Skip to main content

I just received my new Atlas turntable yesterday. I haven't had a chance to run it yet but I took a couple of pictures to share with the group. From the first picture you can see that visually its the same turntable that was issued before. In the second picture you can see the larger can motor which includes a flywheel, the belt was also made larger and flat. They said they beefed up the deck with more rollers but I'm inclined to not take the top off for fear of a jack in the box setup like the previous one.

20190403_08083720190403_080844

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 20190403_080837
  • 20190403_080844
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

artyoung posted:

Davety: I know Atlas made it, I own it. Read it again.

Ok, it's hard to see what you're getting at with your statement. Perhaps worded differently would be less confusing. Since this is not a post-war accessory (it's modern) and Lionel hasn't made their turntable since 1964, over 50 years ago. You might understand why I saw it that way.

Freight Train Jim posted:

I hope the rollers under the table are improved because the original type were undersized and junk. The one I had would not even rotate under the weight of the engine.

If so I might be inclined to buy one.

From their website:

• New - larger and more powerful motor

• New - flat cogged anti-slip belt

• New - deck support with more roller bearings for greater support

of heavier locomotives

• New - redesigned metal contacts to power the rotating track

Railrunnin posted:

Certainly looks like they improved the product. 

The obvious advantage to me is the ease of installation. However it has nowhere near the detail of pit type turntables.  Does this product also have a smaller footprint than those available from other sources?

Paul

Its takes up 26" and the turn part of the table is 24".

Davety posted:
artyoung posted:

Davety: I know Atlas made it, I own it. Read it again.

Ok, it's hard to see what you're getting at with your statement. Perhaps worded differently would be less confusing. Since this is not a post-war accessory (it's modern) and Lionel hasn't made their turntable since 1964, over 50 years ago. You might understand why I saw it that way.

perhaps this will help - the word never is the key - "that Lionel never made"

Last edited by Moonman
Moonman posted:
Davety posted:
artyoung posted:

Davety: I know Atlas made it, I own it. Read it again.

Ok, it's hard to see what you're getting at with your statement. Perhaps worded differently would be less confusing. Since this is not a post-war accessory (it's modern) and Lionel hasn't made their turntable since 1964, over 50 years ago. You might understand why I saw it that way.

perhaps this will help - the word never is the key - "that Lionel never made"

I saw that, it's word trickery and it's supposed to be confusing. People only use it to try and look smart.

Davety posted:
Freight Train Jim posted:

I hope the rollers under the table are improved because the original type were undersized and junk. The one I had would not even rotate under the weight of the engine.

If so I might be inclined to buy one.

From their website:

• New - larger and more powerful motor

• New - flat cogged anti-slip belt

• New - deck support with more roller bearings for greater support

of heavier locomotives

• New - redesigned metal contacts to power the rotating track

I really never did have much of a problem with it's flimsy drive system.  The biggest issue has always been something I've never been able to remedy,  the table bed having intermittent or weak electrical contact with the engines causing erratic shutdowns, DCS engines being especially problematic or unable to receive signal.  If this new replacement cured those problem and its a drop in utilizing  all existing wiring, I may go for it...

joe  

Last edited by JC642

Davety, Thanks for starting this topic. Hope you will give us full report on setup and how it works.

I have the older model and it worked fine once I replaced the rubber band drive with an O ring suggested here on the forum. All went well until I "weathered" it. I got some of the "weathering" under the table and in the mechanics...I can still manually turn it, but lost the gears etc. !!  Lesson learned. I am considering getting the new improved model. Looking forward to your updates. I have even figured out a way to "weather" it this time without goofing the whole thing up.

Does it take up the same space as old table?

Thanks,

Tom

Tom Q Fan posted:

Davety, Thanks for starting this topic. Hope you will give us full report on setup and how it works.

I have the older model and it worked fine once I replaced the rubber band drive with an O ring suggested here on the forum. All went well until I "weathered" it. I got some of the "weathering" under the table and in the mechanics...I can still manually turn it, but lost the gears etc. !!  Lesson learned. I am considering getting the new improved model. Looking forward to your updates. I have even figured out a way to "weather" it this time without goofing the whole thing up.

Does it take up the same space as old table?

Thanks,

Tom

Yes, it takes up the same space as the old one. I plan on it installing this weekend if time permits. I'm going to the show in Timonium this weekend so that will eat up some of my time. I have to rewire my whisker tracks as I've added to them and my LCS PBC2 is full so I'm adding a 2nd one. That will take time as well. I'll try and post some updates once I get some of the work completed.

If only I didn't have those articulateds, I would have bough an Atlas TT - of course, it would have been the old one back then, and I guess that they were fairly flawed.

Anyway, "moving deck" and all, I'd use it if possible. But, it's not.

(There were TT's here and there with decking that turned with the TT bridge, but it was the exception. Painting the entire deck and faux "bridge support track" flat black would help disguise it.)

Richie C. posted:

Since the turntable is surface mounted, does any one know how it matches up (height wise) with various trackage, especially Fastrack, and if any shimming is required ?

I use Fastrack on my layout and had to use shims to get it to meet up. I didn't measure the distance that I needed to shim. I was fortunate enough to work a stint at a data center where they were throwing away hundreds of these. I didn't count how many I got, It's in the hundreds if not the thousands. I use them as shims all over my layout including on the tracks up to the turntable.

s-l640

Attachments

Images (1)
  • s-l640
Last edited by Davety

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×