Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Mike W.:

All very interesting.  I do have these pieces with AAR Trucks.  The trucks look rough as the tooling was wearing out by this time.  I guess they did cast the trucks after 1970.  Also some late 60's pieces. Notice the odd cast wheels on the tankcar.

 

 

 

 

 

Lionel 6369 Log Car [Hagerstown) - 1

Lionel 6369 Log Car [Hagerstown) - 2

Lionel 6369 Log Car [Hagerstown) - 3

Lionel 6369 Log Car [Hagerstown) - 4

Lionel 6369 Log Car [Hagerstown) - 5

Lionel 6369 Log Car [Hagerstown) - 6

Lionel 6464-500 Timken [Hagerstown) - 1

Lionel 6464-500 Timken [Hagerstown) - 2

Lionel 6464-500 Timken [Hagerstown) - 3

Lionel 6464-500 Timken [Hagerstown) - 4

Lionel 6464-500 Timken [Hagerstown) - 5

Lionel 6464-500 Timken [Hagerstown) - 6

Lionel 6464-500 Timken [Hagerstown) - 7

I have a number of those early MPC cars with the AAR trucks as well.  I suspect that the tooling may not have been worn out per se, (the tooling was less than a decade old and molds used for plastics tend to last longer than those used for die-cast) but perhaps when Lionel modified it for the new needlepoint axles surfaces in the tooling got roughed up somewhat in the process, or perhaps it was an early production problem with the delrin plastic combined with the injection molding process that resulted in the trucks looking a bit rough and the oxidization on the trucks; usually the residue comes off with a shot of Pledge and a rag. 

 

Needless to say, I really wish they fixed that early problem with the plastic trucks and kept using those carryover postwar AAR trucks or used a new truck design similar to the ASF ride-control type type trucks LTI came out with after 1989 instead of those very obscure Symington-Wayne trucks.

Originally Posted by RRaddict2:
I just obained my first set of CB&Q MPC F-3's. The chrome finish is nice and it has the actual port hole windows but no vents on the nose or grab irons. Did Lionel slowly start adding details back on or did they do it all at once. Does anyone know when the horns returned I have none in mine. I really like these even without the grab irons and steps below the cab. I am also wondering if the Pullmor motors are smaller than the PW Pullmor motors or is it my imagination?  origanlly posted by Mike W.:

Just curious as to why MPC removed most portholes and other details from the F3's beyond that needed to aid in printing the sides?  The details are already in the tools...so the cost savings had to be minimal at most.  If costing more to remove the items.  I think I read they had slips that fit into the tooling to alter the details.

 

The removal of detail parts like the portholes and front nose grab irons pre-dated MPC.  Lionel started this practice on the F3s (and other items) in the mid-1950s as toy train sales were starting to decline and they were trying to make their products cheaper to manufacture.

 

The F3s that were previously noted should have come equipped with horns as MPC still included those.  During the postwar period Lionel originally used a two-piece horn assembly, but during the aforementioned cost-cutting measures in the mid- late-50s they started using the same one-piece horns that were originally used on the postwar Alcos and Geeps and this along with the other detail-removals simply carried over to the MPC era, exception that MPC took the additional step of removing the molded-in front nose grills.

 

One can easily get those horns, either the one-piece or two-piece, from a reputable parts dealer such as Henning's Trains, "O'nly 3 Rail (Chuck Sartor), Olsen's Toy Train Parts, or Brasseur Electric Trains.

Originally Posted by RRaddict2:
I am also wondering if the Pullmor motors are smaller than the PW Pullmor motors or is it my imagination?  

 

Your imagination, probably, or else you're looking at different types of Pullmors. There were two major kinds of Pullmor motors, commonly referred to as Type I and Type II, in use from the Postwar period through the MPC era into the 1990s. Even within those, there are some variations. There were other types of Pullmors in use in some engines during the very early Postwar period as well, before 1954, and some which were only found in certain engines made in the late 1940s.

 

The Type I is a separate motor and truck assembly, and the motor consists of a single - or double - wound field, depending on the E-unit type, surrounding an armature with a worm gear. The worm gear fits down into the top of the power truck, where it drives either a gear on the main drive axle, or internal spur gearing in the truck which transmits power to more then one geared axle. The motor is mounted to the trick via a single mounting screw and pivots in a keyhole-shaped opening in the frame. This drive system is a descendant of the system Lionel developed in 1954, and was used in MPC and later times in Lionel's "premium" diesels and electrics, including the F-3s, FMs, EP-5s, and GG-1s. Postwar Lionel used this motor on its Geeps as well, but MPC used the less expensive Type II for the majority, though not all, of its Geeps.

 

The Type II Pullmor motor is known as the integral truck and motor assembly (intended to differentiate it from the Type I). This was the most common motor in the Lionel product line in the MPC era, other than their "premium" engines. The Type II was originally developed during Lionel's downsizing period in 1955 in response to cost-cutting demands. In this system the motor field, drive gears and axle mounting frame (i.e., the main body of the truck) are all one piece. The spur gears are mounted on one side of this piece, driving geared wheels. This drive system rides in a large hole in the frame, suspended from spring-loaded bushings traveling in curved slots fore and aft of the large hole.

 

This information is from Greenberg's Guide, and refers to diesel engines. Pullmor engines used in Lionel's steam engines is a completely different subject. Many of the motors used by MPC in their steamers were pretty much the same as were used by Postwar Lionel.

 

It should be clear by now, based on this, and John Korling's comments about F-3s, that there were many crossovers between Postwar and MPC era Lionel. There was no big gate that dropped and all of a sudden everything changed with MPC. Among other things, many of the "cost-cutting" measures many folks associate with MPC were actually initiated by Lionel in the Postwar period.

Last edited by breezinup
Originally Posted by Mike W.:

I am curious as to the distinctive feature of late Bar-End trucks Todd was referring too.  And why did Lionel use passenger trucks on the 1982 Cop and Hobo and not the bar end trucks as used on Milk Cars.

They also used those same Timken passenger car trucks instead of the bar end trucks on the re-release of the Erie animated gondola car between 1980-1984, as well as the die-cast machinery car with transformer load back in 1980 and the same car (with girders) in 1981.

I find it odd the Timken 6464 car did not have the Timken freight trucks. As for the Cop & Hobo, I never noticed the different trucks, thanks for pointing that out. I don't recall too many different powered or roller equipped trucks in those years. The 9308 Aquarium car shares trucks that era's lighted caboose. Shortly after, 82-83, it looks like the lighted caboose started to get the passenger trucks like the Cop & Hobo you mentioned. PaperTRW, the info you give is not boring in the least. I had the pleasure of speaking with Lionel's Chuck Horan ten or so years ago at Milwaukee's Trainfest. I was very interested to find out about the relocation from Mexico to Michigan and the 1983 Hudson. I, at that time, had just purchased a Odyssey System demonstrator. He was able to tell me a little about how those came to be.

Originally Posted:

...Shortly after, 82-83, it looks like the lighted caboose started to get the passenger trucks like the Cop & Hobo you mentioned...

It was long before that. The passenger trucks were used on the premium SSS Bay Window caboose starting in 1976 with the NP versions. This was to match the die-cast trucks of the rest of the rolling stock, which were the sprung "Standard-O" type, for which a roller assembly had not been developed yet for interior illumination. Several more followed over the years.

 

The 9307 Erie animated / cop-hobo gondola had the passenger trucks starting in 1979.

According to what I have read, the late Lenny Dean was the driving force behind MPC reintroducing the F3 series. Lenny was one of the last NJ Lionel employees to have an office in NJ and he served as a consultant and marketing guy for General Mills. It was  Lenny who told the Model Products div that Lionel trains were now being purchased by collectors and were no longer children's toys. The re-introduction and evolution of the MPC F3's products can probably be credited to his doing.

Regarding early MPC with Timken trucks:

 

As has already been posted, the trucks were modified to accept the needlepoint axles.
I'd have to look at one to be certain, I think they may have also been modified to use a plastic coupler locking arm.

Several early MPC cars are known to have come with postwar plastic trucks. I think the early 9150 Gulf tanker is one example.

 

I look for boxed MPC cars with Timken trucks. They are difficult enough to find to make looking for them interesting.

Another point regarding MPC's modification of the postwar AAR truck tooling to use the new needlepoint axle design, is that they also filled in the cavities more in the two simulated hollowed out ares of the truck sides.  Why they did this I don't know; I'm assuming that they felt with the delrin plastic that the postwar truck design needed more structural reinforcement.  When they came out with the Simington-Wayne trucks, they did have those cavities completely hollowed out so that you can see through them (like you can on real freight trucks) but these cavities were much smaller than those on the AAR (and other far more common type of roller bearing trucks).

 

So apart from the fast-angle wheels, new plastic uncoupling tab & locking arm, and the aforementioned more rough-looking surface, this is another key spotting feature to differentiate between the postwar and MPC AAR trucks.  

I am wondering what Todd meant about this... "Lastly, the late bar-end truck (from the mid-1960's through 1972) has a distinct identifying characteristic that I don't believe has been documented in the hobby guides. And while all the MPC-era cars that should have the die-cast trucks have that characteristic, the other supposedly-special cars with die-cast trucks do not, indicating that their trucks or chassis were swapped out sometime over the years."

Originally Posted by RRaddict2:
I just obained my first set of CB&Q MPC F-3's. The chrome finish is nice and it has the actual port hole windows but no vents on the nose or grab irons. Did Lionel slowly start adding details back on or did they do it all at once. Does anyone know when the horns returned I have none in mine. I really like these even without the grab irons and steps below the cab. I am also wondering if the Pullmor motors are smaller than the PW Pullmor motors or is it my imagination?

 

Your Burlington F-3 set dates from 1980, which in my opinion, is one of the best years of MPC production.

 

The body detail question was covered earlier in this thread, but here's the info again:

 

1979: The return of the portholes and nose grabs.

1991: The return of the two-piece horns (I think this is what you meant!), side vents and screened roof vents.

1998: The return of the nose vents.

1999: The elimination of the bottom ridges.

 

Your set doesn't have the nose grabs because of the nose decal. The electronic horn was first issued in 1981, as was added to F-3 B-units. (They even made a kit to do this.) 

 

The Pullmor motors used in your set are essentially the same ones used in postwar production, starting in 1955.

 

I hope this helps - enjoy your set!

Originally Posted by John Korling:

I have a number of those early MPC cars with the AAR trucks as well.  I suspect that the tooling may not have been worn out per se, (the tooling was less than a decade old and molds used for plastics tend to last longer than those used for die-cast) but perhaps when Lionel modified it for the new needlepoint axles surfaces in the tooling got roughed up somewhat in the process, or perhaps it was an early production problem with the delrin plastic combined with the injection molding process that resulted in the trucks looking a bit rough and the oxidization on the trucks; usually the residue comes off with a shot of Pledge and a rag. 

 

Needless to say, I really wish they fixed that early problem with the plastic trucks and kept using those carryover postwar AAR trucks or used a new truck design similar to the ASF ride-control type type trucks LTI came out with after 1989 instead of those very obscure Symington-Wayne trucks.

 

The AAR truck tooling was actually in use about 13 years (starting in 1957) before the MPC guys came in, so it's not completely out of the question that it could have been worn out. But I kind of agree with John, there might be more to it than that as the AAR trucks on 1969 production don't seem to be anywhere near as bad as the ones found in the early 1970's. While I doubt that it could have been screwed-up while making the modifications in the early 1970's (the outside surface of the sideframe is on a completely different tooling surface that likely wasn't touched to make the mods), but the potential use of a different plastic has some merit. Different plastics have different properties -- shrink rates being among them -- and that could also result in some of the truck's rough appearance from this time period. If I had to bet, it's probably a combination of all of the above.

 

As for the choice of the oddball Symington Wayne XL-70 trucks, the thoughts on selecting that particular design might be lost to time. I even tracked down the original Lionel designer of the truck, but he couldn't recall anything other than he used the material that someone gave him.

 

Originally Posted by John Korling:

The F3s that were previously noted should have come equipped with horns as MPC still included those.  During the postwar period Lionel originally used a two-piece horn assembly, but during the aforementioned cost-cutting measures in the mid- late-50s they started using the same one-piece horns that were originally used on the postwar Alcos and Geeps and this along with the other detail-removals simply carried over to the MPC era, exception that MPC took the additional step of removing the molded-in front nose grills.

 

I think the poster was referring to operating horns, but between our two posts, I think we covered the bases!

Last edited by PaperTRW
Originally Posted by Mike W.:

I am curious as to the distinctive feature of late Bar-End trucks Todd was referring too.  And why did Lionel use passenger trucks on the 1982 Cop and Hobo and not the bar end trucks as used on Milk Cars.

 

The exact "whys" of a lot of decisions over the years are simply not known. But having been in a similar position myself, you don't have a lot of time to ponder the question, but you make the best decision with what you know, and then move on without doing a lot of looking back.

 

Originally Posted by John Korling:

They also used those same Timken passenger car trucks instead of the bar end trucks on the re-release of the Erie animated gondola car between 1980-1984, as well as the die-cast machinery car with transformer load back in 1980 and the same car (with girders) in 1981.

 

Originally Posted by Mike W.:

Ahh forgot about the others.  Sorry I meant Erie Gondola in my post.  I like the trucks on the car though...oddly.

 

Originally Posted by Bill S.:

As for the Cop & Hobo, I never noticed the different trucks, thanks for pointing that out. I don't recall too many different powered or roller equipped trucks in those years. The 9308 Aquarium car shares trucks that era's lighted caboose. Shortly after, 82-83, it looks like the lighted caboose started to get the passenger trucks like the Cop & Hobo you mentioned.

 

Originally Posted by ADCX Rob:
Originally Posted by Bill S.:

...Shortly after, 82-83, it looks like the lighted caboose started to get the passenger trucks like the Cop & Hobo you mentioned...

It was long before that. The passenger trucks were used on the premium SSS Bay Window caboose starting in 1976 with the NP versions. This was to match the die-cast trucks of the rest of the rolling stock, which were the sprung "Standard-O" type, for which a roller assembly had not been developed yet for interior illumination. Several more followed over the years.

 

The 9307 Erie animated / cop-hobo gondola had the passenger trucks starting in 1979.

 

Not to be picky, but just to correct some dates: the 9308 Aquarium Car was first produced in 1981 (it used regular plastic trucks), and the 9307 Erie Animated Gondola was first made in 1980.

 

Besides the bay window caboose, don't forget the other "first use" of the die-cast passenger car truck in the 1970's: on the TCA Bicentennial Passenger Cars, also from 1976.

Last edited by PaperTRW
Originally Posted by Bill S.:

PaperTRW, the info you give is not boring in the least. I had the pleasure of speaking with Lionel's Chuck Horan ten or so years ago at Milwaukee's Trainfest. I was very interested to find out about the relocation from Mexico to Michigan and the 1983 Hudson. I, at that time, had just purchased a Odyssey System demonstrator. He was able to tell me a little about how those came to be.

Bill, thanks for your comments! I've known Chuck since the mid-1990's -- he's a good guy, and lived through the entire MPC era as he started with MPC in the late 1960's before they acquired the train production. I was the product manager on those 18288 Odyssey Demonstrators, and remember that project well. If I recall correctly, there were eight different versions made.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×