Skip to main content

I'm thinking of restoring the smoke unit for an NS caboose 6-19711. It had a metal tube with a really thin resistance element inside. I think it was around 65 ohms which would dissipate in command mode, 18 vrms, about 5 watts. That's a bunch. It was probably "designed" for conventional and I figure around maybe 12 vrms max giving a power dissipation of about 2.2 watts. Seems reasonable. I know that fan driven smoke units would be really best. I debated just eliminating the smoke unit but thought better of it. Why not restore something to better than it was. And no parts were available on this smoke resistor unit.

I think I will just restore the smoke unit to sort of stock but for command, with a tiny switch underneath, and let it go at that.

Any thoughts about the power? I think a skinny 68 ohm resistor and a diode in series would be just about right. There was no packing in this vertical tube. Just a vertical resistor stick and an epoxy sealed bottom where the wires came out so the fluid would just pool around the resistor and hopefully drift upward.

Any thoughts?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Yes. Just a vertical tube with a long skinny resistor in the middle. If there was ever packing, there's no sign of it. I can't decide if it would be better to pack it or not pack it To encourage vapor to waft out of it. It gets pretty hot at 200 deg F as far as the plastic near it is concerned. I'm doing about 1.5 watts or so at command voltages. 

Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

1.5 watts wouldn't vaporize much, are you sure?  FWIW, all the caboose smoke units I've taken apart have had some wick material around the vertical resistor.  I've never gotten much smoke from any of them, which is why I do the fan driven smoke mod if I want smoke.

Doesn't seem to. I think I'm done with this experiment. I need to select a caboose and put one of these really neat things in it...

 

MTH HO Smoke Unit

Attachments

Images (1)
  • MTH HO Smoke Unit
Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

That's the ones I use.   I use a variable eBay power source with some diodes to drop the voltage to the motor.  I find I get pretty good smoke in the 4-5 volt range, and I have four diodes to drop the motor voltage down to the 2.5-3.5 volt range.  The little motor doesn't want to see more than that.

Thanks for that...hadn't even thought about the difference in HO or Command O in using this smoke unit. Very helpful.

Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

1.5 watts wouldn't vaporize much, are you sure?  FWIW, all the caboose smoke units I've taken apart have had some wick material around the vertical resistor.  I've never gotten much smoke from any of them, which is why I do the fan driven smoke mod if I want smoke.

I went back to 18 vrms without the diode...so that is around 5 watts and packed the smoke cylinder about half way up and around the resistor. Now I get a wisp of smoke out which is nicely visible. And the side of the caboose did not get as hot as before. I think vaporizing the fluid takes quite a few calories and keeps the assembly cooler on it's outside edge.

Chuck, I'd be careful.  If you can, put some aluminum tape between the side of the caboose and the smoke unit to reflect some heat.  I know that I've seen a number of cabooses with melted sides from the smoke unit overheating.  I'm very leery of using the stock smoke units for any length of time on a caboose.  The fan driven unit doesn't get nearly as hot on the sides as it's moving air, and I can't even detect a temperature rise on the outside of the caboose with one of those running.

 

Not having one myself, I just searched youtube for smoking cabooses and clipped the following from the first few videos that came up.  Is this the desired effect?  Can smoke units without a fan generate enough of an updraft to create the desired effect? 

 

To GRJ's point, it seems that over-powering the heater element to "push" a fraction of the smoke out the top is a risky business.  That is, it sure seems smarter to run the system at a lower power level while powering a fan to blow all or most of the generated smoke out the top.  Is this is inertia from manufacturers from when small inexpensive DC motor weren't readily available?

 

caboose smoke

Attachments

Images (1)
  • caboose smoke

Stan, very few stock smoking cabooses look like that, especially under way!  Most of the time you can barely see the smoke when it's sitting still.  That moving one almost has to have a fan driven smoke unit or they're melting the side something awful!

 

Where did you find those, I don't see them searching for "smoking cabooses" in Google images.

 

Here's a Youtube video, but he says he cranked it up to 18 volts, and I'll bet this one isn't rated for command!

 

 

Here's another one, but same comment.

 

Last edited by gunrunnerjohn

I searched Google videos (as opposed to images) for smoking caboose, and took snapshots of the videos I thought relevant.  The PRR image is from your 2nd video for example.

 

I'm trying to figure out what's going on.  There have been several recent threads on OGR about melting smoking caboose.  As I stated above, if you have to crank up the voltage to 18V command to get the desired level of smoke - but then the caboose melts - then contact Houston because we have a problem.  But if as you say (and what makes sense to me) you need a fan-driven unit to get the desired smoke at a safe operating temperature, then so be it.  In which case, someone needs to put together a how-to with the specific fan-driven smoke unit and whatever electronics is needed to drive it.

 

Other threads discussing how to reduce command voltage to safely generate wisps of smoke that can't be seen when moving seem to be a dead-end...in my opinion that is.

Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

Stan, very few stock smoking cabooses look like that, especially under way!  Most of the time you can barely see the smoke when it's sitting still.  That moving one almost has to have a fan driven smoke unit or they're melting the side something awful!

 

Where did you find those, I don't see them searching for "smoking cabooses" in Google images.

 

Here's a Youtube video, but he says he cranked it up to 18 volts, and I'll bet this one isn't rated for command!

 

 

Here's another one, but same comment.

 

I wish my cabooses smoked half that well.  I just ended up with melted roof and no smoke in conventional.

If you really want to use the caboose smoke, I'd seriously consider a buck/boost power supply and the fan driven unit for conventional.  This will give you constant smoke over a wide range of voltages, and you can control the intensity of the smoke with the voltage of the power supply.  The smoke unit also runs a lot cooler and it's much easier to keep it from melting anything.  In one I did, I managed to mount the supply so I could drill a small hole in the frame and adjust the voltage without opening the caboose up.  I think I'd probably try to remove the adjustment pot and position it so I can do that for installations in the future, it was very convenient.

 

gunrunnerjohn posted:

That's the ones I use.   I use a variable eBay power source with some diodes to drop the voltage to the motor.  I find I get pretty good smoke in the 4-5 volt range, and I have four diodes to drop the motor voltage down to the 2.5-3.5 volt range.  The little motor doesn't want to see more than that.

Always interested in smoke help, even from 5 years ago.  I frequently use the dc to dc min. boards for LED lighting and I am wondering why you wouldn’t just use 2 boards, one for the smoke and one for the motor, both attached to the same rectifier?  Do you put the diodes in series?  Is that a more desirable arrangement?  Your comments are very helpful-thank you. 

 

 

 

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×