Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Sometimes I get the Tradional, sometimes the PS2 versions.  It depends more on what is available than anything, as I prefer the PS2.

 

So far, both the PS2 and Traditional versions I have run well, so I have no complaints with either.

 

I do like the traction tires-I just got a 400E with PS2 and have quite a few 200 Series freight cars.  I intend to have it pull all of them.

Maybe I'm just old. My Std. Gauge & O-Gauge came without sounds when they were made (1920-1930's). I'd like to have a horn, whistle or mabe a bell at times. As far as the cost of the new. I too feel that traditional should cost less because the engines do not have the PS2. Maybe it's just another way to "force-feed" the new buyers PS2? I Dunno .

The motor is entirely different between the two versions:

 

The Traditional motor is a series wound, open field A/C type motor, made in the same style as the originals.  It is equipped with a drum-type E-unit.

 

The Contemporary Version uses a very large D/C can motor.  The electronics in the PS2 board allow it to be operated with A/C current.

 

If you wanted to convert a Contemporary version to A/C operation, you would have to purchase an aftermarket electronic reverse unit with a built in rectifier, or add a rectifier and original style E-Unit.

 

If I had to guess, I would guess that the Traditional type motor is very labor intensive to assemble (lots of separate parts, winding the field and armature, etc).

The "contemporary" MTH locos have been a hit at SGMA events.  Fantastic pulling power allows really long trains, always popular with the crowd.  Sounds and smoke are another advantage.  My only reservation is a concern about future repairs.  Will parts to keep the electronics working always be available?

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×