Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Definitely beautiful cars.  I always mean to research what the deal was with the law change that stopped such paint jobs.  Do any of you know of any good reference material discussing the law, when enacted, what it covers, etc.?  I tend to avoid these because it sets a max date on the train, whereas I tend to use rolling stock that spanned a long time frame. 

pennsy484 posted:

Definitely beautiful cars.  I always mean to research what the deal was with the law change that stopped such paint jobs.  Do any of you know of any good reference material discussing the law, when enacted, what it covers, etc.?  I tend to avoid these because it sets a max date on the train, whereas I tend to use rolling stock that spanned a long time frame. 

The ICC outlawed them as of January 1, 1937.  But this date was extended to January, 1938.

You will find this in detail and much more in Richard H. Hendrickson and Edward S. Kaminski's book ?Billboard Refrigerator Cars."

Ron

Last edited by PRRronbh
PRRronbh posted:
pennsy484 posted:

Definitely beautiful cars.  I always mean to research what the deal was with the law change that stopped such paint jobs.  Do any of you know of any good reference material discussing the law, when enacted, what it covers, etc.?  I tend to avoid these because it sets a max date on the train, whereas I tend to use rolling stock that spanned a long time frame. 

The ICC outlawed them as of January 1, 1937.  But this date was extended to January, 1938.

You will find this in detail and much more in Richard H. Hendrickson and Edward S. Kaminski's book ?Billboard Refrigerator Cars."

Ron

I imagine some or many here have seen this interesting discussion if not having been part thereof, found by googling it: 

http://rypn.org/forums/viewtop...t=36392&start=15

Still pretty nebulous. 

 

rattler21 posted:

Three designations of cars: 1/ Shipper owned(leased) ; 2/ Assigned cars; and 3/ Free runners.  I think the ICC rules about 'billboard' cars pertain to assigned cars and free runners.  John in Lansing, ILL

As of January, 1938 NO billboard cars were legal on any rails no mater how/whom owned them unless parked.  The ICC ruling had to deal with the markings.

tncentrr posted:

Back when I was a kid in the sixties, I remember seeing Miller Beer reefers on the Southern in Alabama. It may not have been a full blown billboard reefer, but it had the Miller High Life logo and maybe some slogans on it. It was obvious that Miller Beer owned it and it advertised that product

Did it for sure say beer of just Miller High Life???  The "book"  thus cover the period.

PRRronbh posted:
rattler21 posted:

Three designations of cars: 1/ Shipper owned(leased) ; 2/ Assigned cars; and 3/ Free runners.  I think the ICC rules about 'billboard' cars pertain to assigned cars and free runners.  John in Lansing, ILL

As of January, 1938 NO billboard cars were legal on any rails no mater how/whom owned them unless parked.  The ICC ruling had to deal with the markings.

I am curious about the actual definition used by the ICC to limit the extent of such displays and if the limitation applied to all RR cars.  I will try to research it, but in the mean time do you know where I can find more info?  Thanks.

BTW, I have 13 or 14 reefers.  Here is my scratch/bash I made a long time ago.

  14762898089481855647417

Edit: Another forum discussion opines that the limitation only applied to Billboard reefers because they were owned by private companies and not RRs.  There was an economic consequence that affected competition with RR owned cars it appears.  http://rypn.org/forums/viewtop...t=36392&start=15

My comments are not authoritative just my understanding from what I have read so far.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 14762898089481855647417
Last edited by pennsynut

This kielbasa reefer is currently in storage but will shortly join sister "Coal Cracker Express" cars Stegmaier Beer hopper (Wilkes-Barre) , Mrs. T's Pierogies boxcar (Shenandoah), Waddell 2 bay coal hopper (Winton) and RJ Walker Plumbing tank car (Scranton). This was done by Frank's Roundhouse.  Photo from robertstrains.com. PolishRedec

Attachments

Images (1)
  • PolishRedec
Last edited by Coal Cracker
Norm posted:

Aah,DuBois Budweiser...not to be confused with The Budweiser (they sued to keep their name and won).

Nice cars,Jimmy!

Norm

Norm,

At one time there was a Holiday Inn( or Holiday Motel) in the Harrisburg area which was not affiliated with the national chain.  Green neon sign large enough to be seen from the Turnpike.  They had to defend themselves in court and also won.

John

rattler21 posted:
Norm posted:

Aah,DuBois Budweiser...not to be confused with The Budweiser (they sued to keep their name and won).

Nice cars,Jimmy!

Norm

Norm,

At one time there was a Holiday Inn( or Holiday Motel) in the Harrisburg area which was not affiliated with the national chain.  Green neon sign large enough to be seen from the Turnpike.  They had to defend themselves in court and also won.

John

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAnojTvyc0g 

 

pennsynut posted:

PRRronbh posted:
rattler21 posted:

Three designations of cars: 1/ Shipper owned(leased) ; 2/ Assigned cars; and 3/ Free runners.  I think the ICC rules about 'billboard' cars pertain to assigned cars and free runners.  John in Lansing, ILL

As of January, 1938 NO billboard cars were legal on any rails no mater how/whom owned them unless parked.  The ICC ruling had to deal with the markings.

I am curious about the actual definition used by the ICC to limit the extent of such displays and if the limitation applied to all RR cars.  I will try to research it, but in the mean time do you know where I can find more info?  Thanks.

Edit: Another forum discussion opines that the limitation only applied to Billboard reefers because they were owned by private companies and not RRs.  There was an economic consequence that affected competition with RR owned cars it appears.  http://rypn.org/forums/viewtop...t=36392&start=15

 

The Billboard Reefers became a complicated convoluted issue back in the day.  The ICC did not get involved by happenstance.   The ICC was pressed into "service" by the "RAILROADS" so they could reclaim the refrigerator car business.  Decades before this ICC involvement the Railroads gave away the business not wanting any more involvement.  But now they wanted it back $$$$$ and press the ICC into their corner.

So the ICC conjured a way to intercede.  They came up with their July 1934 ruling.  Taking effect August 1, 1934 prohibiting NO NEW Billboard reefers.  And effective January 1, 1937 , no refrigerator cars bearing advertisements of any shipper, consignee, or product, will be accepted in interchange or handled locally on any railroad.  This was then extended to January 1938 implementation.  

This got the RAILROADS what they now wanted, control $$$.

The BOOK also has chapters on "Postwar Renaissance"

Ron 

Did the law in 1936 or 1937 ban all billboard reefers, or just the ones whose billboards were not related to the actual owner of the car? For example, the famous “Old Dutch Clenser” billboard was on a car owned by Cudahy, a meat company (and why would clenser be advertised on a reefer, anyway)? The Swift cars, however were owned by and carried Swift meats, a commodity that definitely needs refrigeration, so were these banned? Seems like I recall some more modern steel Swift reefers having large logos much like the wooden versions. Were these not considered “billboards”? And what about even more modern cars than that, the Tropicana cars immediately come to mind. They certainly seem to be like billboards to me, or was the law rescinded at some point, allowing these cars to be legal?

Bill in FtL

Last edited by Bill Nielsen
scale rail posted:

Doug, wish I bought more. When K-line pulled the plug one of our forum sponsors was selling the K-line reefers for about $15 each. I thought they were very close in quality to Atlas. I bought a bunch of them but wish I would have gotten more Doggie Dinners. DonEWK-55

Don, yes I think K-line did a nice job with their reefers.  I only have a few though.

 

I wonder if billboard cars of many types, could be brought back again to make extra money for railroads or car owners.   Imagine sitting at a crossing watching a parade of advertizements on a hopper train, intead of a steady stream of more or less the same blank car.  Seems like a captured audience of viewers to me.

Railgon posted:

I wonder if billboard cars of many types, could be brought back again to make extra money for railroads or car owners.   Imagine sitting at a crossing watching a parade of advertizements on a hopper train, intead of a steady stream of more or less the same blank car.  Seems like a captured audience of viewers to me.

Would violate the ICC Ruling of July, 1934.

Bill Nielsen posted:

Did the law in 1936 or 1937 ban all billboard reefers, or just the ones whose billboards were not related to the actual owner of the car? For example, the famous “Old Dutch Clenser” billboard was on a car owned by Cudahy, a meat company (and why would clenser be advertised on a reefer, anyway)? The Swift cars, however were owned by and carried Swift meats, a commodity that definitely needs refrigeration, so were these banned? Seems like I recall some more modern steel Swift reefers having large logos much like the wooden versions. Were these not considered “billboards”? And what about even more modern cars than that, the Tropicana cars immediately come to mind. They certainly seem to be like billboards to me, or was the law rescinded at some point, allowing these cars to be legal?

Bill in FtL

All the Billboard Reefers were privately owned.  And in 1934 the ICC ruled that all shall go as of January 1,1937 but then extended to January,1938.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×