Skip to main content

As always really neat stuff guys. Really enjoy it!

IMG_1533IMG_1531IMG_1535IMG_1860


This display is a project in progress. Please limit remarks to acclamation or suggestions for scenic details.

Details of bridges and supporting structures are well researched and documented. Scene is designed to depict a river crossing by a Front Range short line that replaced a trestle used by the preceding narrow gauge railroad. The east end was washed out by a flood during WWII and wartime restrictions dictated use of available materials rather than new construction. The plate girder bridge was used to span the new channel formed by the flood. It was salvaged from a class 1 road and the trestle approach repaired. A pile pier was used on the east end for speed and economy.

Bridge deck structures and trestle follow D&RGW standards. Guard rails are fully spiked as per D&RGW standards.

The cut on the west end is narrow by Standard gauge standards, but it was excavated by a narrow gauge railroad and with no demand for oversize clearances, it was never widened. Short lines are notable for their economics.

The display breaks down into two five foot modules after the through truss is removed. The modules and legs weight appox 50#.
The structure will support a 200# load without damage.

Project progress photos can be viewed on the Colorado o Scale Modelers web site: www.coloradooscale.org

Under construction are new end curve modules of 76” radius to allow smoother operation of larger equipment. The original curves are appox. 54” radius with easements. These were an experiment to test the lightweight (less than 20# per module) construction. After 10 years and over thirty public displays the design has proven itself.

Conceptual drawings 

IMG_7490IMG_7491IMG_7492

Attachments

Images (7)
  • IMG_1533
  • IMG_1531
  • IMG_1535
  • IMG_1860
  • IMG_7490
  • IMG_7491
  • IMG_7492
Trussman posted:
PAUL ROMANO posted:
Trussman posted:
PAUL ROMANO posted:

White Line Bridge- NJ HirailersIMG_5165

Nice looking trestles. Did you them ?

 

No. I've worked on some of them but the majority were built by NJ Hirailers club members and Silk City Bridge Works.

Thanks for your response. The reason I asked, they look like the ones I use to build and sell.

 

It looks like one you built because You did build that one    Don't you remember coming with your laser to measure?  We bought this from you

bluelinec4 posted:
Trussman posted:
PAUL ROMANO posted:
Trussman posted:
PAUL ROMANO posted:

White Line Bridge- NJ HirailersIMG_5165

Nice looking trestles. Did you them ?

 

No. I've worked on some of them but the majority were built by NJ Hirailers club members and Silk City Bridge Works.

Thanks for your response. The reason I asked, they look like the ones I use to build and sell.

 

It looks like one you built because You did build that one    Don't you remember coming with your laser to measure?  We bought this from you

Never used a laser, or even traveled to measure a layout, mainly by mail for custom bridge's or trestle orders. My system to do a print for a custom order was simple and I'd guarantee the finished product would fit with in 1/8". I used 1/4" kiln dried oak, deck design was notched and inner locked. The side profile of my trestles dimensions, 3" between bents and 3" between heighth on horizontal braces supporting the diagonals on outside of the bents.  Example of one of my orders, double track radius (quarter of a circle) trestle, outside track 080, inner track parallel w/outer track, one end of trestle 35" high w/ a 1% up grade, clearance at the bottom for a river. It's been about 15 yrs when I stopped doing it.

If you did York 15 yrs or longer, you've most likely seen me set up in the purple hall.   

AlanRail posted:

if you have a truss on top why do you need the arch truss underneath? or vice versa

structural overkill.

I thought it looked good. My original plan was only the truss, then I thought about the arch, and after I installed it, I removed the shelf brackets supporting the truss, and the arch is actually supporting the entire bridge. 

AlanRail posted:

the arch is actually supporting the entire bridge.  exactly so you dont need the top bridge

use it some where else.

 

Sorry, but you don't seem to be listening.  Mo said "I thought it looked good.".  I also think it looks good.  I'm sure most of his visitors think it looks good.  

It's the way Mo wants it. That's good enough for me.

Steven J. Serenska

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×