Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I would really like to see:

 

  • Lionel VISION Line Chesapeake & Ohio 2-6-6-6 H-8 Allegheny Class. Please include: everything the big boy has plus VISION Line coal cars with sounds.
  • Lionel VISION Line Erie 2-8-8-8-2 Triplex. Please include: everything the big boy has plus VISION Line coal cars with sounds.
  • Lionel Union Pacific F3 in ABBA configuration with Legacy
  • Anything Lionel and VISION Line and Steam and BIG!
Originally Posted by d tuuri:
Hi

I haven't seen one of these posts in a while so I will start one and see how it goes....

What loco(s) would you really like to see made in the future?

I would like to see a scale SD40-2 made by Atlas. 

Thanks!

Don

Don,

Thank you for starting this subject.

I model modern CSX. I also think an SD40-2 would be nice in the CSX YN3B lettering/color scheme.

I'd even more like to see a GP40-2 in this same scheme.

Thanks,

Al Hummel

Originally Posted by nw2124:

The last time that I saw a PSC N&W 0-8-0 was on Ebay for $850. It did not sell so I bought it.  They do not bring much and are hard to sell. Stephen

Gilly,

PSC made the N&W 0-8-0 quite a few years ago and they become available from time to time.

Ed

 

Guys,

 

Thanks for the lead. I didn't know about this locomotive. If for only the tender, it will be worth a look on eBay.

 

Gilly

I'll see your Reading K-1 2-10-2 and raise you a Reading N-1 2-8-8-2, rebuilt as a simple 2-8-8-0. Same boiler. Lots pf plumbing on rebuilt locomotives

 

Baldwin 3-cylinder compound 4-10-2 No. 60000 in The Franklin Institute, Philadelphia

 

No. 17, the YORK, rolled out of [David] Kloke Locomotive Works, Elgin, IL, in May, 2013. The Reader Railroad in Arkansas built wooden passenger cars for her that summer. They run on the historic Northern Central Railway between New Freedom and Hanover Junction south of York, PA, under the auspices of Steam into History

LEVIATHANNorthCen 009

 A life-size Lionel GENERAL set

YORKinSnow2

 

Atlantic City Railroad No. 1027 pulled the fastest regularly scheduled passenger trains in the world in the 1890's. She would be the first Vauclain compound in 3-rail "0" Gauge. The Pennsylvania Railroad built 3 similar Camelback Atlantics to compete with her. Designated "E-1," they culminated in the renowned E-6 Atlantics. The sole survivor, No. 460, is "The Lindbergh Engine" in The Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania at Strasburg

P&R1027

 

East African Railways Beyer-Garratt Class 59

EARClass59

Attachments

Images (4)
  • LEVIATHANNorthCen 009
  • YORKinSnow2
  • P&R1027
  • EARClass59

I'll see your Reading K-1 2-10-2 and raise you a Reading N-1 2-8-8-2

OK; I particularly like the K-1 and it was (IMO) a proper use for the mediocre N-1's boiler. As I recall, the K-1 was the biggest and baddest of all the 2-10-2 hogs.

 

Otherwise, the Beyer-Garret is just one butt-ugly loco. How could anyone want one, unless they were Brits or So.Africans. Oh, yeah: opinion.

Last edited by rex desilets

An SD40-2 would be at the top of my list, with the GP40-2 being second, and the early 90's SD70 series (70m, 75m, 70mac). GE B36 would be nice too!

 

I would like to see Atlas do the SD40-2 but I don't think the current vertical motor truck design would allow the trucks to be placed closer to the pilots without the motor shield interfering with the front of the cab. I recently experimented with trying to modify the frame on a Weaver SD40-2 to move the trucks to a more prototypical location or similar to the truck placement on my Overland SD40-2, but it couldn't be done with the current vertical truck design.

 

Atlas would have to use a horizontal motor drive or redesign their vertical motor truck to place them in a more accurate position under the frame, which would then allow use of scale fuel tanks.

 

The SD40-2 and GP20 are two designs with unique long front porches that would require horizontal drives or newly designed truck blocks if using a vertical motor setup to produce more accurate and better looking models than what's currently available.

 

 

I'd like to suggest the ML 4000 diesel hydraulic, the cab version from 1961;  four paint schemes are possible:

   a) DRGW

   b) SP

   c) DRGW patched as SP

   d) "SP"/ KM Semmering test unit

 

Considering some of the locos that have been produced by MTH, I'm surprised they haven't done this one.  It could be offered as a dummy unit as well as powered.

 

Given the number of SSPF's around, you'd think it would sell well.....

 

Just a thought.  SZ

Originally Posted by rex desilets:

I'll see your Reading K-1 2-10-2 and raise you a Reading N-1 2-8-8-2

OK; I particularly like the K-1 and it was (IMO) a proper use for the mediocre N-1's boiler. As I recall, the K-1 was the biggest and baddest of all the 2-10-2 hogs.

 

Rex and ReadingFan,

Glad to see Reading Steam getting some love.

 

The K1 or an N1 would be nice, but don't forget that we could really use an I10 or an M1.

 

Reading K1 2-10-2

Reading N1 2-8-8-0

 

Reading I10 2-8-0

 

Reading M1 2-8-2 

 

We could also use a nice Baldwin Baby faced freight unit for the CNJ side of life.

 

 

 

Originally Posted by p51:

I'm not into 3-rail at all, but that said, it someone made a good replica of SRR 630, I'd be awfully tempted to buy one.

That was the first engine I ever got a cab ride on, and my parents saw it running regularly in their home town in the 50s and 60s at ET&WNC 207:

 

WOW!!I rember whatching the news story by wbtv with my family.One time my grandmother called me to see this.She told me"I thought you want to see this."I told her she was right.I sometimes forget the etnc had narrow gauge and standard gauge.Thanks for posting this good memoies.

Originally Posted by Bob Delbridge:

I'd be all over this:

 

 

streamlined pacific 5

sal pacific 2

streamlined pacific 4

 

E class streamlined Pacific Draw

 

Of course I think Seaboard only had 3 streamlined Pacifics, but hey that's what I want!

They do look pretty nice and look like they could move fast.I have a mil streamlined hudson I think its the fastest steamer I have.Just think how the pacifics would look with high speed driverods.How many cars they pulled?

Anything without a Bellpaire firebox!!!!!!!!!!! How about some non-Pennsy steam locomotives by Brooks, Lima, ALCO, Porter and Stevenson.

 

I am reasonably sure that the those have built elevated railways would love to have a steamer like those that ran on the New York City Els.

 

And oh by the way, I would love to have this:

 

Connecticut Open Car 355

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Connecticut Open Car 355
Last edited by Bobby Ogage

And for SPF's a wish list would include:

 

PRR/LI 4-6-0 (different tenders):  No scale dimensioned G5's have been offered despite attempts by Max Gray, Weaver, Sunset and MTH.  (Discounting the crude by today's standards Saginaw)

 

PRR I1s, I1sa 2-10-0:  No one has offered an I1s (123 of them without the huge feed water heater on the left side).  I can think of at least 5 quite different I1/I1s post-war prototype "looks" that could be produced in brass on the same boiler/chassis by varying front end/boiler details tenders.  

 

PRR H8sc, H9s, H10s 2-8-0:  - Key beautifully did these in limited numbers 25 years ago.  If an H10s is to be offered please do it without a Lines West tender - they were generally gone in postwar era.

 

PRR D16sb 4-4-0:  Hasn't been done since Max Gray imported a few 50 years ago (perhaps the rarest PRR brass model)

 

PRR N2s/ USRA heavy 2-10-2: PRR’s 130 N2sa’s were rebuilt with Belpaire fireboxs.  A production run could share the mechanism and tender with standard USRA boiler versions lettered for Erie, CB&Q, C&S, and B&LE

 

Ed Rappe

Last edited by Keystoned Ed

Folks,

 

Steam: I would love to see a Denver&Rio Grande Western L-77 2-6-6-0 beein produced in the near future. This really would make my day!

 

And some smaller steam such as a D&RGW C-48 or one of the last standard gauge D&RGW engines, such as 4-6-0 No. 784.

 

Diesel: A Alco S-2 would be awesome. Atlas folks: you already have it in smaller scale. Just give us a O-scale 2-Rail model of the S-2, and please please please: A Rio Grande version of it, though...

 

Cheers, Tom

 

 

I'm with Chip R........oh please, please, someone, a Colorado & Southern 2-10-2 (#900, 902, or 903) with auxililiary tender! Toss in Texas & Pacific/Chicago Great Western 2-10-4, Canadian National 2-6-0, Central Vermont 2-10-4. 

        Now, returning to the "real world", I am very appreciative of Sunset 3rd Rail proposing the Burlington O1a 2-8-2. Have 2 reservations in.

Everything posted is fine but...a locomotive is only as good as its guts and mtors

 

Contemporary railroads now use even the big 6-axle locos on branch lines AND switching so my big want would be:

 

NOTHING PRODUCED O SCALE 2 RAIL WITHOUT HORIZONTAL DRIVE SYSTEM AND/OR GEARING SO IT CAN OPERATE PROTOTYPICAL AT A  SWITCHING CRAWL AS WELL AS ON THE MAINLINE RUNNING.

 

Atlas prides itself as The Future of O Scale; the future of O scale is to have mechanisms that operate as smoothly and perfectly as my HO and N (!!!). Vertical drives, jerky acceleration/deceleration and poor slow speed capability is not the future of O scale. Because of this, my entry into O scale 2 rail branch/switching is becoming extremely touch-and-go having to cherry pick from a very limited roster of older models. 

I too think an SD40-2 would be a great engine to build but like mentioned maybe problems putting the super over a China drive. Atlas already did the SD40 and think it would be an easier change over but I am not building them. Lionel adn MTH don't do the superstructures well enough and from what I have seen they sit too high on the trucks. Just be nice if Atlas worked on releasing a engine model once a year, period. Still waiting for the dash 8 40CW. since in the catalog in 2010.

Originally Posted by PatKelly:

Everything posted is fine but...a locomotive is only as good as its guts and mtors

 

Contemporary railroads now use even the big 6-axle locos on branch lines AND switching so my big want would be:

 

NOTHING PRODUCED O SCALE 2 RAIL WITHOUT HORIZONTAL DRIVE SYSTEM AND/OR GEARING SO IT CAN OPERATE PROTOTYPICAL AT A  SWITCHING CRAWL AS WELL AS ON THE MAINLINE RUNNING.

 

Atlas prides itself as The Future of O Scale; the future of O scale is to have mechanisms that operate as smoothly and perfectly as my HO and N (!!!). Vertical drives, jerky acceleration/deceleration and poor slow speed capability is not the future of O scale. Because of this, my entry into O scale 2 rail branch/switching is becoming extremely touch-and-go having to cherry pick from a very limited roster of older models. 

I agree with your post 100%!! This concept as well as buying immediately when something is released or taking the chance you'll never get it,is discouraging coming from HO,where the market is more friendly. But this is O scale & these are some of the ugly trade offs. The market is much smaller than HO & N & growing smaller with increases in prices all the time & modelers restricted to apartments rather than houses with ample room. I face this challenge every day in my decision-"O or HO"-that is the question!

It's a balance of the trade offs,(differences),in the 2 scales that we have to decide if we can live with when the "dust" settles. The Verticle motors as the gentlemen here explained to me,comes from Lionel & followed with other companies, to accommodate the sharp curve demands of 3 rail diesels. So,since 3 rail is the leader in O scale sales as most modelers are 3railers,this can't be expected to change.

I know EXACTLY what you're saying & where you're coming from. The lack of modern couplers is something I as well as other modern modelers desire,but with most modelers in steam in O scale,that's not likely to be seen either.It's a "build your own," scale as many can tell you,or put up with what's out there.

 

I came to O without doing my homework 1st,expecting to have everything in O scale I had in HO & maybe more because of the increase in size-not so. A painful reality as O scale has SO MUCH MORE to offer because of the size not found in other scales.

 

Just my 2 cents.

Al Hummel

I'm a 3R guy by default (if I was getting into the hobby again it would be 2R) but a lot of these projects come about only because of the number of 2R and 3R engines ordered, so I'll speak up.
 
I would LOVE to see some new Reading steam locomotives made.  I have a Weaver G1 and SGL G3 to pull passenger trains, but really nothing (steam wise) to pull my coal trains.  Kind of ironic given the Reading's history in hauling coal!
 
The T-1 just doesn't float my boat, and I'm not really interested in the N-1.  I would really love to have a pair of 2-8-0's to pull a long string of coal cars!
 
That said, Rex, if you can get Scot to have 3rd Rail build the K1, I'm in for a 3R version!!!
 

 

Reading K1 2-10-2

 

Reading I10 2-8-0

 

 

 

 

 

jd-train said:

I have a Weaver G1 and SGL G3 to pull passenger trains,

I have a G#, but no authentic passenger cars. What do you use?

That said, Rex, if you can get Scot to have 3rd Rail build the K1, I'm in for a 3R version!!!

Well, that would be two of us. Scott made the B&O P7d in a run of 50, which is, I suppose, a minimum number. So all we need is 48 more guys

I'm thinking if one wants an I-10, one could start with a cannibalized 2-8-0 chassis and build up the superstructure from scratch. I have a friend whose hankering for a B&O E-27 2-8-0 led him down that very garden path (well,  he also scratchbuilt the frame.). The entire superstructure is fabricated from PVC pipe and ABS/styrene, plus brass jewelry and piping. It can be done. Depends on the degree of lust

Rex,

 

I still need a set of heavyweights to use with the G1.

 

The G3 model is a model imported by SGL.  SGL Lines was a company that was formed by an enthusiast of the Reading who only imported a brass G3 and matching brass passenger cars. The sets are from 2002/3.

 

The SGL G3 was offered in both 2R and 3R and I've seen two different numbered engines come up for sale on eBay. 

 

There were two different sets of passengers cars (both in 2R and 3R) offered: The Schuylkill and King Coal sets.  Both sets are 5 car sets with different numbers and interiors for each set.  There were also two car sets to match each 5 car set.  The sets occasionally come up for sale on eBay, usually at a great price, considering these are brass.

 

I have the Schuylkill 5 car set.  Still looking for the matching 2 car set at a good price.

 

Jim

SGL Lines imported models of the first and last G3 Pacifics (210 and 219) and two sets of 2000-series semistreamlined ("blimp") cars. Seats with blue upholstery represented the KING COAL (Philly-Shamokin) and the WALL STREET (Philly-Jersey City Terminal, with ferry connection to Manhattan); red upholstery, the SCHUYLKILL (Philly-Pottsville).

 

Late in the steam era, the Reading used small tenders from retired steamers as auxiliary water cars ("jugs"). The late George Hart used a Taylor tender from a Camelback as a "jug" for Reading Shop Switcher 0-6-0 1251 on excusions onb the Ma & Pa. No. 1251 is now displayed in The Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania at Strasburg. The Reading & Northern uses that "jug" for "The Four-and-a-Quarter" (425). Her original "jug" was a Pennsy tender. The Reading tender is slightly smaller and fits on the Jersey Central turntable at Jim Thorpe with 425. The Pennsy "jug" had to be turned separately.

425JimThorpe9282014 002

 

DSCF0716

 

This is the Pennsy tender. The coal compartment is intact.

DSCF0725

 

DSCF0724

 

DSCF0726

 

Attachments

Images (5)
  • 425JimThorpe9282014 002
  • DSCF0716
  • DSCF0725
  • DSCF0724
  • DSCF0726
Originally Posted by ReadingFan:

SGL Lines imported models of the first and last G3 Pacifics (210 and 219) and two sets of 2000-series semistreamlined ("blimp") cars. Seats with blue upholstery represented the KING COAL (Philly-Shamokin) and the WALL STREET (Philly-Jersey City Terminal, with ferry connection to Manhattan); red upholstery, the SCHUYLKILL (Philly-Pottsville).

 

Late in the steam era, the Reading used small tenders from retired steamers as auxiliary water cars ("jugs"). The late George Hart used a Taylor tender from a Camelback as a "jug" for Reading Shop Switcher 0-6-0 1251 on excusions onb the Ma & Pa. No. 1251 is now displayed in The Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania at Strasburg. The Reading & Northern uses that "jug" for "The Four-and-a-Quarter" (425). Her original "jug" was a Pennsy tender. The Reading tender is slightly smaller and fits on the Jersey Central turntable at Jim Thorpe with 425. The Pennsy "jug" had to be turned separately.

425JimThorpe9282014 002

 

DSCF0716

 

This is the Pennsy tender. The coal compartment is intact.

DSCF0725

 

DSCF0724

 

DSCF0726

 

In the 1st picture,is a modern switchstand that would add a lot to O scale in modern times,but would also be fantastic offered with counterweights of different shapes,found all across the USA,in the eastern half of the US especially. These switchstands with the counterweights,were used over a much longer period of time,starting in the steam era,right into the early 90s,when "Backsafer,Bow handles" were substituted in place of the low counterweight handles,to give greater leverage for a crewman & also providing less strain to a crewman's back,not having to bend so far down towards the ground.

Al Hummel

Originally Posted by Keystoned Ed:
 PRR D16sb 4-4-0:  Hasn't been done since Max Gray imported a few 50 years ago (perhaps the rarest PRR brass model)

Yes.  Odd absence of this engine not being imported again given the ubiquitous nature and long life span, yet also being fairly desirable.  I would however prefer an early D16b version suitable for the CVRR, but if taking an sb gets them made, I'd still be willing to buy at least 1.

I think the possible sales demand for this engine is underestimated.  It's not just a Santa Fe passenger engine.  More importantly it is the first transcontinental diesel passenger engine.  If any manufacturer was to undertake the project they should also include the related boxcabs like the EMC demos, and the B&O #50.

 

I've posted this before on the 3 rail forums and there is always some demand.

 

I'm aware the the colors used in this print are disputed.  Perhaps Division Point had it correct with their HO model. 

 

1stsuperchiefdiesel

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 1stsuperchiefdiesel

I'd like to see a "modern" 4-4-0...one with the appliances, pilot and appearance of a 1920-1930 era locomotive.  Both C&IM and Katy used them up to the '50s and the end of their passenger service.  Thomas made one way back in the 1950's that was close, but still kept the huge cowcatcher (sorry, pilot).  They're hard to find, though and pricey.

Originally Posted by Jim Scorse:

I would seriously doubt that Atlas can do an SD40-2 (or 38-2 or 39-2) beacuse they are married to the China drive which will not fit under the frame.

 SD40x is a rail industry standard.

"Can't do the vertical China drive", "can't do the horizontal drive"...come on, this is the 21st century. Oh yea that's right...this is O scale.  Nevermind...

Originally Posted by Jim Scorse:

I would seriously doubt that Atlas can do an SD40-2 (or 38-2 or 39-2) beacuse they are married to the China drive which will not fit under the frame.

Atlas told me about a year ago,they want to do the GP40,but with the mess up in their China factories it's doubt full we'll see that.

MTH did the gP38-2 wish they'd do more of them in their Premier line.

Al Hummel

 

These are all 2-rail brass: How about the PRR T-1 in the versions Key gave us when I was in HO scale. How abut an updated B&O  EM-1. An updated UP C-855 a-b-a set. The C&O T-1. Santa Fe 5001 class 2-10-4!! ( PSC promised in 2012 but never delivered ). Santa Fe 5011 class 2-10-4. NP/SP&S Z-6. GE U-28,30,33 AND 36 both ''B'' and ''C''. Updated PRR Q-2.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by CBQer:

I haven't said much for a while about my desired loco. It would be the Milwaukee SDL-39. Simple, sweet and the mfg could sell one to every Milwaukee modeller

How many would those be?

If EMD can make them why not Atlas?    That was a joke but it had some truth in it.  

Originally Posted by rheil:
Originally Posted by pennsyfanman:

How about Pennsylvania RR Electrics  E-2b and E-3c

Sunset/3rd Rail is considering offering the E2b.

IIRC they were announced (or perhaps you or Scott mentioned them in a thread on here once)... but it seems rezzys are light so they must be lower down on the priority list.

 

I'd love to se G5's or I1's in PRR but the L1s seem to be slow sellers. 

Originally Posted by Rule292:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by CBQer:

I haven't said much for a while about my desired loco. It would be the Milwaukee SDL-39. Simple, sweet and the mfg could sell one to every Milwaukee modeller

How many would those be?

If EMD can make them why not Atlas?    That was a joke but it had some truth in it.  

No, not really any "truth in it". EMD would make pretty much anything a customer wanted, and that they were willing to pay for, in any quantity they wanted. Whereas Atlas, or any other model manufacturer/importer, must produce a MINIMUM QUANTITY in order to recover the tooling costs for specialized products. 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Rule292:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by CBQer:

I haven't said much for a while about my desired loco. It would be the Milwaukee SDL-39. Simple, sweet and the mfg could sell one to every Milwaukee modeller

How many would those be?

If EMD can make them why not Atlas?    That was a joke but it had some truth in it.  

No, not really any "truth in it". EMD would make pretty much anything a customer wanted, and that they were willing to pay for, in any quantity they wanted. Whereas Atlas, or any other model manufacturer/importer, must produce a MINIMUM QUANTITY in order to recover the tooling costs for specialized products. 

Lighten up oldhead, no need to turn every joking comment into something nasty.

 

Both EMD and Atlas (or any manufacturer) are in business to make money...  We got that.

Last edited by Rule292
Originally Posted by Rule292:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Rule292:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by CBQer:

I haven't said much for a while about my desired loco. It would be the Milwaukee SDL-39. Simple, sweet and the mfg could sell one to every Milwaukee modeller

How many would those be?

If EMD can make them why not Atlas?    That was a joke but it had some truth in it.  

No, not really any "truth in it". EMD would make pretty much anything a customer wanted, and that they were willing to pay for, in any quantity they wanted. Whereas Atlas, or any other model manufacturer/importer, must produce a MINIMUM QUANTITY in order to recover the tooling costs for specialized products. 

Lighten up oldhead, no need to turn every joking comment into something nasty.

 

Both EMD and Atlas (or any manufacturer) are in business to make money...  We got that.

Sorry if I upset you with reality. Trying to compare model train manufacturing to either EMD, Alco, or GE is pretty ridiculous, don't you think? 

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×