I am trying to find a ballast that I like for my upper level Milwaukee Road branch line. I want it to look different than my lower level high volume BNSF & UP mainlines.
I want a typical Midwestern look of gravel, not crushed rock.
I ballasted the track beside my river valley with sand. I like the color, but felt the granules were too small or fine. So, I went to Menards tonight and got the next step up in coarseness. I put it on a short section of track to see what I think. Here are a couple pictures so you can give me your opinion.
Oh, I forgot to mention this sand cost me $2.50 for 50 pounds.
Thanks for taking the time to give me your two cents worth.
Art
Replies sorted oldest to newest
I think it looks great. Throw in the fact it's $2.50 for 50 lbs and it becomes a no-brainer.
-Greg
I like it. I would drop a magnet in the bag of ballast to make sure it is not ferrous. If it sticks to the magnet, it will also stick to your expensive motors and magna-traction.
Chris Sheldon
Looks Really Good To Me!
Chief Bob (Retired)
Art,
I really like it. The second picture really shows the detail and it looks great.
Nice choice.
Tom
Art, that really looks good. Can't beat the price.
Bob
Looks great. Many people tend to use stuff that is too big.
Art, do you have the product or SKU number of the sand you purchased? I really like how this looks! Wonder how it would look with O Tubular track?
Rusty
Art that ballast looks very life like. It's probably one of the best I've seen. I particularly like how there's a mixture of granule size. It's a winner for sure. BTW what road bed are you using? The way it tapers looks fantastic.
Are you sure this is sand? It is much coarser than the sand I am used to seeing. Whatever it is it is perfect. Nick
It looks OK, if you like it use it. But... I have never seen ballast with so much variability in size. You show some pieces almost large enough to span the distance between ties. You might try straining your ballast to get a more consistent size - the smallest range of stones look OK to me.
Here is what I like for the edges of my Fastrack: its actually two sizes mixed together to get the range or stones that looks to me, to be accurate for the range that I see.
I counted the number of stones spanning the distance between ties on the mainlines around here (North Georgia), and tried to get a mix with the same count. That will of course vary from location to location. Anyway bottom line is if you like it, go with it, the appearance is good.
Attachments
Diverging Clear posted:Art, do you have the product or SKU number of the sand you purchased? I really like how this looks! Wonder how it would look with O Tubular track?
Rusty
Rusty it is marketed at Menards as Traction Sand. Their SKU #1891087.
Art
Attachments
I think that looks great. I have some sections I'd like to try that on. What's the Menard's SKU number?
wild mary posted:Art that ballast looks very life like. It's probably one of the best I've seen. I particularly like how there's a mixture of granule size. It's a winner for sure. BTW what road bed are you using? The way it tapers looks fantastic.
Thanks, Nick. I use Woodland Scenics foam roadbed, but there is nothing on this sample. I just laid in on the wood piece to see what it would look like. I just shaped it with a large paint brush.
Art
I like the variations in color and size, and the price is exactly in my cheapo wheelhouse -- good choice!
I agree with everyone else Art. I think it looks great!
Im liking it!!
Same here Art, looks good!
That stuff NAILS it, Mr. Art!
Paul.