Skip to main content

The DZ-1008 relay is recommended to switch the powered rails for longer switches and stuff like the double-slip switch, it switches center track power to the appropriate rail to minimize the amount of space between the rollers being able to be on a powered rail.  That function works fine, but sadly it's not really a complete solution.  When you have short motorized units of almost any kind, and equally vexing problem is losing power to the wheels, the switching of center roller power does nothing for this issue.  With the standard recommended installation, the unpowered rails are just left floating, which obviously doesn't help the wheels maintain power.

In looking at the issue, it's clear that in order to actually power the proper rails for the switch position AND also ground the unpowered ones, it will require more contacts than the DZ-1008 has available.  What's needed is a relay module that has two sets of contacts so that both the center roller power and the outside rail power can be managed.

So, I'm setting about righting that wrong with this little project.  This is a relay module that has two Form-C sets of contacts to allow switching both the power and ground rails.  While I was at it, I made it a little more flexible so I could possibly use it in other applications.  It accepts AC power from 12-18 VAC, and input triggers from around 2 volts AC/DC and up to fire the relay.  Hopefully, this will be the "silver bullet" that will allow all my small motorized units to finally make a full trip around the layout through the longer curved switches and the double-slip switches.

The module is 1" x 1.05" and about .6" high, similar in size to the DZ-1008 relay package.

DZ-Replacement Relay 1.0 N1 SCHEMATICDZ-Replacement Relay 1.0 N2 TOPDZ-Replacement Relay 1.0 N3 3D BOT

Attachments

Images (3)
  • DZ-Replacement Relay 1.0 N1 SCHEMATIC
  • DZ-Replacement Relay 1.0 N2 TOP
  • DZ-Replacement Relay 1.0 N3 3D BOT
Last edited by gunrunnerjohn
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

John,   

   Is this project of yours going to be available to the masses and if so by kit or assembled.  I see you are using SMT technology which some of us are not up to speed on.  Maybe through hole also?   It is sort of perfect timing as I saved my last 5 or so switches that require the relay until last and they are not done yet.  If you are making these available I would be interested in a few.  I just ordered two speeders and I guess you are saying they will not go through the switch.  Thanks - let us know.

Yep, my speeders, BEEPS, the Trackmobile, Wienermobile etc. all have issues with the DSS or the long curved switches, even with the relays installed.  When I investigate, I see the rollers firmly sitting on a powered rail, but only one wheel without a tire near a powered rail, and apparently that one wheel loses contact long enough to stop the presses.  The relays did help some paths through the switch, but not consistently.  Larger stuff that was stalling on the DSS passage are now making it across, but that doesn't help the little guys.

As for making them available, I was looking and having issues finding the relay I used.  I have my stock of the relays I used, but they're out of stock.  As for a thru-hole design, I also try to use parts I've already used in another design to minimize the number of parts I have to keep around.  It's already getting hard to keep up with all the parts now.  Taking time to design another board that I'll never build and having to verify the design all takes time.

Maybe it's time you stepped up to some simple SMT designs and tried your hand at building them.

Oh, OK, here's what a thru-hole version would look like.  You still have to contend with the opto, I didn't find one that matched what I needed in thru-hole.  It gets a little bigger at 1.3" x 1.05" of course.

 

Attachments

Images (2)
  • mceclip0
  • mceclip1

You'll have do deal with the opto for this project.  It's easy, big legs and only four of them.

I ordered prototype boards, if all goes well and I don't have any issues, the thru-hole one should work as well, it's based on the same schematic.  I did find that Mouser has some of the thru-hole relays in stock, nobody has the SMT ones right now, so I'm glad I have enough to finish my RR.

I have used Atlas double pole, double throw snap relays with great success on an 11 degree ross cross track. For this purpose they will certainly handle the voltage. If you look at the atlas schematic you can use one pole for + and - then crisscross the wires on the second pole to get just the opposite. You will need to put this relay as a separate switch since it cannot take constant voltage on the solenoid. Atlas showed this in a booklet titled, Fun with relays.

The good news is, the relay I use on my board doesn't buzz.

I made sure the "normal" route through my DSS had the relay de energized, but that was just so it wasn't always on and drawing power.  My DZ-1008 relays don't make any noise, they just don't do the full job.  I hear the relays click as I change positions on the double-slip switches, but they're silent after that.

FWIW, I bought seven of the DZ-1008 relays, two were bad right out of the package!  Not exactly a good batting average.  For a little package that has a relay and a handful of components to provide the low voltage trigger, that's a pretty lousy batting average!

Last edited by gunrunnerjohn

Well, I assumed they're bad when I measure the contacts with a meter and they don't change when the green line has 5V or is open.  To me that's a 100% test of functionality, and two of them were bad!  I actually don't hear a noticeable buzz from my DZ-1008's, but I do hear the click when the actuate, if they actuate!

I had actually installed the bad relay with the "assumption" that I wouldn't get a second bad one, that will teach me to assume!

@Rod Stewart posted:

Great little project John! Should be the answer to this problem. You may want to contact Steve at RCS about offering these for him to sell with his DSS, and xover switches.

That smt board doesn't look too challenging to build. The unavailability of the relays though is going to be a problem!

Rod

I can't imagine it being a big challenge to build, all the parts are pretty good sized and pretty well spaced.  It's really getting harder to find thru-hole parts for some functions nowadays, so SMT is really going to be the norm.

I did order a few of the thru-hole relays from Mouser, and I might get a prototype run of the thru-hole version once I have the SMT version working.  The thru-hole is the only game in town unless you want to wait for the relays to be available again.

Looks like the thru-hole relay that is available fits in the 1 x 1.05 size that I had for the all SMT version, so that's not bad.  Sometimes with thru-hole, you have trouble routing the fat traces for power.

@Rod Stewart posted:

Great little project John! Should be the answer to this problem. You may want to contact Steve at RCS about offering these for him to sell with his DSS, and xover switches.

I sent Steve a little blurb about why I was building this, but I don't know if he wants to get into the business of supplying this stuff directly.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
Last edited by gunrunnerjohn

There are two dead rails on a standard switch, the suggested wiring for the DZ-1008 connects one of those to the center rail power and leaves the other one unconnected, depending on the path through the switch.  The one that's not connected to center rail power is the one that the wheels will roll over for that path through the switch.  My additional relay contacts will connect that rail to the outer track for that path.  This will allow small powered units with limited wheel contact to better transition the switches, especially the double-slip switches and the longer switches like the curved switches, #6 and larger, etc.

Once I get the boards in, I'm going to stick them on a couple of the problem switches and see if they do the trick.  I'm sure they have to improve things, but I don't know if it's a 100% solution as stuff like the DSS has a lot of places where you still won't have more than one wheel on any live rail.  If that wheel has a traction tire, you may have a big problem!  However, my little track speeders would stop on the DSS, the rollers were energized, but one wheel would be sitting on that dead rail, and no other wheel was on a live rail, so in that case I suspect it would have had a beneficial effect.

In looking at the parts availability, I see that the surface mount relay is out of stock and has long lead times.  Based on the availability of the thru-hole relay, I shifted gears and I'll use that relay, those are still available.

I added two jumpers to do the cross connection between the two sets of relay contacts, this avoids having to wire them separately from the connector. This will wire just like the DZ-1008, power in, two contacts out to the dead rails.

I also enhanced the relay pick with an accelerator cap.  This allows a reliable pick of the relay while having a large enough value resistor to avoid overheating the relay when energized for a long period of time.  This avoids having to have a regulated power supply for the relay.

The 10-pin connector is optional, I suspect many will simply solder to the board for the connections and treat this just like the DZ-1008 relay board.

     

Attachments

Images (3)
  • mceclip0
  • mceclip1
  • mceclip2
Last edited by gunrunnerjohn

Got my blank boards back from OSH Park, they having pretty quick turnaround nowadays.  I ordered on 2/27, they shipped on 3/9, and I got them today.

Built two of the 1.0 version with all SMT, no surprise they worked fine on the bench, it's a pretty simple design.  In testing I did note that accelerator cap would be useful if you run the board at 18V, I can increase the resistor in series with the relay to 1K and keep it from getting overheated.  I'll also chop the value of the input filter cap down to maybe 47uf, I don't need nearly that much filtering for just a relay.

The input trigger can be AC or DC from around 2.5 volts to 18 volts, pretty flexible.  It's also opto-isolated, so it can come from anywhere.

Given that all I've done is added the accelerator cap and the two jumpers to make wiring this to switches easier, I'm going to "shoot the dice" and order a batch of boards, with the thru-hole relays, what can go wrong?

DZ-Replacement Relay 1.0 Pic

Attachments

Images (1)
  • DZ-Replacement Relay 1.0 Pic

What this does for the everyday railroader WHO USES ROSS SWITCHES is allow better control over powering (and not powering) certain isolated rails that can cause either a loss of power or a momentary short when wheels run over those isolated rails.

This replaces and improves on the functions of the DZ-1008 relay; that although nice was a bit of an overgrown after thought for the DZ-2500C switch machines. The DZ-1008 worked well when plugged into the DZ-1000 switch machine that it was intended to support; but not so much when used in conjunction with the DZ-2500C switch machines.

Also, most of the specialty turnout wiring diagrams displayed on both ROSS's and DZ's sites are for the DZ-1000s. It takes a bit of electrical engineering knowhow ( for me trial and error) to interchange those diagrams for the DZ-2500Cs. This relay looks like it makes that interchange a lot easier.

I looked at the combinations of surface mount and thru-hole and decided that it probably makes sense to go with the thru-hole layout.  This allows me to offer a kit of parts that more people can take advantage of.

The thru-hole board ends up being 1.25" x 1.05".

The all SMT version is 1.05" x 1.0", so not a ton smaller.

Click on graphic to expand.

DZ-Replacement Relay 1.1 TH Schematic

Attachments

Images (3)
  • mceclip0
  • mceclip1
  • DZ-Replacement Relay 1.1 TH Schematic
Last edited by gunrunnerjohn

GRJ-

One consideration in the relay is the speed that it throws the power after the DZ-2500 throws via non-derail.  If the train hits the switch with a good head of speed, the relay would cause a short because the power wasn’t thrown fast enough.  A simple fix is a longer non-derail section of track into the switch than the switch alone provides.  Sometimes this isn’t possible for various reasons.  

Can you look into a high speed relay for this power throw?  The inherent delays (high-speed non-derail followed by the command from the DZ-2500 to throw the relay) all add up.

Just a request since you’re designing a “better” solution.

@LionelAG posted:

GRJ-

One consideration in the relay is the speed that it throws the power after the DZ-2500 throws via non-derail.  If the train hits the switch with a good head of speed, the relay would cause a short because the power wasn’t thrown fast enough.  A simple fix is a longer non-derail section of track into the switch than the switch alone provides.  Sometimes this isn’t possible for various reasons.  

Can you look into a high speed relay for this power throw?  The inherent delays (high-speed non-derail followed by the command from the DZ-2500 to throw the relay) all add up.

Just a request since you’re designing a “better” solution.

I think you're looking for problems where they don't exist!  Just how fast do you think the train is going to cover the few inches between the non-derailing trip and the fixed rails?  Let's look at the relay specifications first.

We'll take the maximum trip or release time of 5 milliseconds.  This analysis assumes the #4 Ross switches, they have the shortest distance between the non-derailing rails and the fixed rails we're switching.  All the other switches have a longer distance between the two points.  In order for the train to cross the three inches between the middle of the non-derailing trip rails and the start of the fixed rails we're switching power on in five milliseconds, it would have to be traveling at over 1,500 scale MPH.  Even assuming it takes the relay two or three times the max amount of time to trip, we're nowhere near having a response time problem.

@romiller49 posted:

So is this a double pole double throw relay?

Yes.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0

Believe me when I say I have a repeatable problem using the DZ-2500 and DZ-1008.  Or don't believe me.

Logic execution does take time and you remember a conversation with an (unnamed) friend that said there were issues with the DZ-2500 firmware.  Maybe my problem couldn't be addressed by a hardware change alone and is part of the logic execution.

Like I said, something that I have a repeatable problem to the point I disconnected the DZ-1008 and the problem goes away.  You're re-engineering the solution and its a point to consider.

@LionelAG posted:
Like I said, something that I have a repeatable problem to the point I disconnected the DZ-1008 and the problem goes away.  You're re-engineering the solution and its a point to consider.

Gee, I thought I just considered it!  Five milliseconds maximum activation time seems to cover the "fast relay" comment more than adequately.  I believe it's a pretty fast relay right now, and I doubt you'll find a suitable relay with a significantly faster transfer time.  Also, if the relay operation was instantaneous it wouldn't make any difference in the results, your train isn't going to travel very far in 5-10 milliseconds!

I can't do anything about the DZ-2500 logic delays, and I'm not planning on recreating their non-derailing logic.  It sounds like my solution isn't suitable for your operating environment, but there's not much I can do about that.

There's no doubt that the DZ-1008 was designed for the DZ-1000, I have to trim the leads sticking out of them to use them on the DZ-2500's.

I haven't seen any of the delay issues that cause shorts because of slow switching where I used the DZ-1008 relays with the DZ-2500 switch machines on my layout.  I have them on all of the 072/096 curved switches and the two double-slip switches.  I've transitioned the curves switches at 60 scale MPH and the relays switched long before there would be a problem with the switched power to the rails.  It's very unlikely that I'll ever be running faster than that speed, so I think I'm good.

Trying to thread your way through the DSS at high speeds is an exercise in futility in any case, so I certainly don't see the relay speed as being an issue there either.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×