.

Nice!

Yes, nice. However, the FRA boiler clock has long begun running, ever since the last tube/flue was installed. So,,,,,,,,,how many years and $$$$ before all the running gear is completed?

Good step in the right direction.  I like how they are keeping their mouths shut and not making any promises 

Hot Water posted:

Yes, nice. However, the FRA boiler clock has long begun running, ever since the last tube/flue was installed. So,,,,,,,,,how many years and $$$$ before all the running gear is completed?

Would it be better if the boiler had failed the test? My suspicion is that it would not be better. So perhaps it is best to take the good news for what it is, and see how things play out from here.

Jeff C

leikec posted:

Hot Water posted:

Yes, nice. However, the FRA boiler clock has long begun running, ever since the last tube/flue was installed. So,,,,,,,,,how many years and $$$$ before all the running gear is completed?

Would it be better if the boiler had failed the test?

No, not at all. My point is, when it cones to steam locomotive restorations/overhauls, most groups/organizations always seem to start on, and finish the boiler first. Then, after the boiler has past its FRA Form 4, work is started in the running gear. Thus, while extensive work is progressing on the running gear machinery, the boiler is just sitting there with the FRA 15 year clock running, without even making steam!

My suspicion is that it would not be better.

You don't seem to understand.

So perhaps it is best to take the good news for what it is, and see how things play out from here.

Jeff C

Hot Water posted:

Yes, nice. However, the FRA boiler clock has long begun running, ever since the last tube/flue was installed. So,,,,,,,,,how many years and $$$$ before all the running gear is completed?

§ 230.17   One thousand four hundred seventy-two (1472) service day inspection.

top

(a) General. Before any steam locomotive is initially put in service or brought out of retirement, and after every 1472 service days or 15 years, whichever is earlier, an individual competent to conduct the inspection shall inspect the entire boiler. In the case of a new locomotive or a locomotive being brought out of retirement, the initial 15 year period shall begin on the day that the locomotive is placed in service or 365 calendar days after the first flue tube is installed in the locomotive, whichever comes first.

You have a year to finish the engine before flue time starts, beginning from the time you install the first flue. Hydro test has nothing to do with it.

So I take it they were able to recover all the stolen items from the scrap yard?

1472?  Why that and not 1500 days?

superwarp1 posted:

Good step in the right direction.  I like how they are keeping their mouths shut and not making any promises 

I agree with Gary!

Hot Water posted:

Yes, nice. However, the FRA boiler clock has long begun running, ever since the last tube/flue was installed. So,,,,,,,,,how many years and $$$$ before all the running gear is completed?

Agreed.  Max time on the locomotive as a whole would be best served by getting everything else possible done first.  The clock as you noted is related to the flues and nothing else. Having the boiler work complete and then waiting on other work does nothing more than shorten the availability between major overhauls.

leikec posted:

Hot Water posted:

Yes, nice. However, the FRA boiler clock has long begun running, ever since the last tube/flue was installed. So,,,,,,,,,how many years and $$$$ before all the running gear is completed?

Would it be better if the boiler had failed the test? My suspicion is that it would not be better. So perhaps it is best to take the good news for what it is, and see how things play out from here.

Jeff C

Turns out that this boiler was in fine shape when the loco was retired (ran for a very short time), so they were working with something pretty good. Unlike the K4, which was really tired and worn when they restored it, and it's been almost 30 years trying to get it fixed. New boiler is the latest remedy - and that is the correct answer for that engine.

These guys had a very ambitious schedule for rebuilding this engine, my hat's off to them. They will get it done if $ are available.

Jim

Hot Water posted:

Yes, nice. However, the FRA boiler clock has long begun running, ever since the last tube/flue was installed. So,,,,,,,,,how many years and $$$$ before all the running gear is completed?

Valid point. Hopefully when all is said and done they get a good ten years of available legal service time out of the locomotive. 

Jim Waterman posted:

leikec posted:

Hot Water posted:

Yes, nice. However, the FRA boiler clock has long begun running, ever since the last tube/flue was installed. So,,,,,,,,,how many years and $$$$ before all the running gear is completed?

Would it be better if the boiler had failed the test? My suspicion is that it would not be better. So perhaps it is best to take the good news for what it is, and see how things play out from here.

Jeff C

Turns out that this boiler was in fine shape when the loco was retired (ran for a very short time), so they were working with something pretty good.

Sure don't know where you heard THAT information! Lots of work had to be done in the firebox, including replacing part of the door sheet and some side-sheet & corner work.

Unlike the K4, which was really tired and worn when they restored it, and it's been almost 30 years trying to get it fixed. New boiler is the latest remedy - and that is the correct answer for that engine.

These guys had a very ambitious schedule for rebuilding this engine, my hat's off to them. They will get it done if $ are available.

In fact, the original WMSR steam crew were all let go, and an outside contractor has now been doing the work, i.e. Diversified Rail Services.

Jim

What a cool little railroad! Good luck with 1309, WMSR.

Seems like a wonderful destination with grandkids.

Now we might have a race!  Who will steam first: 1309 or 4014?  Bets, please!

Dominic Mazoch posted:

Now we might have a race!  Who will steam first: 1309 or 4014?  Bets, please!

4014 for $100

Dominic Mazoch posted:

1472?  Why that and not 1500 days?

3. 31 and 92 Service Day Inspections
This rule also establishes 31 and 92 service day inspection requirements. These are roughly comparable to the monthly 
and trimonthly inspections in the 1978 standards.

4. Annual Inspections
In addition, this rule establishes annual inspection requirements similar to the 1978 standards: requiring that a steam locomotive 
be inspected after 368 calendar days have elapsed since the time of the prior annual inspection. The 1978 standards required that 
certain items be inspected at least ‘‘once every 12 months.’’ The revised annual inspection, as do all the other periodic inspections, 
incorporates the inspection requirements of those inspections required to be conducted more frequently. Thus, locomotives that are not 
operated often enough to accrue either 31 or 92 service days in a 368 day period will have those inspections conducted, at a minimum, 
once every 368 calendar days.


5. 1472 Service Day Inspection
Finally, the 1978 standards required that a steam locomotive boiler be inspected, at a minimum, once each 5 calendar years 
(boiler interior to be inspected after 48 calendar months, within 5 consecutive years; and the boiler exterior to be inspected 
every 5 years, or, if the locomotive is out of service for at least one full month during that time, after 60 calendar months within 6 
consecutive years).  This inspection was a major one, requiring the removal of the jacket and lagging to conduct the exterior inspection, 
and the removal of all flues in the locomotive boiler to conduct a ‘‘minute’’ inspection of the interior of the boiler.

Dominic Mazoch posted:

Now we might have a race!  Who will steam first: 1309 or 4014?  Bets, please!

That's like betting on a race between a 1 legged dachshund and a prize stallion. WMSR still has to replace all of the brasses that were ruined when they were stolen; while UP has apparently already entered the reconstruction phase. Not to mention that the UP steam crew have the full financial backing of the company behind them.

And to add to that, I believe 765 had to replace a flue when it was at Steamtown a few years ago because one cracked. I think it was only about 11 years old at that time. There's probably more stress on the flues and boiler sheets on an engine only steamed up a few times a year, over one that's lit up and under pressure 31 days at a time between boiler washes...