Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by cbojanower:
Originally Posted by Dominic Mazoch:

Meanwhile, 3985 is waiting for her 15 year inspection.....

Meh the 3985 is yesterdays news, the Big Boy has more all around awesomeness

It may be "yesterdays news" to YOU, but to some of us, not to mention hundreds of thousands of fans world wide, the loss of UP 3985 will NOT be forgotten.

And the Big Boy ain't nowhere near done, yet. 

 

Awesome happens when it moves under it's own power.

 

Rusty

Originally Posted by Forrest Jerome:

how much panel track did they put down.  looks like they may run out soon.  has moved about 50 feet, i think.

they put down a few hundred feet move the big boy and then move the track and use it over.

 

the big boy has officially left the rail giants museum never to return again.  this is very exciting to watch the big boy move slowly across the parking lot.  history in the making.

Originally Posted by aterry11:

hey hotwater  in the video it says and shows replaced new bolts on rear coupler in video the crack with a bolt in it means nothing looks to be on same part as coupler rig what gives cause you would know

Sorry, I have no idea exactly what you are referring to, especially since I have not been following this whole thing anyway. When 4014 finally gets on the move to Cheyenne, then it might become of interest for me.

Originally Posted by aterry11:

hey hotwater  in the video it says and shows replaced new bolts on rear coupler in video the crack with a bolt in it means nothing looks to be on same part as coupler rig what gives cause you would know

They replaced all the bolts on the draft gear, I see the crack your referring to...they must not be concerned about it at this point.

Originally Posted by Laidoffsick:

Here's a few shots from this afternoon after it had been moved, and they were waiting for more track panels to be brought in.

 

I saw you show up and place the scale big boy on the real one,  the guy from trains magazine thought what you did was pretty cool.  He talked about it of a while.  When you moved the scale unit to the front he said "I have to now and get another picture".

 

Thanks.

Originally Posted by CP BOB:

Maybe I missed it, but any idea when it will be moving up Cajon Pass?

 

Bob

Probably in December, since they will be spending some time at the Colton Diesel Shop to service the driver axle journal boxes (done while over a diesel pit), then put all the rods and valve gear linkage back on (so that all the mechanical lubricators will function while being towed). Having all the rods on, without the pistons being in place, will maintain rotational balance of all the running gear, but eliminate the "pumping of air & compression" of the pistons & valves.

Originally Posted by Laidoffsick:
I knew you were there BigDodgeTrain, I just didnt know who you were. You shoulda said something to me. I'll be down at the club in SD next Thurs and Fri to run trains. If you're gonna be there, introduce yourself please

oh I wasn't in Pomona, I'm watching it on line.

 

are you staying for the meeting thurs the 21st evening? I will be there then. might show up early. I'm one of the few that are doing some remodel work.

Originally Posted by bigdodgetrain:
Originally Posted by Laidoffsick:
I knew you were there BigDodgeTrain, I just didnt know who you were. You shoulda said something to me. I'll be down at the club in SD next Thurs and Fri to run trains. If you're gonna be there, introduce yourself please

oh I wasn't in Pomona, I'm watching it on line.

 

are you staying for the meeting thurs the 21st evening? I will be there then. might show up early. I'm one of the few that are doing some remodel work.


Ahhh OK, yeah I'll probably run trains, go eat, and then back for the meeting since I'm the newest member and have yet to attend a meeting.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by cbojanower:
Originally Posted by Dominic Mazoch:

Meanwhile, 3985 is waiting for her 15 year inspection.....

Meh the 3985 is yesterdays news, the Big Boy has more all around awesomeness

It may be "yesterdays news" to YOU, but to some of us, not to mention hundreds of thousands of fans world wide, the loss of UP 3985 will NOT be forgotten.

LET HIM HAVE IT!!! 3985 is a NATIONAL TREASURE as much as 4014.

Originally Posted by Dominic Mazoch:

Anyway, I just got this "gut feeling" that when they get the BB into the shops, they are going to find something that is going to be to be repaired or modified which was not planned for.  This will take either extra time and/or money to fix.   One cannot just go to s and get steam loco parts.  

I would plan on there being surprises, I would be surprised if there weren't any.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by superwarp1:

 How long do you think it will take to hope across the parking lot?  One, two weeks?

So why is "hope" involved?  I don't think the UP folks will simply "hope" it makes it across the parking lot.


I'm sure he meant "hop"

 

I'm sure that once it's converted to oil there will be no problems, as the UP seems to always send a diesel out with the steam engines to help with DB and fuel mileage.

 

 Not to mention the UP passenger set is only about 15 or so cars, plus a couple canteens.. probably what, 2000 tons or less?

Originally Posted by steam fan: 

I'm sure that once it's converted to oil there will be no problems, as the UP seems to always send a diesel out with the steam engines to help with DB and fuel mileage.

 

 Not to mention the UP passenger set is only about 15 or so cars, plus a couple canteens.. probably what, 2000 tons or less?

Actually it is a bit more difficult to fire the big machines, i.e. 3985, when they are NOT worked sufficiently hard enough to maintain a good exhaust with a resulting draft for the fire. Prior to 2011, many UP executive train sets behind either 844 or 3985 exceeded 15 passenger cars. The Denver Post Cheyenne Frontier Days Special has historically been over 20 plus cars, which makes the 844 AND MUed the DDA40X work to full throttle capacity in order to maintain the track speed and tight schedule. 

I noticed in the LA Times report they mentioned that the Big Boy is going to be pulled by the diesel numbered 4014 (I still think they should use the Heritage locos)

 

 

In the past  the UP renumbered the 844 to the 8444 to avoid the diesel that used the same number, are they going to have a problem these days having two engines with the same cab number?

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by cbojanower: 

In the past  the UP renumbered the 844 to the 8444 to avoid the diesel that used the same number, are they going to have a problem these days having two engines with the same cab number?

Not for at least four more years. At that time, I would suspect that the diesel #4014 will be renumbered.

Based on seniority, the Big Boy will have no problem pulling rank.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by AmbBob:

Sorry if this has been asked/answered, I am under the impression it being towed tender first, will it be turned before it heads east on the mainline out of Colton?

Most likely, if it doesn't wind up being turned in the process of getting to Colton Diesel Shop. 

If you look at the area on Google maps, there is room for them to curve to the west as they meet the Metrolink tracks. This would leave 4014 facing east (forward) toward Colton.

 

It is the worlds largest snail. But in UP's defense, they have to be meticulous in shimming the panel track across the uneven parking lot.

Originally Posted by cbojanower:

I was wondering , when the Big Boys were sent to their various locations, did any (or all) of them go under power? For the diesels of the era it must have been a real chore to more that much dead weight.

 

Any pics of them being towed?


You understimate the diesels of the era.  A Big Boy dead-in-train is just another freight car (or several) as far as the locomotives are concerned.

 

Rusty

Originally Posted by bigdodgetrain:
Originally Posted by CWEX:

I'm guessing so.  The move on to Metrolink is not going to be until December and they have the 4014 down by the beginning of the drag strip.  Here's a photo I found.

 

 

8400_1385002090

chain in the lower right corner is cool!

Afraid they might come back in the morning, find the wheels gone and the loco sitting on concrete blocks?

 

Rusty

Originally Posted by AmbBob:

Is there route info on the trip from the Metrolink tracks (north of the I-10) to the UP tracks (just south of the I-10.) It looks to me like they will have to go to the interchange next to the BNSF yards in San Berdoo, then turn and go south and then west to get to the UP yard in Colton.

 

Bob, here is the route in a nutshell.  They will enter Metrolink at Fairplex and go West through San Dimas, Covina, Baldwin Park and connect to the U.P.(former SP)Alhambra line at Bassett (just East of the 605 Fwy).  From there it will go East to West Colton passing through City of Industry, Pomona, Montclair, Ontario, Guasti near Ontario Airport, Kaiser Yard and arrive at West Colton.  They will not use the former Santa Fe 2nd district (now Metrolink) between Fairplex and San Bernardino.  This was never in the plan from the beginning.

 

Ray

 

 

Originally Posted by Dominic Mazoch:

For the $$$$ to get 4014 to METROLink line, UP could have the 3985 running and have her 15 year inspection.  An out side the UP firm is handling the move, and the restore on the BB.  Somebody has stated an another threat a third party is paying for all this.  I wonder who has the deep pockets to do this if the story is true?

I can't possibly know. However, If I were to get good odds. I would bet a large sum on Jay Leno.

Originally Posted by AmbBob:

I believe I read on this forum, or possibly T.O. that the bigboy was going to winter at the Colton shops for some preliminary work and wouldn't be headed east across the Cajon until spring (when the weather is more favorable.)

Don't think so. They WILL need to take 4014 to the Colton Diesel Shop in order to put he over a pit and service the driver axle roller bearings. After that, 4014 will proceed north to Ogden, then east to Cheyenne, probably arrivin Cheyenne in late January or early February.

Originally Posted by ROBBYTRAINS:

The axle roller bearings have already been drained, flushed, and refilled wtih new oil at the RailGiants Museum.

It is my understanding, based on everything that has been posted on TO and other sites, that in order to service the driver axle roller bearings, SAFELY, the locomotive should be over a pit. All the other roller bearings on the trailing truck, and tender, are external and have indeed already been serviced while 4014 was still at the museum site.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by CWEX:
They need to drop the drivers to get to them, 

No they don't. I have never seen a roller bearing equipped steam locomotive that requires the "dropping of drivers" simply to service the inside roller bearing boxes.

Does it matter where it is done, if it is done, or about to be done, as long as it is done before the big haul, is all that probably matters to those in control of the work.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by CWEX:
They need to drop the drivers to get to them, 

No they don't. I have never seen a roller bearing equipped steam locomotive that requires the "dropping of drivers" simply to service the inside roller bearing boxes.

My mistake, I thought I heard Ed say something in one of the videos they have put out.  Thanks for clarifying that.

Originally Posted by Ukaflyer:

Does it matter where it is done, if it is done, or about to be done, as long as it is done before the big haul, is all that probably matters to those in control of the work.

Sometimes it does matter to the poor person that is actually doing the work, while laying on his back on the ground/ties! Servicing driver axle bearings, no matter whether roller or plain bearings, is always best accomplished over a pit.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Ukaflyer:

Does it matter where it is done, if it is done, or about to be done, as long as it is done before the big haul, is all that probably matters to those in control of the work.

Sometimes it does matter to the poor person that is actually doing the work, while laying on his back on the ground/ties! Servicing driver axle bearings, no matter whether roller or plain bearings, is always best accomplished over a pit.

The earlier discussion wasn't debating about the poor individual having to do the task but if it had been done or not and for whatever reason a few people seemed quite concerned about it, not sure why? The short distance it has to go is not likely to result in any further deterioration of the bearings before the oil is changed before its longer haul.

 

While I am here I am intrigued to know who the so called third party is that seems to be behind the restoration, or is this a case of smoke and mirrors to deflect the real identity?

Just to be clear on the subject, the bearings have been drained and flushed at the RailGiants Museum before the move.  They will again be drained and flushed at Colton yard, and then several move time during the "long haul".  I do agree that it was not comfortable for the UP Steam Crew to perform this task without a pit.  But they did it because it needed to be done before 4014 moved across the parking lot. 

Originally Posted by ROBBYTRAINS:

Just to be clear on the subject, the bearings have been drained and flushed at the RailGiants Museum before the move.  They will again be drained and flushed at Colton yard, and then several move time during the "long haul". 

 

Why "drained & flushed several more times" during the trip to Cheyenne? Even during the regular service days, the roller bearings were NOT "drained & flushed" all that often, and they were under far greater loads back then. I bet the steam crew doesn't "drain & flush" the roller bearings on 844 during an entire multi-week/month trip.

I spoke to some Cheyenne visitors to our Rocky Mountain Toy Train Show yesterday.

It looks like 4014 will sit next to the light rail track until late December. Apparently they have to wait for the SD40 that they traded to the museum to come out of the paint shop before they cut into the light rail line. They don't want to cut into the light rail line twice.

Just posted on TrainOrders:

"LA METRO (NOT Metrolink) has just announced that UP 4014 will be moved from the LA Fairgrounds via Metrolink on Sunday January 26th! The move will be from the LA Fairgrounds to at least the Covina Metrolink station for an official public/media viewing event"  Starting time not given.

 

Every railfan (and foamer) within 500 miles is going to converge on Pomona.

 

 

Last edited by AmbBob
Originally Posted by ironlake2:

Like ED Dickens said the rebirth of the big boy is like a zoo resurrecting the T Rex.  People will follow this from all over the world to see the biggest steam engine ever made.

Too bad Steve Lee didn't do this instead of 3985.  that engine is so of anti climatic now with a big boy on the horizion.

 

Steve Lee was asked that very question.  His answer is that a BB could only operate only on trackage in WY and UT.  That was then.  But 3985 can go to a lot more places than a BB.

 

BTW, does anybody know where a BB can go on the UP today under steam?

Originally Posted by ironlake2:

Like ED Dickens said the rebirth of the big boy is like a zoo resurrecting the T Rex.  People will follow this from all over the world to see the biggest steam engine ever made.

Too bad Steve Lee didn't do this instead of 3985.  that engine is so of anti climatic now with a big boy on the horizion.

I keep on hearing people saying the bigboy was the biggest steam loco ever made.at 132..?? its the heaviest for sure..the allegheny had the most HP..As for length is PRR S1 at 140 feet and with 84"big driving wheels..

 

Last edited by joseywales

The Allegheny had 7000 boiler hp but sorry not the tractive effort.  That is what pulls trains not boiler hp.  The dm& ir had 140,000 lbs pulling power and big boy had 135,000 but the Allegheny had a little over 100,000 and was so hard on track it went a wooping 20 mph to keep track damage to a minimum.  The c&0 also sued lima for lying about weight on drivers.  It was not a success.  It is not even a good comparison for the big boy.  Lets compare successful engines.  As Gene Huddleston say in his book on the 2-6-6-6 after all the information was out "you decide if the c&0 got its moneys worth out of the engine.   Their 2-10-4 was their superior engine and it is compared in the same book. 

Originally Posted by ironlake2:

It only gets to 163,000 and that is the simple mode and could not supply enough steam to go very fast.  Big boy is the only  4-8-8-4 and that is the biggest wheel arrangement of a steamer that could operate at 70 mph y6b maybe but in compound mode only and then tractive effort is way down.

Only?...Mmmhmm. 

 

UP's 4-8-8-4's would produce higher speeds, and could develop higher HP at higher speeds but they didn't have the starting drawbar pull of a 2100. The thing to remember is that these Y's had boilers the size of a big 4-8-4, and with compound operation it allowed them to squeeze that kind of performance out of it.  The 4000's had a humongous boiler with an appetite to match.  The higher speed is great but you need to start the train first.

  The real point is that each was designed to do a specific job for it's respective road and both performed admirably in that capacity.  

Last edited by N&W Class J
Originally Posted by ironlake2:

The Allegheny had 7000 boiler hp but sorry not the tractive effort.  That is what pulls trains not boiler hp

Hold on just a minute there, Bucko.  All tractive effort does is start the train. The infamous Erie Triplex had monstrous amounts of tractive effort, but didn't have enough HORSEPOWER roll the train faster than about 10 mph or it would run out of steam.

 

It is HORSEPOWER that gets you over the road at speed. And the Lima-Built C&O Allegheny produced 7,498 DRAWBAR HORSEPOWER, far more than the Big Boy. That's REAL Horsepower, at the coupler, as measured by a dynamometer car behind the tender, not a calculated number.

Last edited by Rich Melvin

hello OGR Webmaster and guys...........

 

It would be even LESS than 7,498 drawbar horsepower if measured BEHIND the tender coupler thus guessing about 7,000 H.P. @ tender coupler.  Its the tender coupler that is coupled to the freight cars behind so the horsepower should be measured there and could be called "net drawbar horsepower"

 

the woman who loves the S.F.5011,2678

Tiffany

Last edited by Tiffany
Originally Posted by Tiffany:

hello OGR Webmaster and guys...........

 

It would be even LESS than 7,498 drawbar horsepower if measured BEHIND the tender coupler thus guessing about 7,000 H.P. @ tender coupler.  Its the tender coupler that is coupled to the freight cars behind so the horsepower should be measured there and could be called "net drawbar horsepower"

 

the woman who loves the S.F.5011,2678

Tiffany

id thought id read some where its was 8000hp? other saying 6200 at the draw bar.. the PRR Q2 were 7987hp..measurements on the S1 and bigboy..bigboy..11'wide and 16' 2 1/2"high and 132'long...S1 10'7"wide and 16' 6"high and 140' 2 1/4"..Q2 11'4"wide and 16'5.5"high and 124 long.....If anyone can fill in the C&O alleghenys measurments..I couldnt find them..as for the largest steam loco ever built is the S1,but for production built bigboy is..model train mag there a post debaiting bigboy vs the allegheny..http://cs.trains.com/mrr/f/88/p/34200/436684.aspx

Last edited by joseywales

We apparently have a few folks that have been doing some "book learning", with no understanding of the REAL steam locomotive work environment, nor the physics involved.

 

1) The famous C&O H-8 was definitely NOT "unsuccessful"! Maybe the C&O never properly utilized the Lima Super Power 2-6-6-6 design to their fullest capabilities, instead of "just hauling coal".

 

2) The various eastern coal roads, i.e. C&O, B&O, and N&W for example, all had EXCELLENT supplies of VERY HIGH BTU coal as fuel. Thus their furnace systems were properly designed FOR THAT FUEL! By comparison, the "poor Union Pacific" was relegated to burning southern Wyoming Hanna Coal, and thus need MUCH larger fireboxes and furnace system designs, on order to burn lower BTU coal. Thus, the 4000 class locomotives truly excelled at their DESIGNED service assignments, while burning that southern Wyoming fuel. As another comparison, look what the poor Northern Pacific had to burn, i.e. Montana Lignite! 

 

3) Trying to compare various wheel arrangements, total locomotive weights, and total locomotive lengths add nothing to a discussion of individual steam locomotive performance.

 

 

Originally Posted by ironlake2:

Like ED Dickens said the rebirth of the big boy is like a zoo resurrecting the T Rex.  People will follow this from all over the world to see the biggest steam engine ever made.

Too bad Steve Lee didn't do this instead of 3985.  that engine is so of anti climatic now with a big boy on the horizion.

3985 is far from anti climatic. The Challengers are the steam engine that represents UP's peak of the steam age better then any other engine. The Big Boys were only used in Utah and Wyoming pretty much. Challengers were used system wide. The restoration of 3985 also was not really started by Lee is was started by a group of employees before Lee was manager of the historical fleet. There are 6-7 Big Boys left only 2 Challengers. Personally I think the 3985 is still the better choice. Big Boy makes a nice wow factor but in the end I bet they use it rarely. I think its much sadder 3985 gets neglected since the new manager came around.

Last edited by jethat
Originally Posted by cbojanower:


I have seen this quote "There are several crews (in Colton) that have had experience when steam was the primary mode that powered these trains," said Rod Doerr, superintendent - Los Angeles Service Unit. "

 

Were they 10 years old when UP hired them?

Now there is a manager that has been smoking the good stuff!

 

Lets do the math on that statement:

 

1) The last steam operations on the UP were out of Cheyenne, WY in something like 1958? So the Los Angeles area would have been out of main line steam locomotives in, what no later than 1956/1957?

 

2) A "steam qualified" promoted Engineer, should have been roughly in his 40s, during the mid 1950s, probably able to hold an Extra Board spot. That would make is age TODAY, at least 995 to 98 YEARS OLD!!! Even allowing for the possibility that the man was in his 30s, during the mid-1950s, would still put him well past 80 YEARS OLD today!

 

3) Say the man was a Fireman in the mid-1950s, and he was in his 20s. That would STILL make him well past 70 YEARS OLD today!

 

 

Now, does that Superintendent honestly believe that the Union Pacific STILL has 70+ to 80+, to 90+ year old men employed? What with the Railroad Retirement policy change, some 8 to 10 years ago, allowing FULL retirement benefits at 60 years of age, with 30+ years of service, why would ANY man well over 70 years old STILL BE WORKING (even if the railroad allowed it)? 

 

 

Originally Posted by cbojanower:


I have seen this quote "There are several crews (in Colton) that have had experience when steam was the primary mode that powered these trains," said Rod Doerr, superintendent - Los Angeles Service Unit. "

 

Were they 10 years old when UP hired them?

I thought the same thing when I read the article.  There's no way that could happen....By the way, I love the first picture of 844.

 

HOTWATER:  I'm with you: My first thought was "how old would those guys be now?"  The math wasn't adding up!

 

I am curious, how does any RR find mechanics (with steam engine knowledge) and engineers to operate any steam engine?  I watched a clip on youtube of 3985's engineer and was amazed.  He made it look easy!  Steam engines haven't been used forever, so where /how do they train people?

 

Anyway, look forward to the pictures!

Originally Posted by 86TA355SR:
Originally Posted by cbojanower:

 

HOTWATER:  I'm with you: My first thought was "how old would those guys be now?"  The math wasn't adding up!

 

I am curious, how does any RR find mechanics (with steam engine knowledge) and engineers to operate any steam engine?  I watched a clip on youtube of 3985's engineer and was amazed.  He made it look easy!  Steam engines haven't been used forever, so where /how do they train people?

 

Anyway, look forward to the pictures!

The Navy still runs some steam ships. That would be a source of boiler trained young people.

Originally Posted by jethat:

The Navy still runs some steam ships. That would be a source of boiler trained young people.

 

Sorry, but Navy steam boiler operations are not even remotely close to a steam locomotive. Navy boilers really aren't that much different than stationary boilers in electrical power plants, since the load doesn't vary all that much, plus they are usually very high pressure water tube boilers. Steam locomotives have fire tube boilers in order to withstand the numerous, and drastic loading changes.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by jethat:

The Navy still runs some steam ships. That would be a source of boiler trained young people.

 

Sorry, but Navy steam boiler operations are not even remotely close to a steam locomotive. Navy boilers really aren't that much different than stationary boilers in electrical power plants, since the load doesn't vary all that much, plus they are usually very high pressure water tube boilers. Steam locomotives have fire tube boilers in order to withstand the numerous, and drastic loading changes.

Better then nothing. There are alot of x navy guys working for UP. The training navy engineers get dose fit in with the railroad.

 

Originally Posted by jethat:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by jethat:

The Navy still runs some steam ships. That would be a source of boiler trained young people.

 

Sorry, but Navy steam boiler operations are not even remotely close to a steam locomotive. Navy boilers really aren't that much different than stationary boilers in electrical power plants, since the load doesn't vary all that much, plus they are usually very high pressure water tube boilers. Steam locomotives have fire tube boilers in order to withstand the numerous, and drastic loading changes.

Better then nothing. There are alot of x navy guys working for UP. The training navy engineers get dose fit in with the railroad.

 

You may be right, but how many are there on the Steam Crew?

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by jethat:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by jethat:

The Navy still runs some steam ships. That would be a source of boiler trained young people.

 

Sorry, but Navy steam boiler operations are not even remotely close to a steam locomotive. Navy boilers really aren't that much different than stationary boilers in electrical power plants, since the load doesn't vary all that much, plus they are usually very high pressure water tube boilers. Steam locomotives have fire tube boilers in order to withstand the numerous, and drastic loading changes.

Better then nothing. There are alot of x navy guys working for UP. The training navy engineers get dose fit in with the railroad.

 

You may be right, but how many are there on the Steam Crew?

Not enough. The current steam crew only seems to have big goals. Hope what there doing ends up being a good thing. I personally would have preferd they just kept  the equipment they have maintained. I'm looking forward to seeing the Big boy and all but I like 3985 just fine.

Originally Posted by jethat:
The current steam crew only seems to have big goals. Hope what there doing ends up being a good thing. I personally would have preferd they just kept  the equipment they have maintained. I'm looking forward to seeing the Big boy and all but I like 3985 just fine.

 

In reality, the current manager can not maintain what he already had, i.e. the 3985 AND 844, let alone rebuild/overhaul the 4014! Anyone taking any bets that the 844 will NOT operate during 2014?

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×