Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I would think for a 099” curve, the full table would be around a few inches wider and longer, to avoid losing an engine over the side. That would mean around 8’6” in width and length to accommodate switches. That would need to be repeated on the opposite end of the dog bone or u shape layout. Anything smaller should fit inside allowing for passing clearances.

Last edited by Artie-DL&W

You need a lot of space.  This one is 13 x 23 plus extra for the table for 72 inch diameter curves.  A figure 8  would not take up as much room (about 7x14) , but if you are going big what's the point? I was trying to figure out how big a room I needed for particular layout designs with 72 min curves.

You could save space with a Ross double crossover. 

Inked13x23b idea_LI

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Inked13x23b idea_LI

Excluding the distance between between the track centers and the table edge the minimum width is the curve diameter.  The minimum length for the loop to return to parallel is 1.5 times the curve diameter.  If the loop is not going to close with itself but exit parallel to the entry then the required width increases by the desired separation.

For your O99 reverse loop with a 4.5"  track spacing between the entry and exit tracks is 99" + 4.5" or 103.5".  The length would be 1.5 * 99" or 148.5".

Here are some possible configurations of reverse loops.  These are done in O54 but they illustrate the idea.  The first example is the minimum as described above. By inserting 4.5" straight in the right side the entry and exit will be separate but parallel.

Jan

O54 Reverse Loops

Attachments

Images (1)
  • O54 Reverse Loops

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR
OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
330-757-3020

www.ogaugerr.com
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×