What’s the next Flyer Chief Offering?

That's what I thought. Next a flyer chief EP5. I past on the last one until I saw that it had two vertical motors. No fly wheels but had a digital horn and a regular speaker,plus a digital bell. Have it and It runs well.

My hope is that there might be a throwback to the Pacifics and the Mikados from 2006 that had TMCC.  Lionel told me that the tooling is lost and gone for these, but they do have examples of the castings and running gear to use as models.  They were good looking engines.   

None of those AM engines.  Ron would never sell AM to Lionel.  I actually suggested that to him once.

Roundhouse Bill posted:

My hope is that there might be a throwback to the Pacifics and the Mikados from 2006 that had TMCC.  Lionel told me that the tooling is lost and gone for these, but they do have examples of the castings and running gear to use as models.  They were good looking engines.   

Lionel should  (or their builder) also have the data files for their O scale USRA locomotives.  It would be a matter of rescaling the drawings and making changes for a smaller drive. (Easy for me to say, I'm not paying the engineering costs...)  And of course, the cost of cutting new tools.

Still, with what little I've played with a freind's FlyerChief Geep, I have to say it's a pretty nice little system.  I could see it becoming the standard for all but extremely high end Flyer locomotives.

Rusty

Banjo

I think there is a reason that we have never seen a rerelease F9 from Lionel/American Flyer - and that is just fine by me, I have seen them in person at train shows and never had a desire I pick one up.  IF that tooling is still around, I hope it is nothing more than a paper weight for Lionel.

I want the Baldwin with FC/BT. If Lionel can fit it into the docksider, then they could certainly get it into the Baldwin.  I know it’s not a faithful copy of the VO1000, but I really dig it.  The last run of Baldwin’s I think were in production before the “let’s go all LionChief/FlyerChief” mentality took over at Lionel.  I am going to guess, that since they did not sell well, we might see a break before Lionel produces them again. (Even though, in my opinion, they were a lack luster offering when everything else in the catalog had FC and BT).  And I DO think a Baldwin RTR set is the way to go. 

Lionel has stated that they are done with conventional sets. All LC from now on (and I think it’s smart).  If the Baldwins had the FC/BT capabilities I would have been all over my normal road names.  

As for the mikados and pacifics, I don’t think we will see them again, I can not see Lionel paying the tooling cost all over again to make something that is already in the market (even if they are getting harder to find - that mikado was wonderful!). 

I guess there is the possibility of a FC Challenger? 

I would like to see some of the PAs with BT, but again, Lionel just run the largest single cataloged batch, and there was a decent flow of them before the 2017 catalog as well.

We should only have another month or so before we know what’s in store for 2018 and American Flyer.  

MTH who???!?

Ben 

Does Lionel not own ERR? How about selling FlyerChief conversion kits with the BT technology. I would be in for a few!

Log Cruser, it is perfect logic.  I would have had a few Baldwin’s and a PA set converted.  

But like apple and the IPhone. They don’t want you to like the old stuff as much as the new.  Why would you buy new stuff if you did? 

I talked with someone who has a bit of inside knowledge (IMO) about this very topic, and was present when the question of making the electronics available was asked to Lionel.  While it did not seem that it was impossible that Lionel would make this stuff available, it did not seem like it was going to happen any time soon. 

Ben

Since I own an O Gauge LionChief Thomas and Mikado locomotive, as well as a couple of FlyerChief Berkshires, I will say that I really like that control system, especially with the addition of BlueTooth (which none of my locos have). I was sorely tempted by the FlyerChief 4-8-4 loco, but it just seems too big of a loco. The Geeps fall too short in several categories for me to consider (four rubber tires, inadequate electrical pickup, and flat stamped handrails), as would the Baldwin switchers (it's just too ugly).

Last year, I dug a bunch of my old American Flyer locos out from storage in the loft of my garage, and got most of them running with very little effort, running them at my club's holiday display last year and this year. In doing so, I have rekindled my appreciation of the lowly Flyer Atlantic, and to a lesser extent, the 4-4-0's as well. I find myself wondering why Big L never did a run of Atlantics, was just because Gilbert made so many that they flooded the market forever to come? Or was it because being such a small loco, the perception is that they can't support a high enough price to make them profitable? Anyway, I would like to see a new Atlantic with FlyerChief, especially if it could be upgraded to be closer to scale, along the lines of the Berkshires. But please, whatever you do, don't mold the handrails into the boiler casting!

Bill in FtL

NotInWI posted:

Log Cruser, it is perfect logic.  I would have had a few Baldwin’s and a PA set converted.  

But like apple and the IPhone. They don’t want you to like the old stuff as much as the new.  Why would you buy new stuff if you did? 

I talked with someone who has a bit of inside knowledge (IMO) about this very topic, and was present when the question of making the electronics available was asked to Lionel.  While it did not seem that it was impossible that Lionel would make this stuff available, it did not seem like it was going to happen any time soon. 

Ben

I have an EP5 with a Bluerail board in it.  I put a voltage regulator in and the Bluerail board.  Runs fine.  

Brendan

Roundhouse Bill posted:

My hope is that there might be a throwback to the Pacifics and the Mikados from 2006 that had TMCC.  Lionel told me that the tooling is lost and gone for these, but they do have examples of the castings and running gear to use as models.  They were good looking engines.   

I have the Union Pacific Mikado with TMCC and it's one of my favorite engines!

Dang,  just found 3 Mikados on “that auction site”.  Boy are they awesome.  Always wanted one.  I know things happen - but who lost the molds? Were they promoted or fired?  Put BT in one and I am in for 1 or 2 for sure.  I would look at having Valley Forge try to convert it to scale flanges (doesn’t look easy - rivets on undercarriage on current model).  

Paws2k posted:

Dang,  just found 3 Mikados on “that auction site”.  Boy are they awesome.  Always wanted one.  I know things happen - but who lost the molds? Were they promoted or fired?  Put BT in one and I am in for 1 or 2 for sure.  I would look at having Valley Forge try to convert it to scale flanges (doesn’t look easy - rivets on undercarriage on current model).  

It's been about 17 years since the Mikado's were introduced and there's been one or two management changes at Lionel since.  The people responsible (who also actually TALKED to S folks at an NASG convention in Milwaukee) for bringing the Mikado's to market are long gone.  All the tooling would still be in China if it exists at all. 

The NYC and B&O models were the first release.  The NYC was separate sale and the B&O in a set with AF streamlined cars:

Rusty

I'm all for another steam offering in flyerchief.  Wouldn't mind a Hudson at all. The northerns turned out great. Great build quality, great paint job, good detail on the casting. And if they tooled a 6 wheel driver it would open up allot of options for the future. 

All tooling lost on TMCC Mikados and Pacifics.  Lionel doesn't know where the tooling went.  

To build a Hudson with FlyerChief new tooling would be needed. My guess is to keep price down it would have to be a one piece cast shell like Berkshire not like Gilberts 4 piece unit.  Maybe even cast in handrails!!  

I would agree a Hudson would be a natural.  As long as all new tooling would be needed, charge a couple of bucks extra for wire handrails if necessary.  The cast on ones on the Berks look, well, cheap.  Heck, even most of the LionChief Plus O gauge steamers have wire handrails.

We all know Lionel can do it.

This is the 21st century after all...

Rusty

Heck, I'd even be happy with a one piece plastic shell if the detail was good, and it had wire handrails. Heresy, I know.

Here's another thought, but it would only be possible if the GP7's motor could be relocated to the rear of the locomotive.  The so-called Flyer "GP20."

The new frame and power truck won't allow for the chop-nose and motor to occupy the same space, so the motor would have to be in back.

Rusty

Rusty Traque posted:

Here's another thought, but it would only be possible if the GP7's motor could be relocated to the rear of the locomotive.  The so-called Flyer "GP20."

The new frame and power truck won't allow for the chop-nose and motor to occupy the same space, so the motor would have to be in back.

Rusty

Didn't we work out some time ago when others gave some additional motor data etc that on paper it seem feasible to put the latest truck assembly in the long hood  which would make the GP20 possible?

Greekchief posted:

I'm all for another steam offering in flyerchief.  Wouldn't mind a Hudson at all. 

I only want a Hudson that is super detailed and Legacy. I'd pay whatever it cost. Just sayin'.

FlyerRich posted:

Greekchief posted:

I'm all for another steam offering in flyerchief.  Wouldn't mind a Hudson at all. 

I only want a Hudson that is super detailed and Legacy. I'd pay whatever it cost. Just sayin'.

Agree.  A potential future of less detailed Flyerchief only offerings from Lionel is not an exciting one for me given that it was products like the SD70's, ES44's, and Mallets (along with AM's offerings and the prospect of MTH offerings) that caused me to choose S in the first place.

Dave Olson and Ryan are listening from Lionel.  The market got their attention after the unexpected success of the FlyerChief Berkshires (and Polar Express) as well as solid sales of the Northerns and GP7s. FlyerChief is bring new people into the market slowly.  And when was the last time you saw two catalogs for any manufacturer in S (although one was at the back of an O gauge catalog. 

Also there are rumors of wider radius fasttrack and switches - that would bring people in as well.

After the solid performance of FlyerChief Berkshires and Northerns on the North Penn S gauge shows, we are getting members adding FlyerChief.  The layout has 3 DCC lines and 1 AC line and FlyerChief works on both.

If Flyer/FlyerChief offerings continue to sell out quickly, expect Lionel to become a little more daring with S, conversely if they don't - it will be recycled trains from the past.

I have hope for AM Models as well, just wish they could offer metal couplers for their 4 wheel passenger cars - it would solve my problems and I could purchase the rest of the Ramble.  And a deal with Lionel to add Flyerchief to their offerings would be great as well.

Francine posted:

 

If Flyer/FlyerChief offerings continue to sell out quickly, expect Lionel to become a little more daring with S, conversely if they don't - it will be recycled trains from the past.

 

 

With the exception of the Berkshires, the FlyerChief line is basically recycled Northern's and GP7's from the past.  Any FlyerChiefing of the PA's, EP5's or variations on the GP7 will also be recycling from the past.

Vastly improved in construction, decoration and with crisper details I'll admit, but still based on 60+ year old products.

The Mikado's and Pacific's of the early 2000's were true "break out" products.  As were the Challengers, U33C's, Y3A's, SD70's and ES44's (and I'll include the Berkshires here) of more recent vintage. 

Unfortunately at this time, only the Berkshires remain.

Now, I'm not insisting that Lionel make only S Scale stuff.  If they want to continue down an improved traditional line, that's OK.  But, they have made some really cool non-traditional new stuff.

Rusty

Banjoflyer posted:

OK. One more thought.

Lionel buys American Models, puts a pile of cash in Ron Bashista's hands, Ron retires to the Poconos, Lionel now has the molds for:

Alco RS11:

Alco PA1 and B Unit:

Alco Rs3: 

Alco Fa2 and B unit: 

Baldwin GG-1: 

Baldwin S12: 

EMD F40PH: 

EMD FP7: 

EMD GP9/18: 

EMD GP35: 

EMD E8: 

EMD SD60: 

FM Trainmaster: 

GE U25b: 

Now...which one is next for FlyerChief?....

Mark 

Mark, These beautiful A.M. locomotives are reasonably priced now and if you desire you can add an ERR Driver boards to these with a little measuring and planning . DIY for about $35.00. That is no sound but wireless control.

Ray

I think the $900 Legacy steam engines are a thing of the past.  Why should Lionel pay for the expensive tooling of a $900 engine when they can do a Berk style engine and sell a lot of them for half the price.

Maybe a new Atlantic would be fun!!

Roundhouse Bill posted:

I think the $900 Legacy steam engines are a thing of the past.  Why should Lionel pay for the expensive tooling of a $900 engine when they can do a Berk style engine and sell a lot of them for half the price.

Maybe a new Atlantic would be fun!!

Right, any new Legacy steam locomotive would be north of $1200.00.  Any newly tooled FlyerChief steam locomotive will probably be $50-$100 more than the Berkshires.

Rusty

Chuck K posted:

FlyerRich posted:

Greekchief posted:

I'm all for another steam offering in flyerchief.  Wouldn't mind a Hudson at all. 

I only want a Hudson that is super detailed and Legacy. I'd pay whatever it cost. Just sayin'.

Agree.  A potential future of less detailed Flyerchief only offerings from Lionel is not an exciting one for me given that it was products like the SD70's, ES44's, and Mallets (along with AM's offerings and the prospect of MTH offerings) that caused me to choose S in the first place.

Agreed.

I have purchased a FC+ GP-7, it fits into a certain niche for me, and it is fun, but it is NO substitute for one of the recently offered Legacy diesels or steamers by any parameter that one may chose. The NKP FC+ GP-7 is both the first and the last FC+ engine I will ever purchase. I am fully prepared to pay more for properly done Legacy offerings. Legacy and FC+ (LC+) can coexist, as they do in O. An AF Legacy SD-40 would sell, well, IMO. Here's hoping that a Legacy Berk is offered in the next catalog.

Bob

Rusty Traque posted:

Roundhouse Bill posted:

I think the $900 Legacy steam engines are a thing of the past.  Why should Lionel pay for the expensive tooling of a $900 engine when they can do a Berk style engine and sell a lot of them for half the price.

Maybe a new Atlantic would be fun!!

Right, any new Legacy steam locomotive would be north of $1200.00.  Any newly tooled FlyerChief steam locomotive will probably be $50-$100 more than the Berkshires.

Rusty

You are both guessing to a degree on pricing. I suspect ( I can guess a bit, too) that a Legacy Berk (based heavily upon existing tooling) after discount would come in under what either of you are estimating.

Respectfully,

Bob

Bob Bubeck posted:

Rusty Traque posted:

Roundhouse Bill posted:

I think the $900 Legacy steam engines are a thing of the past.  Why should Lionel pay for the expensive tooling of a $900 engine when they can do a Berk style engine and sell a lot of them for half the price.

Maybe a new Atlantic would be fun!!

Right, any new Legacy steam locomotive would be north of $1200.00.  Any newly tooled FlyerChief steam locomotive will probably be $50-$100 more than the Berkshires.

Rusty

You are both guessing to a degree on pricing. I suspect ( I can guess a bit, too) that a Legacy Berk (based heavily upon existing tooling) after discount would come in under what either of you are estimating.

Respectfully,

Bob

Bob,  I usually discuss these kind of things as MSRP. 

It's the price that will appear in the catalog and the only way to set a baseline and make any kind of valid price comparison.  Discounts can vary depending on the dealer, and if taxes or shipping costs (if any) are included also affects the over all price paid. 

Now, I may be high (or low) on my guesstimates, but the only way we'll know for sure is if something is actually announced.

Rusty

Rusty Traque posted:

Bob Bubeck posted:

Rusty Traque posted:

Roundhouse Bill posted:

I think the $900 Legacy steam engines are a thing of the past.  Why should Lionel pay for the expensive tooling of a $900 engine when they can do a Berk style engine and sell a lot of them for half the price.

Maybe a new Atlantic would be fun!!

Right, any new Legacy steam locomotive would be north of $1200.00.  Any newly tooled FlyerChief steam locomotive will probably be $50-$100 more than the Berkshires.

Rusty

You are both guessing to a degree on pricing. I suspect ( I can guess a bit, too) that a Legacy Berk (based heavily upon existing tooling) after discount would come in under what either of you are estimating.

Respectfully,

Bob

Bob,  I usually discuss these kind of things as MSRP. 

It's the price that will appear in the catalog and the only way to set a baseline and make any kind of valid price comparison.  Discounts can vary depending on the dealer, and if taxes or shipping costs (if any) are included also affects the over all price paid. 

Now, I may be high (or low) on my guesstimates, but the only way we'll know for sure is if something is actually announced.

Rusty

It's the actual purchase price that matters.

Bob

I think a new legacy steamer is gunna be north of it’s O Gauge counterpart in price.  I would think tooling cost between a O gauge Hudson and an S Gauge Hudson are more or less the same.  But there will not be as much of a return in sales on the S Gauge version. That means price is going to go up to cover that loss.

Ben  

Roundhouse Bill posted:

None of those AM engines.  Ron would never sell AM to Lionel.  I actually suggested that to him once.

Well I hope Mike wouldn't get AM, that would be the death of another line of S.

Bob Bubeck posted:

Rusty Traque posted:

Bob Bubeck posted:

Rusty Traque posted:

Roundhouse Bill posted:

I think the $900 Legacy steam engines are a thing of the past.  Why should Lionel pay for the expensive tooling of a $900 engine when they can do a Berk style engine and sell a lot of them for half the price.

Maybe a new Atlantic would be fun!!

Right, any new Legacy steam locomotive would be north of $1200.00.  Any newly tooled FlyerChief steam locomotive will probably be $50-$100 more than the Berkshires.

Rusty

You are both guessing to a degree on pricing. I suspect ( I can guess a bit, too) that a Legacy Berk (based heavily upon existing tooling) after discount would come in under what either of you are estimating.

Respectfully,

Bob

Bob,  I usually discuss these kind of things as MSRP. 

It's the price that will appear in the catalog and the only way to set a baseline and make any kind of valid price comparison.  Discounts can vary depending on the dealer, and if taxes or shipping costs (if any) are included also affects the over all price paid. 

Now, I may be high (or low) on my guesstimates, but the only way we'll know for sure is if something is actually announced.

Rusty

It's the actual purchase price that matters.

Bob

Maybe so, but it's not the price reflected in the catalog.  While dealer cost is the baseline dealers use for discounting, the MSRP is what customers compare against to see how good a "deal" they got.

(It's also what causes the O gaugers to clutch their chests whenever a new catalog comes out. )

And if it's something like the O scale brass hybrid 2-8-2 only available direct through Lionel, MSRP is the price one will pay, assuming Lionel doesn't offer an early order discount.

Rusty

Banjoyerflyer posted 

Ray I had no idea that could be done for such a small price. I have the Frisco U25b and it could be such a candidate.

Thanks

Mark

Mark, I have an RS-3 in Milwaukee Road paint and a pair of Burlington GP-35s that I have converted to TMCC using the ERR Mini-2. Go to their website and you will see the Mini-2 sells for $34.95. It is not a hard install and if you have any problems Ken at ERR is always ready to answer questions.

I usually used the Cruise version.  How is the drivability with the commander?

Brendan

The O gauge steam engines seem to have a lot more detail, features and better electronics. I would guess the cost to tool up an S gauge Legacy steam engine would be less than an O gauge. The sales volume is smaller so fewer units to amortize the one time costs over. There are so many O gauge engines released it is not apparent that the sales volume of a specific engine in O is a lot larger than in S.

I would buy multiples of a nicely detailed Legacy Hudson, Berkshire, K-5 Pacific, Texas, etc. I would expect an MSRP for these to be more than $1,200, less than $2,000.

banjoflyer posted:

Why couldn't the GP20 shell be installed "backwards" and then reverse the wiring to the motor leads?

The new  GP7 chassis looks symmetrical so it appears you could reverse the orientation of a shell. I don't have a GP20 to compare screw mounting holes but that could be worked out. The speaker housing of the GP7 would also need to be reversed.

Mark

The hand rails prevent flipping the shell.  The shells are virtually identical.  The holes are all the same.  The GP20 I have has larger screws but they clear the holes on the new frame just fine.  The holes on the frame for the shell match up.  The GP20 frame has a hump where the motor mounts.  The new frame is flat.  The power truck will mount in the rear.  The electronics can be flipped but the mounting is not symmetrical.  The old frame is in the first picture.

Brendan posted:

The hand rails prevent flipping the shell.  The shells are virtually identical.  The holes are all the same.  The GP20 I have has larger screws but they clear the holes on the new frame just fine.  The holes on the frame for the shell match up.  The GP20 frame has a hump where the motor mounts.  The new frame is flat.  The power truck will mount in the rear.  The electronics can be flipped but the mounting is not symmetrical.  The old frame is in the first picture.

Thanks for the pictures, Brendan.

I kinda thought there would be a good chance the motor could be mounted in the rear, but I no longer have the GP7 "review sample" in my possession to dissect.

Being able to move the motor and mount the "GP20" body on the new frame should open up some new possibilities for FlyerChief.  (As long as us rivet counters stay away...)  A new bracket for the electronics shouldn't be difficult to produce.

Rusty

One side effect of my looking at these is the dynamic brake blister is missing from the SF; the prototype had one.  Also, after looking at the frame, I can't help but see bolt holes on the roof, now.  I will have to get a DB blister.

Brendan

Brendan posted:

One side effect of my looking at these is the dynamic brake blister is missing from the SF; the prototype had one.  Also, after looking at the frame, I can't help but see bolt holes on the roof, now.  I will have to get a DB blister.

Brendan

Not all of them had dynamic brakes:

(Ooops, there's that pesky rivet counter again...)

Rusty

2849 did! (previously posted by Mark).  I don't count rivets; too small - I count dynamic brakes 

Brendan

Mark, we were talking steam not another diesel.

Typoglycemia!

Ben 

I popped one handrail off.  It looks as though the nubs are cast.  I pulled on one and it didn't budge or turn.  I thought you were talking about a user doing the flip.  I would just move the motor which I do plan on doing which is why I got two of these.  I'll have a pair of FC GP20s and a pair of FC GP7s.

Brendan

banjoflyer posted:

How come all of us have taken this long to notice that "cheif" is spelled wrong in the post's title?

Mark

"i" before "e" except after "c".  It is technically after the "c" 

Brendan

Brendan posted:

2849 did! (previously posted by Mark).  I don't count rivets; too small - I count dynamic brakes 

 

Brendan

Mea Culpa.

Although one wonders why Lionel didn't choose a number without D/B...

Rusty

Lionel switched from a horizontal can motor to a vertical can motor in 05.  Mine is a DM&IR SD9. It has 6 wheel trucks.  I haven't looked but maybe that frame is flat.

Rayin"S" posted:

Mark, I have an RS-3 in Milwaukee Road paint and a pair of Burlington GP-35s that I have converted to TMCC using the ERR Mini-2. Go to their website and you will see the Mini-2 sells for $34.95. It is not a hard install and if you have any problems Ken at ERR is always ready to answer questions.

 

Mini Commander 2 Kit  (Vers 1)      - Front/Rear LED's and Light Bulb outputs Ray	34.95

Ray,

I've seen an Amtrak F40PH in Youtube videos of your layout.  Is that one of the AM locomotives that you've installed a Mini-2 in?  Also could I save a few dollars and buy the DC version of an American Models locomotive? If I understand the functionality the Mini-2 or Cruise Lite handles the AC to DC conversion and directional changes so you don't need the AC version of the locomotive.

Craig

banjoflyer posted:

Brendan posted:

I popped one handrail off.  It looks as though the nubs are cast.  I pulled on one and it didn't budge or turn.  I thought you were talking about a user doing the flip.  I would just move the motor which I do plan on doing which is why I got two of these.  I'll have a pair of FC GP20s and a pair of FC GP7s.

 

Brendan

Sounds neat! Yeah I was talking about Lionel having nearly all they needed to crank out a FlyerChief GP20 using the GP7 as a starting point. Flipping the rails/shell and reversing the motor leads would be an easy way to go. Leave the motor where it is.

You gotta post pics when you're done with the switch.

Mark

Given there's a raised pad on the frame, two mounting posts right behind the cab and the handrail nubs (green arrows) would have to relocated in order to reverse the side handrails.  The 6 nubs aren't symmetrical front to back, it would mean Lionel would have to change the tool for the frame. 

It would be far and less costly easier for Lionel to move the motor to the back and make a new bracket for the board.

Rusty

I thought someone reported that the motor flywheel rubbed on the shell of their GP7.  Wouldn't that prevent switching the motor of the rear truck?

I had that problem. The flywheel was cutting into the two lead wires that go to the LED. I put a layer of rubber tape. I'll check later on to see if all is ok. No cut wires.

Ray,

Thank you for your response.  Since you say the F40PH has "plenty of room in those for the Mini-2" I would guess that the Cruise Lite would also fit?

I'm glad you mentioned the SD-60 since I own one and it would be next on my list for modifications.  Which board(s) do you plan on using in that?

I've seen some Youtube videos of an ERR installation (in an O gauge locomotive).  I think it seems like just a matter of following the instructions.  In fact the toughest part may be finding a spot that is roomy and will provide a stable place for the board.

Craig

Ray,

Thanks for your follow up reply.  I saw your first response but had some more specific questions.  I haven't bought the F40PH yet so I can't measure it and since I can't measure it I wasn't sure if I should buy the Mini-2 or Cruise Lite.  A "chicken and egg" situation.  I should probably start with the SD-60 that I do own an buy a Mini-2.  Thank you for clarifying the situation.

Craig

Guys, how about starting your own thread on that topic.  This is about FlyerChief.

Thanks

Roundhouse Bill posted:

Guys, how about starting your own thread on that topic.  This is about FlyerChief.

Thanks

It's called "thread creep."  It happens on many topics.

But let's see if we can get back "on track."

Is there any want/need/desire for FlyerChief U33C's, SD70's and/or ES44's?

Rusty

You gentlemen are totally correct, will move to an electronic topic.

Ray

Rusty brings up a good question, and I think the answer for me is “nope”. 

I am interested to see how the LionChief+ Scale(ish???) SD60M sells compared to the Legacy ones...all cataloged in the 2017 O Gauge signature catalogue. But for me, at this point, because there is no answer to the question of modern rolling stock, and the price point is lower for FC compared to Legacy, I would like to see the “Gilbert-esk” type products continue.  

I would love the recent UP Baldwin with FC/BT.  I would also think the ALCo PA could be a candidate too, but there are so many Legacy units out there now, I don’t know if it would fly.  But for the detail of the scale pieces that Rusty mentions, seems to me that’s the realm of full blown Legacy. 

Ben

Rusty Traque posted

Is there any want/need/desire for FlyerChief U33C's, SD70's and/or ES44's?

Rusty

Not for me.  It's like going backwards to a lesser product from the greatness of the Legacy versions of these.

If you have already purchased the Legacy Base Station with one or more remotes, you likely have little use for LionChief products of any kind. However, if you are coming from traditional AC transformer controls, you probably will find LionChief much more attractive.

Personally, I don't care for the Baldwin switcher because it is just too mis-shaped with that goofy oversized cab. The GP 7/9/20's flat handrails have turned me off of those locos, and the SD9 looks like just a GP with extra wheels. The recent Berkshire is very close to a home run, but I still am unhappy with those cast-in handrails on the boiler. I'm hoping the LionChief 4-8-4 I have coming will be as good as the Berkshire, but even with it's cast handrails, I think the Berkshire is a bit better looking, and a good indicator of where Lionel is heading with future S gauge items. Their recent bay window and EV cabooses with upgraded graphics, lights, windows & handrails are a big improvement over the old Gilbert versions, and the Polar Express passenger cars look a lot better in S than they do in O. 

Bill in FtL

Chuck K posted:

Rusty Traque posted

Is there any want/need/desire for FlyerChief U33C's, SD70's and/or ES44's?

Rusty

Not for me.  It's like going backwards to a lesser product from the greatness of the Legacy versions of these.

Speaking for myself as the one who posted the question:  I would only be interested if the FlyerChief board had DCC code embedded (as the HO Polar Express is supposed to have) and more importantly scale conversion wheels were available.

Rusty

Rusty the FlyerChief will run fin on a dcc powered just run it like you would on a dc or ac layout they work fine

I now have four FlyerChief engines and if if FlyerChief had come before TMCC and Legacy I would never have invested in Legacy and its expensive engines.  This is really true if some of the late model diesels and detailed steam engines came with FlyerChief.  

The simpler and cheaper system does so much that the money and problems with Legacy stuff would be avoided.

Doug-Sr posted:

Rusty the FlyerChief will run fin on a dcc powered just run it like you would on a dc or ac layout they work fine

I'm aware they'll run on dcc power, but I would want to use my dcc controller on my scale railroad.

Rusty

Rusty Traque posted:

Is there any want/need/desire for FlyerChief U33C's, SD70's and/or ES44's?

Rusty

NOPE.

Own all of those diesel-electrics in Legacy. Have no need to own any of these with decidedly inferior operating and sound systems. Also, these might not be so affordable in FC+ form, given the higher level modeling detail and the two motors (SD and ES) that they have.

Respectfully,

Bob

Bob Bubeck posted:

Rusty Traque posted:

Is there any want/need/desire for FlyerChief U33C's, SD70's and/or ES44's?

Rusty

NOPE.

Own all of those diesel-electrics in Legacy. Have no need to own any of these with decidedly inferior operating and sound systems. Also, these might not be so affordable in FC+ form, given the higher level modeling detail and the two motors (SD and ES) that they have.

Respectfully,

Bob

 

Legacy snob...

Jokingly,

Jerry

poniaj posted:

Bob Bubeck posted:

Rusty Traque posted:

Is there any want/need/desire for FlyerChief U33C's, SD70's and/or ES44's?

Rusty

NOPE.

Own all of those diesel-electrics in Legacy. Have no need to own any of these with decidedly inferior operating and sound systems. Also, these might not be so affordable in FC+ form, given the higher level modeling detail and the two motors (SD and ES) that they have.

Respectfully,

Bob

 

Legacy snob...

 

Jokingly,

Jerry

You betcha! 

Bob

The lionchief Android app was actually updated the other day. I'm honestly surprised. I was not expecting frequent updates from big L.

Fix bugs including:
-Throttle response issues
-Bluetooth connectivity issues
-Screen sizing for some tablets
-Bluetooth permission dialog popping up more than once
-Default momentum changed to Low

Greek,

Thank you for the update information! I had given up on the app as the throttle response was terrible. I just tried it and it is vastly improved!!!!! 

Bob (The Snob) Have you tried FlyerChief or are you just guessing that it is inferior?? 

I think there is almost no difference in sound quality and the engines operate just the same in terms of control.

Roundhouse Bill posted:

Bob (The Snob) Have you tried FlyerChief or are you just guessing that it is inferior?? 

I think there is almost no difference in sound quality and the engines operate just the same in terms of control.

Own a new NKP GP-7. Took delivery Christmas Eve. Its OK for the money and easily drops into a traditional Gilbert world. One can and usually does run them on a high constant voltage loop/layout, but ....

It is definitely not a Legacy engine. All I have to do is fire up (or just look at) my PRR Y3 to provide a reminder. Try setting up a double header. One can pair any SD70ACe or ES44es with another one. One can run them using DCC, too. The current generation of double PAs are readily configured to operate in tandem tail to tail due to the flexibility inherent to Legacy architecture. To these ears, the sounds and sound variations (e.g., laboring effects, whistle quality, etc.) available with some Legacy engines are superior to any FC+ L-AF engine, but then I am not bucking for a hearing aid (yet ). When you ran your BB the other day, did you not notice how comparably satisfying the sounds are?  And, that is a 9 year old piece.

Costs more, but you 'gets' more.

Respectfully,

Bob

The "Chief" control systems and Legacy are really aimed at different markets.  If there's some crossover by the Legacy folks, it makes Lionel happy. 

The simple fact is conventional control as a marketable scheme for Lionel has sailed into the sunset.  Lionel's O gauge starter sets aren't even able to be run conventionally, they don't have the conventional slide switch built in and there's no way to add it.  And all MTH sets use a stripped down DCS command system, although their locomotives still can be run conventionally and also have full featured Proto-3 in them.

After playing with a friend's GP7, the FC sound is OK, not a good in comparison as MTH's Proto-3 or Lionel's Legacy, but OK.  But, I'm neither here nor there about sound, I've even turned the sound off sometimes when running.  But, FlyerChief does offer smooth operation and control, something I care much more about than sound. 

If I was still interested in buying traditional type Flyer, the FC system wouldn't be a show-stopper for me.

Rusty

I would imagine if you have a Legacy setup or DCC setup, it would be preferable to have to use only one controller especially if you have turnouts/routes controlled by Legacy or DCC.  If they could make the bluetooth app let you switch between locos easily, that would be nice.  

Brendan

Bob Bubeck posted:

Roundhouse Bill posted:

Bob (The Snob) Have you tried FlyerChief or are you just guessing that it is inferior?? 

I think there is almost no difference in sound quality and the engines operate just the same in terms of control.

Own a new NKP GP-7. Took delivery Christmas Eve. Its OK for the money and easily drops into a traditional Gilbert world. One can and usually does run them on a high constant voltage loop/layout, but ....

It is definitely not a Legacy engine. All I have to do is fire up (or just look at) my PRR Y3 to provide a reminder. Try setting up a double header. One can pair any SD70ACe or ES44es with another one. One can run them using DCC, too. The current generation of double PAs are readily configured to operate in tandem tail to tail due to the flexibility inherent to Legacy architecture. To these ears, the sounds and sound variations (e.g., laboring effects, whistle quality, etc.) available with some Legacy engines are superior to any FC+ L-AF engine, but then I am not bucking for a hearing aid (yet ). When you ran your BB the other day, did you not notice how comparably satisfying the sounds are?  And, that is a 9 year old piece.

Costs more, but you 'gets' more.

Respectfully,

Bob

Completely agree. Received my FC Northern today. Cost me less than half of what my Y-3 cost me and for obvious reasons...detail, sound quality, sound options, momentum function, start up, shut down, light control, and numerous other options available on Legacy. I like the FC Northern, but I would have been willing to pay double for a Legacy Northern detailed to the quality of the Y-3 and to have therefore maintained controlling all of my smart engines with one device.  Pretty sure this will be my last FC purchase unless something highly detailed comes out in the future in which case I might buy it and convert it to TMCC myself.

Chuck K posted:

  I don't think you're going top seeCompletely agree. Received my FC Northern today. Cost me less than half of what my Y-3 cost me and for obvious reasons...detail, sound quality, sound options, momentum function, start up, shut down, light control, and numerous other options available on Legacy. I like the FC Northern, but I would have been willing to pay double for a Legacy Northern detailed to the quality of the Y-3 and to have therefore maintained controlling all of my smart engines with one device.  Pretty sure this will be my last FC purchase unless something highly detailed comes out in the future in which case I might buy it and convert it to TMCC myself.

Don't forget, the F/C Northern is still based off of 1950's Gilbert tooling, which was a fairly good model of a UP FEF1 for it's time.

I don't think your going to see Lionel tool up another UP FEF1 with contemporary detail resolution.  Now, maybe folks could convince Lionel to do the UP FEF3 (UP 844,) an SP Daylight (4449,) N&W J (611) or maybe even an AT&SF 3751 (all presently operational well known locomotives in the real world,) but it would appear that Lionel isn't quite ready to commit to another Flyer Legacy steam locomotive at this time. 

For the Legacy price and contemporary detail resolution, all of the above would require all new tooling from the wheels up because plopping just a new highly detailed boiler adjusted to fit on the current Flyer Northern drive would result in awkward looking locomotives. 

I think the current push with FlyerChief is to try to expand the Flyer market using existing products.  If it wasn't for the Polar Express, I doubt Lionel would have done the F/C Berkshires.

Rusty

Rusty Traque posted:

Chuck K posted:

  I don't think you're going top seeCompletely agree. Received my FC Northern today. Cost me less than half of what my Y-3 cost me and for obvious reasons...detail, sound quality, sound options, momentum function, start up, shut down, light control, and numerous other options available on Legacy. I like the FC Northern, but I would have been willing to pay double for a Legacy Northern detailed to the quality of the Y-3 and to have therefore maintained controlling all of my smart engines with one device.  Pretty sure this will be my last FC purchase unless something highly detailed comes out in the future in which case I might buy it and convert it to TMCC myself.

Don't forget, the F/C Northern is still based off of 1950's Gilbert tooling, which was a fairly good model of a UP FEF1 for it's time.

 

<snip>

Rusty

Just so folks know, the only original Gilbert tool used in manufacturing the new L-AF Northerns (both conventional and FC+) is that for the pilot. That's it. The Gilbert tooling (for the boiler, for example) dated from 1939, was used with modifications through the 1950s, and was no longer usable to obtain quality castings. For example, by comparing the boiler casting in a new Northern and a Gilbert original, one can note that the newer tooled boiler is more round (and more prototypically correct). Essentially, Lionel tooled up an improved copy of the Gilbert model with the chassis being an all-new design.

I wrote of this aspect about the tooling  in my review of the new L-AF Northern in S Gaugian when it first appeared about 10 years ago.

Bob

I should have said "design based on Gilbert tooling."

Rusty

I was at a local (Southeastern Michigan) train show years ago, when there was only talk of resurrecting the Northern.   Folks then were dumpster diving at the factory in Mount Clemens and some interesting things found their way on sellers' tables.  Unpainted freight and passenger car shells when the factory closed, and earlier on, some of what the seller said to be (and I don't suspect they weren't) factory test shots of Northern boilers using surviving Gilbert tooling.  They were ROUGH.  You could tell that the tooling was VERY well worn, and the fact that it hadn't been used in decades allowed the tools to corrode to a point where any castings from those tools would require too much final finishing to be practical.  I almost bought one of them simply because it would have made an interesting historical artifact, but the price was too high at the time.  In retrospect, it would have been cool to own one of those casting.  Alas, hindsight is always 20-20, isn't it?

poniaj posted:

I was at a local (Southeastern Michigan) train show years ago, when there was only talk of resurrecting the Northern.   Folks then were dumpster diving at the factory in Mount Clemens and some interesting things found their way on sellers' tables.  Unpainted freight and passenger car shells when the factory closed, and earlier on, some of what the seller said to be (and I don't suspect they weren't) factory test shots of Northern boilers using surviving Gilbert tooling.  They were ROUGH.  You could tell that the tooling was VERY well worn, and the fact that it hadn't been used in decades allowed the tools to corrode to a point where any castings from those tools would require too much final finishing to be practical.  I almost bought one of them simply because it would have made an interesting historical artifact, but the price was too high at the time.  In retrospect, it would have been cool to own one of those casting.  Alas, hindsight is always 20-20, isn't it?

 

Agreed.

Todd Wagner kindly permitted me to inspect (circa 2002) a test shot of the boiler from the original tooling. It wouldn't have been acceptable. I have a test shot of the Northern tender made with original tooling in my collection and, although not too awfully bad, the finish of the casting is not up to current standards and expectations. There are instances were the old tools fail. For example, this is why an all-new tool for the No. 936 depressed center reel car was made.  And, so forth.

Bob