Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I have no problem waiting as long as it takes for Lionel to develop and troubleshoot the new CAB 3.  If it takes till the end of the year or longer, so be it.

It takes time to develop and test products that combine both hardware and software.  Finding all the hidden bugs is the key, and the only way to do that is to test, test, test pressing any and every key combination you can think of to cause the product to fail, then correcting the software.

Case and point, we don't want another Acela on out hands.

Last edited by NYC 428
@NYC 428 posted:

I have no problem waiting as long as it takes for Lionel to develop and troubleshoot the new CAB 3.  If it takes till the end of the year or longer, so be it.

It takes time to develop and test products that combine both hardware and software.  Finding all the hidden bugs is the key, and the only way to do that is to test, test, test pressing any and every key combination you can think of to cause the product to fail, then correcting the software.

Case in point, we don't want another Acela on out hands.

Well said! I have one on preorder since last May and feel the same as you. Since I recently started, I have purchased 5 Legacy locomotives and looking forward to their full potential with the Base/Cab 3.

Gene

@NYC 428 posted:

It takes time to develop and test products that combine both hardware and software.  Finding all the hidden bugs is the key, and the only way to do that is to test, test, test pressing any and every key combination you can think of to cause the product to fail, then correcting the software.

That probably goes double for this product!  They threw everything but the kitchen sink into it, there's be a lot of testing of interactions of the various transceivers in the box!  Or to put it another way, there certainly SHOULD be a ton of testing for such interactions!

That probably goes double for this product!  They threw everything but the kitchen sink into it, there's be a lot of testing of interactions of the various transceivers in the box!  Or to put it another way, there certainly SHOULD be a ton of testing for such interactions!

This Base 3 reminds me of the all-in-one stereo systems that were popular back in the 70s and 80s. You had an AM/FM receiver, turntable (not the kind we use here), tape deck (remember those?), and sometimes an equalizer, all in one unit. It was a great concept, but if one component failed, you were pretty much out of luck.

While I'm sure the idea with Base 3 is to keep costs to a minimum, a separate component that allows for phone / tablet might actually be simpler, especially when troubleshooting is needed.

Probably not, as I'm with you in the "designated remote" camp. I have zero interest in running trains with a phone or a tablet.

Well John, you did say this...

While I'm sure the idea with Base 3 is to keep costs to a minimum, a separate component that allows for phone / tablet might actually be simpler, especially when troubleshooting is needed.

Don't you hate it when you're words come back to haunt you?   However, I'm in your camp, I like my remotes with real buttons and controls, stabbing at a touch screen just isn't the same.

Last edited by gunrunnerjohn

With everything included in one base, many of us are ultimately paying for technology we won't use.

The irony of the base 3 is that imo it's a solution to a problem that never really existed, until Lionel created it

It seems  one of the the main ideas is to allow one to operate Legacy command control locomotives along with Lionchief via the Legacy handheld.

Many of the Lionchief locos were offered with TMCC years ago. A few years after Lionel designed Legacy, they deemed the cab1 obsolete. To satisfy those looking for a simpler remote system ,and less expensive motive power, the Lionchief system was born.

Then the cab1L was created, the cab1 handheld that communicates via legacy.

Finally, after multiple redesigns, Lionchief 2.0 is TMCC equipped, go figure. Had Lionel not abandoned tmcc/legacy in the first place, Lionchief and Bluetooth would never have been needed. Base 3 brings things back to where they started.

I'm not interested in blue tooth , Lionchief, or 4 digit addresses...if I needed 4 digit addresses I'd probably be in divorce court with nowhere to keep my trains anyway.😉

Last edited by RickO
@RickO posted:

The irony of the base 3 is that imo it's a solution to a problem that never really existed, until Lionel created it

It seems  one of the the main ideas is to allow one to operate Legacy command control locomotives along with Lionchief via the Legacy handheld.

Many of the Lionchief locos were offered with TMCC years ago. A few years after Lionel designed Legacy, they deemed the cab1 obsolete. To satisfy those looking for a simpler remote system ,and less expensive motive power, the Lionchief system was born.

Then the cab1L was created, the cab1 handheld that communicates via legacy.

Finally, after multiple redesigns, Lionchief 2.0 is TMCC equipped, go figure. Had Lionel not abandoned tmcc/legacy in the first place, Lionchief and Bluetooth would never have been needed. Base 3 brings things back to where they started.

I'm not interested in blue tooth , Lionchief, or 4 digit addresses...if I needed 4 digit addresses I'd probably be in divorce court with nowhere to keep my trains anyway.😉

Rick you are exactly right.   Now look at where we are with no available higher end control systems and doesn't seem like Base3 will be here anytime soon.

Last edited by MichRR714
@RickO posted:

Had Lionel not abandoned tmcc/legacy in the first place, Lionchief and Bluetooth would never have been needed.

Why did they "abandon" it; why was LionChief needed?

  1. TMCC/Legacy is too costly for low-cost sets and engines (this probably became apparent to them about 15 years ago)
  2. Component obsolescence for Cab-x's (this came up well afterward, but is now a problem)

Why was Bluetooth needed? it wasn't but it "made things more attractive" to Millennials, Gen-Z, and beyond.

Mike

Why did they "abandon" it; why was LionChief needed?

  1. TMCC/Legacy is too costly for low-cost sets and engines (this probably became apparent to them about 15 years ago)
  2. Component obsolescence for Cab-x's (this came up well afterward, but is now a problem)

Uhh... in that case, how do you explain that TMCC came back to LionChief?  Also, they're still producing the CAB1L, so apparently they're still able to buy the components.

Somehow, Lionel can still produce the little TMCC receivers that are in stuff like the track speeder, Trackmobile, etc.  Obviously, TMCC components are not all that expensive or hard to obtain.

Apologies for repeating this, but if your Base 3 doesn't work, you can use the $50 or so Universal Remote to control all basic functions of Bluetooth locos, LionChief locos (including LionChief 2.0+), and thus do not need a smartphone or tablet .  It's a lot like the cab-1 or cab-1L, simple and reliable, in my experience.  Won't control TMCC or earlier Legacy locos, but you have your cab-1, 1-L or cab2 for that.

Last edited by Landsteiner

If you don't already have a CAB-1 or Cab-3 you almost have to wait for the Base 3. I checked on Ebay and a Cab-1 is around $300 and a CAB-3 is $1000 to $1400. Makes waiting for something that does it all for $500 seem like common sense.

I think you mean Cab-1L and Cab-2.

The Cab-3 is yet to be released software. The Cab-1 can be picked up for well under $200.

If you don't already have a CAB-1 or Cab-3 you almost have to wait for the Base 3. I checked on Ebay and a Cab-1 is around $300 and a CAB-3 is $1000 to $1400. Makes waiting for something that does it all for $500 seem like common sense.

I'll be really surprised to see the BASE2 in Feb, I'm thinking more along the lines of April.

I thank my lucky star that I purchased the Cab1L system for my home layout.  (I recently picked up a spare used one).  Our club has full Legacy, but most folks pick up our Cab1L controllers to run their Legacy and TMCC trains.  I admit that the Legacy controller has better whistle quilling control than the Cab1L. (It is easy to turn on the quilling in the Cab1L and it gives you plenty of play value). I find Legacy controllers as more than most operators need. It's sad that Lionel didn't keep the Cab1L around until after the Cab3 was available. I have hopes that the Cab3 will be successful but will wait until it has some time in the field.

Merry Christmas eveyone.

Earl   

   

It's sad that Lionel didn't keep the Cab1L around until after the Cab3 was available. I have hopes that the Cab3 will be successful but will wait until it has some time in the field.

Actually, the CAB1L is still in production and will be for some time.  I agree for casual running, I normally reach for the CAB1L, it's handier, and it is also considerably more robust as it doesn't have an delicate displays to break when you drop it.

Go to the YouTube channel,  look up Will2926 videos, and watch his video of the discussion about this new Cab 3APP at the new Lionel Store in Nashville. Dave Olson had the actual unit there and the demo was great. It’s coming and it will be a great working base and works great with the Cab 1L, and the Cab 2 remotes, and phones and IPads.   I recommend you going to YouTube and watching all of Will2926 videos, ad he makes this hobby lots more fun. I’m thinking by April 2024…. Happy Railroading Everyone

Post
This forum is sponsored by Lionel, LLC

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×