Ross track vs Gargraves track

what are the advantages of Gagraves track over Ross track or vice versa? Seems like most people recommend Ross switches and Gargraves track. Seems logical that if you were using Ross switches that you would want to use Ross track. I have always used FasTrack (love the command control switches with cab2) but fixing to begin construction on large 17x38’ layout and want to get it right the first time. Thanks in advance for your help!

Original Post

Ready for someone to correct me here, but I believe in quality there isn't much difference between the two in regular track but when it come to switches Ross is superior. 

Also I'm thinking ( probably wrong again ) that at first Ross just did switches and track came as a later product. So everyone one got use to using Gargraves track with Ross switches. I see 14.5" and 29" straight track on there site for straight track but doesn't say if it's flex track or not so I'm guessing not. Gargaves straight track is 37" long

Bill

Gargraves seems to be known more for it's flextrack sections that allows you to bend any radius curve by hand, although it takes some basic skills. Their rails have a lower pair of flanges that ride in grooves cut into the wooden ties. This isn't seen if the final trackage is ballasted. 

Ross, while known primarily for their high quality switches, seems to offer mostly sectional track. Like their switches, they fasten the rails to the top of the ties in a more traditional spike manner. Thus, their sectional track doesn't have the rail flange below the surface of the ties. Not sure if they make flex track.

I always assumed that Ross was a little more $$ across the board so people would spend it on their switches, which are critical, but save on the regular trackage where gargraves was both good enough and offered the flex sections.

 

Gargraves, plastic ties, Ross wood ties.   Ross sectional track is much better looking and not as noisy.

Ross sectional curves if they say they are 0-72, they are 0-72.  Gargrave if its 0-72 it might be 0-71, 0-73.  It's never what it's stated.

My previous small layout was FasTrack, and I had no problems. The layout I am about to begin now (significantly larger) will be fitted with GarGraves track (both sectional and flex) and Ross switches. That last combo seems to be something of an accepted standard in the 3-rail world these days.

I just finished laying all Ross sectional track and switches on my 20 x 13 layout.  I picked it because it looks better (spikes, rail entirely on top of the ties), and is only marginally more expensive than Gargraves.  I still think so, but I can't say the process was easy.  The 72" diameter curved sections are slightly too broad.  That is to say, if you put 8 sections together, you end up with something less than 180 degrees and 2-3 inches too wide.  I though I was crazy until a layout builder recently confirmed the problem, and told me that you have to bend the curves a bit (even though they're rigid) to make it work.  Then, you end up having to re-trim the ends to make them square.  Overall, I found it difficult to get kink-free curves, but the end result is nice-looking trackwork.  Bottom line: if you want to stick sections together and run trains, I wouldn't use Ross.  If you enjoy doing trackwork and appreciate how good Ross looks when painted and ballasted, go for it like I did.

Building a pair of three rail additions to my 2 rail layout using GG track with Ross switches. My 3 rail track will be out of the way so appearance is not an issue.  However the switches will be hard to access so I would ONLY use Ross switches!!!!!

The GG track is a little loosie goosie but very useable.  The Ross track is more exacting.

The Ross track is more realistic in shape and attachment.  The Ross track is more labor intensive in the manufacturing process so a tad more $$$

Both companies are great, each with a tremendous track record.

Buy a small quantity of each and decide for your self.

Due to appearance, consider using Ross track front and center for visitor impression.

Ross track and GG track are compatible.  I like the owners of both companies.

IMO, only use Ross  switches.

I have used Ross high quality turnouts and Gargraves wooden tie flextrack on 3 different layouts, one with over 400' of track, since the late 1980s.  The flextrack enables custom curves that further enables more efficient use of limited space and placing of structures.  

 

A&Y RY[NC's Southern/N&W connector].

We are using Ross switches and sectional track, Gargraves where we want flextrack and are pleased with the results although there is a long way to go. We like the look with all Ross.

You didn't mention pricing but we were able to do better than list (40 X 22 so a good bit of track). If you want info, send me an e-mail.

Bill Webb

 

Old Hokie 70

Another very happy Gargraves track, Ross switches person here.  American made, very friendly/helpful staff, complementary products (Ross lists certain Gargraves items in their catalog/website that complement their product line without duplicating), excellent quality, competitive pricing (watch for the Ross ad comparing $$ to a popular off-shore brand), etc., etc..  Yes, Ross' genesis was in switches....now an extremely extensive line...,but now they have sectional track, too.

But I chose Gargraves track for another reason.....consistent appearance. 

Gargraves is the only one of these two suppliers to have the flex track.  While that's not necessary if you're laying long tangent (straight) trackwork, it is truly a godsend if you're trying to fit transitional curves into a free-form layout arrangement.  OTOH, using GG flex track to make standard curves, while not impossible, is a lot of work to get consistent curvature and has some inherent waste associated with the process.  So, for those portions of the layout using standard dimensional curves, I elected to use sectional preformed track.

Now BOTH Ross and Gargraves make sectional track in a variety of curvatures.  However, Ross uses their standard technique of staples ('spikes') to fasten the rails to the wood ties, whereas GG uses additional stringers embedded and glued to the bottom of the wood ties to hold the curvature.

Since there is sufficient GG flex track throughout my rather large layout, I considered that the main track work would have a more consistent appearance if the preformed pieces also did not have the staples ('spikes').  So I used sectional GG track for that reason.

Then, too, I really like the plethora of 'spikes' in the Ross switches.  It tends to celebrate (Norm Abrams term, not mine!) the switches, which they certainly deserve.  But, if you look at prototype switches, the rail supports are beefier of necessity than just spikes.  They stand out in appearance more significantly.  So, I think the Ross switches have their own prototypical justification in appearance.

All in all, you will be pleased to build an O3R layout with either/both of these suppliers.  We are truly blessed to have them a mainstays in our branch of model railroading.  I've had more than a couple folks modeling in HO comment to me that they wish their branch of the hobby had TWO complementing AMERICAN suppliers of the quality, reliability, always-availability of Gargraves and Ross.  And, you know?.........they're absolutely right!!!

KD

Gentlemen,

   I really love both Ross and GG for post war and modern train running.  Remember however if you are a Tin Plate runner neither handles Tin Plate correctly.

Long ago we build the Iron Horse layout with GG and unfortunately my Tin did not run well on it at all.  

The Ross Tin Plate Switches are Tin Plate in name only unfortunately.

PCRR/Dave

Never worry about what other people think, be strong and walk in the way of the Lord.

Too me either brand is a win win. I like the gargraves 37” for straights and any place a cut is necessary. I don’t try to bend it to a particular radius for a complete circle but will bend slightly to make things complete. Ross and Gargraves sectional curves are used for all major curves.

Rod Miller

I agree. Ross switches and Gar Graves track. Ross makes very nice track. When you come right down to the finish line it is the person building his or her layout that has the final vote. As said bending Gar Graves takes a bit of getting use to.  And another factor to possible consider is that Gar Graves offers more preformed curve track in different radius, with wood or plastic ties then any of the other manufacturers. .........Paul

Both brands of tracks are good. Gargraves flex is easy to bend while Ross tacks each rail to the tie and is not easily bent. I used mostly Gargraves Phantom Flex track on my layout as my curves are not standard.  I just bend them on a plywood jig and screw them down as I lay the track. If you want 100% Ross then you must use their pre-bent curves.  High quality track but more costly than Gargraves. As for switches the newer Gargraves is acceptable but Ross is really high end. Kind of like comparing a Chevrolet to a Cadillac. Once you start laying track don't forget the road bed material. I use the best, Midwest Cork- a rubberized cork composite material.

Builder of the Hill Lines ( New Delta Lines). Recreating history for the model RR community.

Allan Miller posted:

My previous small layout was FasTrack, and I had no problems. The layout I am about to begin now (significantly larger) will be fitted with GarGraves track (both sectional and flex) and Ross switches. That last combo seems to be something of an accepted standard in the 3-rail world these days.

I agree with you, Allan. That is what I used on this layout....

IMG_4365

IMG_4850x_edited-1

IMG_5120_edited-3

 

IMG_5184

IMG_5185

IMG_4354

IMG_5128

....both of them, as you have explained.IMG_5197

FrankM

Attachments

Photos (8)
superwarp1 posted:

Gargraves, plastic ties, Ross wood ties.   Ross sectional track is much better looking and not as noisy.

Ross sectional curves if they say they are 0-72, they are 0-72.  Gargrave if its 0-72 it might be 0-71, 0-73.  It's never what it's stated.

Compare apples to apples in other words compare Gargraves wood ties to ross wood ties. Gargraves does make wood ties track. Plastic is louder than wood anyday

Bill

A homespun version of what Mike CT is doing above for precision custom curves: I have always used a spare tape with a drilled hole at the 1" mark for the 3p nail at the pivot point for swinging the radius to the center rail for installing flex track. The tape has holes drilled at the desired curve arc dimensions for marking with a Sharpie. For example, in the photo below the black mark on the joists is at the 43" tape hole for 084 (42" R) and the red mark is at the 37" hole for 072 (36"R). I mark the joists to enable extending rough wiring, and placing distribution strips prior to cover up for:  connecting rail power at selected locations, for Tortoise motors, switchstand lights and lighting for planned structures. I follow the same procedure on the layout surface for installing split cork roadbed to the marked centerline and bend the track center rail to the cork center as I advance from trailing end to leading end, removing excess ties and installing screws  every 8-9 ties as I bend, fasten and drive up the rails for a loose fit at the trailing end. Then I ease the  tracks inward at the trailing joint until center rail at the track joint is precisely over the cork center and install screws. Then lightly drive up rails but not jam tight. IMG_1576How to achieve a perfect curve at the track joint.100_1239100_1240100_1304

A&Y RY[NC's Southern/N&W connector].

Attachments

Photos (4)
superwarp1 posted:

Gargraves, plastic ties, Ross wood ties.   Ross sectional track is much better looking and not as noisy.

Ross sectional curves if they say they are 0-72, they are 0-72.  Gargrave if its 0-72 it might be 0-71, 0-73.  It's never what it's stated.

Gargraves also has wood tie track.

Doug N 

 

 

Chief Engineer of the "See & Owe" railroad. When I see something that I like I will soon owe someone for it.

I do things a bit differently I use tubular on the portion of my layout that I want a 50s look . I then connect Gargraves  to it and use disguised Lionel switches where I want more realism. I used a wine barrel from one of my other hobbies to bend the Gg track O42 near the end O72 closer to the middle.

 

Al

Al Smeraldo posted:

I do things a bit differently I use tubular on the portion of my layout that I want a 50s look . I then connect Gargraves  to it and use disguised Lionel switches where I want more realism. I used a wine barrel from one of my other hobbies to bend the Gg track O42 near the end O72 closer to the middle.

 

I would just point out that mixing P/W Lionel track with Gargraves or Ross requires using conversion pins. Just thought that I'd make this clear for the new forum member.

Builder of the Hill Lines ( New Delta Lines). Recreating history for the model RR community.

Also there is a height difference between Gargraves and tinplate  lionel O. If the lionel O is laid without cork roadbed the addition of cork roadbed to the GG matches them up. In my case the tinplate O is on cork so I just added a second layer of cork under the GG and tapered it down. There is no problem with O27  as it is the same height as GG. The lionel switches work great and I have bought used ones for $20 a pair at train shows the iniital curve is 031 but I have cut some of  them down to mitigate that. The 072 ones are rarer and more expensive.

Al

Add Reply

Likes (0)


OGR Publishing, Inc. PO Box 218, Hilliard, OH 43026 330-757-3020
www.ogaugerr.com
×
×
×
×
×