Just for reference, here's a 736 and a 2046. This is a later Berk with the plastic sided trail truck, headlight wedge, dull plated rods, and heat stamped number. The 2046 has the simplified bell casting, no decorative whistle, different position slot for the E-unit lever, and the one piece boiler front. Some of the earlier Berks also had the 3 pane windows like this 2046.
Jim
Thanks, Jim. Same motor ?? Mine are packed away. Very frustrating. Only steam I have out is a 1615. Have to dig a Berk out.
Jim,
Totally different motors. The Berkshire is a single worm drive system while the 2046 is a spur gear driven motor like most of the other postwar Lionel steam engines. Only the Berkshires, turbines, and 773 Hudson had the worm drive systems.
Jim
Everyone raves about the 8-wheel worm drive of the 736. But my own experience with them isn't that great... The motor is geared only to the rear-most axle, and power is transmitted to the other wheels through the drive rods. If the rods aren't lubricated, the holes wear wide, causing erratic operation. The bushings of the rear axle also tend to wear in an oval shape, which causes the rear wheels to rub against the frame, and binding. Even after substituting a larger 25-tooth worm wheel in 1948, the gear ratio is only 8.33 to 1. This is pretty tall, which gives a high top speed, but not very much low speed torque.
Meanwhile the 2046 and 2035 have a spur-gear mechanism similar to the prewar 226, albeit with lighter-gauge aluminum sides and magne-traction. The gear ratio is about 11-to-1. That means more RPM and more torque. The spur gears do a better job of transferring power equally to all six wheels. Pulling power is mostly about the weight (and on steel rails, magnetraction) but unless the 736 is much heavier, I would put my money on a 2046 or 2035, especially on tight O31 curves.
As Lionel moved away from 1950, I do believe that tooling got worn, and manufacturing tolerances declined. So a late-1950s 646 might not run as quietly as the original 2046. My $.02
C W Burfle posted:Isn't the 2035 being brought into this thread a 'prairie' type 6 wheel driver. The 726 & 736 are 8 wheel.
As is the 2046 Mentioned earlier. The 2046 uses the same boiler casting as a postwar Berkshire, but does not have a boiler front that opens.
I always noticed that the 2046 does not have the side marker jewels on the front classification lights above the boiler front, and the Berkshires did. Just one more thing differentiating the upper line engine.
Dieseler posted:A good maintained "46" berk with the dual worm drive with its drive train in good shape in my opinion cannot be beat ......
That's what I've always heard - the '46 Berk, the first Postwar, which had the dual worm drive, was the best of the bunch.
So, I stand corrected, the 726 is a Post war item, I was misinformed. Keep the comments coming fella's, this is a great discussion and very educational!
The other postwar steamer with a worm drive motor is the 746 N&W J. Per Greenbergs Repair and Operating Manual, "The motor and reversing unit of this locomotive are identical to those used in No. 736. The frame and drive gear are very similar to 736 and most of the parts are interchangeable." It uses the 2046 front truck.
In Roger Carp and Bob Kellers "100 Years of Toy Trains" (Kalmbach), they relate how the 736 Berk helped create the 746 J. "...O gauge enthusiast...John Van Dyck...starting with a Lionel 2-8-4 Berkshire...refashioned it in 1955 to resemble a J by creating a bullet nose for the boiler, adding two wheels to the pilot, and moving the drive rod to the second wheel." It spurred Lionel to develop the J for sale in 1957.
30 years later in 1987 Lionel introduced the Rock Island 4-8-4 Northern, a new boiler on the "tried and true chassis...of the...J..." (Greenbergs Lionel Trains 1987-1995 by Michael Solly) Two similar Northerns followed with the third (Northern Pacific) being a smooth runner with a well made Berk style motor. The first two had almost universally poor running Berk motors. The warning is not to buy one of those unless you test run it first.
Michael Solly also says the 1992 Mikado (Southern) uses a "...prototypically correct body, but still riding on the sturdy Berkshire frame." The later NYC and Denver and Rio Grande Mikados I suppose are also on the Berk chassis. I have the NYC version and someday I will check to see if it is a Berk chassis. Interestingly, these locos have can motors rather than the open frame AC motors of the Berkshire. The new Lion Chief Berk will use a can motor. Once it is delivered we will need to see it the motor mounting is the same as that used in the Mikado. And it will be fun analyzing this new Berk and comparing it to all the previous Berks, 2046s, Js, Northerns, and Mikados.
After reading all these great postings I would not be surprised if we are only "scratching the surface on what there is to know about the Berkshire and its relatives.
Jeff
My 736 will pull about 22 cars of lionel boxcars.I not really sure is that the most it will pull.Because I have a lot of mth, weaver,kline.But I bet it would pull a lot of mpc cars.
Jeff2035 posted:The other postwar steamer with a worm drive motor is the 746 N&W J.
Jeff
I knew I forgot one in my list! Thanks, Jeff.
Should probably also mention the MPC engines based on the Berkshire mechanism such as the UP, Southern, Great Northern, etc. engines. These were Berks, Mikados and Northerns, in that order, if memory serves me. These ran just as well as the postwar Berks they were based on.
Jim
Ted, I agree with you that the #736 drive isn't so hot. I converted mine to PS2, and when running slowly, one could really see the erratic operation. I replaced bushings, axles, rods, even bushed the rods, all to no avail.
My 736 was always one of my smoothest and best runner. Will have to dig it out and give it a good look.
Correction. Before leaving for work I checked my NYC scale Mikado (same design as Solly referenced Southern Mikado of 1992) and it is definitely not on the Berk chassis. The wheel base on the new Mikados is much longer than the Berks and also have lubrication ports.
Team,
Looking for a little help, can anyone tell me what year this is from? I was hoping this might be 1957 to 1960 but per the article posted I am a little confused. I think it is 1950 - 1951 as I assume those are the flagstaffs on the front pilot - Little help please.
I am looking for a 1957.
he Lionel Lines Berkshire Type 2-8-4-Locomotive No. 736 replaced the No. 726 in 1950 and would continue to be available until 1968. This was the longest production of any Lionel locomotive during the Post War period. This locomotive came with Magnetraction which was the most significant alteration from the previously issued No. 726. Also gone were the Baldwin disc zinc rimmed driving wheels. There were a number of other distinct changes that occurred over the production period of this locomotive. These are listed below: |
2. Those engines built in 1950 and 1951 have large rubber-stamped number on the cab. All other issues, with the exception of some late post war period releases, would have smaller heat stamped numbers. |
The one pictured shows a set of characteristic characteristics that doesn't pinpoint it into one of the variations mentioned on the quoted Tandem Associates Postwar Identification page:
*Flagstaffs
*Shortened Pickup Roller Assembly
*3 Window Cab
*Sheet Metal Trailing Truck
Correct, that is why I am confused. Per the report:
Flagstaffs appear on the pilot in early issues. The earliest issued had hexagonal bases, while later issues had round bases and were sometimes painted BLACK. These extra detail parts would be eliminated after 1956.
Variation B: WHITE heat-stamped cab numbers, four cab windows, flagstaffs and a die-cast trailing truck (1953-1954). This has 3. says should have 4.
WHITE heat-stamped cab numbers, four cab windows, flagstaffs and a die-cast trailing truck (1953-1954).
Says in 1957, Lionel changed the center rail pick-up assembly to a shorter, smaller roller assembly that was held in place by one screw. This has that. but the body makes me think this is 1957 motor with a different body.
1. Where the bodies interchangeable?
2. Could this be a rebuild?
Kevin
PSU1980 posted:
1. Where the bodies interchangeable?
2. Could this be a rebuild?
Yes & Yes
So it is possible the motor is 1957 and the shell is from 1956 or earlier?
Access to this requires an OGR Forum Supporting Membership
