Skip to main content

Good evening,

I've noticed a significant difference in performance between new MTH and older MTH and am wondering if it has anything to do with the motors they are now using compared to the older models.

This evening, I put an older PS3 loco (20-3140-1 P47 Pacific from 2004) on the layout, and it ran like a Swiss watch at all speeds, including very slow. It pulled a string of 7 heavyweights as if it had nothing in tow, with steady, even power throughout all speeds, even at the slowest speeds.

On the other hand, my new MTH Pacifics (20-3816-1 and 20-3813-1) show much different performance, especially at slow speeds. I have to advance the thumbwheel on the DCS remote to at least 3 or 4 mph before the loco moves, and then it lurches ahead, instead of gradually speeding up. Sometimes, the loco will start chuffing and puffing smoke before it starts to move, which seems odd to me, because I thought those features are triggered by flywheel rotation. Both of these locos exhibit the same poor performance at slow speeds.  I have perfect 10 for track signal all the way around, and all my older MTH locos run perfectly.

I've heard discussion about MTH going "cheap" on motors, so I'm wondering if what I'm seeing is a symptom of that, and also wondering if it's possible to upgrade the motor. The 2 new Pacifics I just bought are the only "new" MTH locos I own; all my others are from the early 2000s and earlier.

Thanks for any info,

John

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It’s not that either mfr. went cheap, …..well, sorta,……your older engine is Pittman equipped, that motor is pretty hard to beat. Very good low voltage performance, with lots of power even at the lower rpm/voltage ranges,……what happened was, Pittman’s parent company Ametek, pretty much ditched the hobby industry as a whole, by pricing themselves right out of our market, …..clearly they saw bigger fish to fry in aerospace, medical, and the ATM machine business…..they’re even pretty much out of the elevator door motor business from what I’ve been told,,……this happened like overnight, so it left our dynamic duo of mfr.s to find another source, …..Lionel went to Cannon, and at first, MTH was using a SPG motor from Korea, that was a really good knock off a Pittman, but for whatever reason, it was short lived, …..perhaps SPG was too pricey as well, and MTH just used them as a temporary fill in the blanks until a more permanent solution could be had,……they finally went to a Chinese motor, same size as a Pittman, but not as good as a Pittman IMO, ……but before you go cussing out the motor, try a good break in period to see if she’ll loosen up,……

Pat

I've got the last edition Premier Big Boy, 20-3808-1,  and I did notice it ran a bit jerky below 3-4 mph. I swapped out the stock no name Chinese motor for a ball bearing 9234 Pittman and it runs so much smoother. It'll crawl down to 1-2 mph without issue, and it's far from broken in yet.

Lionel's Canon motor isn't much better. I swapped the Canon in my Legacy 2031170 ATSF Northern for a 9433 Pittman and the low speed performance pulling a train was greatly improved.

@harmonyards posted:

It’s not that either mfr. went cheap, …..well, sorta,……your older engine is Pittman equipped, that motor is pretty hard to beat. Very good low voltage performance, with lots of power even at the lower rpm/voltage ranges,……what happened was, Pittman’s parent company Ametek, pretty much ditched the hobby industry as a whole, by pricing themselves right out of our market, …..clearly they saw bigger fish to fry in aerospace, medical, and the ATM machine business…..they’re even pretty much out of the elevator door motor business from what I’ve been told,,……this happened like overnight, so it left our dynamic duo of mfr.s to find another source, …..Lionel went to Cannon, and at first, MTH was using a SPG motor from Korea, that was a really good knock off a Pittman, but for whatever reason, it was short lived, …..perhaps SPG was too pricey as well, and MTH just used them as a temporary fill in the blanks until a more permanent solution could be had,……they finally went to a Chinese motor, same size as a Pittman, but not as good as a Pittman IMO, ……but before you go cussing out the motor, try a good break in period to see if she’ll loosen up,……

Pat

Thanks Pat......what is considered adequate break-in?

2004 Pacific: 5 hrs 12 min / 29.7 mi.

2023 Pacific: 5 hrs 19 min / 30.0 mi

There is a huge difference in the performance of these 2 locos, with the 2004 model being much better-performing.

We can certainly discuss a motor swap upgrade if you’d like ……I’m almost positive the P47 Pacifics will take the larger 60mm motor, which is a good thing, …supplies of the 55mm 9433 Pittmans are getting kinda tight until I find another source…Lou can verify the P47’s I believe ….I know the PS4 Pacifics won’t take a big motor at all, ….I think they’re relegated to a 9432 short Pittman ….

Pat

@harmonyards posted:

We can certainly discuss a motor swap upgrade if you’d like ……I’m almost positive the P47 Pacifics will take the larger 60mm motor, which is a good thing, …supplies of the 55mm 9433 Pittmans are getting kinda tight until I find another source…Lou can verify the P47’s I believe ….I know the PS4 Pacifics won’t take a big motor at all, ….I think they’re relegated to a 9432 short Pittman ….

Pat

The latest Pacifics are USRA and use a 9232/9432 size motor. There is no way a longer motor will fit.

I’ve swapped a bunch of Lionel’s from the crappy Cannons to Pittmans, always with better performance, …..all of my Legacy steam that WAS Cannon equipped are now Pittmanized,….( play on words there )  …..so I can say from the field that there’s an improvement in performance, …..I’ve set up a few motors for Lou, and he would have a better field report, as he’s swapped out those Chinese knock offs from a few of his MTH engines,…….so I’ll let @Lou1985 grade that performance…..

Pat

@harmonyards posted:

I’ve swapped a bunch of Lionel’s from the crappy Cannons to Pittmans, always with better performance, …..all of my Legacy steam that WAS Cannon equipped are now Pittmanized,….( play on words there )  …..so I can say from the field that there’s an improvement in performance, …..I’ve set up a few motors for Lou, and he would have a better field report, as he’s swapped out those Chinese knock offs from a few of his MTH engines,…….so I’ll let @Lou1985 grade that performance…..

Pat

I've only got two Premier steam locomotives that came with the Chinese knock off motor, my SP AC6 Cab Forward and UP Big Boy. Both had issues running below 3-4 mph with the Chinese motor, but swapping in a 9234 Pittman resulted in smooth performance down to 1-2 mph. I'm pretty sure the improved low speed performance is due to the Pittman making more torque at low RPM than the factory motor.

Also as a FYI even though the motor in Premier steam locomotives are made in China the locomotives are still made in South Korea.

@harmonyards posted:

I’d think they’d be loosened up after 5 hours though Lou, …….no??….not everyone runs a gazzillion miles like we do,….😁

Pat

They should be after 5 hours, but 5 hours of run time with 30 miles is about an average of running 6 mph. I'd run it at 30 mph for an hour or so then see how it runs at low speed. Warm everything up and let it run in a bit.

I never really consider a locomotive really broken in till its got a couple hundred miles and 20+ hours of run time.

Thanks guys. I'll couple the 7-car heavyweight consist to each one and crank it up to 30 and let it run....with the smoke and sound turned off, and will see if there's a difference.

It couldn’t hurt to do that, …..that’s for sure,…..if it’s still wonky after that, then we’ll dive in for a closer look,….if this is indeed the smaller Pacific platform, I have a few of these here as parts models ( earlier runs ) we can look into what it takes for an upgrade,….kinda curious if others will chime in with the same kinda complaint as you have with your two,….

Pat

On the other hand, my new MTH Pacifics (20-3816-1 and 20-3813-1) show much different performance, especially at slow speeds. I have to advance the thumbwheel on the DCS remote to at least 3 or 4 mph before the loco moves, and then it lurches ahead, instead of gradually speeding up. Sometimes, the loco will start chuffing and puffing smoke before it starts to move, which seems odd to me, because I thought those features are triggered by flywheel rotation. Both of these locos exhibit the same poor performance at slow speeds.  I have perfect 10 for track signal all the way around, and all my older MTH locos run perfectly.

The only way I see them chuffing and puffing and not moving is the driveline is slipping somewhere.  Sounds like the flywheel is spinning but the wheels are not being driven.

It just sits on the track, chuffing and puffing smoke as if the drivers are turning.......except for one problem: the drivers aren't turning. Is this a relatively easy fix, or is it best left for warranty coverage?

It could be an easy fix, it depends on the specifics of the locomotive.  It could be as simple as a loose setscrew.  It could also be the gearbox, not so simple.

The only other scenario I see possible is if the dog bone coupler is slipping on the worm shaft. That would explain all his woes, …..kind of odd two would be doing it, but never say never in this industry,……might can use a flashlight and start the locomotive moving and see if the flywheel turns, but the drivelines doesn’t …….that surely would indicate lost motion…..that could definitely make the engines herky jerky at lower speeds,…..if this is the case, and you have two doing this, I’d suspect more complaints to be rolling in,……not a horrible fix if this is true, drill the dog bone coupler for a set screw, and never look back,….😉

Pat

FWIW, both of mine (new Heavy Pacifics) ,different road names and from different dealers, had LED light issues from some seriously bad QC.

IMG_3271

And then it's now the middle of December, and they still haven't said a peep about the sound files.

I had not noticed loose driveshafts/flywheels, but I don't yet have a lot of runtime on them (both did run and pull cars at my local club).

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_3271
Last edited by Vernon Barry
@harmonyards posted:

The only other scenario I see possible is if the dog bone coupler is slipping on the worm shaft. That would explain all his woes, …..kind of odd two would be doing it, but never say never in this industry,……might can use a flashlight and start the locomotive moving and see if the flywheel turns, but the drivelines doesn’t …….that surely would indicate lost motion…..that could definitely make the engines herky jerky at lower speeds,…..if this is the case, and you have two doing this, I’d suspect more complaints to be rolling in,……not a horrible fix if this is true, drill the dog bone coupler for a set screw, and never look back,….😉

Pat

If it's chuffing in time with the set speed and not moving, the flywheel pretty much has to be spinning.

FWIW, both of mine (new Heavy Pacifics) ,different road names and from different dealers, had LED light issues from some seriously bad QC.



And then it's now the middle of December, and they still haven't said a peep about the sound files.

I had not noticed loose driveshafts/flywheels, but I don't yet have a lot of runtime on them (both did run and pull cars at my local club).

Your lighting issue has not been reported by others so I suspect it not to be "seriously bad QC" as you describe.  Not sure why you insist on painting with such a broad brush when YOU experience an issue.

If it's chuffing in time with the set speed and not moving, the flywheel pretty much has to be spinning.

Agreed, …..I’m talking about the other end, on the worm shaft itself,….if that coupler is spinning on the shaft, that would give him the grief he’s describing,…..no doubt the flywheel must be turning, and seeing the tach stripe ….

Pat

Here's a short video that shows exactly what it is doing. In this video, it sits still, but chuffs and puffs smoke as if it's rolling. It starts out at 1 mph, and then I gradually increase it to 2, 3, 4, and it finally lurches into reverse at 5 mph. If you look closely at the video, you'll see that the flywheel is not turning while it is smoking and chuffing while sitting still. It does the same thing in forward; I just happened to get a good video capture of it in reverse.

I took the advice here and ran it for an hour, varying the speed between 30 and 35 mph. I did this for an hour in forward, and again in reverse. This video was taken after those 2 "break-in" runs, so there is clearly something else going on here.

Attachments

Videos (1)
MTHMEC470poorrunning
Last edited by BlueComet400

I can not explain the chuffs while it’s sitting still, but the lurch to me looks like a mechanical bind somewhere that the locomotive can overcome with enough voltage ……that’s just my observation from a far,……it must just be enough of a bind that it can overcome, and stay out of it as long as it’s in motion…..does this happen every time you stop it and do a restart from zero?….

Pat

@harmonyards posted:

It’s not that either mfr. went cheap, …..well, sorta,……your older engine is Pittman equipped, that motor is pretty hard to beat. Very good low voltage performance, with lots of power even at the lower rpm/voltage ranges,……what happened was, Pittman’s parent company Ametek, pretty much ditched the hobby industry as a whole, by pricing themselves right out of our market, …..clearly they saw bigger fish to fry in aerospace, medical, and the ATM machine business…..they’re even pretty much out of the elevator door motor business from what I’ve been told,,……this happened like overnight, so it left our dynamic duo of mfr.s to find another source, …..Lionel went to Cannon, and at first, MTH was using a SPG motor from Korea, that was a really good knock off a Pittman, but for whatever reason, it was short lived, …..perhaps SPG was too pricey as well, and MTH just used them as a temporary fill in the blanks until a more permanent solution could be had,……they finally went to a Chinese motor, same size as a Pittman, but not as good as a Pittman IMO, ……but before you go cussing out the motor, try a good break in period to see if she’ll loosen up,……

Pat

I had wondered about that. I remember hearing that Pittman motors that we use for our locomotives aren't even for model locomotives. My understanding is they're designed for industrial equipment, printers, etc., but happen to be the right size for O scale steam locomotives. I pulled a motor out of a broken printer years ago and wondered it it could be used for a model, but never tried it out.

Add Reply

Post
This forum is sponsored by MTH Electric Trains

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×