Skip to main content

Is it safe to assume that dcs is likely cheaper to license than tmcc? The sounds and remote are usually considered to be much better with Lionel (especially legacy). Furthermore, lionels brand name is also high value and compatibility with Lionel is extremely convenient. Add that to the fact that mth’s announcement about  closing was well before the atlas announcement,  makes me think this may have been a bit of a fire sale (at least a little). Thus, my conclusion is that dcs is a cheaper to much cheaper license than Lionel tmcc. Let me know what you guys think of my logic. If it is correct, it would in theory bring down the cost of atlas engines a tad. Obviously we’ll know more in less than a week.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It’ll never be known what Atlas paid for the DCS license. And it doesn’t matter anyway. It’s a pipe dream to think prices are ever going to go down. Atlas O trains were already more costly that MTH. TMCC is older technology that Lionel abandoned for Legacy control.

For MTH to finally license DCS, I’m sure it didn’t come cheap. DCS was planned to continue on with new improvements coming. From what the Atlas video says, it seems the acquisition of MTH tooling has been in the works for a while. It’s looking more and more to me that this deal was more about Atlas getting access to the MTH factory than the tooling.

I don't see prices coming down. Even if it costs Atlas less to manufacture, I think I'd keep the profits! Atlas has experience with DCC in its HO line. Personally, I don't see the value in an investment in DCS. Atlas uses third-party decoders so bringing development of a competing command system in-house seems expensive. For those using DCS, it's important, but if I were running Atlas, I wouldn't invest in it. I'd try to increase my O gauge market share for as little as possible and make use of the existing tooling and factory.

I would speculate Atlas did this deal to get access to a reliable O gauge factory.  The DCS license gives them the ability to offer a product to the O gauge market that does not overlap with and consist of an inferior operating system to Lionel Legacy.  I hope however they continue to offer TMCC and DCS as a way to keep the market healthy for ERR and the new DCS spinoff.

I don't see prices coming down. Even if it costs Atlas less to manufacture, I think I'd keep the profits! Atlas has experience with DCC in its HO line. Personally, I don't see the value in an investment in DCS. Atlas uses third-party decoders so bringing development of a competing command system in-house seems expensive. For those using DCS, it's important, but if I were running Atlas, I wouldn't invest in it. I'd try to increase my O gauge market share for as little as possible and make use of the existing tooling and factory.

They also have experience with DCC on the O scale 2 rail side. I am not sure what brand of decoder/sound system they have been using lately (for 2 rail) but what I heard was that at some point they were supposed to switch over to ESU Loksound for the 2 rail decoders. I don't know if this ever happened but if their plan is to now start using PS3 in all of their O scale locomotives due to the fact that PS3 has a DCC decoder built in it isn't hard to guess that many 2 rail guys will feel this is a step backwards. I personally like PS3 but there is no doubt the ESU Loksound decoder has better sounds and more sound options. If I had a choice I would definitely prefer the ESU Loksound decoder over PS3.

Another thing to consider is there is NO WAY that the current PS3 boards will fit in the Atlas SW or MP15. The bigger locomotives yes, but not those small switchers with the horizontal drive. My opinion.

It's a pretty good guess that regardless of the cost of the DCS license, Atlas prices will be higher than MTH prices were, for many reasons, but we will see.  My other guess is that this license cost Atlas nothing upfront, but will be a royalty arrangement per piece sold.  Atlas invests next to nothing and Mike Wolf and any successor companies get an income stream that wouldn't have occurred. Given market conditions, the disappearance of the MTH brand, any substantial capital investment by Atlas would seem to be an unwise strategy, at least to me.

As far as TMCC showing up in these former MTH products, I wouldn't hold my breath.  They are engineered to use DCS and redesigning for TMCC is additional capital investment that may or may not see a return.  Once again, we'll see, but it seems like, at least initially, the odds of seeing TMCC and PS3 both being offered are not favorable.  I hope I'm wrong, since I have little interest in PS3 locos at this point.  I have a few, but that's it.

Last edited by Landsteiner

My personal feeling is that it is unrealistic to expect prices on just about anything, including our model trains, to go down in the near or even not-so-near future. Perfectly understandable if you keep up with what is happening on the national and international scenes. I am just VERY happy that Atlas is continuing the cream-of-the-crop of the MTH Premier line, and I am perfectly willing to be patient to see what results from the acquisition (consistent with the fact that I am a seasoned senior, and probably can't wait too long ).

Companies are not in business to lower prices, they are in business to make a profit. Altas just bought part of MTH tooling and other items, some one has to pay for that purchase. That someone is going to be us-the consumer. There is going to be no cost saving with an outlay of capital like that, we are going to pay for that. Furthermore why would they pass the cost savings on to the consumer? Atlas already knows they have a large customer base that will continue to purchase MTH, do you honestly think they just swooped this up because they though it was a "good deal"? No, I'm sure a lot of thought, cost analysis, profit margin and other items accountants take into consideration went  went into this purchase before they approached MTH. And even if all these items were cheaper to manufacture than Lionel, why on earth would you lower prices? That extra income would go towards re-investment into the company and to pay down the debt they took one to purchase the tooling, and other items. I have never seen any company purchase something without raising prices. Economies of scale work for the company, not the consumer.

.... Personally, I don't see the value in an investment in DCS. Atlas uses third-party decoders so bringing development of a competing command system in-house seems expensive. ...

Atlas is not bringing manufacturer of DCS in house. DCS will be developed by a separate company yet to be named but still property of Mike Wolf. Atlas will just have the license to use it, not develop or manufacture DCS.

Oh, I see. I suppose Atlas can then use the tooling and license to produce DCS-ready locomotives. It would save the expense of installing new firmware at first. Otherwise? Color me dumb, but I just don't see DCS as a growth market. Maybe something to do with the DCC capabilities? I was looking at Lionel Legacy S gauge locomotives this morning and some of them are advertised as being DCC capable. DCC seems to be very popular and widely used, at least according to the many online groups. I've been using DCC for years and it can be simple to get going, but it can also get complicated really fast.

Hard to say what Atlas paid for the DCS license, but I can see where it would be desirable to have that license since Proto-3 incorporates sound and control, plus includes DCC operability. The flexibility and availability of sound sets (I presume they'll have access to all of those as well) is a big plus and hopefully the DCS operation remnant will provide new sound sets down the road.

@Csxcellent posted:

I’m fairly new (no permanent layout and Christmas layout for 5-7yrs), but wasn’t one of mth’s selling points being cheaper than Lionel? This was part of my formulation when I made my first post.

Yes. But the price difference between Lionel and MTH has nothing to do with Atlas O trains.  With Lionel, you’re paying the higher price for the brand name recognition. MTH came in less expensive to be able to compete. Atlas O product is more detailed and tends to make trains more like the prototypes.

The real value in O gauge was K-Line. It’s a travesty that they couldn’t stay in business.

@Landsteiner posted:

It's a pretty good guess that regardless of the cost of the DCS license, Atlas prices will be higher than MTH prices were, for many reasons, but we will see.

As far as TMCC showing up in these former MTH products, I wouldn't hold my breath.  They are engineered to use DCS and redesigning for TMCC is additional capital investment that may or may not see a return.

You're probably right but for me the higher the prices go the more 3rd Rail locomotives become even more attractive.

While I agree with you that MTH products are engineered to use DCS I think it would be very easy to change a few things and install TMCC if they wanted to. If the users like us can do it I am sure Atlas could do it even more efficiently.

I'm thrilled that Atlas will produce engines with DCS PS3!!!  I have an evntire fleet of MTH DCS locos.  I have been very concerned over the past year or so.  I only hope and pray that someone makes an attachment to the TIU  that will enable it to receive signals for MTH handheld remotes.

I greatly prefer the remote to my phone or a tablet.  We operate on our railroad.  We just don't watch them chase their tail in an unending pursuit.  It is too inconvenient and a pain in the rear to carry a laptop around.  In addition, many of my operators do NOT wish to burn up their phone battery just running my railroad.

I would gladly pay the "new" DCS company the extra money needed to incorporate the technology that would continue to allow those of us who have sunk thousands and thousands into their product to be able to continue to use the product.

Fortunately, I have acquired multiple TIUs and Remotes, just in case none would ever be produced again.  I hope and pray that I've wasted my money and DCS systems are readily available soon, soon, soon, and also the DCS company either incorporate the capability for remote, or create a product to plus into the TIU the "newer" TIUs that will allow for the remote.  My dream.

Last edited by John C.

Add Reply

Post
OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
330-757-3020

www.ogaugerr.com
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×