Skip to main content

Reply to "Benchwork - Laying Track"

@DoubleDAZ posted:

Mark,

There are already grades of 3.4% and 3.6%, so I'm not sure what John is saying. The Blue tracks are at 7" elevation and the yellow tracks on the left are at 1" elevation for a 6" separation.

The TT is a 34" model with crazy curved 37" whiskers done with flex track on the left and 19"-29" on the top". With a 34" TT, there's no way to fit a Round House because it has a 60"-63" footprint from the center of TT to the back wall of the RH, assuming that large engines will have to fit. The last photo is a view of the original TT configuration I sent John earlier. He moved the double cross and went lower with the elevation change. Going lower is something I always seem to forget.

Final_Rm_Dim_2020_09_15_34_36TT_A 3D

Final_Rm_Dim_2020_09_15_34_36TT_A

test

 

Hi Dave,    I'm looking at having some height changes in track to add interest with trains running over and under each other. I made some poor attempts with setting a high elevation of seven inches and a lower one inch which may not be needed for clearences. Thought using a worst case would be better to see if there was a grade bigger than four degrees. I moved the double crossover to provide a lower grade. The turntable and track coming off of it was to see how much room there is for an engine house or a small round house. Also was trying to keep in mind space for  industries and towns. I loved your putting in the turntable and that area. I have a ross four way hard switch that I would like to use which is why I changed any of your original hard drawing. Almost forgot I have a vascular bridge and a MTH 30" grider bridge that I would like to work in somehow.

Thanks John

Last edited by Aegis21

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
×