Skip to main content

I decided to build a separate post for the Twin Pines Railroad. This continues to be a work in progress. A BIG THANKS to everyone who contributes to this forum. I've learned a lot and enjoy seeing how everyone approaches the hobby.

My train room is in a basement  space with the available layout space of 9 x 13.  Walls are at the top and left and right sides. The layout can run three trains separately or a single train with access to all rails. I am not set on any particular period as I like to run both steam and diesel. For now I am a "looper" who is trending towards scale 3 rail.

For the most part I have some of the BNSF merger family and bits of Canadian National (think Illinois Central and ICG) and UP/SP.  Outliers are a Pennsylvania GG1 and the NW 611 steamer. I grew up in Chicago and saw most of the larger road names running in the 60s.

All  I can say is, what I started with is in no way similar to what I have now and I expect that my next layout will be different that what exists now.

This is a "not quite" current Scarm image of the basic layout. I've since added another passing track along the top.

basement yard 5

This shows the layout as it basically is today. I still need to add the switch labeling to the new switches. The black track serves as my staging area / commuter station.

Switch Plan v2

This Scarm 3D gives an idea of the elevation changes on the layout. Its hard to get enough clearance for crossovers with such limited distance. The drawing is missing the added passing track. I can reach most everything with the open center. There are pop ups at the corners and another at the top right.  The bridges are either swing out of lift up in order to access the center, In an emergency it's a "dive under" as the table height is only 32 inches (will never do that again).  The double crossover is at an elevation of 4 inches (my zero elevation) and track either rises to about 7 inches or descends to 1 inch.

Layout 5

I realized I did not have enough yard or staging area and grabbed real estate wherever I could. Yes this makes for a track heavy layout.

An early photo of the rough layout. Lots changed after I picked up a couple of engines which needed 072 minimums. Previously, I built to 042 minimum to handle passenger cars. Best I knew at the time. Notice the reversing loop in the foreground. There is a wye at the bridge which provides two separate loops for operations. I cannot operate in the middle, I get dizzy spinning while watching the trains loop around me.

IMG_2129

Torn apart and rebuilt, with the help of Scarm this time to fit the 072 curves.  This is where I wished I had never laid down the plywood deck. It made doing the track revisions much more difficult than it needed to be. But I was not going to start from scratch. Another mistake? - I could argue either way.

IMG_2216

Beginning to be happy with this layout, but the lack of staging would arise once more and end up in more tweaks.

IMG_2218

So after starting scenery and ballasting track, I decided I could get another 5 inches in depth to the layout for another long passing track along the back wall. Here I go again ripping up sections of my layout. Work in progress. Note the added track under the power station. Nice because it gave me more modeling space for a town above it and reduces the amount of visible track.

IMG_20201113_161523934

More to follow ... Jeff

Attachments

Images (7)
  • basement yard 5
  • Switch Plan v2
  • Layout 5
  • IMG_2218
  • IMG_2216
  • IMG_2129
  • IMG_20201113_161523934
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Jay, yes a backdrop is actually done. I there is a post Dec 17th which shows a couple of buildings with the backdrop in the background. I have also posted several videos which capture portions of the layout. I am making progress to getting it into the shape for a "Big Reveal".  I am considering buying  cloud stencils to do my side walls since I don't have room to hang anything.   

GRJ - I tried to build with no more than 2.8% grades. There are a couple of spots pushing 3.8% according to scarm - although I did adjustments as I built to minimize the grade, particularly at the turnouts. So what on scarm was supposed to be 6 1/2 to 7 inches clearance ended up at 5 1/2.  Visually most of the adjacent track is on a down grade while that next to it is going up, so even at a 2.5% grade it looks like 5%. The most visible spot is left of the dbl crossover where the track is diverging vertically in order to get cross over clearance further around the bend. While operating, the longer trains slow down a bit going up and speed up going down when running conventional. Using DCS it maintains constant speed. Without the space savings of the crossover I could not get the vertical clearances and could not build this layout.  NOTE: I went back with a level and measured the grades at various points.  My steepest grade is 13/16" over a run of 28"  = 2.9% grade.  A few points have 3/4 rise over 28" = 2.68%. The rest of the grades are 1.8%.  Minimum tunnel clearance is 5 1/2" top of rail to bottom of tunnel / bridge.

This is where the software helped immensely. I kind of knew what I wanted, it showed what I could and could not do given my space constraints.  Really good reality check.

https://drive.google.com/file/...yLx/view?usp=sharing

I posted this in May 2020. I forgot about all the residue left by blue painters tape used to protect the track from the gray grout mix seen all around the layout. A quick wipe with alcohol cleaned it right off.

Last edited by ScoutingDad

3.8% is workable, but it's pretty steep.  I have 2.5%, and I was trying for 2%, just couldn't get enough run to make it happen.  At 3.8%, I can see some smaller and less powerful locomotives being limited as to what they can pull.  I tested my 2.5% grade with a Lionchief Plus Camelback that I converted to battery power, I don't have track power fully wired yet.  I ran the Camelback up the grade pulling eight Railking Aerotrain passenger cars, it had no issues, which gave me confidence.  The Aerotrain cars were selected as they're noted for having fairly high rolling resistance, so I thought they'd be a good test for the grade and the fairly small LC+ locomotive.

Got a little more work done over the past week or so, amazing how distracting selling off trains can be. Been focusing on the town area of the layout and thinking about how I want it to look given the space I have available. Added the wall in pink on the left and tore out the wall on the right.   

IMG_2626

Using my drill press and a couple of router bits I made the railings out of 3/4 inch foam insulation.  The foam is covered with a thin layer of mortar mix and painted. I should really scratch the foam, since there is not much for the mix to grab on to - it chips and flakes off easily - OK on wood though.

IMG_2629

Now with the top deck removed, more foam was laid down to provide walk ways for passengers. As much as I wanted the deck to be at subway door level, the curves just would not allow that to work. The outside curve is about 42 inches and the inside 31. (Next time the passenger station will have to be a straight section.)  The back retaining wall is masonite with thin foam strips all coated with mortar mix. I'll go back and paint to better match a concrete color. Planning to add arched detail sections between the back columns and add spot lights to the columns to illuminate the passenger areas.

IMG_2630

Top deck is back on with a coating of concrete paint color.  Decided to add spheres to the top of the pillars for a bit of detail interest.

IMG_2632

Attachments

Images (4)
  • IMG_2626
  • IMG_2629
  • IMG_2630
  • IMG_2632

Did a little more work on TPRR. Got the upper level painted and added ballast to the terminal track all the way out to the 4 way yard switch. 

Still trying to decide what I want on this upper level. I have several buildings I could assemble. Need to add lamp posts and below ground lighting. I like the way the rails came out.

IMG_2634

A view of the terminal. Arches added and painted. Printed a few "old" travel posters and hung them on the retaining wall across from the terminal. I may add a "frame" around them.

IMG_2635

A bit of an illusion - the gray section is the retaining wall. I added passengers to the last 'eL' and need to add them to the 3 other subway cars. They are 1:50 scale people and pretty narrow, but fit well in the tight space of the cars.

IMG_2636

Still need to do a touch more ballasting and lay down some grass. This section is about where I want it. The right side is a backdrop I painted a while ago. The back right with the trees lifts out completely so I can access track for maintenance as needed. This section blends pretty well with the backdrop so the eye does not notice the transition. Paint is a little more subtle in person.  It would be a lot easier popping up through the space if the table were 40 inches off the floor rather than 32. The light ballast is decomposed granite purchased at a feed store - called starter chicken grit. Has some nice color variation. And at $9 for a 50 pound bag it can work well in places. I prefer a dark grey for my main lines since it tends to hide the middle rail.

IMG_2633

Attachments

Images (4)
  • IMG_2633
  • IMG_2634
  • IMG_2635
  • IMG_2636

Marty (McFly?) - More than likely if the Twin Pines never existed, the town and RR would have a different name - but "lone pine" could have been a choice : )  The name stems from a resort in the Spooner Wisconsin area my dad owned in the 50s and 60s - Twin Pines Resort on Twin Lake.  The twins were a red pine which had a common trunk until about 4 feet up and then split into two. Unless the DeLorean hit it when the tree was young, the DeLorean would be totaled - it was a big old growth tree. 

I have an idea for modeling a twin red pine tree and placing it in the center of town's main road. So yes there is a chance a vehicle could run into it. I don't have room for a "parkway" but a tree island will work.

9x13 is a really challenging space to work with - lots of compromise needed, especially if you want to have 072 curves to run the big stuff and still have visual and operating interest. 

twin pines n

Attachments

Images (1)
  • twin pines n
@MartyE posted:

OK so I have to ask, if a Delorean runs over one of the pine trees back in 1955, does your Railroad become "The Lone Pine Railroad"?

Nice work.  I've booked marked this thread as I have a similar space to work with.

@ScoutingDad posted:

Marty (McFly?) - More than likely if the Twin Pines never existed, the town and RR would have a different name - but "lone pine" could have been a choice : )  The name stems from a resort in the Spooner Wisconsin area my dad owned in the 50s and 60s - Twin Pines Resort on Twin Lake.  The twins were a red pine which had a common trunk until about 4 feet up and then split into two. Unless the DeLorean hit it when the tree was young, the DeLorean would be totaled - it was a big old growth tree.

I have an idea for modeling a twin red pine tree and placing it in the center of town's main road. So yes there is a chance a vehicle could run into it. I don't have room for a "parkway" but a tree island will work.

9x13 is a really challenging space to work with - lots of compromise needed, especially if you want to have 072 curves to run the big stuff and still have visual and operating interest.

Jeff, thank you for the history behind the name for your layout.

Yes, 9x13 is a tough space for 072 curves.  I gave up on the idea of including them myself early in the designing process in my 11x11 room.  As it is the layout ended up being about 9x11 with a little peninsula in the opposite corner from the door since there is a big sliding glass door on the adjacent wall.

Pennsynut - to me it seems like this is taking forever. I have lots of ideas and get stuck trying to figure out what to do first. Then the CEO walks in and ask why certain sections are not done. Of course she is right, but I was focusing on my town area and left others devoid of any work - no ballast, backdrop - so those areas do not look very good. (Same area as the EP-2 photo - track laid but not much else)

I really should take the advice others have offered - do something on your layout every day.  Or as Nike used to say " Just do it" .

After rebuilding my layout at least three times, all by modifying existing areas and building on top of the old, I finally reached the conclusion, when it comes to track, it is better to rip everything down to the base and restart. I saw an area where I have a dip on a curved switch which sometimes causes a problem. I think the only viable solution is shimming the track because this area is already landscaped and ballasted. I really thought the base was level when I laid the track.

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×