Skip to main content

As I start building my layout I need more power then what I have. I want a modern transformer to go along with my post war TW that will be used to power accessories and lights on the layout.

I was thinking of going with a few CW-80's,   This new layout will be mostly ran by transformer instead of my CAB2 or Cab 1L.  I will mostly be running MPC era trains but want a modern transformer for when I want to put on my scale Legacy stuff for it to take a few loops.  

So are CW-80s really that bad? It seems I can pick up a few pretty cheap.  They are easy to use and my 6 year old knows how to use them.  Are the breakers fast enough if I do derail with one of my Legacy locomotives?  

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I think that any of the G variant (label on underside I believe) and beyond are just fine and should be a great fit with modern motive power.

As long as your child understands how the power "ramps up" after pressing the direction button, then you should be fine for traditional control.

 

If you go by the common wisdom of many folks that seem to know what they are talking about, the CW80 is about the worst choice you can make.  On the other hand, the actual design looks pretty good, and I don't know why it wouldn't work out just fine.  

I've been offering to pay the shipping to anyone that actually wants to throw away a CW80 for years now, and as yet no one has taken me up on the offer.  Email is in the profile for any takers.  

As for the breakers, the CW80 does not use a 'breaker' but rather has a circuit that detects when there is too much current draw and lowers the output.  As I understand it, this works very fast, but may be the source of some of the reported failures.  The most common thing to fail seems to be the cooling fan, which can be replaced somewhat easily.  

Over all, I have nothing against the CW80, however, unless you can get them dirt cheap,  you'll probably get more bang for your buck with other choices.  Properly reconditioned post-war transformers are good choices, especially the ZW and KW.  

JGL

I was in my LHS the other day. Lady comes in with one, totally failed. It was a recent unit out of a RTR set.

I had one. Got it in a PRR Flyer set, Christmas 2004. It worked - sort of. I eventually transitioned to MTH Transformers (better quality IMO) but kept the CW80 for accessory and Bump and Go Trolley operation. It worked OK for that, I really liked the programmable accessory voltage options.

All buttons - direction, whistle, bell - failed on mine. The cooling fan also began making a horrific "chain saw" sound.

Last weekend I decided to upgrade my older MTH transformers with 2 new Z-4000s. In the process, I cut the cord off the CW80 and threw it in the trash.

JD, The enclosed picture is of my layout transformers, they are used to control the trains only. I have been using these for over 8 years and have had NO problems whatsoever! I know a lot of people hate CW80's,  They work great for me! There are 8 and no failures, it works for me! I run postwar, and newer equipment to include Lionel, MTH, and Wiliams!

Old Uncle Al

Attachments

Images (1)
  • transformers
Last edited by Old Uncle Al

I used them for a long time with no issues, mostly for auxiliary power.

I took one apart that was stuck on full power. Just for fun I'm attaching  a few of the pictures . 

I was  thinking someone  someday might want to know what's inside one.

And by the way Lionel replaced 3 for me at once from old ready to run sets that were all stuck full power.

I'm pretty sure you want the ones with the G on the serial number. All the ones that I had issues with did not have the G serial number. The replacements from Lionel did.

Larry

DSCN3926DSCN3906DSCN3928DSCN3901

Attachments

Images (4)
  • DSCN3926
  • DSCN3906
  • DSCN3928
  • DSCN3901

Interesting to see the "guts" of one of those things.

I had several of the earlier versions but tossed them a long time ago because they did not perform well with various makes or models of trains and trolleys that I have. The noise of the fan also was a bit annoying, at least for me.

I imagine more recent models would have had any problems corrected. I really liked the appearance of the CW-80.

Last edited by Allan Miller

For what you are looking to use it for, I would think it should work. Remember, it is only 80 watts, so it is not really made to run multiple trains.

Also, if you ever plan to use command control, people have had problems with the chopped sine wave. However, I believe you can run it at full power in a command environment, and the sine wave is not as distorted at a full 18 volts. Don't use it with an MTH PS-1 engine. That is where I have heard the biggest issues. 

If you need more power, the Lionel GW is a very good option.

George

Firewood

A suggestion. If you still have it.

Send Lionel a e-mail, tell them it died with the problem, after sending you a shipping  number bet ya they will tell you to cut the cord  and  mail it.

Then they will send you a recondition one.  Just saying.

I know things have changed recently, but you can test the waters to see.

Larry

PS. Just try it. All three of mine were out of warranty. I had a dozen or more RTR sets at the time and couldn't even tell them which set.

They were very nice about it.

Old Uncle Al posted:

JD, The enclosed picture is of my layout transformers, they are used to control the trains only. I have been using these for over 8 years and have had NO problems whatsoever! I know a lot of people hate CW80's,  They work great for me! There are 8 and no failures, it works for me! I run postwar, and newer equipment to include Lionel, MTH, and Wiliams!

Old Uncle Al

Nice line up; what's the large (white?) unit off to the right of this picture? I see what looks like a couple of MRC-looking knobs on it...

 

Mark in Oregon

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×