Skip to main content

Hello Everyone!

I thought it might be helpful to start a 3rd Rail Wishlist thread so that we can have a place to state our requests for future Sunset engines!

I know we all have our favorite engines, and railroads, and I just want to say no matter what my personal favorites may be...  it's nice to see everyone's wishes for what they would like 3rd Rail to make, and I'm all for seeing rare, and new cool steam engines being done. 

My vote, would be for something never before done in O scale...

How about an O scale ATSF 5000 Class Madame Queen?  It could be offered in as built, and in later versions... 

What engines would you like Sunset to make? MQ-1--web-site_c1bf0729-5056-a36f-23bc04c99bcf700b

 

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • MQ-1--web-site_c1bf0729-5056-a36f-23bc04c99bcf700b
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

An Erie K-5-A Pacific would be great for pulling around a set of Golden Gate Depot passenger cars, but any Erie K-1 through K-5 variant would be much appreciated by Erie fans. 

I think there has only been one previous Erie Pacific offering by Max Gray models, but it must be pretty rare because I have yet to actually see one.

Erie loco NJ6899382429_acf1125005_b

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Erie K5
  • Erie Pacific

Well here's a bit of an off the wall suggestion, but how about the Amtrak E60 and E60MA?

We have only had the semi scale Williams engine offered in O gauge, and I belive that neither MTH or Lionel will want to tool up for what is a regionally popular locomotive, which would make it a good candidate for Scott to offer.

It would also go nicely with his scale Amfleet cars due out soon. 

Here are some sample photos I found in various searches as I have been collecting photos for a modeling project, but they are not mine.

The E60 as delivered in 1975: 

image

The Rebuilt E60MA in phase 3 paint:imageimage

They were also used by New Jersey Transit, NdeM of Meixco, and the Black Mesa and Lake Powell Railroad. 

Attachments

Images (3)
  • image
  • image
  • image

A major gap in 3 Rail N&W locomotives is the S1a. The S1a was a 0-8-0 and was used by other railroads as well.  

The C&O's most common switcher engine was the class C-16 0-8-0.  The C-16a was manufactured in 1942 by Lima. They were numbered 240-254. The C-16b was manufactured by Baldwin in 1948. They were numbered 255-284. 

The Virginian Railway bought 15 C-16a's; numbers 240-254. They were classed as SB retaining the same numbers.

In 1954 C&O donated 18 to the Korean National Railway.

The Norfolk & Western bought 30 C-16b's; numbers 255-284. They were classed as S-1 and also retained the same road numbers. Improvements made by the N&W included over-fire air jets, a second air pump, and changes to the walkways.

The N&W then "cloned" these; producing the S1a numbers 200-244. Cab #244 holds the distinction of being the last steam locomotive built for an American Class 1 railroad. As such, it is a significant locomotive in the history of steam. 

Note the unique welded tender. The "USRA" 0-8-0s previously offered don't come close.

0 8 0_1

 

This is a locomotive that should appeal to C&O, VGN, and N&W fans.  Please consider offering additional tenders for separate sale with the various road names.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0 8 0_1
Last edited by Gilly@N&W

I would like a GP9 with their fantastic single motor drive for diesels.    I am also hoping for a second run of the Alco PAs.

Realistically, our requests should go to sunset, not OGR forum.     And a word to the wise, if they do announce something, you have to reserve it, otherwise, no build.    They build to order.

 

I'm still in for C&O / NYC "Super Makido's".

Once again that being C&O's having the flying front pumps on the smoke box,  pilot mounted head/marker lights, and both tenders, Vanderbilt 12 wheeled, and the long 12 wheeled tender that was used on the Kanawha 2700's.

Then the NYC "H10's a/b/c's, with their version of the 12 wheeled tender........Richard Leonard has some beautiful pictures, of these engines.

Both versions have a mega amount of pipe work, and in most opinions, what all of the Makido's should have looked like...

!

Gilly@N&W posted:

A major gap in 3 Rail N&W locomotives is the S1a. The S1a was a 0-8-0 and was used by other railroads as well.  

The C&O's most common switcher engine was the class C-16 0-8-0.  The C-16a was manufactured in 1942 by Lima. They were numbered 240-254. The C-16b was manufactured by Baldwin in 1948. They were numbered 255-284. 

The Virginian Railway bought the C-16a's. They bought 15, numbers 240-254; classed as SB, also retaining the same numbers. In 1954 18 were donated to the Korean National Railway.

The Norfolk & Western bought the C-16b's; numbers 255-284. They were classed as S-1 and retained the same road numbers. Improvements made by the N&W included over-fire air jets, a second air pump, and changes to the walkways.

The N&W then "cloned" these; producing the S1a numbers 200-244. Cab #244 holds the distinction of being the last steam locomotive built for an American Class 1 railroad. As such, it is a significant locomotive in the history of steam. 

Note the unique tender.

0 8 0_1

 

This is a locomotive that should appeal to C&O, VGN, and N&W fans.  Please consider offering additional tenders for separate sale with the various road names.

I second that Tom. I'd also like to see 3rd Rail do an N&W K1. They've done and K3 and K2a before so it would seem a logical choice.

VintageClassics posted:
WITZ 41 posted:

I love wish lists, but they all suffer from the same problem:

A  hundred locomotives that two or three people want instead of two or three locomotives that a hundred people want.

That's often true.... But if more people chime in, as is the point of the thread, we may have something nice for Scott and gang to see what we would like...

Happy to chime in.  I just need 99 more of you to chime in too!  I already talked to Scott about it.  He's not optimistic after offering and cancelling the earlier 3 cylinder version.  Only the SP version was made.  However, I would posit that the late version would have more interest due to period of operation 1942-1954 during steam's zenith.

Like many unique Union Pacific power it's been done in HO but never in O.  UP 4-10-2 (late) #5090-5099.  They used oil tenders converted from the 9000 series.  After being simplified to 2 cylinder operation in 1942 they ran as late as 1954 on the Cajon pass.  Big, Brutish, and Beautiful.

#5097 would be the must have cab number.  It survived in operation the longest.

 DSC08243~4

up4-10-2

UP 4-10-2

The Streamliner Vol. 7 No. 1 has some great photos and info on the 4-10-2s in it's discussion of the Cajon Pass....

The Streamliner Vol. 7 No. 1 CoverThe Streamliner Vol.7 No. 1 pg. 20The Streamliner Vol.7 No.1 back Cover

but alas, there only seems to be a market for more Hudsons or another F3/F7........I'll take my singular wishes and go cry tears of self pity, by myself, curled up in the corner now.....

Attachments

Images (6)
  • up4-10-2
  • UP 4-10-2
  • The Streamliner  Vol. 7 No. 1 Cover
  • The Streamliner Vol.7 No. 1 pg. 20
  • The Streamliner Vol.7 No.1 back Cover
  • DSC08243~4
Last edited by WITZ 41
Joe Congemi posted

I second that Tom. I'd also like to see 3rd Rail do an N&W K1. They've done and K3 and K2a before so it would seem a logical choice.

The K1 is on my short list too. Along with the Z1b. Since this 0-8-0 was common to C&O, VGN, and N&W I had hoped that it would have a better chance of being produced.

Gilly@N&W posted:
Joe Congemi posted

I second that Tom. I'd also like to see 3rd Rail do an N&W K1. They've done and K3 and K2a before so it would seem a logical choice.

The K1 is on my short list too. Along with the Z1b. Since this 0-8-0 was common to C&O, VGN, and N&W I had hoped that it would have a better chance of being produced.

N&W guys,

I would be interested in any of those steamers, too.  I know this was an engine tread, but how about getting some of these done so our engines have some accurate hoppers to pull?  I would love to see Scott do either  one or both in plastic:

 

H9

h10

Attachments

Images (2)
  • H9
  • h10

If there is anything that will get me to spend the money on a 3rd rail locomotive it would be this:

 

My favorite stories from my grandfather's time on the SP were when the first ones came through Englewood Yard in Houston on the way to California.  His eyes always were lit up when telling it.  These wild locomotives from Germany were apparently the talk of the SP system when they first arrived.

Joe Congemi posted:
Gilly@N&W posted:

A major gap in 3 Rail N&W locomotives is the S1a. The S1a was a 0-8-0 and was used by other railroads as well.  

The C&O's most common switcher engine was the class C-16 0-8-0.  The C-16a was manufactured in 1942 by Lima. They were numbered 240-254. The C-16b was manufactured by Baldwin in 1948. They were numbered 255-284. 

The Virginian Railway bought the C-16a's. They bought 15, numbers 240-254; classed as SB, also retaining the same numbers. In 1954 18 were donated to the Korean National Railway.

The Norfolk & Western bought the C-16b's; numbers 255-284. They were classed as S-1 and retained the same road numbers. Improvements made by the N&W included over-fire air jets, a second air pump, and changes to the walkways.

The N&W then "cloned" these; producing the S1a numbers 200-244. Cab #244 holds the distinction of being the last steam locomotive built for an American Class 1 railroad. As such, it is a significant locomotive in the history of steam. 

Note the unique tender.

0 8 0_1

 

This is a locomotive that should appeal to C&O, VGN, and N&W fans.  Please consider offering additional tenders for separate sale with the various road names.

I second that Tom. I'd also like to see 3rd Rail do an N&W K1. They've done and K3 and K2a before so it would seem a logical choice.

Me three!

CSX Troy posted:
Gilly@N&W posted:
Joe Congemi posted

I second that Tom. I'd also like to see 3rd Rail do an N&W K1. They've done and K3 and K2a before so it would seem a logical choice.

The K1 is on my short list too. Along with the Z1b. Since this 0-8-0 was common to C&O, VGN, and N&W I had hoped that it would have a better chance of being produced.

N&W guys,

I would be interested in any of those steamers, too.  I know this was an engine tread, but how about getting some of these done so our engines have some accurate hoppers to pull?  I would love to see Scott do either  one or both in plastic:

 

H9

I would like to see these hoppers too. I think someone has done them in brass, BUT, who the heck can afford to build a train of $300+ hoppers?

As a post WWII and PRR runner, I realize I have a lot of steam to choose from.  However, if 3rd Rail decided to do another PRR steamer these are my choices in order of preference:

-B8a.  A 0-6-0T converted from B8 shifters.  Nice small engine that lasted into 50s.

-K5.  Two were built and they lasted into the 50s.

-K2.  242 K2/K3 were built, and only one K2 remained in 1949.  But that is my era so I'd buy it.

-N2sa.  Don't really need another large engine, but this one is missing from all manufacturers' lineups.  While this was initially a USRA design, all were rebuilt with Belpaire fireboxes starting in 1923.  I would only buy the rebuilt version.

The only diesel I want is a Phase II or Phase III F3 ABA (Phase II early would be great).  Not interested in Phase I, Phase IV or F5.  Right now 3rd Rail's web site states only the Phase IV will be made, probably using some of their F7 tooling.  

Last edited by CAPPilot

I'll dream too and put in a vote for the PRR K2.  A little before my era of modeling, but I'm not past faking it a bit.  It is so homely compared to the K4s.  Got love an ugly steam engine.

The Wyoming is cool, but I don't see 100 orders for it.  Too bad because I just picked up a Locomotive Cyclopedia that has the drawings. 

Other dreams include:

  • CNJ 4-4-2 Camelback
  • CNJ 2-8-0 Camelback
  • CNJ Baby Face Baldwins
  • PRR D16sb
  • FP45 and SDP40F
  • Western Maryland Potomac
  • PRR R1
  • PRR DD2
  • ACS64
  • Metroliners
  • Silverliners
  • EMD EA

 

The list goes on ......

Last edited by GG1 4877
GG1 4877 posted:

I'll dream too and put in a vote for the PRR K2.  A little before my era of modeling, but I'm not past faking it a bit.  It is so homely compared to the K4s.  Got love an ugly steam engine.

 

Well you could do the PRR K3 4-6-2, and that would also allow sunset to do the N&W E3 4-6-2, whom the PRR sold 5 K3 to, thought the N&W supplied their own standard tender (which sunset has done.

image

Image Source: http://www.nwhs.org/archivesdb/detail.php?ID=91279

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • image
superwarp1 posted:

I wonder how many here would actually pony up the money if there wish came true and 3rdrail was to make their engine?   Case in point when 3rdrail didn't get enough reservations for the NYC H10 mikado.

A good point... I for 1 definitely would purchase any of my wishlist engines if 3rd Rail were to make any of them.

I remember back when we tried to get 3rd Rail to do the ATSF 2900 class, and THEY DID! 

It's a shame about the NYC H10 Mikado...  I wonder if perhaps it wasn't the "right time" for it...Perhaps the H10 might do better now or in the near future?

 

 

VintageClassics posted:
superwarp1 posted:

I wonder how many here would actually pony up the money if there wish came true and 3rdrail was to make their engine?   Case in point when 3rdrail didn't get enough reservations for the NYC H10 mikado.

A good point... I for 1 definitely would purchase any of my wishlist engines if 3rd Rail were to make any of them.

I remember back when we tried to get 3rd Rail to do the ATSF 2900 class, and THEY DID! 

It's a shame about the NYC H10 Mikado...  I wonder if perhaps it wasn't the "right time" for it...Perhaps the H10 might do better now or in the near future?

 

 

I'm wondering how the reservations are going for the two Mohawk classes 3rdrail announced last year???  A engine no one seem to ask for.

GG1 4877 posted:

I'll dream too and put in a vote for the PRR K2.  A little before my era of modeling, but I'm not past faking it a bit.  It is so homely compared to the K4s.  Got love an ugly steam engine.

The Wyoming is cool, but I don't see 100 orders for it.  Too bad because I just picked up a Locomotive Cyclopedia that has the drawings. 

Other dreams include:

  • CNJ 4-4-2 Camelback
  • CNJ 2-8-0 Camelback
  • CNJ Baby Face Baldwins
  • PRR D16sb
  • FP45 and SDP40F
  • Western Maryland Potomac
  • PRR R1
  • PRR DD2
  • ACS64
  • Metroliners
  • Silverliners
  • EMD EA

 

The list goes on ......

Other than something interesting like a side rod electric like DD2 the others are neat but probably a small target audience.   The O1's are still often seen and both them and the L1s were not the quickest sell-outs so it seems that either PRR stuff sells slow (worked out?) or is made in too high of run numbers.  Only the manufacturer knows that.

Surprised the FP45/F45 hasn't been done.  It has a lot of curb appeal.   Athearn got a lot of miles out of the HO version (or was it AHM with the N scale one - getting too old to remember!).

Love them even though they are out of my era.  I recall a post by Number 90 where Tom said they were noisy to run due to the enclosed/full carbody.    Still wished I would have been able to have some of his right hand cab seat time.  

Last edited by Rule292
superwarp1 posted:

I wonder how many here would actually pony up the money if there wish came true and 3rdrail was to make their engine?   Case in point when 3rdrail didn't get enough reservations for the NYC H10 mikado.

I stood by my word and purchased the GGD Amtrak Slumbercoach, The Amtrak decorated El Capitan, the Amtrak Superdome, 

IMG_20180110_125504760

and have on order the PRR heavyweights: dinner, baggage and RPO!( To go with my one or two Sleeping cars that arrived last year!)

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_20180110_125504760
Last edited by prrhorseshoecurve
M J Breen posted:
GG1 4877 posted:

I'll dream too and put in a vote for the PRR K2.  A little before my era of modeling, but I'm not past faking it a bit.  It is so homely compared to the K4s.  Got love an ugly steam engine.

 

Well you could do the PRR K3 4-6-2, and that would also allow sunset to do the N&W E3 4-6-2, whom the PRR sold 5 K3 to, thought the N&W supplied their own standard tender (which sunset has done.

image

Image Source: http://www.nwhs.org/archivesdb/detail.php?ID=91279

 

It may be a Pacific type wheel arrangement but for two popular railroads along with that funky looking trailing truck and it being an older PRR steam class  never been done in O scale or three rail before would sell better than the monotonous PRR L1 that has flooded the market for the past decade.

To the Most Knowledgeable All-seeing, All-knowing, Great Manufacturer 3rd Rail,

Please allow me to enjoy before I croak (I will be 70 in May) the most illustrious of all smelly diesel locos, the most famous Milwaukee SDL-39. Please. Thank you, I plead, beg what ever it takes, Please.

Dick

 

texastrain posted:

Texassp

   ATSF also used the German manufactured engines.  They used a hydraulic powered motoring system, one reason why they were not used for as long a time.  I, too, have always wished they would be produced in O scale/gauge modeling.

Jesse      TCA

Jed

None of my Santa Fe books even indicate that Santa Fe ever tested a Krausse-Maffei locomotive, let alone owned one. 

SP and D&RGW are the only roads that bought K-M's and even the Rio Grande trio eventually went to the SP.

However, in February 1963, the New York Central tested two Rio Grande K-M's for 19 days.

Rusty

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Jed
Last edited by Rusty Traque
CBQer posted:

To the Most Knowledgeable All-seeing, All-knowing, Great Manufacturer 3rd Rail,

Please allow me to enjoy before I croak (I will be 70 in May) the most illustrious of all smelly diesel locos, the most famous Milwaukee SDL-39. Please. Thank you, I plead, beg what ever it takes, Please.

Dick

 

Oooo!.....I like it!

Groveling to the drumbeat of mortality!

Now, why didn't I think of that?

I'm with Santiago.........Rock Island 4-8-4, coal & oil, either 5000's or 5100's.  Beautiful locomotives, which operated all over the CRIP system, including Chicago, Omaha, Twin Cities, Kansas City, Denver, Colorado Springs, Tucumcari NM, Dallas/Ft worth, Lincoln NE.  So these locomotives could be an addendum to almost any modeler's roster of SP, CBQ, Milw, DRGW, etc.

superwarp1 posted:

I wonder how many here would actually pony up the money if there wish came true and 3rdrail was to make their engine?   

Well, I stepped up on the N&W K2a, M, and TE-1. Bought the K3 on the secondary market. It was offered before I became active in the hobby again.

The only reason I didn't buy the Y6b; I already had the Lionel JLC. "Good enough" in my book.

If a K1, S1a, or Z1b is offered, I'm getting them even if something else gets sold-off.

Last edited by Gilly@N&W

Milwaukee Steam Power

Northern Pacific Steam Power

SP&S Steam Power

Steam that's never been offered in O scale.

I love Steam but I see that these could be hot sellers.

FM Erie Built AB units. Those would go great with the GGD Hiawatha passenger set.

Amtrak Cascades Talgo Set would be cool. Never offered in O scale or any other scale.

A better model of the Amtrak GE P42 than MTH with more prototypical detailing.

ALCO Century Series. C636's which have never been done on O scale.

 

 

Last edited by Bruk

I'm with Mark S,  Central Vermont T3a 2-10-4. smaller, 60" drivers, Elasco feed water heater, Vandy tender

and a popular road name with a great splash of color on the tender. This engine would stand out chugging

along with a string of milk cars  on anyones layout. Would love to see Scott put this

engine out for a reservation trial balloon ,  I think he'd be surprised at the level of interest in producing 

this locomotive.

 

Screen Shot 2018-03-09 at 7.04.41 AM

 

a

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Screen Shot 2018-03-09 at 7.04.41 AM
Daniel Raible posted:
J 611 posted:

I would like a properly detailed N&W 611 excursion version.

That's an interesting one.

I think the excursion version has a dual headlight - are there any other defining features?

 Not sure if it was just on the 611 or all of the later J's, but the earlier ones had rounded tender tank tops (as modeled by sunset) and 611 has a flat top today. 

roll_the_dice posted:

Let's get this back to the top...  I would like to see a 4-6-2 light pacific or similar, painted black, but undecorated to any road name.  This way we could letter it to any road name we wanted.  This would help with obscure road names not being done.

This is a very interesting idea.  If there is any chance said light pacific could be stretched into a Erie prototype with a little work (detailing & decaling) on my part, I would be 100% in.

CAPPilot posted:

As a post WWII and PRR runner, I realize I have a lot of steam to choose from.  However, if 3rd Rail decided to do another PRR steamer these are my choices in order of preference:

-B8a.  A 0-6-0T converted from B8 shifters.  Nice small engine that lasted into 50s.

-K5.  Two were built and they lasted into the 50s.

-K2.  242 K2/K3 were built, and only one K2 remained in 1949.  But that is my era so I'd buy it.

-N2sa.  Don't really need another large engine, but this one is missing from all manufacturers' lineups.  While this was initially a USRA design, all were rebuilt with Belpaire fireboxes starting in 1923.  I would only buy the rebuilt version.

The only diesel I want is a Phase II or Phase III F3 ABA (Phase II early would be great).  Not interested in Phase I, Phase IV or F5.  Right now 3rd Rail's web site states only the Phase IV will be made, probably using some of their F7 tooling.  

Relooking what I wrote earlier, I realize that I really only need/want/desire two engines, the B8a and F3 Phase II/III ABA consist.

I do not need, nor want, any more large steamers.  The B8a would be a nice small steamer for yard work.

I only have one freight diesel, an Erie Built AB consist.  I would like an F3 (Phase II/III only) ABA set to give me another freight option, but right now 3rd Rail is only doing the Phase IV.  May have to wait a few years for this one.

Well, with the failure of the Santa Fe 2-6-2 to generate much interest, I think more Santa Fe steam is only wishful thinking for a while, so don't faint, I am actually going to suggest foreign line engines.

Frisco had very neat and well-maintained locomotives.  I could get a Frisco caboose or three Frisco passenger cars and use a small Frisco steam engine on an imaginary train on the high plains.  Even better would be an engine from the Frisco subsidiary, Quanah Acme & Pacific.  I think they both rostered 4-6-0's.

But Scott has tried to offer Frisco in the past, and not enough interest was forthcoming.  So, something that might sell and I might buy would be a Southern Pacific 4-6-2.  Scott offered such an engine, oh, I don't know, maybe 10 years ago.  Maybe it could work again, especially in light of the Harriman cars recently produced.

I won't hold my breath, though.  Big 4-8-4's and articulateds seem to be what the market wants.

Last edited by Number 90
CAPPilot posted:
 

Relooking what I wrote earlier, I realize that I really only need/want/desire two engines, the B8a and F3 Phase II/III ABA consist.

I do not need, nor want, any more large steamers.  The B8a would be a nice small steamer for yard work.

I only have one freight diesel, an Erie Built AB consist.  I would like an F3 (Phase II/III only) ABA set to give me another freight option, but right now 3rd Rail is only doing the Phase IV.  May have to wait a few years for this one.

Looks like I got my wish on the F3.  Do to the similarities between the F3 Ph IV and the F7, 3rd Rail has decided to make a F3 Ph II engine instead, at least for the PRR according to Jonathan.  Not sure about the other roads.  Their web site now says they are making Ph II through Ph IV but has not yet provided any additional information.

daylight posted:
milwrd posted:

Milwaukee Road Mallet 2-6-6-2.

Image result for milwaukee road mallet 2-6-6-2 pics

They did these engines years ago ( not mallets) with the shroud over the boiler.  I had one but didn't think the Milwaukee road was a choice.  Like small Berkshires.

 

Hot water I know you can correct me regarding type

It's not a shroud.  It's a Coffin Feedwater heater. 

Coffin Feedwater heaters could also be recessed into the smokebox as on some Frisco 2-8-2's:

2-8-2 SLSF 1355

Rusty

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 2-8-2 SLSF 1355
  • mceclip0
CAPPilot posted:
CAPPilot posted:
 

Relooking what I wrote earlier, I realize that I really only need/want/desire two engines, the B8a and F3 Phase II/III ABA consist.

I do not need, nor want, any more large steamers.  The B8a would be a nice small steamer for yard work.

I only have one freight diesel, an Erie Built AB consist.  I would like an F3 (Phase II/III only) ABA set to give me another freight option, but right now 3rd Rail is only doing the Phase IV.  May have to wait a few years for this one.

Looks like I got my wish on the F3.  Do to the similarities between the F3 Ph IV and the F7, 3rd Rail has decided to make a F3 Ph II engine instead, at least for the PRR according to Jonathan.  Not sure about the other roads.  Their web site now says they are making Ph II through Ph IV but has not yet provided any additional information.

While I did get my F3 ABA Ph II wish, the B8a tank engine is still on my 3rd Rail wish list.

B8aT

Attachments

Images (1)
  • B8aT

For those who like Union Pacific power, as I do, and I know enough have been made already.  But, for something a little different, the U.P. ALCO made C855/C856 units of the early Century Series engines.

And, as Tom stated, would really like to see more Frisco and QAP engines from the turn of the 20th century to the 1940s periods.  AS for passenger. a model of the streamliner passenger the QAP ran on it's short line between Frisco and Santa Fe mains, and the Frisco Firefly.   As well as the one that started this off, the Santa Fe Madame Queen.  Have seen and photographed her many times, to have a scale model would be great!

Jesse   TCA    12-68275

Last edited by texastrain
texastrain posted:

And, as Tom stated, would really like to see more Frisco and QAP engines from the turn of the 20th century to the 1940s periods.  AS for passenger. a model of the streamliner passenger the QAP ran on it's short line between Frisco and Santa Fe mains, and the Frisco Firefly. Jesse   TCA    12-68275

The Frisco Firefly streamlined 4-6-2 was the engine that I was referring to as not being produced.  Scott Mann cataloged it in early-2000's catalogs, but it did not generate enough orders for a production run.

Maybe a second attempt would work, since Scott now can do smaller numbers of an engine.

TM Terry posted:

I was excited about the upcoming L&N FA-2 offering by 3rd Rail. Ordered one, then they announced the L&N FA-2 would be L&N's 1960's paint scheme. So much for a transition era L&N FA-2 offering.

That project is well into next year at this point.  Nothing has been set in stone for the FA-2 project.  I would think it is likely we will do the early scheme for L&N.  Scott takes his best guess with photos or other artwork to start.  Send him an email on your interest as others would likely prefer the same scheme. 

Right now 3rd Rail is knee deep in finishing E5 & E6s while also getting heavily into the F3 project.  Geeps will be next.  FA's likely after that if orders come through.

So GG1 4877 posted:
TM Terry posted:

I was excited about the upcoming L&N FA-2 offering by 3rd Rail. Ordered one, then they announced the L&N FA-2 would be L&N's 1960's paint scheme. So much for a transition era L&N FA-2 offering.

That project is well into next year at this point.  Nothing has been set in stone for the FA-2 project.  I would think it is likely we will do the early scheme for L&N.  Scott takes his best guess with photos or other artwork to start.  Send him an email on your interest as others would likely prefer the same scheme. 

Right now 3rd Rail is knee deep in finishing E5 & E6s while also getting heavily into the F3 project.  Geeps will be next.  FA's likely after that if orders come through.

So the GP7 and GP9 will be produced before Alco FA’s?

GG1 4877 posted:
TM Terry posted:

I was excited about the upcoming L&N FA-2 offering by 3rd Rail. Ordered one, then they announced the L&N FA-2 would be L&N's 1960's paint scheme. So much for a transition era L&N FA-2 offering.

That project is well into next year at this point.  Nothing has been set in stone for the FA-2 project.  I would think it is likely we will do the early scheme for L&N.  Scott takes his best guess with photos or other artwork to start.  Send him an email on your interest as others would likely prefer the same scheme. 

I had ordered the L&N FA-2 when the initial announcement was made. The drawing on their website showed the transition era colors. A couple months later the drawing was replaced with a photo of the 1960’s paint scheme. I called and canceled my order.

I will get back on board when I feel assured that the transition era paint scheme is one of the L&N FA-2’s being offered.

GG1 4877 posted:

Ron,

Yes, the PRR F3 will be phase II.  We will be reviewing the first round of factory drawings this weekend at Scott's office just after he gets back from his latest trip to China.  There is a lot to review!  I have my order in for an AB in PRR myself.

I have some F3’s in order when will we see delivery,thanks

MR-150 posted:

I have some F3’s in order when will we see delivery,thanks

Scott will know more than I would.  E6s are in progress so I'm just guessing that the end of the year is a reasonable time frame. 

jonnyspeed posted:

GGD passenger cars: Erie Stillwell coaches

Hmmm.... I just bought a book that has the plans for those along with all the mid Atlantic RR suburban coaches except for the CNJ standard coach which was the one I was looking for!   

I would guess a hard sell to get the numbers for such a unique car in anything but brass, but who knows?

GG1 4877 posted:
MR-150 posted:

I have some F3’s in order when will we see delivery,thanks

Scott will know more than I would.  E6s are in progress so I'm just guessing that the end of the year is a reasonable time frame. 

jonnyspeed posted:

GGD passenger cars: Erie Stillwell coaches

Hmmm.... I just bought a book that has the plans for those along with all the mid Atlantic RR suburban coaches except for the CNJ standard coach which was the one I was looking for!   

I would guess a hard sell to get the numbers for such a unique car in anything but brass, but who knows?

Scott liked the Stillwell idea AND I posted a poll on the 2 rail Facebook group and after just 2 days 11 people would purchase 1-9 cars and 2 would purchase 10+.

Agree!  E1 and E1b..... and later E2....  Would be nice to be possible for having an example of each in the line of E series motive power.

As for the Frisco and connecting line, the QA&P:   Many lines ran the same engines in that period of the early 20th century.  To have some available in a choice of lines, such as....   4-4-0 Americans in correct detail and paint for the QA&P...……. 4-6-0  in correct for QA&P/Frisco/T&P        2-10-0  Decapods for the same lines as mentioned.    In fact, to have a choice of popular and often used engines on Short Line Rails, and anyone produce passenger/freight cars also correct for such, even undecorated so they can be detailed specific to any Short Line.

I know, it can be a tall order for any company.  But, to allow modelers to have representation of the many Short Lines in our country.  Many of the large, and too often modeled, major railroads were at times dependent upon the Short Lines.

Jesse   TCA   12-68275

CSX Troy posted:

I would still LOVE to see Scott make an accurate N&W hopper - either HL / H9 2 bays or H2 / H2a 3 bay in plastic to go along with the Y6's from a few years ago:  

        N&W H9 HopperN&W H2a

You can find the mondo-heavy Atlas HL/H9 cars, likely on ebay, or elsewhere. The 3-bay cars are only available in brass, from (my experience) Precision and KTM. If you're really lucky you may find one of these painted and decaled...why, you ask? Because only Champ made decals for them (H2a).
If someone had produced the cars in plastique I would have bought several..I'm filled up, after years of looking & bidding.

rex desilets posted:
CSX Troy posted:

I would still LOVE to see Scott make an accurate N&W hopper - either HL / H9 2 bays or H2 / H2a 3 bay in plastic to go along with the Y6's from a few years ago:  

        N&W H9 HopperN&W H2a

You can find the mondo-heavy Atlas HL/H9 cars, likely on ebay, or elsewhere. The 3-bay cars are only available in brass, from (my experience) Precision and KTM. If you're really lucky you may find one of these painted and decaled...why, you ask? Because only Champ made decals for them (H2a).
If someone had produced the cars in plastique I would have bought several..I'm filled up, after years of looking & bidding.

And the H2 were leased to the PRR as well. I am surprised that Atlas O and/ or Weaver models and/ or MTH didn't make an accurate H2.

Instead of making a  locomotive that was built for only one railroad, I would like to see manufacturers build a compliment of USRA locos that all the rail lines owned.  Maybe a stock 0-6-0, 0-8-0, 2-8-0, 2-10-0, OR 2-8-2. It would nice to have these also done in undecorated so we can decal them for our own favorite line. Then a larger number of us can have these on our layouts in the road we model instead of having to deal with unwanted road names. The HO people have been doing this for years that's why HO is so big. You can model your favorite road and get a locomotive livery without having to settle.

Allan E posted:

Jonathan;

Speaking of being knee deep (btw my favorite brewery) in E6s, is there any chance they will be ready for delivery at O Scale West?

Allan

Allan,

When I last spoke to Scott just before he left for York, he told me that it looks like the E5/6 run will leave the factory in May.  Give it a month on the water along with customs and it sounds like a June delivery for these.  Wish I could make O Scale West!  Not in the cards this year. 

I've enjoyed a few Knee Deep brews myself!

GG1 4877 posted:
Allan E posted:

Jonathan;

Speaking of being knee deep (btw my favorite brewery) in E6s, is there any chance they will be ready for delivery at O Scale West?

Allan

Allan,

When I last spoke to Scott just before he left for York, he told me that it looks like the E5/6 run will leave the factory in May.  Give it a month on the water along with customs and it sounds like a June delivery for these.  Wish I could make O Scale West!  Not in the cards this year. 

I've enjoyed a few Knee Deep brews myself!

Jonathan;

Cheers!

Allan

third rail posted:

Instead of making a  locomotive that was built for only one railroad, I would like to see manufacturers build a compliment of USRA locos that all the rail lines owned.  Maybe a stock 0-6-0, 0-8-0, 2-8-0, 2-10-0, OR 2-8-2. It would nice to have these also done in undecorated so we can decal them for our own favorite line. Then a larger number of us can have these on our layouts in the road we model instead of having to deal with unwanted road names. The HO people have been doing this for years that's why HO is so big. You can model your favorite road and get a locomotive livery without having to settle.

I made a similar suggestion melgar_comment  earlier in this thread but no one has expressed agreement. It seems to me that everyone wants their favorite locomotive to be selected but, unless it's from a major railroad, it doesn't generate enough support. There were 12 USRA locomotive designs ranging from switchers to articulateds, to which 1856 locomotives were built while USRA was in existence and 3251 copies were made afterwards. USRA and USRA-derived designs ran on 97 railroads. It should be possible to build basic tooling to produce brass or die cast models with accurate prototypical details for many actual locomotives. This approach would also be more likely to generate sufficient orders for cost-effective production. And, for me, models of smaller locomotives would be just as welcome as larger ones.

MELGAR

Last edited by MELGAR

At my club EVERYONE has a 4-8-4 because all the manufacturers made tons of them, but no one has or runs switch engines. It's one thing to run a long train with a big engine at the point. But it's just as satisfying to break up that train and make a new one for the next run. IMO switching a yard or industrial sidings can be more fun than watching a train chase its caboose . If manufacturers could bring to market a reasonably priced switch engine and continue to produce it over the years, there would be enough interest amongst us hobbyists that they would not have to resort to "built to order" sales. I would rather buy 4 switchers for the price of one $2000 built to order road engine that I have no use for. What I'm  saying is I think built to order stifles the hobby because if not enough preorders are received the company does not manufacture the product. 

third rail posted:

At my club EVERYONE has a 4-8-4 because all the manufacturers made tons of them, but no one has or runs switch engines. It's one thing to run a long train with a big engine at the point. But it's just as satisfying to break up that train and make a new one for the next run. IMO switching a yard or industrial sidings can be more fun than watching a train chase its caboose . If manufacturers could bring to market a reasonably priced switch engine and continue to produce it over the years, there would be enough interest amongst us hobbyists that they would not have to resort to "built to order" sales. I would rather buy 4 switchers for the price of one $2000 built to order road engine that I have no use for. What I'm  saying is I think built to order stifles the hobby because if not enough preorders are received the company does not manufacture the product. 

I would say that the odds of 3rd Rail making a $500 switch engine, multiple times, is probably close to Nil.  LOL, I think I have better odds (maybe not by much! ) of seeing a Reading K-1 or even a Reading I-10 2-8-0 made.

Maybe at $700 - $800, Lionel or MTH could make a decent die-cast switch engine. I don't see this happening in brass.

Jim

A very large number of steam engine model types has already been produced in die cast and brass. Many of the less common types suggested here do not seem to get enough of a response to be cost-effective for production. Maybe the question to ask is - is production of the types of engines proposed in this thread feasible at anything like current pricing or has it just become too expensive even for the small number of relatively affluent buyers who are active in the high-end O scale/gauge market?

For many years, I would have liked to buy a New Haven I-5 4-8-4, although I already own the nice model that was made by Weaver. But, at likely current prices, I would not buy.

Just my thoughts...

MELGAR

Last edited by MELGAR
third rail posted:

At my club EVERYONE has a 4-8-4 because all the manufacturers made tons of them, but no one has or runs switch engines. It's one thing to run a long train with a big engine at the point. But it's just as satisfying to break up that train and make a new one for the next run. IMO switching a yard or industrial sidings can be more fun than watching a train chase its caboose . If manufacturers could bring to market a reasonably priced switch engine and continue to produce it over the years, there would be enough interest amongst us hobbyists that they would not have to resort to "built to order" sales. I would rather buy 4 switchers for the price of one $2000 built to order road engine that I have no use for. What I'm  saying is I think built to order stifles the hobby because if not enough preorders are received the company does not manufacture the product. 

I agree that there are not nearly enough "small" steam engines on the market.  3rd Rail has offered several over the years, but the reality of the marketplace (at least in the case of 3rd Rail / Sunset universe) is that R&D, parts sourcing, assembly, management, and several other functions cost about the same regardless of the size of the locomotive.  That $2000 Big Boy doesn't correlate to four 0-6-0's on a 1:1 basis.  It is more likely that the smaller engine runs in the $1400-$1500 range.  Buyers then react negatively to the price for the relative size of a switcher.  That is why you see so many 4-8-4 and articulated locomotives.  People buy them.

Here is one that 3rd Rail has a few left in stock of. 3rd Rail SP 0-6-0

The other reality of the marketplace is that we are not likely going to see any new cast steam locomotive tooling unless there is a huge resurgence in O scale.  The only way Lionel, MTH, and Williams can produce these at current costs is by amortizing the initial tooling cost over a lot of runs and many years.  With the decline in interest in O scale steam in general, producing new tooling is very risky for any company producing O scale product and could put a company out of business.  This is the main reason behind the Lionel hybrid concept.  Brass bodies over existing cast drive systems.  Brass doesn't require the tooling investment, but of course has a higher labor cost.  The result is less models can be produced to meet true market demand.  

Built to order only exists because inventory is a terrible business plan in this era.  Case in point is the JLC Silver GG1.  Many were manufactured, but demand turned out to be poor and what was a $800 locomotive went for $500 on discount to clear warehouse space.  Big boxes filling a warehouse cost money.  Those "blowout" models were likely either sold at cost or at a discount. 

I'm not trying to be negative at all about the suggestion for small steam.  I would love some steam switchers balance my roster. 

third rail posted:

No diecast engine is worth $700-800. I think manufacturers go for unique locomotives to cater to the pure collector market. If you sold 5000 $500 engines, you gross $2.5 mil. Do you think you can convince 1250 people to order a one of a kind locomotive to generate the same sales?

Again with this being a wishlist for 3rd Rail product, we can't get 75 orders to move a steam locomotive into design in most cases.  1250 orders is extremely rare anymore.  Consider that the Vision Line Big Boy was a huge success for Lionel and it only received a total of a little over 1000 units from what I understand. 

What an engine is worth is up to the buyer to decide.  Price is a function of what it costs to manufacture it plus a small profit to keep the manufacturer in business.

Last edited by GG1 4877
GG1 4877 posted:

That $2000 Big Boy doesn't correlate to four 0-6-0's on a 1:1 basis.  It is more likely that the smaller engine runs in the $1400-$1500 range.  Buyers then react negatively to the price for the relative size of a switcher.

Probably true. But I might be a buyer for a smaller locomotive in the $1400 price range but definitely not a big steam engine for $2000.

MELGAR

Last edited by MELGAR

Hi there,

I'd buy 3 each of Norfolk and Western K1 engines and/or Class A engines.

I'd buy 2 each of Norfolk and Western Z1b engines and/or S1/S1a engines.

Several Z1b engines also went to Rio Grande, I do believe. It's just another legitimate name to put on them.

Sunset could easily do a better Class A than anything that is out there now. I'd think there would be an appetite for this iconic engine to be done well.

 

I guess that I would like a reasonably priced small  engine that many roads owned over an engine that only 1 road had. I have more use for a switcher on my point to point industrial layout than a big road engine.  But I think that if it comes down to oddball locomotives, my vote would go for the Santa fe hinged boiler articulated.  At least it would look decent going around O-72 curves!

I am also a big fan of small steam engines.  I own two of the recent 3rd Rail SP switchers.  They are fantastic engines.  My only complaint is the lack of a working coupler on the front of the locomotive.  Thankfully, I operate two rail equipment, so I only have to retrofit a Kadee coupler, not the larger tinplate coupler.  Considering even Lionel puts front couplers on their steam switchers, I was hoping for more, but beggars can't be choosers.

As far as wishlist locomotives (the point of this thread), anything Lackawanna (DL&W) or a re-run of SP Pacifics with skyline casings.  A diesel switcher, such as an Alco S-2 would be fantastic.

K-5a-011
 

FYI...

http://mattforsyth.com/?p=31

Matt Forsyth

Forsyth Rail Services

 
 
Daniel Raible posted:

An Erie K-5-A Pacific would be great for pulling around a set of Golden Gate Depot passenger cars, but any Erie K-1 through K-5 variant would be much appreciated by Erie fans. 

I think there has only been one previous Erie Pacific offering by Max Gray models, but it must be pretty rare because I have yet to actually see one.

Erie loco NJ6899382429_acf1125005_b

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • K-5a-011
Last edited by Penn Division
christopher N&W posted:

Hi there,

I'd buy 3 each of Norfolk and Western K1 engines and/or Class A engines.

Can't afford but one, but, this one is at the top of my list.

I'd buy 2 each of Norfolk and Western Z1b engines and/or S1/S1a engines.

A couple of S1a's would be nice.

Several Z1b engines also went to Rio Grande, I do believe. It's just another legitimate name to put on them.

Sunset could easily do a better Class A than anything that is out there now. I'd think there would be an appetite for this iconic engine to be done well.

I'd like to see an original version.

 

 

rex desilets posted:
CSX Troy posted:

I would still LOVE to see Scott make an accurate N&W hopper - either HL / H9 2 bays or H2 / H2a 3 bay in plastic to go along with the Y6's from a few years ago:  

        N&W H9 HopperN&W H2a

If you're really lucky you may find one of these painted and decaled...why, you ask? Because only Champ made decals for them (H2a).

Not true. Here is a link to Great Decals. He makes an excellent set of N&W hopper decals in all scales.

Last edited by Big Jim
Big Jim posted:
rex desilets posted:
CSX Troy posted:

I would still LOVE to see Scott make an accurate N&W hopper - either HL / H9 2 bays or H2 / H2a 3 bay in plastic to go along with the Y6's from a few years ago:  

        N&W H9 HopperN&W H2a

If you're really lucky you may find one of these painted and decaled...why, you ask? Because only Champ made decals for them (H2a).

Not true. Here is a link to Great Decals. He makes an excellent set of N&W hopper decals in all scales.

Well, the site says they are new, so I may be forgiven for not knowing.

However...the decals are for the 2-bay cars. I have a few sets of those from other mfgrs; what am I gonna do for dimensional & weight data???

rex desilets posted:
Big Jim posted:
rex desilets posted:
CSX Troy posted:

I would still LOVE to see Scott make an accurate N&W hopper - either HL / H9 2 bays or H2 / H2a 3 bay in plastic to go along with the Y6's from a few years ago:  

        N&W H9 HopperN&W H2a

If you're really lucky you may find one of these painted and decaled...why, you ask? Because only Champ made decals for them (H2a).

Not true. Here is a link to Great Decals. He makes an excellent set of N&W hopper decals in all scales.

Well, the site says they are new, so I may be forgiven for not knowing.

However...the decals are for the 2-bay cars. I have a few sets of those from other mfgrs; what am I gonna do for dimensional & weight data???

Rex,

IIRC, the Yoder cars are at least 10 years old and from what I have seen, the earliest runs were nothing more than factory painted brass bodies that were not lettered at all, nor did they come with trucks.    They run about $150 - $175 each and still need trucks and decals.   Even if you can get decals for any of the Yoder versions that may need them,  to be honest the only examples I have seen that actually look good were done with dry transfers and those are no longer available.    In fact, most N&W guys I know of in O scale  hoard those dry transfers for some odd reason, even though they have plenty of finished cars to last their lifetime.   I believe later runs of the H2a's did come factory lettered with Yoder trucks but those are usually about $325 - $375.   The Yoder cars are an excellent, high quality model, but investing 20 - 30 grand in a model of an N&W coal train is just not feasible for me.

Also, even if you were good with the upfront cost, I have reservations about the weight of having  50 or more of these in a train along with the die-cast Atlas cars mixed in as well.   I have a couple examples of most versions for testing, but If I get to pick, I would prefer to have them all in a high quality plastic version.  

Last edited by Former Member
Big Jim posted:
christopher N&W posted:

Hi there,

I'd buy 3 each of Norfolk and Western K1 engines and/or Class A engines.

Can't afford but one, but, this one is at the top of my list.

I'd buy 2 each of Norfolk and Western Z1b engines and/or S1/S1a engines.

A couple of S1a's would be nice.

Several Z1b engines also went to Rio Grande, I do believe. It's just another legitimate name to put on them.

Sunset could easily do a better Class A than anything that is out there now. I'd think there would be an appetite for this iconic engine to be done well.

I'd like to see an original version.

 

 

Me too! I would LOVE  a Class A - probably would take more than 1.  I would also take any example of the K class. 

rex desilets posted:
what am I gonna do for dimensional & weight data???

You might send Bill a note and ask about making decals for three bays, or, maybe there are data from other sets that might work,  or, you can drop back ten and piece 'em together from where you can find them. I will say that these decals are very sharp and mingling brands of lesser quality might not look very good. Or, you can go strictly two-bay! 

Last edited by Big Jim
Penn Division posted:
K-5a-011
 

FYI...

http://mattforsyth.com/?p=31

Matt Forsyth

Forsyth Rail Services

 
 
 

 

Wow, very nice!  Hopefully someday either I can find one of those older Max Grey's to fix up, or a newer version is released.  Personally it wouldn't matter much which of the K-series locos were released (beggars can't be choosers), but anything which would help to approximate this Erie Limited scene would be most welcome!

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Erie_Limited
CSX Troy posted:
Big Jim posted:
christopher N&W posted:

Hi there,

I'd buy 3 each of Norfolk and Western K1 engines and/or Class A engines.

Can't afford but one, but, this one is at the top of my list.

I'd buy 2 each of Norfolk and Western Z1b engines and/or S1/S1a engines.

A couple of S1a's would be nice.

Several Z1b engines also went to Rio Grande, I do believe. It's just another legitimate name to put on them.

Sunset could easily do a better Class A than anything that is out there now. I'd think there would be an appetite for this iconic engine to be done well.

I'd like to see an original version.

 

 

Me too! I would LOVE  a Class A - probably would take more than 1.  I would also take any example of the K class. 

We would also be interested in any of these. Would especially like the K1 and S1/S1A. Multiples likely depending on the cost.

Hi All! Just had to resurrect this thread as there was SO MANY responses for so many engines that have yet to be made!

So let's have at it again, what would you like 3rd Rail to make? Personally, I like everyone's suggestions and value them as much as my own, I'd love us all to see various examples of engines that have never been made before. Perhaps, even a revamp of ones that have but with 2020 tech?  Nothing wrong with updating something done over 20 years ago... But still so many items that have never been done need to be made!

So, let'hear what you want Sunset to make! My vote is the RF&P 4-8-4 ! 

DSC08420

The Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad bought five 4-8-4 type locomotives from the Baldwin Locomotive Works in 1937, and assigned them road numbers 551 through 555. Not wanting to use the generally accepted "Northern" name the RF&P named each of the new locomotives for a Virginia Civil War general. These five "Generals" had 77" drivers, 27 x 30 cylinders, a 275 psi boiler pressure, a tractive effort of 66,500 lbs and each weighed 446,040 pounds.

In 1938, six more 4-8-4s were acquired from Baldwin (road numbers 601 through 606). Each was named for a Virginia governor. These locomotives had 77" drivers, 27 x 30 cylinders, a 260 psi boiler pressure, a tractive effort of 62,800 lbs and weighed 408,400 pounds. In 1942, another six (road numbers 607 through 612), identical to the 1938 "Governors", were added to the roster and each of them was also given a name of a Virginia governor.

10 more 4-8-4s were delivered by Baldwin in 1944 or 1945 and were assigned road numbers 613 through 622. They were identical to the "Governors" but were each given a name of a Virginia statesman.

After receiving the first five, the RF&P called its 4-8-4s "Generals". As it added the "Governors" the older 4-8-4s were still called "Generals" while the newer 12 were called "Governors". After it received the last 10 which were named for Virginia statesmen it had three different names for the 4-8-4 wheel arrangement.

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • DSC08420: RF&P 4-8-4
Last edited by VintageClassics
VintageClassics posted:

Hi All! Just had to resurrect this thread as there was SO MANY responses for so many engines that have yet to be made!

So let's have at it again, what would you like 3rd Rail to make? Personally, I like everyone's suggestions and value them as much as my own, I'd love us all to see various examples of engines that have never been made before. Perhaps, even a revamp of ones that have but with 2020 tech?  Nothing wrong with updating something done over 20 years ago... But still so many items that have never been done need to be made!

So, let'hear what you want Sunset to make! My vote is the RF&P 4-8-4 ! 

DSC08420

The Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad bought five 4-8-4 type locomotives from the Baldwin Locomotive Works in 1937, and assigned them road numbers 551 through 555. Not wanting to use the generally accepted "Northern" name the RF&P named each of the new locomotives for a Virginia Civil War general. These five "Generals" had 77" drivers, 27 x 30 cylinders, a 275 psi boiler pressure, a tractive effort of 66,500 lbs and each weighed 446,040 pounds.

In 1938, six more 4-8-4s were acquired from Baldwin (road numbers 601 through 606). Each was named for a Virginia governor. These locomotives had 77" drivers, 27 x 30 cylinders, a 260 psi boiler pressure, a tractive effort of 62,800 lbs and weighed 408,400 pounds. In 1942, another six (road numbers 607 through 612), identical to the 1938 "Governors", were added to the roster and each of them was also given a name of a Virginia governor.

10 more 4-8-4s were delivered by Baldwin in 1944 or 1945 and were assigned road numbers 613 through 622. They were identical to the "Governors" but were each given a name of a Virginia statesman.

After receiving the first five, the RF&P called its 4-8-4s "Generals". As it added the "Governors" the older 4-8-4s were still called "Generals" while the newer 12 were called "Governors". After it received the last 10 which were named for Virginia statesmen it had three different names for the 4-8-4 wheel arrangement.

 

I second this!

Trainbros89 posted:
VintageClassics posted:

Hi All! Just had to resurrect this thread as there was SO MANY responses for so many engines that have yet to be made!

So let's have at it again, what would you like 3rd Rail to make? Personally, I like everyone's suggestions and value them as much as my own, I'd love us all to see various examples of engines that have never been made before. Perhaps, even a revamp of ones that have but with 2020 tech?  Nothing wrong with updating something done over 20 years ago... But still so many items that have never been done need to be made!

So, let'hear what you want Sunset to make! My vote is the RF&P 4-8-4 ! 

DSC08420

The Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad bought five 4-8-4 type locomotives from the Baldwin Locomotive Works in 1937, and assigned them road numbers 551 through 555. Not wanting to use the generally accepted "Northern" name the RF&P named each of the new locomotives for a Virginia Civil War general. These five "Generals" had 77" drivers, 27 x 30 cylinders, a 275 psi boiler pressure, a tractive effort of 66,500 lbs and each weighed 446,040 pounds.

In 1938, six more 4-8-4s were acquired from Baldwin (road numbers 601 through 606). Each was named for a Virginia governor. These locomotives had 77" drivers, 27 x 30 cylinders, a 260 psi boiler pressure, a tractive effort of 62,800 lbs and weighed 408,400 pounds. In 1942, another six (road numbers 607 through 612), identical to the 1938 "Governors", were added to the roster and each of them was also given a name of a Virginia governor.

10 more 4-8-4s were delivered by Baldwin in 1944 or 1945 and were assigned road numbers 613 through 622. They were identical to the "Governors" but were each given a name of a Virginia statesman.

After receiving the first five, the RF&P called its 4-8-4s "Generals". As it added the "Governors" the older 4-8-4s were still called "Generals" while the newer 12 were called "Governors". After it received the last 10 which were named for Virginia statesmen it had three different names for the 4-8-4 wheel arrangement.

 

I second this!

Preach it Brother!  

RF&P 553 named General J. E. B. Stuart

Let's hear them requests Folks! 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • RF&P 553 named General J. E. B. Stuart
Last edited by VintageClassics

Interesting to reread this....with above posting about die cast cost vs. quantity saleable, no wonder l find little new in the Big Two catalogs.  3rd Rail/Sunset appears to be the last hope for new and different prototypes, except for the Lionel hybrid, and l fear that will be limited locos from only most popular roads.  Still think there ought to be enough York attendees to have seen #90 on the Strasburg (across from the Pa. RR museum, no less), that it would sell.  The N&W 4-8-0 on the Strasburg sold. Has an HO model of #90 been made, that would sell in their gift shop, and be my mantelpiece?

colorado hirailer posted:

Interesting to reread this....with above posting about die cast cost vs. quantity saleable, no wonder l find little new in the Big Two catalogs.  3rd Rail/Sunset appears to be the last hope for new and different prototypes, except for the Lionel hybrid, and l fear that will be limited locos from only most popular roads.  Still think there ought to be enough York attendees to have seen #90 on the Strasburg (across from the Pa. RR museum, no less), that it would sell.  The N&W 4-8-0 on the Strasburg sold. Has an HO model of #90 been made, that would sell in their gift shop, and be my mantelpiece?

I Agree Colorado Hirailer... Sunset is our last, BEST, hope for rare prototypes... 

You make a very good point how  the N&W Strasburg sold, and it's not mainstream popular, yet it knocked it out of the park!

If you notice, the New haven stuff ALWAYS sells too, time and time again... and it's not a popular road. Another road that sells INCREDIBLE is Lehigh Valley, of all. Remember the John Wilkes Booth Streamlined 4-6-2s, and Black Diamond? They ALWAYS sell... It just proves everything you are saying, and how well it sells, if it's made... David

well OK here is my  2 cents. to go with the T&P 2 10 4  . Texas and Pacific 4 8 2 mountainsThere was 2 classes of these with and without FWTR  900-909 , These were used on there passenger trains for there Texas eagle trains. They were Eagle blue and Eagle gray  with silver and yellow stripping , silver lettering outlined in black edging  on the letters and numbers.

Bob

Attachments

Images (2)
  • T&P 907 M2 4 8 2
  • T&P 907 4 82 2
Last edited by Bob Harris
Bob Harris posted:

well OK here is my  2 cents. to go with the T&P 2 10 4  . Texas and Pacific 4 8 2 mountainsThere was 2 classes of these with and without FWTR  900-909 , These were used on there passenger trains for there Texas eagle trains. They were Eagle blue and Eagle gray  with silver and yellow stripping , silver lettering outlined in black edging  on the letters and numbers.

Bob

Hi Bob! Great idea!! Those locos would be gorgeous, and an excellent compliment to the 3rd Rail T&P 2-10-4 

DSC05003DSC04996DSC04995DSC09094DSC09093DSC09092

Attachments

Images (6)
  • DSC05003
  • DSC04996
  • DSC04995
  • DSC09094
  • DSC09093
  • DSC09092

Modernized 1929 Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R67 4-8-4; one could be done with a red boiler, as was done for the 1933 World's Fair. And/Or the WWII R67. Both are very handsome machines and  ran to many locations populated by other railroads. For example, Rock Island 4-8-4's bedded down in the Rio Grande's Burnham Roundhouse in Denver. The Rock Island interchanged with the Espee in Tucumcari, NM, etc.

Mike DeBerg posted:

A few ideas on locos that might meet the bar and provide some opportunity for market differentiation

ET44AC 

Dash-9

SD70/75 including a standard cab

SW1500

 

The first and the last above I have tried many time with Scott.  Ends up being in the same boat as the SD/GP40-2, less than half the required interest.  Why anyone wants another GP7/9 from probably the only manufacturer that has not done them when they are available all over the place?  I have no clue.  Same as the Kraus Maffei.  But people reserve them so they get done.

And what is getting the most interest here in steam?  NW class A, another huge locomotive.  So it probably has a decent chance.

VintageClassics posted:
Bob Harris posted:

well OK here is my  2 cents. to go with the T&P 2 10 4  . Texas and Pacific 4 8 2 mountainsThere was 2 classes of these with and without FWTR  900-909 , These were used on there passenger trains for there Texas eagle trains. They were Eagle blue and Eagle gray  with silver and yellow stripping , silver lettering outlined in black edging  on the letters and numbers.

Bob

Hi Bob! Great idea!! Those locos would be gorgeous, and an excellent compliment to the 3rd Rail T&P 2-10-4 

DSC05003DSC04996DSC04995DSC09094DSC09093DSC09092

Well these are nice the black version is the most accurate. The blue is way off the color chart for what they used. It is just like the E 6 color which the RR called Eagle Blue and Eagle Gray these were painted this way to run with the New Texas Eagle consist because the streamline cars and the E 6 had not arrived net from the builder in 1948 . When they arrived the steamers were kept painted this way and used for stand by power when needed.

I am with you. I would love to have these In O scale model from but doubt if it will ever happen. It took me 5 years to convince Scott to do the 2 10 4 , and the CGW model helped to get the Texas.

But who knows. All it takes is the reservations, so who else would want these, I will take 2 blue and 1 black.

Bob H

 

 

third rail posted:

I guess that I would like a reasonably priced small  engine that many roads owned over an engine that only 1 road had. I have more use for a switcher on my point to point industrial layout than a big road engine.  But I think that if it comes down to oddball locomotives, my vote would go for the Santa fe hinged boiler articulated.  At least it would look decent going around O-72 curves!

If you have a point to point layout, why are you concerned with getting around O72 curves????? 

Some of us actually read these posts! LOL

Simon

I'm always surprised that there isn't more love for the Reading.

The Philadelphia and Reading Railroad (P&R) was one of the first railroads in the United States.  No doubt, it was also one of the nation's most important carriers of coal (anthracite, the best!), as well. 

Couple this with the fact that the Reading Lines were located in one of the country's model railroading hubs (eastern PA) and the fact that The Blue Mountain and Reading Railroad still operates on some of the Reading's original track. 

Yet, there have been very few scale Reading models made, just Pacifics and T-1's

Jim

jd-train posted:

I'm always surprised that there isn't more love for the Reading.

The Philadelphia and Reading Railroad (P&R) was one of the first railroads in the United States.  No doubt, it was also one of the nation's most important carriers of coal (anthracite, the best!), as well. 

Couple this with the fact that the Reading Lines were located in one of the country's model railroading hubs (eastern PA) and the fact that The Blue Mountain and Reading Railroad still operates on some of the Reading's original track. 

Yet, there have been very few scale Reading models made, just Pacifics and T-1's

Jim

Hi Jim,

I believe that the Reading is INDEED popular... One note to mention is that Reading #2100 and #2102 are both close to being fully restored, and restored engines always sell, just like the Strasburg engine...

Reading does very well, time and time again with Broadway Limited always doing the T-1, and Not to mention the Not to Shabby Lionel legacy T-1 is pretty darn nice. But that being said, nothing like a brass...  

But to lend support that the Anthracite railroads sell well, look at the Weaver Streamlined Lehigh Valley 4-6-2s, and their 4-8-4 Lackawanna, those engines time and time again sell for a hefty resale value, and they start huge bidding wars on ebay! As much as a 3rd Rail Articulated! It's true...

I too would love to see some Reading... And with that said, how about a Reading K-1 2-10-2?

rdg-3006-1krdg-3013-1k

Attachments

Images (2)
  • rdg-3006-1k
  • rdg-3013-1k

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×