Originally Posted by rrman:
. . . not sure why a box car at the end. Only reason I can surmise is FREDs can't fit the TiteLock couplers that linked these cars together, because of the large overhanging coupler shields.
Right, wrong, other suggestions?
Actually, it has nothing to do with couplers. All US automatic couplers on interchanged cars or locomotives will couple together -- standard couplers, tight lock couplers (passenger equipment), and shelf couplers (tank cars).
The reason for the buffer car is to provide the minimum separation (between certain cars placarded for certain hazardous materials and an engine, passenger car, or occupied caboose) required by Federal law. If the tank train stalled and had to be shoved to clear the main track, or had to be switched from the rear, then a following train or locomotive crew (and the railroad) would be in violation of Federal laws if they coupled directly onto the rear tank car (providing, of course, that it had a hazardous material placard displayed). Corn syrup and other non-hazardous materials carried in tank cars are exempt. It's the cargo, not the type of car.
So, standard practice is to place a buffer car at the rear of a train in which the rear car is placarded for hazardous material, regardless of whether it is a boxcar or a tank car, and regardless of the type of automatic coupler it is equipped with. It is not a requirement to do this, but the railroad is spinning the wheel of fortune and hoping to win, if it does not take this step, and the monumental amount of unnecessary delay involved in having an engine -- especially if it is leading a following train -- hunt down a buffer car, move at Restricted Speed with a Trainman hanging onto the side of the car on the leading end while shoving, possibly for miles, up to the hazardous car at the rear of the preceding train, etc., is obvious and is just plain bad operation of a business and subjects the employees to unnecessary risk of injury.
Proper Preparation Prevents Poor Performance.