Skip to main content

I am looking at purchasing a new camera for photographing trains with the Christmas money I get. My budget, added on to my existing money should total out around $500-600  The Canon Rebel T4i especially stands out to me. What kind of camera do you use or recommend that is high quality and within my budget?

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by ES44AC:

What kind of camera do you use or recommend that is high quality and within my budget?

 I use a Canon 7D, but it is about $1400 over your stated budget.  However, when I saw the end coming for roll film cameras, I bought a Canon Rebel and learned digital photography by using it and some on-line instruction.  Than I upgraded to the 7D.

 

The Rebel is a good camera, light, durable, and reasonably well-equipped, and you can surely get your money's worth.  There are a lot of lenses and accessories available from Canon for the Rebel.  Canon markets toward professionals, but also does a lot of marketing to advanced amateurs, mores than Nikon.  So there is a lot of helpful instruction on the Canons website.  I would suggest that, whatever camera you decide to purchase, read -- and try -- everything in the owner's manual.  The image software that comes with the camera is not bad.  If you like the camera and want to use it a lot, then use Adobe Lightroom.  For railroad photography you can do anything you need with that program, unless you plan on making murals or selling prints, in which case you might need Adobe Photoshop for acute adjustments and repairs.  Lightroom will get rid of birds and utility wires, make your teenage daughter's acne disappear, improve color saturation, and many other things.

 

Nikon's cameras have a sterling reputation for being able to take a licking and keep on ticking, which makes them popular with professionals, and you could not go wrong with Nikon's competitor to the Canon Rebel, if you so choose.  However, the Canon marketing is friendly to advanced amateurs, and I have found Nikon's to be aimed more toward professionals.

Last edited by Number 90

I was a happy Kodachrome 64 and Kodak/FUJI print film shooter until 2007, using all Nikon manual cameras, but today I use 2 digital cameras and 1 Nikon manual loaded with Fuji Velvia slide film.
In the past 3 years, I purchased first a Canon A-1400, and then a GE X-550. While both are point and shoot digitals, the GE is more like a DSLR in that it has many more settings and features. Total cost for both: less than $300.00. I use both for train pics and vids,depending on weather, train speed, and other variables.  

My Nikon FM10 loaded with Velvia has been relegated to working steam photos only, it was used on trips to see: #611,#765, #734, and EVRR #11.

Since my other hobby is posed photography of emergency vehicles, both digitals have viewfinders.

I am satisfied with this set-up, as my income is restricted.

First off, asking what camera -I- use gets you nowhere.   Sometimes I use a 1942 Leica IIIc, sometimes I use a Chamonix 045n 4x5, sometimes I use a Nikon D800E with many  thousands of dollars worth of lenses.  

 

A better question is, "What's the best way to get what I need for $500?"  I will begin by telling you this, you have it backwards.  The MOST important thing is not the camera.  All cameras made in the past ~8 years are pretty close the same when it comes to making an image.  Foamer photography is about the LEAST demanding kind of photography you can do.  My advice is to get a capable but cheap USED camera, from ebay.  The value of digital cameras drops very fast.  Buy a new one, and you're throwing money away.  Buy a used one and you are taking advantage of that rapid decline in price.  I suggest a used Nikon D7000.  Very capable camera, a definite step up from the entry level Rebel.  These can be had for $300 on ebay, and will be cheaper after Christmas.

 

Now for the important thing, the lens.  It's the LENS, not the camera, that determines what you can photo and how well.  If you buy a new Rebel that's going to eat up all your money right there.  Buy a used Nikon D7000 and a USED Nikon  55-300mm VR for ~$150.  You've now spent at total of $450.  With the remaining money buy a USED Nikon 18-55mm VR for about $50.  Add a camera bag for $20 and you're all set!  By buying used gear, you will be able to have TWO lenses instead of one, which will double the kinds of shots you can take.  You will have lenses that cover from 18--300mm, and that's almost certainly all you're going to need for several years (unless you start getting into night photography.)  The D7000 is a better camera than the Rebels, all in all.  You will get more for money.

 

 

Kent in SD

I have a Canon 750D/T6i, a newer model with 24MP, stabilization and very good imaging, which I bought at the B&H store in NYC with a similar smaller camera for my wife at the end of September (yes, I was more than a little concerned walking out of that store with a massive bag of cameras and gear). It is orders of magnitude better than the older version of the same camera I'd started shooting with in 2007 or so
 
 
 
 
 
 
Originally Posted by Two23:

First off, asking what camera -I- use gets you nowhere.   Sometimes I use a 1942 Leica IIIc, sometimes I use a Chamonix 045n 4x5, sometimes I use a Nikon D800E with many  thousands of dollars worth of lenses.  

Yeah, I have a few cameras I sometimes use that are a little on the older side. I shot with a Pentax K1000 for several years before I finally embraced digital.

Then, there's these...

 

 

Last edited by p51
Originally Posted by Two23:

First off, asking what camera -I- use gets you nowhere.   Sometimes I use a 1942 Leica IIIc, sometimes I use a Chamonix 045n 4x5, sometimes I use a Nikon D800E with many  thousands of dollars worth of lenses.  

 

A better question is, "What's the best way to get what I need for $500?"  I will begin by telling you this, you have it backwards.  The MOST important thing is not the camera.  All cameras made in the past ~8 years are pretty close the same when it comes to making an image.  Foamer photography is about the LEAST demanding kind of photography you can do.  My advice is to get a capable but cheap USED camera, from ebay.  The value of digital cameras drops very fast.  Buy a new one, and you're throwing money away.  Buy a used one and you are taking advantage of that rapid decline in price.  I suggest a used Nikon D7000.  Very capable camera, a definite step up from the entry level Rebel.  These can be had for $300 on ebay, and will be cheaper after Christmas.

 

Now for the important thing, the lens.  It's the LENS, not the camera, that determines what you can photo and how well.  If you buy a new Rebel that's going to eat up all your money right there.  Buy a used Nikon D7000 and a USED Nikon  55-300mm VR for ~$150.  You've now spent at total of $450.  With the remaining money buy a USED Nikon 18-55mm VR for about $50.  Add a camera bag for $20 and you're all set!  By buying used gear, you will be able to have TWO lenses instead of one, which will double the kinds of shots you can take.  You will have lenses that cover from 18--300mm, and that's almost certainly all you're going to need for several years (unless you start getting into night photography.)  The D7000 is a better camera than the Rebels, all in all.  You will get more for money.

 

 

Kent in SD

Kent, I have to say that is some of the best advice I have read about used digital equipment. My question is; if I go this route in the future, would the fleet of lenses I have for my current Nikon FM10 be usable on the 7000 body?
Thanks,
Warren Jenkins

I am always a little cautious about used electronic equipment, and digital cameras are big-time electronics.    So I would not recommend used off ebay.   If you want to go the used route, go to a camera store that sells used equipment.    That way you can test it and perhaps get a small warranty.   And yes you will pay a few bucks more.

 

My current camera is a Canon T5i.   When I was looking, B&H camera mentioned above had a package deal on a T3i which I found first.   Then I read a review and found out that the T3 was a 5 year old model.   I learned that they had release the T5 about 9 months previous.   I searched the B&H website and found a T5 package within my price range.   I figured the later model was better due to more pixels and stabilization.    B&H does mail-order and this is the second camera package I have bought from them.   

 

I did my reviews on a website called "DPREVIEW" which reviews all sorts of photographic equipment is very current.  You might want to visit their site and do some research.   They also give some estimated street prices.    I found the B&H deal the best if I bought a package including a second lens etc.

I primarily use an iPhone 5 for my videos. Occasionally, I will use a GoPro Hero 3 White. Neither is the cutting edge of videography in terms of quality, but both are relatively cheap compared to newer models. I'd say video quality is decent. 

 

For stills, I use the iPhone, and I used to use a Fujifilm Finepix S 2500. The 765 photo is with the Finepix, and the UP SD90MAC is a screenshot/photo taken with the Iphone while taking video. 

Dan's 14th birthday party NKP 765 9-7-13 070

IMG_3716

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Dan's 14th birthday party NKP 765 9-7-13 070
  • IMG_3716
Last edited by pittsburghrailfan

I just checked B&H photo, and they have the Cannon T5i at a great price

 

put this in your search bar

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/...s_rebel_t5_dslr.html

They have several bundles with the T5i, but this one has two lenses with

image stablization, a very good feature.

Also free shipping, no taxes unless you live in New York state.

 

I personally use Nikons, namely two D7000's, but having said that,

when you get to DSLR cameras, the later ones, it's up to the person

with the camera to make good images.

You can use the "program" setting while you learn. Taking many many images

helps, one reason I love digital. Keep your back to the sun and on your subject

while you learn!

I have purchased lots of stuff from B&H, I trust them, good folks to deal with.

 

Good luck,

Ed

 

Michael,

 

Interesting that you should bring up this subject.

 

I use my cell phone camera (LG Stylo) and a Fuji Fine Pix (nothing expensive here) but have become increasingly frustrated in the quality of the videos of with both of them. Everything looks great on the device screen, but once I view it on a monitor, it's less than desired.  Taking videos of trains and planes requires zooming for long distance shots, and all I get is pixilation. 

 

So I'm finally going to look into buying a "real camera" so will be watching this thread closely as it goes on.

 

 

Originally Posted by ES44AC:

Thanks for all the advice everyone! This is very helpful in picking out the right camera. I really like both the Canon T4i and the Nikon D7000. I think I would still go ahead and buy the camera new, but I will look at used just to see if I find anything. Keep giving your opinions!

 

 

Just since this time last year I have purchased about $8,000 worth of used camera gear, mostly from ebay.  Going back the past 15 years I have no idea how much I've bought & sold, mostly on ebay.  Never once have I had a problem.  Sellers know that if you are unhappy you will give negative feedback, and that absolutely kills them.  I did have someone list a 105mm macro lens as something it wasn't, and when I contacted them they not only took it back immediately, they gave it free return shipping if I'd give them positive feedback.  I have zero qualms about buying something from ebay from a person that has an excellent feedback history.  You can save major money going this way.  A great source for refurb Nikons is Cameta Cameras.  I have bought three refurbs from them over the years and they were absolutely perfect.  They might sell refurb D7000, but honestly how can you possibly go wrong buying a lightly used D7000 for $300?  It's a no-brainer.  Saving the money on the camera is going to let you get a second lens, and that's an absolutely major plus for photography.  The $450 deal on the Rebel + two lenses sounds OK, although I still prefer the Nikon/Sony sensors.  Those make more of a difference for night and low light shooting though.  There are a lot of features on a D7000 that are aimed at the "advanced amateur"  that you might not use though, such as flash sync 1/250s and the ability to use a wider variety of lenses.  My main gripe with a new camera is they lose about half their value in the first year or so.  I'd rather make someone ELSE take that hit, LOL.

 

 

Kent in SD

Last edited by Two23
Originally Posted by Borden Tunnel:

rmines what you can photo and how well.  If you buy a new Rebel that's going to eat up all your money right there.  Buy a used Nikon D7000 and a USED Nikon  55-300mm VR for ~$150.  You've now spent at total of $450.  With the remaining 

Kent, I have to say that is some of the best advice I have read about used digital equipment. My question is; if I go this route in the future, would the fleet of lenses I have for my current Nikon FM10 be usable on the 7000 body?
Thanks,
Warren Jenkins

 

 

You can use AiS lenses on the D7000--I have three I use on my F3/T and D7100.

 

 

Kent in SD

Hi Members - I am a retired Industrial Arts Teacher. Taught High School for 36 years in Michigan. My subjects were Graphic Arts, Photography, Printing Trades, Year Book Advisor and Drivers Education. Owned several Driving Schools over the years. Still do side jobs in Drivers Education and Desktop Publishing, using Adobe InDesign, Illustrator and Photoshop.

     The video below is a Train Room & Home Darkroom Tour. Published about three years ago.

    I will show you examples of railfanning in B&W Photography, in this video. The B&W Photography and Darkroom tour will start at about frame 4:14 - Enjoy.

 

• Cheers from The Detroit and Mackinac Railway - A Toy Train Layout

Last edited by trainroomgary

I use my old Canon Rebel XSi DSLR (2009) 12.1 MP camera that I originally used for college classes to take photos of trains whenever I get the spare time to do so (usually once to three times a month). Not too many trains come through Chico on a average Saturday (discovered that by sitting at the Amtrak [old Southern Pacific] station for five hours, only to see two Union Pacific freight trains come and go), which is a bummer sometimes.

 

Anyway, when a train does come through, taking photos from alongside the tracks or at the station platform with my old DSLR is pretty fun. Some examples below:

 

 

 

As for your question, it really just depends on what you want out of your camera. Both Nikon and Canon cameras are fantastic, each with their own pluses that make them stand out from the other. While my camera does not shoot video (that was on the next model up out of my price-range), it takes really good pictures, so long as I get the settings right.

Last edited by California Railfan508

No expert here, however, I've always found the http://www.dpreview.com/ site very useful in getting both owners(users) reviews, professional reviews, rating, and pro/cons features.  It also gives information on how cameras perform at multiple functions such as taking movies.  Be warn that it can be technical, or at least more technical than my current level.  We have an older Canon point a shoot G9, very good at what it is designed for, very useful and portable. Doesn't quite make it to the body/lens quality but better than almost any "pocket" camera.  My humble advice is to also consider the "feel" and ease of use.  Being able to operate the camera without looking down at it for every shot is a good thing.

 

-sb

I recently bought a certified refurbished Canon SL1 with 18-55mm and a 75-300mm lenses package with charger. It looks and acts brand new for $269 with free shipping and includes a one year warranty. Even in the camera body craps out the motorized lenses are a great deal. Black Friday might have cleaned out inventory. Canon is always adding new refurbished product for sale.

 

See the Canon USA website for more information and pricing on refurbished models. That said you need to do you your homework and check pricing on models includig the T4i, T5i etc as the prices fluctuate with demand. Here is the Canon  link for refurbished cameras. I do not work for Canon just trying to be helpful. 

Last edited by Seacoast

Hello Michael

 

I don't think you've said what you plan on doing with the photos after you've shot them. If you plan on posting the finished product on websites or just doing small prints, then what some of these folks have suggested about using the Iphone really makes a lot of sense. On the other hand, if you're planning on large prints then a different camera is in order.

 

Like many here I've been shooting for over 50 years and have had so many cameras that I probably can't remember them all, from oddball Leica's to Hasselblads, film and digital. A couple of years ago I decided I was tired of hauling all the peripherals around with me wherever I went and decided to go the (gasp) pocket camera route.

 

I did a lot of research and testing and finally bought a Sony DSC-RX100. By now I'm sure there are many improved and upgraded versions of this camera and I have never regretted the purchase. It has a 20 megapixel sensor, Carl Zeiss lense and a full feature set with various priority modes and, of course, some features that are more of a gimmick than practical. It is still a pocket camera, though, and has the drawbacks inherent in that type of system.

 

I do a lot of night shooting (cityscapes mostly) and wanted a camera with a bright lense and this one fills the bill nicely - 1.8-4.0/10.4-37.1 - with a decent movie mode and 4.0 zoom before it goes into digital zoom mode. I've blown some of these shots up to 30+ inch prints and the quality is excellent. It's something that you might want to take a look at. it's certainly portable and is always handy without hauling a bag of stuff around, comfortable to use and has very sturdy construction. Just my thoughts on this subject.

Originally Posted by tripleo:

Hello Michael

 

I don't think you've said what you plan on doing with the photos after you've shot them. If you plan on posting the finished product on websites or just doing small prints, then what some of these folks have suggested about using the Iphone really makes a lot of sense. On the other hand, if you're planning on large prints then a different camera is in order.

 

Like many here I've been shooting for over 50 years and have had so many cameras that I probably can't remember them all, from oddball Leica's to Hasselblads, film and digital. A couple of years ago I decided I was tired of hauling all the peripherals around with me wherever I went and decided to go the (gasp) pocket camera route.

 

I did a lot of research and testing and finally bought a Sony DSC-RX100. By now I'm sure there are many improved and upgraded versions of this camera and I have never regretted the purchase. It has a 20 megapixel sensor, Carl Zeiss lense and a full feature set with various priority modes and, of course, some features that are more of a gimmick than practical. It is still a pocket camera, though, and has the drawbacks inherent in that type of system.

 

I do a lot of night shooting (cityscapes mostly) and wanted a camera with a bright lense and this one fills the bill nicely - 1.8-4.0/10.4-37.1 - with a decent movie mode and 4.0 zoom before it goes into digital zoom mode. I've blown some of these shots up to 30+ inch prints and the quality is excellent. It's something that you might want to take a look at. it's certainly portable and is always handy without hauling a bag of stuff around, comfortable to use and has very sturdy construction. Just my thoughts on this subject.

I would like to take photos of trains as a hobby, and probably upload some of them to social media. 

Originally Posted by ES44AC:

The kit is a good price but I'd rather have a T5i than a T5. The T5 is a little to "beginner" for me, I'd rather have a more advanced camera. There is a refurbished T5i on the Canon website, hopefully it will stay there after Christmas, that's a very good price!

Micheal, sign up for the Canon email alerts. Visit the site often if your interested, again the price I paid is now gone and included 2 lenses. However, Pricing and supply are fluid and change every several days to one week or so. This is also a great way to get some quality lenses for much less money. Best of luck. Keep us posted.

Last edited by Seacoast
Originally Posted by Putnam Division:

My iPhone has better resolution than anything else I own......but, its major advantage is the I always have it with me, ready to go.

 

Peter

i agree 100% about the availability of my camera.  it's typically not even in the car and my iPhone is generally always close-by.

 

the real downside is magnification, though.  if you're standing next to a train, great, but put any distance between you and the subject and the resolution goes downhill very fast.

 

here is a cropped image from my Nikon D5100 with my big telephoto lens, though i'm not sure exactly what mag this was taken at, the lens is a 26-300mm...

 

BNSF thru Painted Desert NP -det

just a guess, but i believe i was a good 200 yards away from the train.

 

whereas i was no more than 50 feet from this locomotive taken with my iPhone5...

 

BNSF freight - NM

granted, i was on the wrong side for a good picture anyway, but my point is the resolution.

 

my camera is fully automatic, but i still have the option of framing the shot with the zoom lens.  that's the main advantage i can see.

 

cheers...gary

Attachments

Images (2)
  • BNSF freight - NM
  • BNSF thru Painted Desert NP -det
Originally Posted by p51:
I have a Canon 750D/T6i, a newer model with 24MP, stabilization and very good imaging, which I bought at the B&H store in NYC with a similar smaller camera for my wife at the end of September (yes, I was more than a little concerned walking out of that store with a massive bag of cameras and gear). It is orders of magnitude better than the older version of the same camera I'd started shooting with in 2007 or so
 
 
 

Niiice shots!! I wonder how close the T6i is to the T5i, which is the camera I like the most at this point.

Michael -

 

There's been a lot of good advice. I use DSLRs - and film cameras, depending on what I'm doing. Sometimes both, as in the accompanying pic. DSLRs for video, perhaps, and the film for stills.

 

Are you jumping from point to point, or staying in one point, on a given day? Do you plan to use a tripod? If you're moving around, look for something you can set up and break down quickly, yet is still sturdy - especially if you're using a long lens.

 

David

culpsetup

Attachments

Images (1)
  • culpsetup
Originally Posted by NKP Muncie:

Michael -

 

There's been a lot of good advice. I use DSLRs - and film cameras, depending on what I'm doing. Sometimes both, as in the accompanying pic. DSLRs for video, perhaps, and the film for stills.

 

Are you jumping from point to point, or staying in one point, on a given day? Do you plan to use a tripod? If you're moving around, look for something you can set up and break down quickly, yet is still sturdy - especially if you're using a long lens.

 

David

culpsetup

I typically jump around when railfanning, and because I will primarily take photos vs video, chances are I won't buy a tripod now, but that could change in the future however.

Originally Posted by p51:
... It is orders of magnitude better than the older version of the same camera I'd started shooting with in 2007 or so
...

Considering the digital technology treadmill, cameras manufactured in 7-10 years are "ancient" today -- especially with regards to sensor technology for low/existing-light photography.  If you're planning to do any type of existing-light photography, don't waste your time and/or money on older digital equipment -- even if the price looks like a great deal.  The main issue is you'll want nice CLEAN images straight out of the camera whenever possible.  If you're photographing in bright daylight, this is much less of a concern.  But for any kind of evening photography, choose a camera that can produce relatively noise-free images at ISO 6400 or greater.  Those kinds of cameras just didn't exist 7-10 years ago.

 

It's a double-edge sword in that digital cameras are on such a fast-paced technology treadmill.  The good news is updated features are readily available fairly quickly.  The bad news is the camera you buy today may be quickly "outdated" tomorrow.  So try and match your real needs to the camera body you're buying. 

 

Good lenses (i.e., top quality glass), OTOH, will easily outlive MANY generations of camera bodies.  I have a Canon 400mm F2.8 IS lens that is now pushing 12 years of every-day use (largely for sports photography).  If I wanted to (which I don't), I could sell that lens today for more than I paid for it in 2004 because the newer-generation glass is SO MUCH MORE expensive!!!  Try and say that about the digital camera body you just purchased this year even 3 years from now -- not to mention 12! 

 

David

Last edited by Rocky Mountaineer
NKP Muncie posted:

 

culpsetup

David--

 

Is that 5x7 or 8x10?  You shoot C41 or b&w?   I've been doing night/flash shots with 4x5 b&w, and have been tempted to try 5x7.  Already have a 5x7 back for my Gundlach Korona.

 

As for what camera OP should pick, again I'll say that if you are mostly just posting on the web, what camera really isn't going to make much difference.  Foamer photography is the least demanding type of shooting on camera gear there is.

 

Kent in sD

Kent -

Mostly B&W, occasionally chromes, it's 8x10.

Here's a small version of the pic shot there. Was really peeved  - waited for two or three hours, then 20 or 30 seconds before 611 arrived, those guys on the left came barreling across the tracks and ruined everyone's shot. Would have waited until the train was a bit closer - maybe between the crossing and the crossbuck.

Your night work sounds very interesting. culpsmall

David

Attachments

Images (1)
  • culpsmall

One of the things about buying s DSLR is the fact that so many of the "kits" both Nikon and and Canon offer the the 18-55 selection.  That always struck me as an odd combo for a zoom. It requires that you have the big tele readily available for the longer shots that we so often have to take. With the higher focal length available such as a 125mm I have some telephoto ability.

 

Dick

NKP Muncie posted:

Kent -

Here's a small version of the pic shot there. Was really peeved  - waited for two or three hours, then 20 or 30 seconds before 611 arrived, those guys on the left came barreling across the tracks and ruined everyone's shot. Would have waited until the train was a bit closer - maybe between the crossing and the crossbuck.

Your night work sounds very interesting. 

David

Drum scan the neg, and clone out the clowns.  I posted a couple of 4x5 night shots here on last week's "Midweek Photos."  Will shoot some more when I get back from Pittsburgh.

 

Kent in SD

CBQer posted:

One of the things about buying s DSLR is the fact that so many of the "kits" both Nikon and and Canon offer the the 18-55 selection.  That always struck me as an odd combo for a zoom. It requires that you have the big tele readily available for the longer shots that we so often have to take. With the higher focal length available such as a 125mm I have some telephoto ability.

 

Dick

Most kits from both Nikon and Canon come with cameras that have crop sensors (DX sensors).  More expensive DLSRs have full frame sensors (FX sensors).  An 18-55mm lens on a camera with a crop sensor is roughly equivalent to a 28-80mm lens on a full frame or traditional 35mm film camera.  IMHO a 28-80mm lens is kind of the standard for an indoor or close quarters zoom.  I have one for my 40 year old film camera.

Canon's crop sensor uses a 1.6 multiplier and Nikon uses a 1.5 multiplier.  So the math works out like this:
     Canon 18-55mm = 28.8-88mm and Nikon 18-55 = 27-82.5mm

Now the "roughly equivalent" statement also includes depth of field.  Even though these combinations yield focal lengths around the classic 28-80mm lens, the depth of field remains the same as the actual focal length of 18-55mm.  But with that said, I've only ever herd 1 pro photographer complain about the depth of field difference.  A crop sensor with any lens gives you a little more room if you screw up.

The photo in the link was shot with a Nikon D80 (DX sensor) and a Tamron 18-50mm lens back in 2007.

https://ogrforum.ogaugerr.com/t...12#71397234057746412

Tony

Tony_V posted:
CBQer posted:

One of the things about buying s DSLR is the fact that so many of the "kits" both Nikon and and Canon offer the the 18-55 selection.  That always struck me as an odd combo for a zoom. It requires that you have the big tele readily available for the longer shots that we so often have to take. With the higher focal length available such as a 125mm I have some telephoto ability.

Dick

...

Canon's crop sensor uses a 1.6 multiplier and Nikon uses a 1.5 multiplier.  So the math works out like this:
     Canon 18-55mm = 28.8-88mm and Nikon 18-55 = 27-82.5mm

...

Tony

add to that, cropping most full resolution digital photos up to 50% still leaves a huge amount of pixels left to work with, so you can basically double those figures.

but after all, the std 50mm SLR lens has always be a popular field size with tourists, wedding parties, etc, so the 18 - 55mm lens (and considering the CCD-crop, as pointed out, effectively ~30 - 80mm) brackets that standard lens fairly well.

cheers...gary

Last edited by overlandflyer

There are some amazing photos in this thread, and should be included in that other thread about "My Best Railroad Shot Ever".    

Personally, I use my smart phone, iPhone 5c, I think it is.  Before that I used a kodak Easy-Share digital camera.  And way back in the day, I used my Miranda Sensorex SLR, I purchased while on the Ho Chi Minh Trail back in 1968.  

I was pretty good with the Miranda.  I hadn't used in in many years as life took over, kids, house, etc.  When I got the Kodak camera as a gift, I thought it was the cat's meow.  Then three years ago, I obtained my smart phone.  And not long after bought a mac computer.  While taking some lessons at the Apple store, i asked the gurus there why I was having a hard time coordinating my kodak camera with the new computer.  The answer I got was to retire my Kodak and use my smart phone as it has a much better camera.  They were right.  

So to answer the question posed, it's my smart phone that I use for rail fanning photography. 

Tony_V posted:

Canon's crop sensor uses a 1.6 multiplier and Nikon uses a 1.5 multiplier.  ...

with my suspicion that there had to be a live steam link here, i looked up the US HQ's...

NiCan NY
... might be interesting to check out the corporate softball league situation in Melville, NY. or whatever other challenges that have likely been brewed up during Marriott happy hours.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • NiCan NY
645 posted:

It's not the camera brand or model that is most important. The person taking the picture is the most important factor as in how to use it so one can get the desired results. Some (not all) aftermarket lenses can do quite well but in my experience a lens that is same brand as the camera was the most satisfying to use.

Tripod - it's a necessity for low light and night shots for a sharp (not blurred) image. Also helps with taking pictures with a long telephoto lens as in 300mm and larger.

At one time lenses from the camera makers were the best, but not so much any more.  The latest lenses from Zeiss and Sigma (ART series) are now the best you can buy.  Half of the lenses in my camera bag are now Sigma ART and I'm planning on adding another (14mm f1.8).  I'm talking about ~$1,000 lenses though, not kit lenses.  As for tripod, I use one for virtually all of my shots as a tripod is even more important than the lens when it comes to sharpness.  And the most important thing?  I agree that it's the photographer and their ability to previsualize the shot.  The camera is the least important thing in photography.

 

Kent in SD

A Canon 60D with a Canon  28-135 zoom lens that I have had for awhile. No tripod, usually shoot at 400-500th of a second. For me it is one of several hobbies and I like to keep it easy and simple plus I take a lot more than RR photos. If I did an upgrade it would be a better lens.  I love digital- versatile, instant gratification, easy printing and I keep buying more memory chips as I fill them up.

DIESELBOB,

I love my Sony SR-12 Hard Drive Handycam, but declined getting their DSLR A6000 or upgraded model due to No touchscreen.

I went with a Nikon D5500 - Touchscreen.

The issues I'm having now with all of these extra pixels - I'm able to see the limits of the kit lens. Am considering spending some money on a decent Sigma lens.

 

UP_662_12-2-16

Attachments

Images (1)
  • UP_662_12-2-16

I've used many cameras to railfan and to shoot in general. I have a Nikon D750 which is a great camera, great autofocus, and low noise under ISO 6400-12800 in some conditions. I use manual mode so im not sure about the auto mode functions, it should be ok. 

I have also used a Sony A6500 A7rII, Canon 70D and Nikon D4. The Sonys are nice and small, but the battery life is short, not sure im ready to make the move to mirror less. I like my D750, just the right size and resolution for trains and shoots with m friendsIMG_4393 [1)IMG_4192IMG_4061E2EF07C3-5ED5-4862-AF5D-B178939161C5.  

Attachments

Images (4)
  • IMG_4393 (1)
  • IMG_4192
  • IMG_4061
  • E2EF07C3-5ED5-4862-AF5D-B178939161C5
SPSF posted:

DIESELBOB,

I love my Sony SR-12 Hard Drive Handycam, but declined getting their DSLR A6000 or upgraded model due to No touchscreen.

I went with a Nikon D5500 - Touchscreen.

The issues I'm having now with all of these extra pixels - I'm able to see the limits of the kit lens. Am considering spending some money on a decent Sigma lens.

 

UP_662_12-2-16

Well, I've never really looked into those camera models, so I can't comment on them other than to say that the word touch screen usually running for the door.  Touch screens are one of the main reasons I don't have a smart phone (size is the other) and while I love what I can do with my tablet, the way I have to use it makes me want to throw it against a wall.  I use my wife's smart phone from time to time and would love to throw it against the wall too, again all due to the way touch screens work and their refusal to lock and hold anything.  I can't even pick the dang thing up without it doing something I don't want it to do.

I have a lot of Sony products except digital cameras. I just got started on Canons back in the film days and like them. Have always liked the way they handled and were easy to use.  I still have a Sony Hi8 video camera plus a Sony D1000 with a hard drive. Don't video as much as before.  In retirement, money is limited and I would rather save to go places to take pictures than get the latest trinkets. I have talked to pros and if they aren't using a Hasellblad, they use a Nikon or  Canon as a GENERAL rule.  Up until a few years ago I would occasionally use a WW II German 35mm Leica. Took great photos.

SPSF posted:

DIESELBOB,

 

The issues I'm having now with all of these extra pixels - I'm able to see the limits of the kit lens. Am considering spending some money on a decent Sigma lens.

 

 

I have a Nikon D5300 (same sensor as D5500) that I use as my travel & light hiking camera.  The best zoom lens I found for it was the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 OS.    I bought a used one on ebay for less than $300.  Here's a DxO comparision.  Under "Lens Metrics" look at the line labeled "Resolution."  The Sigma has significantly more resolution than anything Nikon sells.  The very best zoom lens is the Sigma 18-35mm f1.8, but because it has a limited zoom range you would need to pair it with another lens, such as the Sigma 50-150mm f2.8 or 50-100mm f1.8.   Those are considerably more expensive lenses, and heavier.  DxO:

https://www.dxomark.com/Lenses...919_1208_919_173_919

 

Kent in SD

 

LetcherElvM

Attachments

Images (1)
  • LetcherElvM
Last edited by Two23

While it seems this subject has largely been discussed thoroughly, I will put out a vote for Pentax digital.  I have shot 4x5, medium format, and a large variety of vintage cameras over the years, but my very first "pro" quality camera was the Pentax K1000.  I still have it and carry it on back country trips as a back up.

What I like about the Pentax system is the amount of features versus the lower relative cost for equal quality products.  I have progressed from the K1000 through the ME Super and Super Program in film and then into the *istD, K10D, K5 and just now the K1 full frame 35mp.  While I have newer lenses all my old ones are compatible with every K-mount Pentax ever made without an adapter.  That means that my 1970's vintage 50mm / F1.2 lens and 20mm / F4 lens are still useful as they still cost about $350.00 each on the secondary market.

Lately my main lens for railroad photography is a Sigma 135-400mm zoom that has given me consistent results on trains.  I also like a wide-normal zoom lens.

Regardless of the system you go with, remember that when purchasing a DSLR you are buying into a system, not just a camera.  To keep in your budget any of the major brands with the kit 18-55mm lens will be a great start.  You can expand the system as funds permit.  The biggest thing is to try them all and decide which one feels best in your hand.   

For me, staying with my original brand of camera loyally for 30 years has meant that I have an incredibly diverse collection of gear that all works within the system.  The camera is ultimately a throw away anymore which is the big change from the film era.  You are really investing in lenses that will hopefully give your many, many years of quality service.  As an example my APX sensor digital bodies, the Pentax DA 16-45mm has been in use for 13 years during which I used it on three separate bodies.

A variety of photos all shot with my Pentax Digital gear.  Only three lenses were used on these; 16-45mm Pentax, Sigma 10-20mm, and Sigma 135-400mm.

One thing about us Pentax users is that we are so fiercely loyal to our brand we are known at "Pentaxians".  Depending on who you talk to, it's a badge of honor, or a slur. 

Arizona Eastern Railway Excursion Train in 2011, the last year it ran before the line was sold by SLRG to the Genesee & Wyoming and the service stopped:  Pentax K10D with Pentax DA 16-45mm.

IMGP4889_ED

UP 844 when it visited Arizona in 2011:  Pentax K5 with Sigma 135-400mm.

IMGP6143

IMGP6209

30th Street Station in 2012:  Pentax K5 with the 16-45mm lens

IMGP8393_edIMGP8413_ed

Then New GE ET44AC's in February of 2016 on a cloudy day in New Mexico:  Pentax K5 and 135-400mm lens.

IMGP1691

Amtrak fun under wires during my York trip last April:  Pentax K5 with both 135-400mm lens and the Sigma 10-20mm lens.  To be honest, I haven't been extremely pleased with the 10-20mm.  It tends to be fuzzy at the edges.  I just had to learn how to shoot with it and how not to shoot with it.

IMGP2193_EDIMGP2210_EDIMGP2248_EDIMGP2250_EDIMGP2256_ED

Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania in 2008:  Pentax *istD with 16-45mm lens.

_IGP9054_ED_IGP9056

 

  

Attachments

Images (13)
  • IMGP4889_ED
  • IMGP6143
  • IMGP6209
  • IMGP8393_ed
  • IMGP8413_ed
  • IMGP1691
  • IMGP2193_ED
  • IMGP2210_ED
  • IMGP2248_ED
  • IMGP2250_ED
  • IMGP2256_ED
  • _IGP9054_ED
  • _IGP9056
Last edited by GG1 4877

But probably a few cannons.

David, with Canons, Gitzos, Manfrottos, Bogens, Speedotrons, and not a clue how to take a pic. Really.

Edit: Farmer Bill: you do have a valid point. The equipment can make it easier to take the photo, but one has to have the idea for the photo first. A few time recently I've found that having too much gear leads to bad photos. This year, I hope to simplify. One picture, composed. Oh, something a boss said about 35 years ago, when people were clamoring for a certain lens. Was the Charles Lindbergh photo taken with a 300 f/2.8?

Last edited by NKP Muncie
NKP Muncie posted:

. . . Was really peeved  - waited for two or three hours, then 20 or 30 seconds before 611 arrived, those guys on the left came barreling across the tracks and ruined everyone's shot. . .culpsmall

Those guys again???!!!  Aren't they the same ones who shoot in rapid sequence with loud mirror clack right next to anybody who has carefully composed a video shoot?

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×