Skip to main content

Several years ago I bought a manual O-36  switch. Shortly after removing the switch from the box the switch stand broke. I've attempted to fix it several times, only to see it break again and again.IMG_20170501_173733072

Now I'm sure these stands are okay on a layout, but for us carpet central modelers and those with grabby kids and grandkids. There needs to be a better solution. I took the old switch stand and reverse engineered the main shaft. I created a strong, short racor target switch signal, that you can use to switch your manual tracks, using a free 3d design program. I had this switch signal then rendered in stainless steel. 

IMG_20170501_173759724

This signal is very strong, and the internal switch mechanism would break before this would.

IMG_20170501_195842672IMG_20170501_195720392

Attachments

Images (4)
  • IMG_20170501_173733072
  • IMG_20170501_173759724
  • IMG_20170501_195842672
  • IMG_20170501_195720392
Last edited by Tom M
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Mike H Mottler posted:

A Modest Proposal:

Patent the switch control lever and license it to Lionel as the solution to an initial design fault with the Fastrack manual switches.

Mike

 

I don't know if they would be interested. I mean they sell replacement parts, but they're just as flimsy as the original switch stand. I saw an old thread where someone bought 10 replacement switch stands. That's a little ridiculous.

The press fit sounds good - better than the small indicator that breaks off. The grandkids, 4 & 5, have three on their layout. Two are broken, but the handle is still there and one is surviving. I think they learn not to man handle it, but stuff still gets dropped on it.

You little one went right to turning it - already knows what to do - he seemed surprised when you asked him to pull it off.

Nice job on the part - I think I'll try a few - Thank You!

Last edited by Moonman

I just ordered for of these "flag" style switch flippers ... and would take four "round heads" if you made them.   Just pick the ones I like best I guess.  (I assume about the same cost).

BTW that reminds me somehow -- I have this 3D model of european engine someone sent me.  It's in autocad format I think.   Can I just upload that to shapeways and get a cost estimate in stainless?

I best it would be several hundred...  still... kind cool if they could print it.

 

Severn posted:

I just ordered for of these "flag" style switch flippers ... and would take four "round heads" if you made them.   Just pick the ones I like best I guess.  (I assume about the same cost).

BTW that reminds me somehow -- I have this 3D model of european engine someone sent me.  It's in autocad format I think.   Can I just upload that to shapeways and get a cost estimate in stainless?

I best it would be several hundred...  still... kind cool if they could print it.

 

I'm going to start working on a knob switch ASAP. Shapeways has certain file type requirements for uploading. They also have many mediums available to render models including many types of plastics and steels. They also have silver, brass, bronze, gold, aluminum, and believe it or not, sandstone.

For my model of a White Pass shovelnose diesel I paid about $125 to print in a durable plastic.

IMG_20170426_225604982

To print it in high detail plastic Shapeways asked for about $400. I said thanks but no thanks. This model in stainless steel? About $800!

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_20170426_225604982

I followed your thread on the custom engine with interest.  However I see $800 will not pass the "home front" test but I still have this irrational thing about metal shells.  I don't own any but I rather like idea of it...

What I should do is make an account there, upload the files for that engine I do have and ... see what they say for costs.   That's ought to be easy!

As for lego -- oh the worst on bare feet!  Also wooden train stuff is not so good either.   Interestingly fastrack seems a pleasure since my kids walk all over the tracks all the time... even though I've said not to do that 100s of times! 

This is sort of related... you folks seem to have kids & legos got me to thinking.  We were in legoland recently and I was really taken with a large scale "city scape" scene they'd made out legos.

Perfect for the carpet layout which comes and goes I thought!

Then I poked around the web and it seems there's an interest in this kind of thing -- folks recreating large building with legos, and stuff -- kind cool.

But alas, the prices to do it are way out there... so another idea hits the dust bin.

Oh that's very interesting.  My grandfather was a machinist and I have all his machinist school books.  I've read up on last wax and sand casting and that before.  It's one of those things... be neat to try at least on paper.  I found a website which ... you know it was just a google result where some guy was casting in his back yard. I can imagine doing it at least...

However immediate path of least resistance first... or perhaps only.

I tried to upload my model I have to shapeways but it's in .dwg autocad format.   I tried tinkercad to convert it which some suggested but it won't read the original .dwg format.

I'm sure there are some converters out there.

Instead I emailed the original author to ask if he's export it to one of the supported format using is autocad... but I'm not sure he has a long term license.

The other option is to get the 30 day trial for it ... then export it (assuming they turn this feature on... tbd)

Kind of annoying really...  but autocad is the king, so they can get away with it.

(I'm suspicious also the model is highly detailed and will need to modified to make it print worthy -- tbd)

Tom M, I have to say I admire your creativity, watching your other White Pass threads and now this one.

While there's an aspect of the hobby moving towards more realism, that accuracy and durability don't often go together. The easily broken switch lever on the FasTrack turnouts is a good example of that, and in my thinking, durability with maybe less realism would have been better. As you indicated to with your mention seeking interest for a simple knob to control these manual switches.

FasTrack is hardly cheap as compared to tubular, and since FasTrack is now the Lionel standard for starter sets, one would hope the manual switches would be a little more durable, as there is a chance that young hands will be operating them.

The MPC era 027 switches with their large housing box is not the most realistic design, but on the manual switches, it is certainly a durable operation. And I haven't had the problems that others have spoken of with the 027 switch tracks.

On mine,  I drill a small hole in the level on those manual 027 MPC era switches, and then run nylon fish line to the front of the layout. So I avoid the headaches by design of the electric Lionel 027 switches, and yet get benefits of an electric switch.

In a hobby where the participants expect more and more from the "manufacturers" in this small niche (AND diverse) market, it's nice to read your threads where you are making things yourself. I personally don't have much hope for seeing any new 027-ish diesel engines, so I've taken to kitbashing and making them myself. Just as with my many repainting projects. Just because I'm an 027 guy doesn't mean I don't like current modern road names. And fortunately, many of the larger hearld HO decal sets work out just fine with the smaller 027 types of rolling stock and engines.

Nice idea and thanks for sharing it.

that's very nice.  but i can still see the print details.  another reason i was thinking the metal... cause I though it would be buffed smooth without losing too much details.  BUT not for $800 and up...

Still not a really deep criticism, just an observation.... next year it will be even higher resolution and so on...

 

 

Super speedy... I will order tomorrow.   I also found a free model someone printed of an engine. it's in STL format ... each part of it loads in Tinkercad... but there's an STP file which I think links it all together but Tinker wont take it.  I guess I need to try FreeCad... 

Anyway the big issue I have with it is its in the wrong scale so every piece would need to be resized... which sounds a bit daunting.

It's an EMD SW1500.  I got it off of GrabCad (which I know nothing about)...

Here's another place I found it:

https://www.youmagine.com/desi...1500-1-32-locomotive

 

I've found shapeways will take my ~25 or so individual STL files for the EMD using the drag and drop interface ... and there's a convenient scale button... so I can go from the 1:32 its in original form to 1:48 ... hopefully with the push of a button.

Sadly it's looking a little on the pricey side to print ... but I have to play around with it.

I think though it's a well done model...

Sounds like quite the jigsaw puzzle.

Severn posted:

I've found shapeways will take my ~25 or so individual STL files for the EMD using the drag and drop interface ... and there's a convenient scale button... so I can go from the 1:32 its in original form to 1:48 ... hopefully with the push of a button.

Sadly it's looking a little on the pricey side to print ... but I have to play around with it.

I think though it's a well done model...

Sounds like quite the jigsaw puzzle. They are really good to work with. I look forward to hearing how it works out for you.

I'm pretty interested in printing this engine now. I've uploaded all the individual parts.  I see that I have to run through a re-scale process and fix thin spots per part.  I haven't done that yet.   I also need to figure exactly which parts I need because I believe it is the entire engine plus trucks and wheels...   I may not print all of it to save a little.   First I'll probably print one piece in their default material just to see what it looks like.  Finally of course I'll need to get enough extra change together print the whole thing... so this may take awhile before I really do print it... weeks or months even...

There's probably a mount to be constructed that would hold a small stepper motor & say battery & tiny PCB.   The mount would be fixed and the stepper motor would go into the manual switch hole in some fashion but be affixed to the mount to hold it firmly in place.  The pcb would contain a blue tooth and when actuated by some kind remote signal turn the stepper one way or the other depending on the signal from the remote.

Or ... you could just sell the manual switch and upgrade to a remote toggle or command control version.

 

I was able to import all of the EMD-SW1500 engine's models into shapeways -- and work my way through each one -- re-scaling them to O scale (originals are in 1:32).   I also ran their "thickness" analyzes tool for each and made some adjustments there.

This all took time, possibly 8 hrs in total people time -- mainly because it's all done on their servers so the dependency is based on how fast these various functions will run -- the thickness analysis is particularly slow.

With that -- prices per part.    So as best as I can tell - printing all the parts which includes the trucks for example and wheels (so 8 of those) and things like the railing "pins" to hold the railing wire...

... total would be $350 in their default lowest end plastic...

I could of course throw out the trucks and wheels and this would lower the cost somewhat.  I could throw the base plate too...   But I'm tempted to start at least with the whole thing.

So that price, to me isn't too bad from an experimental pt of view...

I would however like to make at least one change before trying even a sample part -- that is turning the now solid fuel tank into a hollow one...

(this is a handy place to put a speaker or some weights for example & so I'd rather it be hollow)

My guess though is the print will come out in some ways imperfect and so I in theory I'd cycle through some iterations to get out a good print... 

Given that, I can see this is really rather pricey ... and yet it's very likely to only get better... it's a fascinating thing really if that occurs.

Chris Lonero posted:

Question.  Does the switch have to be taken apart to install one of these stands? I have a switch in a tight spot on my subway that I could maybe use one.  

To install it without taking it apart you have to pull the main post up and out of the gear inside.  Then break or cut the supports for the stand. Then you simply push the new switch stand into the switch stand post hole  lining it up with the gear. Then press the new switch in firmly. I have placed it with the switch cover in place no problem.

Severn posted:

I was able to import all of the EMD-SW1500 engine's models into shapeways -- and work my way through each one -- re-scaling them to O scale (originals are in 1:32).   I also ran their "thickness" analyzes tool for each and made some adjustments there.

This all took time, possibly 8 hrs in total people time -- mainly because it's all done on their servers so the dependency is based on how fast these various functions will run -- the thickness analysis is particularly slow.

With that -- prices per part.    So as best as I can tell - printing all the parts which includes the trucks for example and wheels (so 8 of those) and things like the railing "pins" to hold the railing wire...

... total would be $350 in their default lowest end plastic...

I could of course throw out the trucks and wheels and this would lower the cost somewhat.  I could throw the base plate too...   But I'm tempted to start at least with the whole thing.

So that price, to me isn't too bad from an experimental pt of view...

I would however like to make at least one change before trying even a sample part -- that is turning the now solid fuel tank into a hollow one...

(this is a handy place to put a speaker or some weights for example & so I'd rather it be hollow)

My guess though is the print will come out in some ways imperfect and so I in theory I'd cycle through some iterations to get out a good print... 

Given that, I can see this is really rather pricey ... and yet it's very likely to only get better... it's a fascinating thing really if that occurs.

Maybe you could slowly have it printed as you go, part by part.

I recommend finding a frame from a different model and fitting the engine to the frame.IMG_20170426_225604982

This engine is set on a postwar ALCO frame with U36C trucks.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_20170426_225604982

I thought there might be some existing o-scale EMD 1500s but I didn't see any after a quick look ... but that's an idea.   Still I'd like to print the whole thing once just to see it all fit together before deciding what could be changed or retrofitted.  

I did manage to use Tinkercad to hollow out the fuel tank ... probably could do more there.  Shaved off $6... not bad really.

Jhainer posted:

now here's another idea drill a small hole in it and add a tortuous switch machine to it for us who have manual switches on a layout and can't reach then anymore cause the layout grew to big to reach them

 

I'm intrigued with the idea of selling something that would make this an easy modification. I might have to talk to gunrunnerjohn about it.

Severn posted:

I posted in another thread by accident -- but the gist is I got the items and they work.  But I think a longer stem could be an option to match the existing -- and this would then work if the "stand portion" is intact for the actuator.   I hope that makes sense.

 

Are you saying you would rather have the main shaft be as long as the original, to fit in the original switch stand assembly? I can do that, I'll just have to measure the original shaft length and go from there.

I've thought of manufacturing an actual stand assembly to complement these different switch indicator designs. I already have the geometry figured out to match the existing holes but i haven't figured out how to fasten it to the switch without having to glue it.

There's the pointing finger idea... and those above could also be quad-vaned... (like the ends of darts).

But yes, I was thinking the shaft could be longer and just fit there in the stand.  The stand is plastic I believe.  I took mine apart.  It is held in place by 2 tiny screws on the inside.  These are slightly occluded by the gear that actives the mechanism. (also plastic)...

If you printed new stands, you'd have to decide on making the screw holes in the "feet" (legs) for the screws.

Also -- I got the round knobs... I haven't tried them yet but they won't likely hurt to step on. I suppose I could try that too.

I think a child could pull these items out though...  I could imagine a way around with a blocking sleeve preventing it from being pulled up if in the stand, but I don't see a good way to put it on ...

Severn posted:

There's the pointing finger idea... and those above could also be quad-vaned... (like the ends of darts).

But yes, I was thinking the shaft could be longer and just fit there in the stand.  The stand is plastic I believe.  I took mine apart.  It is held in place by 2 tiny screws on the inside.  These are slightly occluded by the gear that actives the mechanism. (also plastic)...

If you printed new stands, you'd have to decide on making the screw holes in the "feet" (legs) for the screws.

Also -- I got the round knobs... I haven't tried them yet but they won't likely hurt to step on. I suppose I could try that too.

I think a child could pull these items out though...  I could imagine a way around with a blocking sleeve preventing it from being pulled up if in the stand, but I don't see a good way to put it on ...

I have wanted to make a stand or a retaining sleeve from the beginning but I have been hung up on how to make it work. The minimum diameter of the shaft, for printing, is 1mm. And I think that may be too big for the original stand. 

One of the big problems is designing something that the original lionel screws will be compatible with. I designed this switch and stand but as it sits the only way to make the stand stay in position would be to glue it in.

 

Last edited by Tom M

I would think you'll need to tap in the screw threads.  I've a tap & die set I think but I'm not sure it includes the size or the thread...   Alternatively some kind of new idea there may work.... maybe a rivet, a plastic rivet  might hold it tightly enough.

I can try to take some measurements this weekend.  I thought about giving you some competition but I'm still caught up in the EMD-SW1200.

I've stuck with Tinkercad and made a lot of mods to the original set of models.  The biggest thing is that I combined models to form large 1 piece parts -- basically shell, platform it sits on and the things that go with it.  I've hollowed out the tank, done this and that.

It's a huge pain and then you have to fun it all through their tools to find thin spots.

Tinkercad which is more powerful than it seems at first blush doesn't allow you to get at the original mesh at all... so I think in the end I may try something else in the future...   that would be nice so one can tweak the individual piece for thickness more readily (instead of adding or subtracting 3D spaces which is what they support now)

I'm going to print nearly everything except the trucks...  probably in PLA ... I'm hoping to send it all off by the end of the month or sooner.

And I found that MTH produce a non-scale version of this model sometime in the past.  I'm hoping to retrofit its trucks over if I can find an dinger at a show some time... or some other solution as yet to be determined.

I do see that I could print my own trucks, gears, even wheels etc... if I wanted to go there.

 

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • EMD-SW1500 Model: Tinkercad Projection

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×