Skip to main content

Reply to "Second level height?"

Moonman posted:

Which do you want more...another line for train or command operations?

I see having to tie on to the mountain top in the first photo. The r-loop will mess up the amusement park. Next will be the coaling tower and support scene and the beacon tower.

I would use a pylon style support between the tracks on the way to the next corner. Then, a tower there will need a new home.

Finally, the corner on the transformer table near the wall looks like easy pickin's.

Command operations will necessitate the addition of a Lionel-Lock-on Building for each track or a PSX-AC for fast action circuit protection for the electronics. I suppose that you could get a ZW-C or ZW-L.

It's not just the #990, but the power and control upgrades that will add to the cost.

I would go for the additional line and save command for another layout.

The balloon reverse looks like it takes up too much space. I wanted to see if it would work. (see attached)

 

Carl, What did you use to make the drawing?

 I would like to see more options with the track I have.

I Ordered up a post war 332 arch under bridge for a fit-up idea I am working on for the elevated line long straight section and it looks like I may get my other truss and girder bridges I gave away back because they ended up never getting used. I like the prewar 332 because it used bolts to hold it together and not plastic clips. That will help because I will be removing the ends so it can be driven through underneath.

Tks, Kev.

Last edited by KRM

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
×