Lionel Smoke Question

If you’re running conventional there’s not much you can do to increase smoke output. It took Lionel a long time to realize engines with can motors do not require high voltage as pulmor motors do. Simply not enough voltage going to the smoke unit. 

Rod is right about power needs in conventional mode.  You said you put a few drops in, try putting a few more drops in to see if there is any change.  Don’t flood it but if you haven’t run with smoke in a while the unit is, probably, dry.  Add a little at a time.  If there is no change you may need to swap out the smoke resistor for one with a lower rating.

There is one thing, but note that you don't want to sit around at idle for any length of time with the smoke on if you do this.

Swap out the 30 ohm smoke resistor for something in the 20-22 ohm range.  Note that if you don't keep smoke fluid in it when the smoke is on, you'll quickly cook the wick.

Good information as mentioned by Rod and Dan.   You have a postwar style smoke unit in your engine with a 30 OHM resistor.

You can try and add double the fluid you put in and see if you get any results.    

A lower resistor will help but you will never get the results that a fan driven smoke unit can provide.

Nice little engine.....but has limits with respect to smoke output.

Dave

Hey Phrankenstign, I run locos with regular puffer type smoke units. The regular smoke fluid that comes with the engine really doesn't perform very well. Instead try the Premium Lionel Smoke Fluid... I have found it is a huge improvement, even with the puffer smoke units in starter types of steam engines, and even pulling shorter trains (thus using lower voltage to the track).

Just for your info, I've also tried the Mega-Steam, along with smoke fluids by Crest, Williams, and Model Power. They all work better than does the normal included regular Lionel smoke fluid. My preference from the list above is the Model Power brand, but given they're all made overseas, it could be darn close to the others.

But my first choice above all those is the Premium Lionel Smoke Fluid. It will never be equal to like having a fan driven smoke unit in the engines. But still, it's a vast improvement. So much so I've had visitors ask if I installed fan driven smoke units in them.

So give the Premium type a try.

I don't know much about electronics, so I don't know how to swap out the smoke resistor, GUNRUNNERJOHN.

Which one of those smoke fluids you listed produce the most smoke output, BRIANEL_K-LINEGUY?

Is there a difference between the three Lionel fluids I have (#6-02920, #909 & #6-2909)?  If yes, can either of the older smoke fluids or the 3rd party fluids damage the #8624's smoke unit?

Some aftermarket brands are suspect. 

I've not heard of older Lionel fluids having issues.

Who's is best/safe is the topic of many posts over the years. 

Mega Steam has lots of fans. 

 Ive been using various fluids differences to compliment different loco's outputs.

(likely can't reply again, hi all, happy holidays)

phrankenstign posted:

Which one of those smoke fluids you listed produce the most smoke output, BRIANEL_K-LINEGUY?

In my small fleet of Lionel 4-4-2's, the Premium Lionel Smoke Fluid has the most visible smoke output, hands down. I don't know what the chemical difference is between the basic and premium Lionel smoke fluids, but there is obviously a big difference in smoke output.

As a side note, I've never had any luck with the Seuthe Smoke Generators, like the ones used by K-Line in their starter set steam engines. Williams at one time was also using them. Even using the Seuthe brand fluid only, they still don't last very long.

I don't think they're being made now, but Model Power had a visually similar version of the Seuthe Smoke Generator, that I had much, much better luck with. I've had the Model Power ones last for several years. They of course recommend using only the Model Power Smoke Fluid, so that's how I stumbled into that one.

Bachmann, also makes some affordable smoke generators that I have also had very good luck with. And the Bachmann units work equally well with any brand smoke fluid.

Is there a difference between the three Lionel fluids I have (#6-02920, #909 & #6-2909)?  If yes, can either of the older smoke fluids or the 3rd party fluids damage the #8624's smoke unit?

Don't know if the following videos apply to your puffer unit but have a look:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRcpFRtA6IY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1asUWbJtfok

phrankenstign posted:

Is there a difference between the three Lionel fluids I have (#6-02920, #909 & #6-2909)?  If yes, can either of the older smoke fluids or the 3rd party fluids damage the #8624's smoke unit?

I've never used the 909, but obviously there is some difference:

www.tandem-associates.com/lion...l_trains_909_acc.htm

As far as the other smoke fluids I've already mentioned, I've had no damage to the smoke unit. The real difference is the output of smoke. The regular Lionel fluid that comes with the train sets produces the least amount of smoke, and that's probably intentional. Most kids getting a starter set are going to have it set up around the Christmas tree in the living room with Mom nearby. Mom doesn't want a ton of smoke smelling up the living room.

Again, I've used many other fluids and the Lionel Premium puts out the most visible amount of smoke in my 4-4-2 starter type steam locos with the old style puffer smoke units.

Unlike the videos linked above, you DO NOT want to put that many drops of fluid into a puffer type smoke unit... that'll make it not work.

Brianel027, thanks for the correction on how much fluid can be put into a puffer smoke unit!!; my experience is only with Lionel fan driven units; maybe the videos above do not apply to puffers but do show the internals of fan driven units for those that are interested thanks to laidoffsick.

I have used both Megasteam and Lionel Premium with no ill effects.  For fan driven Lionel units, I am experimenting with adding 1 drop of fluid per 1 minute of smoke time with 10 minutes and 10 drops as an add point.  In my fan driven units, anything less than 10 drops only wets the funnel and resistor and doesn't do much for the batting.

phrankenstign posted:

Is there a difference between the three Lionel fluids I have (#6-02920, #909 & #6-2909)?  If yes, can either of the older smoke fluids or the 3rd party fluids damage the #8624's smoke unit?

Since nobody here was able to answer my questions, I decided to try calling Lionel's Customer Service telephone number I saw in a video on YouTube.com.

The guy I spoke to told me the first three smoke fluids were too old.  He couldn't find them in his system, and he recommended that I NOT use them because they might damage the smoke unit.  I told him I'd been using the first two for years with engines (#233 & #239) from the early 1960s.  He told me back then the smoke units used pills.  I told him my dad bought those engines new, and he'd always used smoke fluid.  He never knew anything about smoke pills, and the smoke output was very good.  I asked him if the smoke units in those engines worked differently, because those engines don't have a switch to turn the smoke unit off.  When the fluid has run out, I've continued to run them for hours.  When I later decide to put fluid in them, the smoke immediately starts pouring out again.  The smoke units have never failed to work.  In fact, I never knew anything about the possibility of any wick burning up in those engines.  However the book for the #8624 engine states:

Caution: Slide the smoke unit switch to the OFF position if the locomotive remains in neutral. The smoke unit will become damaged if the locomotive is left sitting on the track with power on.

His recommendation to increase the smoke output was that I put a few drops into the smoke stack of the #8624.  Then I should put the engine in neutral for awhile to let the smoke unit heat up.  I should then run the engine forward.  That should result in an increase in the smoke output.

He told me as far as he knew, the smoke units in the 1960s used pills, so he doesn't know how those worked.  He then told me the third one was probably made in the 1990s.  He recommended I not use that one either, because it may also damage the smoke unit in #8624.  I asked him how he knew when that third one came out.  He told me the numbering convention was different back then.

Since I originally asked him what the difference was between all four types, I never mentioned THE THIRD ONE CAME WITH THE SET ALONG WITH #8624 in 2008.

1. #909 Smoke Fluid
2. #6-2909 Smoke Fluid
3. #6-02920 Smoke Fluid
4. #6-37841 Premium Smoke Fluid

I asked him about other brands, and he told me he recommends only using Lionel's Premium Smoke Fluid to avoid risking damage to the smoke unit.

The bottom line from him was:

Use only Lionel's Premium Smoke Fluid, because the older ones and other brands may damage the smoke units.

I don't trust his judgment based on the following reasons:

• He didn't know anything about the formulations used in any of the three older ones.
• He thought only pills were used in Lionel's smoke units in the 1960s.
• He wasn't specific about how long the #8624 should be in neutral before running it.
• He misdated the third one and then recommended against using it.

I would have respected him much more if he'd just told me, "I don't know, and I don't know how to find out the answers to your questions."  Trying to appear authoritative when he doesn't know something makes me not ever want to call Lionel's Customer Service again.

If you do a search on this forum, you will find many threads on smoke units; lots of good info from forum members who have been in the hobby for years.

phrankenstign posted

• He thought pills were used in Lionel's smoke units in the 1960s

That's correct.  Some used liquids, but the 665, 773(both cataloged to 1966),  736(cataloged to 1968) and 2029(to 1969) all used SP pellets.

ADCX Rob posted:

phrankenstign posted

• He thought pills were used in Lionel's smoke units in the 1960s

That's correct.  Some used liquids, but the 665, 773(both cataloged to 1966),  736(cataloged to 1968) and 2029(to 1969) all used SP pellets.

I made a mistake.  He thought only pills were used in Lionel's smoke units in the 1960s.

I'm not surprised that some of the history is difficult to find. As for smoke fluids, I've never heard of anyone who knew positively what the formula was for them. I got a glimmer of an idea in a post from a former Lionel employer (I'm blank on his name at the moment) as to the newest Lionel Premium fluid that it doesn't dry out when sitting. That seems like a reason to use it and forget the old ones. Do you know what the mechanics are on the older smoke units you have? Is it a platform that a pill would have rested on (they used to use a light bulb with a dimple in it) or is it a resistor in a pile of fiberglass?

He shouldn't have tried to sound like he knew what he was talking about if he didn't. But to call up a place like Lionel in 2019, ask the questions you did, and expect the customer service rep to know the answers about products from the 60s or earlier is ridiculous!

I remember now, Mike R said the Premium was the best to use...doesn’t dry out.