Skip to main content

@SIRT posted:

Again, 5" high?  Someone goofed

Atlas O Hy-Cubes are fine adding 1/8" wood under portal feet without roadbed using G.G. to 036 fast track.

Hope you don't have any standard tunnel portals...

My scale corrugated auto racks from MTH Premier are about 5-1/16" high.  Lionel's version is about the same.

I have a bunch of Lionel Tunnel portals.  I build up the bases so the opening is at least 6" above rail height.  That way scale stuff and post-war style operating cars with things sticking out the top all go thru.

With the introduction of these, I am thinking we can kiss goodbye to Menards making any more bi-level auto carriers with die cast vehicles included.

Even without the non prototypical era Buicks or Sandford & Son Ford trucks included, the bi-level cars look nicer empty and are closer to scale than these new enclosed ones.

Last edited by Chas
@cabinet Bob posted:

Did you notice Menards didn't  announce  them in this forum ?

As a toy-train operator (NOT a "scale modeler") I would appreciate still getting the announcements here, though I know Menards gets a lot of grief from certain members over some stuff not being scale etc.



Out of curiosity, what curve radius looks good (not exorbitant overhang etc) with a 17-18 inch car?  Are these cars ideal for O-31? O-36?  I know our Lionel 15.5" passenger car overhangs our O-31 track to some extent.

Thank you!

@Micro posted:

As a toy-train operator (NOT a "scale modeler") I would appreciate still getting the announcements here, though I know Menards gets a lot of grief from certain members over some stuff not being scale etc.



Out of curiosity, what curve radius looks good (not exorbitant overhang etc) with a 17-18 inch car?  Are these cars ideal for O-31? O-36?  I know our Lionel 15.5" passenger car overhangs our O-31 track to some extent.

Thank you!

I have found that by subscribing to their trains email list, I am better able to get train items that sell out quickly, rather than wait to see an announcement here

@paulp575 posted:

One thing I noticed is they do not have the operating railroad logo on them, i.e., BNSF, CSX, NS, etc. All the real world cars I've seen have not only the leasing company logo (DTTX, etc.) plus they also have the operating railroad logos on them.

Yeah, I noticed that too. Surprised Menards didn't include sticker sheets like on their open bilevel. I could see someone coming up with decals to "correct" the DTTX reporting mark to something actual autoracks wore (DTTX is for spine cars), as well as roadnames to fit the blank panels. Should be do-able with standard inkjet decal paper or even inkjet adhesive paper.

---PCJ

The correct reporting marks for a flat car with a Bi-Level auto rack are

TTGX 

The reddish car could have logos and names for Missouri Pacific, Southern Pacific, CONRAIL, NORFOLK SOUTHERN, The early 1980's SOUTHERN , the early 1980's NORFOLK AND WESTERN lettering, C&EI

The UNION PACIFIC yellow car would of course need decals for the UNION PACIFIC, CN, CSX, TFM, KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN, BNSF, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway circle-cross, CANADIAN PACIFIC CP, Ferromex, Chicago & North Western



Andrew

Falcon Service

"During my floor-layout days I never had issues with the MPC trilevels tipping over, but I always ran them empty. Fully loaded, these cars were (1) very heavy, and (2) very prone to tipping over if you didn't hold your speed down on those 027 curves. Probably explains why virtually all of the post-MPC reissues of this car were bilevel."  I've got the Great Northern MPC open side tri-level.  I tried several different type of autos hoping to be able to run it loaded.  I thought those plastic Dime Store Dreams would do the trick but they were too wide.  I finally found some Hot Wheels Extremes Volkswagens that fit.

IMG_1131

The two vans and the Beatle had to ride the top level, two Variants and a white Karman Ghia in the middle and two hatchbacks and the black Ghia on the bottom.  Weight was definitely a problem.  I couldn't figure out how to disassemble the auto rack so securing the cars was an issue.  Center of gravity was a big, big issue, especially with those loose trucks.  Train speeds needed to be kept very slow.  I've got 3 of the Lionel screened autoracks from the 90s.  Never did try to load those.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_1131
@RailRide posted:

They look like a stretched and widened version of the Lionel 027 autoracks. At 17.5" measured over the couplers,

Here are some photos comparing the new Menard's Auto Carrier and the Lionel traditional sized Auto Carrier. The Lionel car is orange Rio Grande and the Menard's car is brown.

20220714_185424

20220714_185504

20220714_185552

20220714_185709

Being longer, wider, and greater height, the Menard's car is much larger than the Lionel car.

Attachments

Images (4)
  • 20220714_185424
  • 20220714_185504
  • 20220714_185552
  • 20220714_185709

The MENARDS version of the Auto Carrier can be used as a transition between MTH Railking and Premier freight cars.

Andrew

Mmm...I'd intermix Menards with the MTH Premier cars. The size difference is less noticable in that use case. The RailKing cars are significantly different being short open bilevels, and would be a better match for the Menards open bilevel cars.

The MTH Premier cars would be a transition between Menards and the upcoming Atlas O Gunderson cars

---PCJ

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×