I don't really think there is any call for folks to entrench into one "side" or another here. People like what they like for various reasons. There is one thing I'd like to address, however:
GGG: "Boom, hit. BUT... too simple, too inexpensive, so can be have more functionality? Isn't that really CAB-1L the system in the middle? Why not purchase the system that gives you the amount of functionality you want."
I think more functionality would be nice, but I don't think most fans of LC are asking for it. As it stands the LC+ engines do about all most of us want them to. The only issue is bridging the gap between LC and other command systems.
I do not think the CAB-1L is in the middle. it is just a replacement for the original CAB1. a few added features but not much. I expect just as many of these sell to folks so they can run TMCC through DCS than because people think Legacy is too complex. People get stuck in their ways, and the look of a cab 1 that hasn't changes in 20 years is reassuring to some folks. the market for these, however is NOT the same market as for LC/+ engines.
Another issue for many in this hobby is that while we may 'want' all the bells and whistles and sounds and smokes, we just can't afford them. I'm not complaining about the prices of legacy engines, just stating that they are beyond my reach, and that of many others, at this time. Buying a cab1L will not make that legacy engine cost any less. On the other hand, I can afford a $300-400 engine from time to time, and WILL buy one with cruise control and electro couplers from time to time rather than buying a used, 10 year old, TMCC engine for the same price.
Ken-Oscale, I think it is very possible, but do not know if it is worth it for Lionel. The actual parts required, as you suggested, are insanely cheap. Less than $5 in low quantity. Probably half that for a production sized order. In fact, for something as simple as turning 1 or 2 functions on or off the processor on the radio board it's self could be connected right to a relay module. $2 for me to build with off the shelf modules, about $.50 in actual component level parts cost. If I thought there was a market for an independent, non-compatible, wireless accessory and operating car controller, I'd offer one for sale, but the folks that want these sorts of things seem to be firmly entrenched in the high end control systems, so compatibility is a must. That could be done too, but just not worth the bother at this point.
JGL
