Skip to main content

Reply to "Why isn't O Scale 2-Rail more popular with model railroaders? What can be done to increase 2RS's popularity?"

@Number 90 posted:

Over 20 years ago, I decided against O scale and began to work toward having an O gauge layout, because:

  1. O scale requires more space.
  2. AC is easier to work with than DC for track.
  3. O scale brass locomotives and cars are very expensive.

Item 1 was the most influential factor.  It wasn't difficult for me to learn how to ignore the center rail and enjoy running O gauge trains.  I still spent a lot of money, but have enjoyed my trains and the layout, as well as having met many friendly O gauge modelers.  The trade-off was impeccably detailed equipment versus easy, low stress model railroading.

Tom couldn't have expressed my view any better! 

I modeled in HO since the late '60s, with a dabble in N scale to boot, so I was used to DC.  As my eyesight got worse I considered O scale 2 rail, but with my limited space, I would have had to settle for a switching layout.  I don't really like to do much switching.  I did buy an On30 engine and a couple cars to run on my HO track and built one O scale building kit.  I liked the size of the building kit, but couldn't get enthused with the typical narrow gauge railroading.  So, 10 years ago, I tried O gauge and learned about AC trains, DCS, TMCC.  It was the best choice for me.

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
×