Skip to main content

Reply to "Why isn't O Scale 2-Rail more popular with model railroaders? What can be done to increase 2RS's popularity?"

I would also state that it's a technology and availability issue.  In HO scale, I can buy a prototype detailed locomotive that features great detailing, advanced lighting, DCC, and great sound for under $350.   To achieve that in O scale 2 rail, I need to spend north of $700 whether it be to purchase a turnkey Sunset 3rd rail model or spend more money to buy an OMI brass model that I need to install the lighting and DCC in.  Not to mention that in O scale, it's hard for me to buy what I see on the railroads.  If I want to buy a GE ET44AC (Tier 4 GEVO) in HO, I have 2 great options in Intermountain and Scaletrains.  I don't even think the model exists in O scale (MTH?)

I also agree with the space issues.  More people are interested in prototype operation and that requires space to make than just a loop of track around the wall.

Sean

Sean, I agree with your statement but isn't also true than in HO you will need more locomotives to occupy the same space compared to O scale? So when the typical HO guy buys that prototypical locomotive to pull their train won't they want to double head them? Or picture a roundhouse and turntable each occupying the same space. One HO and the other O (could be 3R or 2R). The HO guy is going to have more tracks and will have to buy more engines to fill those tracks.

I think most model railroaders or collectors buy too many trains anyway regardless of scale. We see those comments on here all the time. I just think that whether it is a train layout or wall space the enthusiast will have to buy more HO or N scale locomotives than O scale locomotives to fill the same amount of space and this negates most of the price difference. ALL OPINION.

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
×