I'm under the impression that you use a separate power source for the
accessory ( that most of us have ) and the track cable ( plugged into
the track ) allows you to operate the accessory through TMCC remotes.
Why not take the command signal from the track ? If that is the way it works
not a bad idea. It would be nice to know what is going on inside the
accessory track.
Guess we will find out from Lionel at York....
There really isn't anything Tesla like about plug and plug and plug and plug. But, I assume
that the terminal track with multiple connectors can have the power supply isolated from the track power As a option? I actually thought that the plug and play was going to ease
installation of accessories for the around the tree crowd in relation to a low technical skill
level. I don't understand the marketing decision to segregate product functionality. A decision to run everything across the board motive wise and accessory wise is ideal.
