Skip to main content

I like both but prefer the steamer engines.  One reason is I just like the working and action of all those wheels and drive gear moving. 

My steamers seem to stay on the tracks better and I find them much easier to put back on the track than diesels.  I also like the actions that steamers require like adding coal and water to the coal tender and the operating actions like operating a coaling station and water towers versus just fueling a diesel.

Granted the diesel engines are often more colorfully painted but steamers also can be painted in colorful schemes.

The steamers also represent most of the trains of my favorite period if the great train era, the 1940s and early 1950s.

Which do you like the best, steamers or diesels and why?

Charlie

 

 

 

 

Last edited by Choo Choo Charlie
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Twenty years ago a train buddy told me that if I could have only one engine to seriously look at the Premier Santa Fe Northern.  I bought the Chicago, then the Pueblo, then sold both.  Bought a second Chicago and still have it.  If allowed only one, it would be either the Northern or the Texas.   Both pull well and have good sounds.  John in Lansing, ILL

Although my collection includes most of the famous steam, diesel and electric locomotive types, if I could have (or afford) only one locomotive model, it would be my Weaver Brass New Haven Railroad ALCO I-4 Pacific #1389 - a very finely detailed and well-made steam engine. That's partly because of my interest in the NYNH&HRR and partly because of the advanced mechanical engineering required to build a "modern" steam engine. Many years ago, I worked on the development of a low-emission automotive steam engine which was unsuccessful... 

MELGAR

MELGAR_NEW_HAVEN_LOCOMOTIVES_062_I4_1389

Attachments

Images (1)
  • MELGAR_NEW_HAVEN_LOCOMOTIVES_062_I4_1389

Diesel.

I've worked on a railroad that had only one engine for many years.  Fortunately, it was (and is) a 65 ton GE with two prime movers powering two sets of two traction motors; essentially two smaller locomotives under one roof.  However, ALCos are far cooler than little GEs, therefore, I'd want an S-2 from my other railroad, the one dearest to my heart:

MTH 20-20067-1

Image result for mth staten island alco s-2

Diesels have ruled the railroad world during my lifetime and my career.  Steam and electrics are interesting but diesels mean "railroad" to me.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • blobid0
Last edited by Rapid Transit Holmes

No question; I'd opt for a steam locomotive every time.  In order of preference I'd take the  Lionel N&W Class J Northern 4-8-4 followed by any Hudson ever made and thirdly the early 726 Lionel Berkshire made in 1946 with the smoke bulb and nickel plated Baldwin Disc drivers.    This is not to say I dislike Diesels because I really do like them for the variety and flexibility they provide for operations on my layout but I have a real weakness for steamers.

I really like the color of Diesels, but my favorite engines to see running are Steamers, with the drive rods turning, smoke out the smoke stacks, out the cylinders, and out the back draft, and then the bells and that Whistle...with steam flying out....Wow...I love seeing Rich Melvin take the 765 to limits beyond imagination....Great thread, Happy Railroading...

"I would have to choose a diesel. It would be for the same reason the real rail roads chose them, dependability,"

Early diesel technology was anything but dependable. The steam technology was. It was an example of the rule that the last of an old technology is typically better than the first of a new one. It took a couple of decades to translate successful diesel switcher technology to diesel road locomotive technology. The internal combustion engine of any type was a weak sister for a long time.

Ultimately, diesel-electric technology was "superior" to steam, especially in terms of costs. This did not make the steam technology "bad".

===============

Now, to answer the thread's question - in detail: NYC J3a Hudson.

My default answer is my childhood 2037.

  But if that wasn't on the table I'd be running a 6 driver pre war steam switcher with all that great valve gear and rod action packed nice and tight. Like watching fancy clockwork

 If got to have a wish, and a catenary system too, I always wanted the first 3phase loco & first full electric line, Ganz's Valteleena Line, It.. Basically I want a small, loop type pantagraph, electric steeple cab like some folks used to wanted the Jawn Henry, Centapede, or Big Boy. A 2-6-2, jackshaft and rod center cab?; awsome! But even a B&O steeple on bogies would work

Adriatic posted:

My default answer is my childhood 2037.

  But if that wasn't on the table I'd be running a 6 driver pre war steam switcher with all that great valve gear and rod action packed nice and tight. Like watching fancy clockwork

 

Hey Adriatic, I think we must be related. You know from on and off the Forum what I think of the prewar switchers, but my wife bought me a 2037 in 1994 to bring me back into the hobby being away due to misc. life diversions...

Tom 

So many choices! Modern super power era Steam with all the motion of the drivers and rods. Streamlined steam like the Santa Fe Blue Goose, etc. or the C&O Turbine combine some of both. F units, E units, and PA Diesels with their fantastic paint schemes. (Maybe a 5 stripe Brunswick Green GG1, though I never know which way it is heading:-) Modern Diesels with their massive look. And aren't we fortunate to have all these possibilities to chose from!

Did this scheme get us all started somewhere along the way?ATSF F3 AB a2ee85d68dd671687b7b5498cb31ce57

Attachments

Images (1)
  • ATSF F3 AB a2ee85d68dd671687b7b5498cb31ce57

Wow!  Very tuff question.  If I were ever in the hard place of choosing one engine ( from my existing fleet )  and running in a realistic prototype way on my layoutB&O GP9 & caboose,  I'd pick my passenger equipped B&O GP 9 ( in gray, blue, and gold livery ) because of its utilitarian use.  It virtually can execute every task on a railroad from yard switching, long distance road freight engine, and commuter & long distance passenger work.   I hope I never have to make that choice.  

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • B&O GP9 & caboose
Videos (2)
GP9 Fast mail & Sw 1500 freight
GP9 Freight local leaves Patsburg

Steam!!  Which one us problematic because there us so much to like.  If we're talking passenger power then a NYC Niagara and a PRT T1 top my list.  If we're talking freight haulers I like the classic look of 1920s power with Elesco FW heaters on the front of the smokebox with double airpumps on the pilot deck. The NYC L2a Mohawk is a classic example, but their are similar examples from other roads.  

Too many options to narrow to just one.  I like the potato chip analogy...

If were in the awful position of having only one lokie on my layout, I, too, would choose a steam engine from the latter days of steam.  But it wouldn't be a Northern type or an articulated,  It would be something like a lowly 2-8-2 Mike.  Why?  Because that one engine would have to provide all services from freight, peddler freight, switching and even any passenger duties.  In my opinion, the Mike is as "universal" of an engine that you can get

Paul Fischer.

trumptrain posted:

B&O GP9 & caboose,  

I'd pick my passenger equipped B&O GP 9 ( in gray, blue, and gold livery ) because of its utilitarian use.  It virtually can execute every task on a railroad from yard switching, long distance road freight engine, and commuter & long distance passenger work.   I hope I never have to make that choice.  

Your choice is based on the same logic as mine, and I love it when you post photos or videos of your beautiful torpedo boat geep.

TM Terry posted:

Reading through this thread one thing kept running through my mind. Only one locomotive for a layout???

Sure, The RR I model only had one type of locomotive at the time I model it (though they had three of them running at that time). One type suits me just fine (and I have 4 of them, including one they'd sold to the White pass & Yukon less than a year before).

If I had to choose I would definitely choose steam. I have always loved steam engines. These engines are the reason my road of choice is the Pennsylvania RR. If I had to limit myself to only one, I would probably select the versatility of a consolidation to the pure brute power of the J1, S1, T1, or Q1. A K4 Pacific might be a compromise between size and versatility. Heck, I don't want to choose. 

Number 90 posted:
trumptrain posted:

B&O GP9 & caboose,  

I'd pick my passenger equipped B&O GP 9 ( in gray, blue, and gold livery ) because of its utilitarian use.  It virtually can execute every task on a railroad from yard switching, long distance road freight engine, and commuter & long distance passenger work.   I hope I never have to make that choice.  

Your choice is based on the same logic as mine, and I love it when you post photos or videos of your beautiful torpedo boat geep.

Coming from you Tom ...your words mean A LOT!!  THANKS!!!  AND thanks  for your support of my posts and videos of my GP9.   It's interesting ...  when I first saw this topic, immediatley the  GP 9 popped into my head.  As I gave it more thought, while visualizing my locomotive fleet, steam, diesel, and electric, the GP 9 consistently took precedence.   I, and I assume you,  love our steamers, GG-1's, and all our diesels but the GP - 9/7 is our one answer to this question.  General Purpose locomotive.  A great idea!

Last edited by trumptrain

My first post here!

I like anything that moves on rails.

My first train was a loop of track, a steam outline engine, a couple of freight cars and a caboose. I was between 4 and 5 years old (~1945). The engine was a (long departed) steam engine (possibly Marx, but I'm no historian). I do remember that the loop of track was mounted on a piece of plywood. My father and a couple of guys he worked with liberated the plywood from their aircraft company employer right at the end of WW-2.

I grew up appreciating all kinds of propulsion machinery. Lots of memories of steam, diesel and electric motive power.

Just starting on a new (mostly) On30 layout. First motive power will be steam. It will interchange with a standard gauge line using a single Budd Diesel car. Kind of like the NWP and the California Western RR interchange at Willits, CA, except the Cal Western segment will be narrow gauge.

Rereading the question: I would run what I have or what fits to the modeled era!!

Last edited by Boonter41

I honestly don't know what I would chose if I could only have/run one engine on my layout. I guess I would have to say a steam engine, since I like the look of the steam engines better running than diesels. As to what steam, I guess first choice would be NKP 765, since I have ridden behind that one, second choice would probably be the N&W J 611, since I have that one, then probably the Big Boy by MTH.

Now, if I had to choose one that my wife would want me to have, it would have to be a 19th Century Steam Engine, since that is the only kind she likes.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×