@Madockawando posted:Yes Shawn, If you refer back to the first post made by @MTH RD, Jon includes my quote so I would be automatically notified of his post. He didn't have to to that when he posted but he did. @ is how you notify people of a thread or post and its a way of inviting someone to the thread. I asked a sincere question and gave clear reasons why I was asking it. Instead of seeing it as an opportunity to inform me more about DCS or swing me over to your way of thinking you have been unwelcoming and called me a troll. You and the other "Anti-Ambassadors" here have made a poor impression on behalf of your favorite train company.
First off I am not an ambassador for any train company. I do how think people should think before they post things such you asking MTH to make a control function more than they already have for a product for one not even released and the fact no way they can add the proprietary hardware to their system to do that....
The same could said for you Mr Fanboy.... In the way you come off on this forum I think @RickO said it best when he stated "You would not want to ruin your reputation on the forum". So I am not the on one who sees it.
I think both companies make great products and I choose which ones I support.
I chose DCS because I needed one unit to run DCS and conventional. Where with TMCC/Legacy I needed a powermaster two brick cables that exceeded the cost of the DCS system to do the same thing. I did use DCS with a TMCC base to control my TMCC engines awesome product feature that again MTH took into account. I am sorry Lionel chose not to and still chose not to do that.
I have lots of both companies products but that is going to change with the new pricing I am still buying form the new catalog just not near as much and I am tech junkie.
I think Atlas has great opportunity here and I hope they seize it.
