Skip to main content

Bill T posted:

Trees and I would say that the photo chain game has completely gone off the tracks.

DSCF6475

Agreed. If you want to post your random photos, might I suggest doing so in "a picture a day"? Sorry if I contributed to the problem in my most recent addition; I was only making a link to the last photo I saw in the thread.

Now back to our regularly scheduled programming, please.

Last edited by TrainMan1225
John H posted:

I'm with Bill. Each photo should link (hence Chain) in some way to the photo before it. We can do it, just think about it when you post.

Yeah, that's why I no longer post on this thread. So many people just pick what they want to emulate, which null and voids the entire concept.

Also, posting photos of real trains, in my mind, sort of nulls the whole thing as well, but that's just me...

I was hoping it wasn't the case anymore, but I still look at the thread and see it happens even more these days.

Greg's original post to start this game was very clear and was a great idea: https://ogrforum.ogaugerr.com/topic/photo-chain-game

Straighten me out then, fellas, as I am positive you will not hesitate to do.

If we held strictly to that precept, on this page, 88, as an example, then looking back at the post showing a diner, every post reply would have to be featuring a diner. How would we go anywhere else, then? The post showing Gilly's Switch Tower, and Arnold's featuring signs, and mine showing more locomotives would be offenders of the sacred rule, and would merit removal. Well, if you say so, I will do so immediately that I hear from you.

Apparently, then, I mistakenly misunderstood that the "link" among the "chain" was the enjoyment of sharing photos, along the line, which reminded each of us of a particular feature among our own creative efforts in our hobby. Also, we are not all able to stay glued to this thread, nor the Forum, every minute of the day, nor over a couple days' time period, so we might easily come across a posting that interested us, once we were aboard again, quite beyond when it appeared along the chain; hence, we would, of necessity, be posting a photo that was at a precise spot along the line, BUT in keeping the the spirit of the thread - sharing related details, when we were able to post. No?

FrankM

Last edited by Moonson
John H posted:

I'm with Bill. Each photo should link (hence Chain) in some way to the photo before it. We can do it, just think about it when you post.

If that should be the case, JohnH, where would your posting of the diner fit-in along said chain, leading up to the top of this page, since it does not follow any diner photo posted anywhere along the entirety of page 87 ?

Go ahead. You can do it. Enlighten us.

FrankM

Last edited by Moonson

Maybe it would help if I explained my last above post about train signs as an example.

My train signs post was in response to the post immediately before that, which showed a switch tower. However, if you look extremely closely at that switch tower post, you will see the top of a tiny Yard Limit sign. That is why  my post had 2 small train signs in it, one of which says Reduce Speed.

Another thing I do when I post a photo is to pick one that has at least several other interesting things in it besides the feature that connects it to the prior photo. For instance, in my train signs photo, there is an oil Derrick, a freight station and a little man standing on that station waving his hand at the viewer, among other things. That gives the next poster some things to connect his photo to mine.

My point in explaining the above it is that a Forum member can easily miss the connection to the chain, unless they look very carefully at the photo in the prior post.

I agree with Moonson (Frank) that it would be best not to be strict about requiring a photo that one posts relate to the photo in the post immediately prior. As Frank said, it would be impossible for most of us to be glued to this topic 24/7.  My suggestion is to encourage having one's photo connect to a photo in the last several that were posted, but not to be critical if that doesn't happen.

IMO, we should keep in mind that new participants in the Photo Chain may not yet know the protocol here. Let's be kind to them.

Arnold

John H posted:

In my defense, the last post on 87 was by Arnold, with a diner in it. Also, you don't need to be glued to this thread 24/7, you just need to look at the current post to come up with a chain link.

You do not need any defense sir.

However, that post by Arnold was not about the diner. He focused our attention, in both posts with that diner in them on that page, on a coke machine and on a jukebox, each positioned in front of the diner in separate pictures for us to enjoy. He mentioned them, not the diner. We reacted to all of it, as did you. The diner was the backdrop, but either way, it was nice to see your post following them featuring your diner. That , to me, was in the spirit of this thread = sharing creativity and ideas, featuring a whole variety of items, from time to time, inviting  interaction from our fellow hobbyists according to our own inspiration and creativity.

BTW, Arnold and I, and Jim Battaglia had posted pictures of diners on page 86, so you had good precedent for your posting your diner, provided we are going to loosen-up a bit and allow/welcome some creativity among responses that might reach back a way along this thread, too, right?

FrankM

Last edited by Moonson
Gilly@N&W posted:
Moonson posted:

Straighten me out then, fellas, … If we held strictly to that precept, on this page, 88,  then looking back at the post showing a diner, every post reply would have to be featuring a diner. 

Nope. The next picture should have almost anything BUT a diner in it. Look at the picture and the link is something else that is also in that picture. There's a lot to choose from in John H's picture at the top of this page. There is a lighted sign, a road with double yellow lines, a van, parking places, rock wall, covered hopper in the background.....

True, as did FRANKTRAIN drawing our attention to the light present in that diner scene, using that facet to show us his marvelous vignette bathed in light.

I'm going to allow myself to be guided and instructed by your very interesting interpretation of all that the scene with the diner present made available to us. Your interpretation will now be my guide if I elect to share further here. Thank you for opening my eyes further, sir. I think your broader interpretation is marvelous.

FrankM

Last edited by Moonson
John H posted:

In my defense, the last post on 87 was by Arnold, with a diner in it. Also, you don't need to be glued to this thread 24/7, you just need to look at the current post to come up with a chain link.

Understood, of course.

I just enjoy looking beyond the most current post to see what I may have missed previously and want to applaud by posting a scene tied to it, like this one, reaching back and connecting to a post Arnold made in this page, of "Train Signs"...IMG_9498_edited-1

(P.S. Yes, I had counted the number of figures I had affixed to the layout by that time.)

FrankM

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_9498_edited-1
Last edited by Moonson

This recent gaggle of cabeese (cabooses? Cabeesi? Cabboosaroniious? Cabincars?  jus' messing witcha   ) posted by Briansilvermustang and Sidehack remind me of a favorite "wagon-top" caboose I have favored for a long time...IMG_5403

P.S. Hey Bill T, there are some passenger cars in the picture , too, for you. Luv 'em, too.

FrankM

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_5403
Last edited by Moonson

Well, not quite the "wrong side" of the tracks; rather, more of a workman's side of the tracks, just like so many communities had, back in the 40's and 50's, in the Pittsburgh area, around steel-mill plants.

Businesses like these catered to the workmen as they passed from the mills to the roadways that led them homeward...IMG_0111

FrankM

Attachments

Images (2)
  • IMG_0103
  • IMG_0111
Last edited by Moonson

Beast 20191211_192816

To be clear, my beast is in the lower right of the photo immediately above (looks like a bear staring at the hobo) and the beast in the prior post is King Kong.

I thought that it would also be OK if my post was a taxi cab, provided it was a different or interesting taxi cab, not one that looks the same as the prior taxi cab. Do you folks agree?

Arnold

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 20191211_192816

Oh yeah, multi-story buildings....IMG_5807 on the layout - My personal philosophy, as I have crafted layouts, has been that since the trains themselves are so horizontal, that having vertical variety among the layout is a good thing, visually, for myself as well as for guests.

Good mention, Bill T !

Luv 'em.

FrankM

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_5807
Last edited by Moonson
John H posted:

Some of you are not connecting to the previous picture.

I find it interesting that it is difficult for some to follow the simplest of rules for this game. I was thrown off myself for awhile, maybe just with the anticipation of posting the next picture.  Rules, procedures, what ever, I suspect we conjure up in our own minds what feels right to ourselves. It is just a harmless game so why should we care. So there is my two cents worth(less) of thought on the matter. Looking  forward to the next photo in the chain.

John H posted:

Some of you are not connecting to the previous picture.

So? I thought we settled this. Some of us look down the line and find interesting posts we hadn't seen due to not being on the forum for a while. Right? No? Huh?

Please.

Can we simply have recreation without being scolded?

FrankM

P.S. It might even be interesting to note that this reply does not address the posting immediately before it, though touching upon its theme and message; rather, to yours, one step further down the line. Oh dear.

Last edited by Moonson

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×