Skip to main content

Reply to "Is it time for a new way to control and power our trains?"

I appreciate the earlier comment that we already have an open standard when Lionel released the TMCC codes.

There is an example from computer processors:  the original PCs had 8-bit processors, and now we are at 64-bit processors with hyperthreading and all sorts of cool internal stuff.   You would be amazed at the gymnastics Intel designers have gone through to allow a 64 bit processor to understand and run 8-bit instructions internally.   So the point is, an open standard, even if designed years ago (Intel from the 1970s) , can be maintained through many evolutions into the future.  But, this is expensive: Intel has deep pockets and can support dozens of engineers working for years to develop multiple generations of technology- beyond Lionel's reach to do quickly (a long delay between TMCC and Legacy).  

I am not saying TMCC is the "gold" standard.  Just pointing out that we already have some of the pieces of these desired future systems right now.

The battery issue is interesting:  One idea I find intriguing is to have battery powered locos that have 3-rail pickups and can recharge when running thru or standing on 3-rail track, otherwise 2-rail battery power for the rest of the layout.

Last edited by Ken-Oscale

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
×