I don't understand why some layouts are cut out (see example below) when a flat sheet of plywood is easier to lay? Are there advantages to all that extra work?
This example is cut out on the first level but flat on the second. I'm just trying to learn; I'm not criticizing here.
Thanks, Bill
Replies sorted oldest to newest
You would have to see the entire track plan to understand why. The lower level is cutout because we need to support the middle and upper levels and it's easier and gives more options of support using open grid. The sheets on east side of the layout is the main (guts) of the layout. Turntable and roundhouse with tons of tracks and a couple diesel service buildings. Some people go strictly cutout, some people go strictly table top, and some people (like we are doing) use a combination of the 2 styles to suit our needs.
Open grid benchwork also leaves many more options when it comes to doing scenery. Our layout has 3 different levels of track so the scenery transition between levels will be a lot easier this way. You're right though, the cutout method is a lot of work but required on our lower level. Otherwise we would NOT have any access to the bottom of the middle and top levels of track for wiring and installation of switch machines.
OK, that's makes a lot of sense. I hadn't thought about wiring and access. Duh, Bill!
I was thinking of making a post with a simalar title. I'm doing open with cut out roadbed with flex track and it takes a lot longer. The world isen't flat like a tabletop layout although I see many flat layouts that look great. 2/3rd's of my track is going up or down or at a different height than other track. I have poor imagination of how to scenic it so when I get to that I plan to do what I know I want and then other areas will be more apparent I am thinking.
Access to this requires an OGR Forum Supporting Membership
