, then into EMD, on July 2, 1975. I don't recall any derailments in the Chicago area either, but then that was 37 years ago. I do however, remember that the former Reading locomotive (AFT 1), which brought the train into Chicago, derailed trying to get to the AFT display area down at Navy Pier.




Now that you mention it, I think it was the Reading loco,thanks. Somewhere theres a photo album I need to find.
All engines, no matter what they are built for or what runs em have a sweet spot somewhere in it's own power curve.

That 844 sure looked good and the poor fella hanging onto that tender is going to be tired.

A living Steam Engine hauling a train with commerce, reaching across time and space; is a wonderful journey undertaken by Man.

 

A product of our fine College System that has been made redundant by imports of Foreign Workers willing to push a Keyboard for a living.

quote:
Originally posted by CWEX:
Hotwater,

Your story had me wondering. Taking out the condtion of the track is there a sweet spot in terms of speed that engines like the 844/3985/4449 like to be at where it seems they are running the smoothest?

Both 4449 and 844 seem to "like" the 65MPH range, from a fuel & water consumption issue. Both locomotives will run at a nominal 65MPH by the hour and use minimal amounts of fuel & water with a 10 to 15 car passenger train.

The 3985 seems to like 60MPH for minimal fuel & water usage with todays small passenger consist.
Back in the day, if you wanted a 33 1/3 recond, the onwers of the shop seould send you over to the "sepecial effects" part of the store.

I was listening to the AFT 4449 disk, and my sister, about 3 years old, pointed at the hi-fi, and said: Train inside?

The TEXAS SPECIAL:  The REAL RED streak of the golden prairies!

quote:
Originally posted by Hot Water:
Both 4449 and 844 seem to "like" the 65MPH range, from a fuel & water consumption issue. Both locomotives will run at a nominal 65MPH by the hour and use minimal amounts of fuel & water with a 10 to 15 car passenger train.

The 3985 seems to like 60MPH for minimal fuel & water usage with todays small passenger consist.


Thanks for the information, I appreciate it.

    Chris

 

Help support the Operation & Preservation of N&W Class J 611

& donate to the Fireup611 group.  Also come see my videos.

 

 

quote:
Originally posted by Hot Water:
quote:
Does CSX ever let you do some running?

Surly you jest! CSX will not even allow a DEAD steam locomotive on their lines, let alone a live UP 844 or SP 4449.


Well, I hear that they ARE letting Ross Rowland move the 614 to White Sulphur.

OLDGUYFROMNJ

quote:
Originally posted by Hot Water:
quote:
Well, I hear that they ARE letting Ross Rowland move the 614 to White Sulphur.

I don't think CSX is "letting" Ross do anything. I'll bet he is paying a pretty penny for CSX to tow the 614!

Gold is high. Ross has the $$$$$$
You say they're On The Water, I say they're Sur l'eau.


OGR Publishing, Inc.
33 Sheridan Road, Poland, OH 44514
330-757-3020

www.ogaugerr.com
×
×
×
×
×