Normally the proper way for a city to remove something of value, is to put it up for bid with a "must be removed by" time restriction. Highest bidder gets the train and removes it. If no one bids on it, then action would be taken to have to pay someone to remove it. That action would also go up for bid. Lowest bidder would get the job and charge their bid to remove it. After watching the video of the meeting, it looks like no decision has ever been made. Was the comment about the contractor that received $25,000.00 for removal fact or fiction?
|
|
