Skip to main content

Reply to "Why so few Vanderbilt Tenders?"

https://ogrforum.ogaugerr.com/...5#153322190445216715 b0

@scale rail posted:

Guys we are getting off subject here. My original question was " Would't it be great for Lionel to offer coal or oil tenders?" The Pacific Steam engine would be a good example. Pacific's ran with coal and oil depending on the road. I'm from the West coast so I always liked oil tenders more than coal. DonDSC_0609

Whether Lionel offers a coal or oil tender is a question that is very different from whether it offers a Vanderbilt tender... I've just finished researching the subject by looking through two reference books that I have with typical collections of steam locomotive photos'.

It is quite clear that the majority of Vanderbilt tenders were coal tenders.  Look at most B&O engines.  The Erie had them on their Pacifics.  CN was suing them on locomotives built as late as 1944.  All were coal.

Oil burners were not all using Vanderbilt's, I think not even a majority.  Look at Santa Fe and Frisco, both mainly oil burners in Texas and west.  All straight tenders.

SP's cab forwards all had straight tenders.

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
×