Skip to main content

Reply to "Why isn't O Scale 2-Rail more popular with model railroaders? What can be done to increase 2RS's popularity?"

@rdunniii posted:

Seeing comments about MTH's center beam lumber cars all of a sudden where I have not seen them before tells me something.  Now that Midwest has shown samples of their brass version, everybody wants brass quality at MTH prices.  The MTH version is one of their better cars but even if most major inaccuracies are corrected they will not be close to the brass version.  The amount of new tooling or retooling necessary to update the MTH version to an Atlas master line or even trainman version would raise the price of the car to the neighborhood of the new autoracks.

The new Atlas well cars are new tooling Master series.  I do have most possibilities reserved including extras.  The same is true for the new containers they have announced.  With Atlas not doing reruns of their other contemporary cars in the foreseeable future, you takes what you can get.  I'm not sure what prototype well cars they are talking about because I'm not familiar with rebuilt 48' cars with flat sides.  But then Atlas does usually does pick the unusual rather than the common for O Scale.  Disappointing to me but it is what it is.  A standalone version of their 53' Gunderson car would have worked just as well for me.



Regarding Atlas retooling of MTH cars, they should work on the 50' airslide hoppers by thinning down the roof walks and corner stirrup steps. Also the 2 bay ACF 2970 covered hoppers need their roof walks thinned down or have metal roof walks installed instead of plastic.

I don't want to hear that retooling costs too much. If Athearn can do it with all of their former roundhouse cars then Atlas can do it. Over the past 15 years Athearn is forever retooling something. O scale deserves just as much if not more.

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
×