Skip to main content

Reply to "Good Day Scott Mann, How about producing the Gunderson Maxi Stack IV cars?"

Originally Posted by naveenrajan:

If brass is for low-volume production, I speculate that 3D printing is for even lower quantities. I always thought that 3-D printing or rapid prototyping is for as the name suggests – prototypes not for making the same piece over & over. It is suitable for small, unique detail parts like a railroad-specific antenna or pilots for converting few 3-rail locomotives to 2-rail. Since the material is deposited in layers from a thin wire, along a single line or curve at a time, it could take a long time to make just 1 car. At that speed the car could end up costing as much as the brass models if not more. Even using commercial 3-D printing services like the ones I used for past work projects for scaled prototype automotive components,  on the same size range as these cars, it was over 4 – 6 hours quoted time / part.

Another concern is the length of these cars. The actual Gunderson 3-car prototype is almost 204’ long. The approximate length of each car in O-Scale would be over 16” long. Are there many hobby 3-D printers able to print models of this size?

These are just my opnion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

Maybe a few answers for you on 3D printing.  Entire trolley body shells including interior partitions in O scale are now being printed and are available through Shapeways.  So the issues of size and time are probably not all that serious and also then not a hobby printer exercise.

 

Costs for these trolley shells are ~$200.

 

These shells are also probably considerably more complex, involve more material, and are time costing than the cars being discussed here.

 

 

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
×