Skip to main content

Anybody else out there interested in a Golden Gate Depot MP / T&P passenger  train run ??? Specifically the “EAGLE”.  This beautiful but Neglected train has not been Correctly/nicely done Before. Scott has said 50 sets are doable. There are soooo many options with the EAGLE !!!!  Colorado Eagle with domes, Texas Eagle with TWO consists - one for MP and one for T&P. Most differences only named cars and numbers. Thru sleepers from NYC, Penn, B&O possible and even Mexican sleeper pick up in Laredo. Other extras could be painted in Jenks blue. How cool would it be to run a mixed MP TP consist, throw in some Jenks blue cars, add GGD heavyweight TP car, head up with a 3rd Rail E6 or 8 ???
The Eagles covered a lot of territory and serviced quiet a few big cities. Surely there are 50 3rail 2rail fans out there to try to make this happen.
What do you have to say ?????? 

Respectfully

TrainBub

Last edited by TrainBub
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The PRR carried through sleepers to both MP and T&P destinations via St. Louis trains from New York.  PRR sleepers assigned to this service were painted in Texas Special and MP Eagle colors ( much in the same way a PRR sleeper was lettered for California Zephyr service).  I particularly like the MP Eagle scheme on PRR ACF built 10-6 sleepers.  I’d be down for either scheme with PRR lettering.  I’d also purchase a MP blue and gray lightweight baggage car as they were often found on PRR mail and express trains.

The PRR carried through sleepers to both MP and T&P destinations via St. Louis trains from New York.  PRR sleepers assigned to this service were painted in Texas Special and MP Eagle colors ( much in the same way a PRR sleeper was lettered for California Zephyr service).  I particularly like the MP Eagle scheme on PRR ACF built 10-6 sleepers.  I’d be down for either scheme with PRR lettering.  I’d also purchase a MP blue and gray lightweight baggage car as they were often found on PRR mail and express trains.

Yes. These Thru sleepers are exactly the Kind of extras that I’d want to see. I don’t remember seeing Scott offer extra baggage cars before .... but why not do   it !!!!!!  
For me 
For extra head end I have GGD heavyweight T&P and Pullman baggage cars in green plus a nice Atlas T&P blue/grey express box car -  and then there’s Atlas 53’ MP and T&P express reefers. Man could we put together a cool consist. 

22DD8C72-16D7-4BA9-AF26-FE59547AA32106CD5897-8817-427D-B246-B1856F2DFC11@Rob English posted:

I would support a 3rd rail/GGD eagle. E6s for me please.

Scott’s E6s are sweet. The E5,6s Need a run 2. Run 2 would be nice for those that missed run 1. I’d be looking for an extra variant with one in Jenks Blue. Would be nice with some “extra” cars Also in Jenks blue. Builds a later consist that interesting. The Colorado Eagle also had unique nose decoration. I don’t know how long it lasted but it makes it different from the Texas Eagle. I think it was on the 6 and I’ve seen it in later E’s. 

oops !!! Dropped the E6 in wrong spot but it shows nice. ( I bet I screw this up at least half the time.) The nose shot is MTH model. Look carefully to see unique markings. But This model had wrong square side windows. 3rd Rail model much nicer and correct. 

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 06CD5897-8817-427D-B246-B1856F2DFC11: 3rd Rail E6
  • 22DD8C72-16D7-4BA9-AF26-FE59547AA321: MTH E6
@Hot Water posted:

Or,,,,,,,,,,you could eMail Scott Mann directly at Sunset/3rd Rail/Golden Gate Depot.

Or...

you could do both so Scott knows and others know that there are many out there who would be in for this set; especially if and E6 rerun provides the possibility of a full train.

I would imagine SF reservations alone could come close to supporting an E6 rerun with the ‘38-‘47 SC moving on along. 

Last edited by BigJohn&theWork
@TrainBub posted:

Anybody else out there interested in a Golden Gate Depot MP / T&P passenger  train run ??? Specifically the “EAGLE”.  This beautiful but Neglected train has not been Correctly/nicely done Before. Scott has said 50 sets are doable. There are soooo many options with the EAGLE !!!!  Colorado Eagle with domes, Texas Eagle with TWO consists - one for MP and one for T&P. Most differences only named cars and numbers. Thru sleepers from NYC, Penn, B&O possible and even Mexican sleeper pick up in Laredo. Other extras could be painted in Jenks blue. How cool would it be to run a mixed MP TP consist, throw in some Jenks blue cars, add GGD heavyweight TP car, head up with a 3rd Rail E6 or 8 ???
The Eagles covered a lot of territory and serviced quiet a few big cities. Surely there are 50 3rail 2rail fans out there to try to make this happen.
What do you have to say ?????? 

Respectfully

TrainBubYou helped support the forums pleas for Slumbercoaches. I'm in for the Eagle! My great-grandfather spent many years on the Chicago & Eastern Illinois and the Missouri Pacific. Not many sets that would be more fitting than the Eagles!

You helped support the forums pleas for Slumbercoaches. I'm in for the Eagle! My great-grandfather spent many years on the Chicago & Eastern Illinois and the Missouri Pacific. Not many sets that would be more fitting than the Eagles!

I am in and would be a set so long as I could represent the Aztec Eagle.  I  emailed Scott to let him know.  If you are interested I would suggest you email him too, thank you!

MISSOURI PACIFIC-NATIONAL RAILWAYS de MEXICO
ST. LOUIS - MEXICO CITY
Through Air-Conditioned Trains—
Modernized Service
EQUIPMENT—Through Pullman Sleepers, 10-Section, 2 Compartments, 1 Drawing-room and 8-Section, 5 Double Bedroom—also A.C. Reclining Chair Cars and Dining Lounge Cars on Trains 1 and 2 between San Antonio and Mexico City, connecting at San Antonio with the Texas Eagle of the Missouri Pacific.

@T4TT posted:

I am in and would be a set so long as I could represent the Aztec Eagle.  I  emailed Scott to let him know.  If you are interested I would suggest you email him too, thank you!

MISSOURI PACIFIC-NATIONAL RAILWAYS de MEXICO
ST. LOUIS - MEXICO CITY
Through Air-Conditioned Trains—
Modernized Service
EQUIPMENT—Through Pullman Sleepers, 10-Section, 2 Compartments, 1 Drawing-room and 8-Section, 5 Double Bedroom—also A.C. Reclining Chair Cars and Dining Lounge Cars on Trains 1 and 2 between San Antonio and Mexico City, connecting at San Antonio with the Texas Eagle of the Missouri Pacific.

@T4TT posted:

I am in and would be a set so long as I could represent the Aztec Eagle.  I  emailed Scott to let him know.  If you are interested I would suggest you email him too, thank you!

MISSOURI PACIFIC-NATIONAL RAILWAYS de MEXICO
ST. LOUIS - MEXICO CITY
Through Air-Conditioned Trains—
Modernized Service
EQUIPMENT—Through Pullman Sleepers, 10-Section, 2 Compartments, 1 Drawing-room and 8-Section, 5 Double Bedroom—also A.C. Reclining Chair Cars and Dining Lounge Cars on Trains 1 and 2 between San Antonio and Mexico City, connecting at San Antonio with the Texas Eagle of the Missouri Pacific.

Aztec EAGLE fans. NDM had Alco FPA-2 for the Eagle in mid 50’s. I Think it may be a FA-2 with a steam boiler added for passenger service. If no external differences, perhaps Scott can add it to FA offering !!! Perhaps you Aztec Eagle Fans know more about this. All can see Picture on “Classicstreamliners.com”. (I avoid copyright probs here). It’s in black n white but should be quite beautiful - Pullman green with red stripe and orange nose decoration that has red pin stripes.  Email Scott to let him know if you’d be interested.

EAGLE research continues  !!!

TrainBub

 

(NOTE...PHOTO DELETED DUE TO COPYRIGHT.)

The famous publicity photo of the "Colorado Eagle" led by new E7's circa 1947 posed in Colorado near Palmer Lake on the Joint Line. The train's accommodations at this time included five sleepers (10 roomettes/6 double-bedrooms [Denver-St. Louis], 6 section/6 roomettes/4 double-bedrooms [Denver - St. Louis], 14 roomettes/4 double-bedrooms [Denver - St. Louis], 6 sections/6 roomettes/4 bedrooms [St. Louis - Los Angeles in conjunction with the "Golden State"], 8 section/1 drawing room/3 double-bedrooms [Wichita - Denver], coaches, grill coach, "Planetarium Dome" coach, and diner-lounge.

 

I have a Coach Yard HO set fabulous model by Sam Tech, it’s an interesting mix of modernized heavyweight to then state of the art Budd domes. Scott, I might be persuaded. Be a legendary project. The porthole windows that were all over the train were the neat things other than that gorgeous paint scheme. 

Last edited by OGR CEO-PUBLISHER

Well, On 6/23 Scott asked for “consist please“. In the midst of packing for my St. Louis move, I managed to research and submitted to Scott a reasonably decent first pass Eagle consist email on 7/10 before my move. I covered ALL Eagles. I also floated E6,8,Alco PA diesel re-runs.  There are Really lots of “moving parts” and interchangeable pieces to sort thru. 
As I said, Scott has the vote that counts. And it has to be an economically Viable proposition for him.  Let’s hope it is. 
Lets not let this Opportunity go dark. I ask everyone that has emailed Scott to do so again to reinforce that interest IS out there for the EAGLE to take off. Spread the word. Tell your fellow MP fans. Have them email Scott. 
Step Up time. !!!!  
Respectfully,

TrainBub

 

I am interested in learning about the Texas Eagle and the Aztec Eagle.  I found this webpage.  Did the Texas Eagle have N de M Sleepers mixed in its MoPac colored consist?  The page does state that it would have been all N de M equipment from Mexico City to Laredo, but would the MoPac consist go from Laredo to Mexico City?  Or would the N de M sleepers have been pulled from the consist and sent through via N de M?  That seems more plausible.  Information about the Aztec Eagle is scarce.  Thank you for sharing whatever info or links you may have!

@T4TT posted:

I am interested in learning about the Texas Eagle and the Aztec Eagle.  I found this webpage.  Did the Texas Eagle have N de M Sleepers mixed in its MoPac colored consist?  The page does state that it would have been all N de M equipment from Mexico City to Laredo, but would the MoPac consist go from Laredo to Mexico City?  Or would the N de M sleepers have been pulled from the consist and sent through via N de M?  That seems more plausible.  Information about the Aztec Eagle is scarce.  Thank you for sharing whatever info or links you may have!

Yes NDM / Aztec EAGLE information is quite meager. I hope some NDM fans can offer up info and some color pictures. I’ve read some “core” MP cars went south but no details. Two heavyweight coaches headed the consist painted in green with an orange stripe (described - no pictures), followed by MP CAR (diner ? Heavyweight ?) followed by I think two NDM sleepers - again green with red stripe. I think heavyweights. Later - NDM upgraded the sleepers buying surplus streamlined 10-5 and 10-6 from NYC. I’ve seen ONE b&w picture of a 10-6 in St. Louis in NDM paint. 
I’d sure like to see a NDM car included in the EAGLE extras. A 10-6 would be great!!  Also - email Scott to add NDM to a future heavyweight coach offering. If all those that purchased Scott’s NDM F3 CAN Step Up, we can get some NDM cars as extras and in future offerings. Perhaps “boilermaker” can lead that charge. 
Cheers !!!

TrainBub

@T4TT posted:

I know it is tricky to post pics here, but here is a link to an open flickr account with a quite a few N de M passenger and mail cars.

Wow what a treasure trove of NDM color pix !!!! Thanks so much. Just guessing but supposedly the 10-6 became the later norm on the Aztec EAGLE. I’d love to see Scott offer an NDM 10-6 extra in a couple of  numbers/names !!!!!  Get any NDM FANS that will place reservations to also email Scott about Wanting this (follow thru reservations important). To get this to fly he NEEDS a minimum number of X. 10-6 is a great entry as probable in consist. A different paint scheme adds a twist and will REALLY need good interest to make it happen !!!!  I’m game !!!!   Shoot high and make it possible !!!!!

thanks Sooo much. !!!

cheers !!!!

@T4TT posted:

Great pic, thanks for sharing Bob. I have the Lionel N de M Centipede painted in a later livery.  I had no idea it first appeared in green.

Lucky Lionel did it !!!  The Centipedes are Amazing to see and quite fascinating but so few buyers. Limited roads had so hard to produce in “O” - limited buyers. I’d love to have the MP Baldwin “Babyface”.  I don’t think we will see Either one any time soon (perhaps Only if one is willing to pay $5000 /pair or more). I hear some background music - “Mission impossible”.

Last edited by TrainBub
@SANTIAGOP23 posted:

Could the two car Delta Eagle be offered with this project?

The 2 car Delta Eagle  could be done. But to be serious I would want the E6 7100 Baggage door version with it. EMD made only one of these the rear engine was removed and made into a 17 ' baggage section and keep the steam generator There is one of these being built of this model in O scale soon to be finished

Attachments

Images (2)
  • MP-7100: MP 7100 with 2 car train  ED E 6
  • MP 7100 E 6 aa
Last edited by Bob Harris
@Bob Harris posted:

The 2 car Delta Eagle  could be done. But to be serious I would want the E6 7100 Baggage door version with it. EMD made only one of these the rear engine was removed and made into a 17 ' baggage section and keep the steam generator There is one of these being built of this model in O scale soon to be finished

I agree about the EMC AA.... I’d be interested in knowing about the O scale model being built if you don’t mind sharing the details.

@Bob Harris posted:

The 2 car Delta Eagle  could be done. But to be serious I would want the E6 7100 Baggage door version with it. EMD made only one of these the rear engine was removed and made into a 17 ' baggage section and keep the steam generator There is one of these being built of this model in O scale soon to be finished

At first I thought all this is not likely. 2 one-off build Passenger cars and a unique E. But after a lot of Thought - hmmm. Another possible later project A-la Rock Island TA Rocket. Brass E6 and aluminum cars - target 50 - 75ish Buyers.
Perhaps Some green Heavyweights in plastic (I’ve seen some Delta Eagles pics with heavyweights) added.
Be expensive. Enough MP FANATICS to pull off ?  Otherwise you are probably talking about doing brass one offs.

Last edited by TrainBub

I wrote up an announcement about this because I didn’t see this one. May I add Lionel is selling the unclaimed surplus corrected T&P A sbd B shells. They are available in two numbers. A’s are $125 and B’s are $110 with the Superbass B being $100. Order direct 1-800-454-6635.

Apologies if this is old news - seems a good place for it.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 743FA70E-7FF4-4282-914E-9A40C9ED8679: Letter to my grandpa on 1950

With the Eagle being announced, I bet there are some out there regretting passing on the MP E6 because there was no decent passenger cars. Well perhaps now those that missed the MP E6 Need To Email Scott !!!! to do an E6 run 2. We’d need a whole rerun as MP E6 stand alone run would never fly. Perhaps a short E6 run 2 can be added to the EA, E1 run.
Let’s  push for A E6 run 2 !!!!!!

Aztec Eagle fans. If you want to see an “extra” NDM 10-6 sleeper you need to step up and email Scott!!! I’ve asked him for this but he will need to see support/commitment to add it to the Eagle offerings. These cars made it into St. Louis Union Station So they would be cool to have in a MP consist. They’d also be nice for those that bought the NDM F3. If those people can commit, I think it could go. It won’t happen if Scott just Gets “crickets”.

Last edited by TrainBub

well i am serious and have reservations in for a set of mopac eagle cars, a couple of texas pac cars and a would get a couple of NDM sleepers if offered. also just nailed a nice mth e6 aba set of engines to pull consist with. they will be on their way to bruk for mod to tmcc control. now can only hope the cars dont get cancelled for lack of interest !!!! oh well nothing ventured, nothing gained.

@TrainBub posted:

Aztec Eagle fans. If you want to see an “extra” NDM 10-6 sleeper you need to step up and email Scott!!! I’ve asked him for this but he will need to see support/commitment to add it to the Eagle offerings. These cars made it into St. Louis Union Station So they would be cool to have in a MP consist. They’d also be nice for those that bought the NDM F3. If those people can commit, I think it could go. It won’t happen if Scott just Gets “crickets”.

Sent an email to Scott stating my interest in the NDM sleepers. Added interest in NDM domes/coaches as well. Hopefully enough interest is there to get them produced.

My parents took the train from Fort Worth to Mexico City in the late 1930’s. Dad took 8mm movies but not Quite enough train ones. My best guess is that they rode the Eagle under discussion. Would the NdeM sleepers have been standards or streamline? Dad took me to see the Valle de Mexico roundhouse in 1963. Me met up with a Fort Worth Railfan, Ed McLaughlan, who set us up on a tunnel entrance north of Mexico City. I have 8mm movies of an F unit powered passenger train which was mixed streamline and standard cars. I even have a movie of one of the NdeM 4-8-0s. My youngest daughter keeps promising me she will put these on YouTube for me.  I saw one of the Aztec Eagle steamers in the roundhouse which was I think a 4-8-4. We also rode the narrow gauge from Mexico City to Cuatla. I got off the train when we stopped at a passing siding to let a rock train go buy. I and another railfan got up on top of a cut to film the rock train... as soon as it cleared the up track switch our train hiballed and we were cut off from it. We ran to catch up the older railfan caught up but I (13) was left in the dust. The conductor on the rock train saw the whole thing, plugged in his phone to call the uptrack station to hold our train. They ditched their freight consist and put me in the caboose and ran tender forward to the next station where I was reunited with my frantic mom and dad. I’ll never forget my parents’ generousity for indulging me like that.

My parents took the train from Fort Worth to Mexico City in the late 1930’s. Dad took 8mm movies but not Quite enough train ones. My best guess is that they rode the Eagle under discussion. Would the NdeM sleepers have been standards or streamline? Dad took me to see the Valle de Mexico roundhouse in 1963. Me met up with a Fort Worth Railfan, Ed McLaughlan, who set us up on a tunnel entrance north of Mexico City. I have 8mm movies of an F unit powered passenger train which was mixed streamline and standard cars. I even have a movie of one of the NdeM 4-8-0s. My youngest daughter keeps promising me she will put these on YouTube for me.  I saw one of the Aztec Eagle steamers in the roundhouse which was I think a 4-8-4. We also rode the narrow gauge from Mexico City to Cuatla. I got off the train when we stopped at a passing siding to let a rock train go buy. I and another railfan got up on top of a cut to film the rock train... as soon as it cleared the up track switch our train hiballed and we were cut off from it. We ran to catch up the older railfan caught up but I (13) was left in the dust. The conductor on the rock train saw the whole thing, plugged in his phone to call the uptrack station to hold our train. They ditched their freight consist and put me in the caboose and ran tender forward to the next station where I was reunited with my frantic mom and dad. I’ll never forget my parents’ generousity for indulging me like that.

Pretty cool experiences !!!

My sources are limited but I think NDM Aztec Eagle had heavyweight coaches up front and heavyweight sleepers in rear, MP car(s?) in center.  I don’t know when MP cars went streamline. NDM did later upgrade sleepers to streamline by purchasing 10-5 (I think) and 10-6 (definitely) Sleepers from NYC. I believe this was in the 60s. So they’d possibly/probably be seen With MP Jenks blue cars by then.
I welcome better knowledge of these details.

AztecEAGLE fans. Scott’s just placed NDM 10-6 sleeper on the Eagle reservations page as an extra car !!!! Time to step up and reserve to make sure this gets done. Those that ordered NDM F3s - this starts a consist for you !!! MP fans - these made it to St  Louis Union Station  

thanks Scott !!!!

🙂🤗😊😆😃🙃😜

Last edited by TrainBub
@TrainBub posted:

AztecEAGLE fans. Scott’s just placed NDM 10-6 sleeper on the Eagle reservations page as an extra car !!!! Time to step up and reserve to make sure this gets done. Those that ordered NDM F3s - this starts a consist for you !!! MP fans - these made it to St  Louis Union Station  

thanks Scott !!!!

🙂🤗😊😆😃🙃😜

Just ordered 2 to add to my Mopac set! Appreciate Scott adding these so quickly.

These NDM 10-6 are streamlined and ran all the way to St. Louis. They were bought from NYC. SO COOL to be able to add them to the MP consist. Before streamline upgrading, the NDM sleepers were heavyweights. I don’t have references if heavyweights made it into St. Louis. The heavyweights were on the Aztec Eagle for sure as were heavyweight coaches. When Scott does a heavyweight coach run we need to get the NDM coaches as part of that run.
Cheers 🙂👍👍👍👍

Here’s hoping reservations are are coming in. We’ve two beautiful consists to consider and a nice batch of extras that includes Penn and NDM 10-6 thru sleepers. Now - Just to stir the pot a Bit. Is there Anyone Else out there besides me that would Love to See some Jenks Blue EXTRAS ??? These would allow us to Also model later Eagles !!!!  These are contemporaneous with the NDM extra. Great JB extras would be baggage (think mail trains), coach, dome (yes prototypical in JB), and 10-6. This may be our ONLY CHANCE EVER to get models of these cars in Jenks Blue in “O”.
Scott. It’s just different paint and lettering of cars already in set !!!!!  This can add numbers to run total to get offering to fly.
Please email Scott to Voice your interest !  Cheers !!!!!!
Trainbub

@Bob Harris posted:

like to know how you can get a riveted car side with Aluminum ?  All MP  are ACF riveted cars , with the chrome molding above and Below the windows his is a must have feature,  Scott still is to much in the dark on this project  for me to jump in and order.

We all have different expectations. Sorry you’ve decided this won’t meet yours. This offering will be wonderful as far as I’m concerned as it will replace my quite nice, ordinary, and perhaps generic MTH premier MP 5 car set. I see it as a Very Serious Upgrade - even if it’s not riveted. I look forward to its future delivery and my enjoying it.
Cheers !!! 🙂

Last edited by TrainBub

All good points Bob and I am throwing this out just for discussion mostly for another project for Scotts E6’s.



At roughly $300 a car, I don’t think you will get the riveted detail you correctly pointed out. On the flip side, there are now MP E6’s with no real consist to pull. So the options for engine owners are as follows:

1: Buy this set and understand the details will have to be “close enough” with correct paint. You at least have something to pull with the E6’s

2: Build your own in brass or plastic if you have the time, talent and money as going this route will probably cost more than $300 per car.

3: Do nothing and wait to see if someone manufactures a set with more or acceptable level of detail.

4: Sell your engine’s and move on to another railroad to model.

In my case, and I am only speaking for myself, I am ok with “close enough” on the details on Streamline cars so long as the paint is correct. I do believe that correct paint is more important for my visual concern as an operator. If the details were spot on and the paint was not accurate, that would cause me more concern. Of course, correct paint AND correct details would be the best, but as I said, you will be much more than $300 per car in cost.

The last E6 run has some really nice engines produced with no passenger cars to haul around (IC, C&NW and UP) just to name a few. While there is another option for the C&NW cars (build your own from a kit), there is not an option for all the others, unless you operate ATSF, SP, NP, PRR or Milwaukee Road - I may have missed a few.

Where this brings us to today is, we as consumers of Scotts products might have a chance to purchase a less than perfect/accurate set of cars for our engines at a fairly reasonable price but will have to live with the understanding that there are some limitations. I’m hoping that there are more people with this same line of thinking so this and other projects can move forward and not get stalled due to lack of customers.



Charlie

I’ll pull my T&P with Lionel F-7s; we will see if we ever get an apropos T&P E unit.
My dream - likely never to be realized -would be a pre streamline era T&P P-1 pacific. Or a TP mountain. Dreaming -sigh.

Talk to Harry!! He will be repainting a Lionel E6 and PA engines for me. The E6 will be in T&P motif and PA will be in Mopac scheme. He has the correct decals for each road. Wings and all. Ain’t life grand!!!!

@tangoman posted:

Talk to Harry!! He will be repainting a Lionel E6 and PA engines for me. The E6 will be in T&P motif and PA will be in Mopac scheme. He has the correct decals for each road. Wings and all. Ain’t life grand!!!!

Oops my mistake. According to my research inStouts book T&P had no E6’s. Only E7, E8, & F7’s. So my E7 will be going to Harry for conversion

@Bob Harris posted:

like to know how you can get a riveted car side with Aluminum ? 

Well, I'm sure it could be done...even credibly...with Archer Transfers' rivet detail decals...at the time of manufacture and certainly before painting/finishing....which would be something 3rd Rail would have to do...at a premium price, I would predict...at a risk of being a reservation breaker for those more willing to compromise...as is more often accepted than not with MTH/Lionel offerings.

Of course, in this world of advances in computer-controlled manufacturing techniques, it would be great if there were a 'dot-jet' printer machine tied to a high speed 2-axis table or printing head just for situations like this.  Material?....anything that would give a durable bond to a parent or treated aluminum/brass surface.  Streamline, heavy weight passenger cars...freight cars galore...I can think of a lot of applications a manufacturer like 3rd Rail could use to merge the best structural material and a printable 3D surface feature material that would be more versatile, less costly than hard tooling.   Or maybe a prep coat or sealcoat that would improve the bond integrity/durability of such printed detail?

BTW...I believe Scott Mann and his team do the due diligence for details better than most manufacturers in this hobby.  It certainly is a benefit to him to know all the subtle details, such as these rivets, that drive make-or-break decisions for a firm reservation.  In the end, however, there probably will be compromises in the interest of keeping cost/pricing under control...to ensure viable production quantities.    I often wonder how many of us wish for a 2nd...or 3rd?...run of an item because of regret for not accepting such compromises or assurances on the first run?

TEHO

KD (a.k.a. Lucas Gudinov)

@Charlie posted:

All good points Bob and I am throwing this out just for discussion mostly for another project for Scotts E6’s.



At roughly $300 a car, I don’t think you will get the riveted detail you correctly pointed out. On the flip side, there are now MP E6’s with no real consist to pull. So the options for engine owners are as follows:

1: Buy this set and understand the details will have to be “close enough” with correct paint. You at least have something to pull with the E6’s

2: Build your own in brass or plastic if you have the time, talent and money as going this route will probably cost more than $300 per car.

3: Do nothing and wait to see if someone manufactures a set with more or acceptable level of detail.

4: Sell your engine’s and move on to another railroad to model.

In my case, and I am only speaking for myself, I am ok with “close enough” on the details on Streamline cars so long as the paint is correct. I do believe that correct paint is more important for my visual concern as an operator. If the details were spot on and the paint was not accurate, that would cause me more concern. Of course, correct paint AND correct details would be the best, but as I said, you will be much more than $300 per car in cost.

The last E6 run has some really nice engines produced with no passenger cars to haul around (IC, C&NW and UP) just to name a few. While there is another option for the C&NW cars (build your own from a kit), there is not an option for all the others, unless you operate ATSF, SP, NP, PRR or Milwaukee Road - I may have missed a few.

Where this brings us to today is, we as consumers of Scotts products might have a chance to purchase a less than perfect/accurate set of cars for our engines at a fairly reasonable price but will have to live with the understanding that there are some limitations. I’m hoping that there are more people with this same line of thinking so this and other projects can move forward and not get stalled due to lack of customers.



Charlie

Quite eloquently said / summarized. 👍

@dkdkrd posted:

Well, I'm sure it could be done...even credibly...with Archer Transfers' rivet detail decals...at the time of manufacture and certainly before painting/finishing....which would be something 3rd Rail would have to do...at a premium price, I would predict...at a risk of being a reservation breaker for those more willing to compromise...as is more often accepted than not with MTH/Lionel offerings.

Of course, in this world of advances in computer-controlled manufacturing techniques, it would be great if there were a 'dot-jet' printer machine tied to a high speed 2-axis table or printing head just for situations like this.  Material?....anything that would give a durable bond to a parent or treated aluminum/brass surface.  Streamline, heavy weight passenger cars...freight cars galore...I can think of a lot of applications a manufacturer like 3rd Rail could use to merge the best structural material and a printable 3D surface feature material that would be more versatile, less costly than hard tooling.   Or maybe a prep coat or sealcoat that would improve the bond integrity/durability of such printed detail?

BTW...I believe Scott Mann and his team do the due diligence for details better than most manufacturers in this hobby.  It certainly is a benefit to him to know all the subtle details, such as these rivets, that drive make-or-break decisions for a firm reservation.  In the end, however, there probably will be compromises in the interest of keeping cost/pricing under control...to ensure viable production quantities.    I often wonder how many of us wish for a 2nd...or 3rd?...run of an item because of regret for not accepting such compromises or assurances on the first run?

TEHO

KD (a.k.a. Lucas Gudinov)

Many times but mostly because of prior financial commitments. One can only hope for a second run or it comes up on the market.

Another stir of the EAGLE pot.

B&O didn’t run 10-6 sleepers on MP. That’s why there is no reservation spot for that. They DID run 10-5s. Actually so did Penn (in addition to 10-6). Anyone out there want 10-5s as extras for the consist ??? We need this B&O car and if that , why not the Penn also ????  As usual, both of these are in MP colors. And yes, it’s prototypical.
(and don’t miss reserving the NDM 10-6 extra. It only shows up on the reservation page. It’s Not in MP colors so is a cool stand-out car.)

Email Scott if you WANT these 10-5s !!!!

Cheers

TrainBub

I wish Scott would get with the program and get that Observation  off the description. It is not correct for the Eagle train in either version. They never ran that car, it is correct only for the Missouri River Eagle and its train 1939.

Both MP and T&P only ran the Pullman Dome coach  I can give him a photo  of a  3000 dollar O scale custom built brass  model to replace it Lettered for  I G N # 896 in the Eagle Blue and Gray.

It would be more of what he is going to make. The way it is now to me is misleading.

BH

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Dome at lounge windows: Model during construction
  • Dome at Passageway: Model during construction
@Bob Harris posted:

I wish Scott would get with the program and get that Observation  off the description. It is not correct for the Eagle train in either version. They never ran that car, it is correct only for the Missouri River Eagle and its train 1939.

Both MP and T&P only ran the Pullman Dome coach  I can give him a photo  of a  3000 dollar O scale custom built brass  model to replace it Lettered for  I G N # 896 in the Eagle Blue and Gray.

It would be more of what he is going to make. The way it is now to me is misleading.

BH

Scott stated on website that he wants customer input for consist revisions and to “sit tight”. I hope he’s getting feedback. Yes observation car is not prototypical for the Eagle but if big majority want the observation car, that’s what he will do. I prefer it not to be there too but I’ve still reserved a MP 8 car set. What I HAVE DONE is also reserve the MP and T&P extra 5 BR - Lounge cars. With no observation car in the consist, these cars were a nice option for passengers beyond the diner or grill/chair cars.
I hope the 14-4 and 14-2-1 get added to the extras list (these 2 have same exterior but diff insides - easy do for Scott). I’d like to see at least one extra IGN car and perhaps a STL B&M car. I’m greedy and only names/numbers differ but our list of wants get quickly long. I want some Jenks cars too !!! This is likely our only chance of seeing well done EAGLE cars / consist !!!!  

Email Scott what you want !!!!!!!!!!  

393588C5-995B-422E-968B-200D12D7A56CLots of good information is being brought up. I was moved to look in my Collias book and it’s interesting that F-7s regeared for passenger service were sometimes run with E6’s and E-8’s. Those F-7s received passenger paint schemes. The T&P certainly did it their way. Collias states in regard to the Eagle streamline consists that “...no observation cars were ordered by either T&P or MoPac.”

The author also shows a real attractive modernized business car, No. 2, with almost a Harriman roof and a full back porch. That would  make a great tail end car that would satisfy our obsession with an obs car and would be accurate. T&P had a roster of “...five near identical cars for official use.” The photo is on page 153. I’d post it but I’m unsure of the legality...

This photo is of me in 1994 with the business car Ellesmere which was then at the Pate Museum of Transportation in Fort Worth. Does anyone know of its fate?

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 393588C5-995B-422E-968B-200D12D7A56C
Last edited by Griff Murphey

When did Scott build those E-8s? As I recall he WAS going to make TP ones about 3-4 years ago but dropped the T&Ps as he was concerned there were details such as portholes that were not consistent with T&P practice. I’d have settled for close enough.

The E8 box end says May 2017. There were MP and T&P 8s done.
E7 Run 3 November 2019 was proposed to have MP and T& P. These were Canceled 😮😖☹️ as they would require new tooling for the porthole windows.
The E8 and E6 Thankfully got the portholes. 🤗  Why the 7s didn’t and the 8 and 6 did .......????

Last edited by TrainBub

I had emailed Scott Mann about offering N de M sleepers as add-on cars to this MoPac set.  The sleepers are on the GGD reservation page.
GGD N de M Sleeper

Of course the N de M sleepers will only be produced if there are enough orders.

N de M Sleeper-Nepal

N de M Monte Verde-337

N de M cars and engines are offered so rarely.  This is a golden opportunity!  If you are interested in these cars please email Scott, sales@goldengatedepot.com or better yet make your reservation today!

thank you!

Attachments

Images (2)
  • GGD N de M Sleeper
  • N de M Monte Verde-337
@vash44 posted:

I ordered a pair of the N de M sleepers in November. I hope they get produced. Not sure on the threshold required but hope others see it as an opportunity to get them produced in a very nice manner.

Yes it was great to get Scott add the NDM 10-6s to the EAGLE offering. I’m getting the feeling there’s going to be enough people reserving. Because this was offered,  I then reserved a NDM F3. I hope That flies in run 2. The NDM 10-6 might/could get more reservations if Scott would list it on MP TP main page. Even without that, people seem to be finding. That’s good.
also interesting - a NDM diesel has been added to the SD40-2 offering. The NDM fans are watching and emailing Scott. So also needed for Aztec EAGLE are NDM heavyweight coaches in NDM colors. Email Scott about this too.
Cheers.
TrainBub

Last edited by TrainBub
@T4TT posted:

I ordered 2 N de M sleepers.  I actually ordered the MoPac set because of the N de M sleepers.  Some heavyweights would be great in future!!

Do you have any Aztec EAGLE consist comments you can contribute. AE info is pretty scarce (at least that’s what I’ve encountered). I’ve found that heavyweight coaches ran up front and eventually streamlined 10-5s and 10-6s (purchased from NYC) in the rear. Some MP car(s ?) in the middle - but references don’t say what. I’ve not yet tried diving into public timetables to see if AE consists are listed.
I guess I’m just looking for an NDM Aztec Eagle consist “Champion” to step up.

And it’s cool to have you “buy in” to the MP EAGLE offering !!!  
CHEERS !!!!

Anyone wanting to have their EAGLE include a Mexico consist - that is the Aztec Eagle - take note that Scott has sent out notices to those with F3 run2 reservations that production will begin soon. That includes NDM F3 !!! That probably means reservations close Soon!! Time to step up or just have regrets later. We also have a NDM 10-6 sleeper on the reservation page if anyone has been shy about going there (Hint). Down the road we target some NDM Coaches in the next Heavyweight offering !!!

I saw NdeM passenger consists north of Mexico City. Tempting but I am about maxed out on space and funds for trains. The impending Lionel Katy pacific with (WAIT for IT!!) a first time OIL TENDER also beckons (but not the yucky Texas Special cars). Gotta focus on my beloved T&P. Btw sympathy please... after Christmas I unboxed my new Lionel TP legacy F-7 ABA, the powered A would not run on conventional- gotta send her back to Gryzboski’s.

I saw NdeM passenger consists north of Mexico City. Tempting but I am about maxed out on space and funds for trains. The impending Lionel Katy pacific with (WAIT for IT!!) a first time OIL TENDER also beckons (but not the yucky Texas Special cars). Gotta focus on my beloved T&P. Btw sympathy please... after Christmas I unboxed my new Lionel TP legacy F-7 ABA, the powered A would not run on conventional- gotta send her back to Gryzboski’s.

Out of the box and doesn’t work stinks !!! Sorry any time I hear that.  I get only so much $ for the “train budget” too. As for space, I’m pretty limited in a condo. In fact, I’m mostly full with storage capacity. When something shows up that I REALLY Want, it means something has got to go ! The “empire” had to shrink having downsized to a condo too. ☹️

@Bob Harris posted:

I wish Scott would get with the program and get that Observation  off the description. It is not correct for the Eagle train in either version. They never ran that car, it is correct only for the Missouri River Eagle and its train 1939.

Both MP and T&P only ran the Pullman Dome coach  I can give him a photo  of a  3000 dollar O scale custom built brass  model to replace it Lettered for  I G N # 896 in the Eagle Blue and Gray.

It would be more of what he is going to make. The way it is now to me is misleading.

BH

Bob.
I hope you’ve seen Scott’s updates for the EAGLE by now. I think the revisions will satisfy most prototypical fans. A option to choose an observation car (always popular) or a prototypical 14-4 sleeper is really a nice deal !!!  I REALLY welcome the 14-4. Scott also added a Correct B&O 10-5 in the extra car department. Also a great Add.  
We can now put together a Really Cool consist sans observation car - the 6 “core” cars of bag, express, chair, dome chair, grill, diner PLUS at least 5 sleepers - 10-6, 14-4, Penn 10-6, B&O 10-5, and 5BR-Lounge (and a 6th NDM if you wish). Those with monster layouts (or access to club layouts) can add additional Chair, dome chair, 10-6 for a huge consist.

Hope these revisions are acceptable enough to get you “buy in” and make a reservation. They are a significant improvement for the offering !!!!

Cheers. 🙂
TrainBub

Last edited by TrainBub
@TrainBub posted:

The E8 box end says May 2017. There were MP and T&P 8s done.
E7 Run 3 November 2019 was proposed to have MP and T& P. These were Canceled 😮😖☹️ as they would require new tooling for the porthole windows.
The E8 and E6 Thankfully got the portholes. 🤗  Why the 7s didn’t and the 8 and 6 did .......????

Because the newer models are made with slide molds where the sides can be changed.  But the E7s were the first 3rdrail plastic diesels made (10+ years ago) and they had fixed molds back then so would require a whole new set of molds.

I wish I had more information about the Aztec Eagle.  I have spent way too much time searching the web and have come up with very little. 

I am leaning towards the 14-4 option over the observation car.  What would the order of the cars?

baggage
baggage express
chair
dome chair
grill
diner
Sleepers (10-6 Sleeper & 14-4 Sleeper)

How would the last car in the train have been treated?  Would it have had marker lights or an MoPac medallion?  The nice thing about the observation car is that it visually represents the end of the train.  While not prototypical is a beautiful car and for me it "feels" right that passenger trains end with obs cars!   

I really appreciate the knowledge and information shared on this forum!  Thank you!

@rdunniii posted:

Because the newer models are made with slide molds where the sides can be changed.  But the E7s were the first 3rdrail plastic diesels made (10+ years ago) and they had fixed molds back then so would require a whole new set of molds.

Oh I sure hope if there is another E7 run sometime in the future, we can get MP and T&P models. This diesel is a significant gap in MP, TP power for us that model these roads. (But also understand I Appreciate Scott doing the MP, TP E8s and the MP E6)

@T4TT posted:

I wish I had more information about the Aztec Eagle.  I have spent way too much time searching the web and have come up with very little.

I am leaning towards the 14-4 option over the observation car.  What would the order of the cars?

baggage
baggage express
chair
dome chair
grill
diner
Sleepers (10-6 Sleeper & 14-4 Sleeper)

How would the last car in the train have been treated?  Would it have had marker lights or an MoPac medallion?  The nice thing about the observation car is that it visually represents the end of the train.  While not prototypical is a beautiful car and for me it "feels" right that passenger trains end with obs cars!   

I really appreciate the knowledge and information shared on this forum!  Thank you!

The Aztec Eagle is a tough nut to source good or appropriate info. A 10-6 or two in NDM colors for the rear of a consist is a nice start. A MP grill or Diner moving forward might, Might be appropriate, and then in front, 2 NDM heavyweight coaches (I’ve been campaigning Scott for a plastic heavyweight coach run - with NDM included). I’ve a NDM F3 on order. This is my Aztec Eagle consist goal/scenario to which I aspire. Simple but decent.  

I haven’t paid much attention to car order but your order might be correct. The grill could be forward - I’ll eventually see if I can find out. Sleepers last. The extra Penn and B&O sleeper cars fit in nicely and I don’t think they are last (TRRA had “fun” switching in the Thru sleepers and keep the trains departing on schedule).  The 5BR-Fountain/Lounge becomes interesting as a possible observation car / replacement - last car. (Only 3. 1 MP, 2 T&P) That may not be prototypical - but it plays nice in my mind. A place to go to that’s not the grill or diner.  Add in the extra sleepers and you have a heck of a consist with 5 sleepers.  

I don’t know if the last car had a drumhead, a gate, or gate and drum..... or nothing.

I lean towards the 14-4 myself - to be prototypical. There were only Two MP observation cars and they were on the Missouri River Eagle that ran between St. Louis, KC, and Omaha.

Last edited by TrainBub

One more time - the solution from a modelers’ standpoint might well be a business car. Esthetically it would make modelers happy looking at the train and would be prototypical. I’d hate to have to cut the 3 rail coupler off that dome lounge. I don’t know if Scott has anything close to any of the T&P’s which I believe some or maybe most were old truss rod wooden cars sheeted over to look metal with the clerestory roofs covered as well like Harrimans. Might be a subject for scratchbuilding or reworking a LaBelle wood kit. Maybe rework a Harriman steel obs sand off the rivets and add truss rods...

The comment about the IGN is interesting. I had a few old T&P guys as patients and one fellow in particular was trying to tell me about the “Ginny Railroad” which is I guess what the T&P guys called it. I would welcome more information about its relationship with the T&P. What we DON’T know about the T&P is a pretty substantial deficit.

Last edited by Griff Murphey

One more time - the solution from a modelers’ standpoint might well be a business car. Esthetically it would make modelers happy looking at the train and would be prototypical. I’d hate to have to cut the 3 rail coupler off that dome lounge. I don’t know if Scott has anything close to any of the T&P’s which I believe some or maybe most were old truss rod wooden cars sheeted over to look metal with the clerestory roofs covered as well like Harrimans. Might be a subject for scratchbuilding or reworking a LaBelle wood kit. Maybe rework a Harriman steel obs sand off the rivets and add truss rods...

The comment about the IGN is interesting. I had a few old T&P guys as patients and one fellow in particular was trying to tell me about the “Ginny Railroad” which is I guess what the T&P guys called it. I would welcome more information about its relationship with the T&P. What we DON’T know about the T&P is a pretty substantial deficit.

I hope you were able to get the recent GGD plastic T&P heavyweights. They can nicely be worked into a T&P consist. (Couldn’t get him to do MP ☹️).  Issued were RPO, baggage, diner, observation. I’ve campaigned to Scott for a follow on coach run.
I’d like to see an IGN (MP in Texas subsidiary / International Great Northern) car added to the extras. Probably only chance to ever see one of these cars !!!  At least a couple of car options. Only thing different from all the cars offered is the car name and IGN in small letters by the door.

Rattler 21 sold me the baggage - I had no idea they were being made as we had some serious health issues in 2017 and I was not following new releases. I wish Scott had  a roadname based database and could send out notice of offerings to those of us with specialist interests. T&P is normally a model RR desert then when they come that’s all, folks.

Another EAGLE Option Added !!!!
Just added 14-4 to extras.  Now you can have your prototypical consist (sans observation car) or the consist with the observation car and can add a 14-4 if you wish. We can do prototypical and have a beautiful observation car too.  Really Nice Option !!!  Choice is a good thing !!!  🙂😁😜

CHEERS !!!

Can you post the site to go to for that? When I try to look up Scott’s site I usually (always) get incomplete stuff and listings of product from other secondhand sources etc.

BTW I am hoping to recover my dvd I made of my and my dad’s 8mm home movies of early 60’s NdeM stuff - I will try to see if I can put on pix of passenger consists. Also have some movies of the Lancaster Yard in the closing days of T&P I think about 1972. Just 8mm and I don’t want to promise too much first step is getting them back from youngest daughter who was going to put them on youtube.

Can you post the site to go to for that? When I try to look up Scott’s site I usually (always) get incomplete stuff and listings of product from other secondhand sources etc.

BTW I am hoping to recover my dvd I made of my and my dad’s 8mm home movies of early 60’s NdeM stuff - I will try to see if I can put on pix of passenger consists. Also have some movies of the Lancaster Yard in the closing days of T&P I think about 1972. Just 8mm and I don’t want to promise too much first step is getting them back from youngest daughter who was going to put them on youtube.

Scott’s webpage is

goldengatedepot.com

The “general” page will come up and you can scroll down to “new announcements O scale”. Click there to go to next page. Scroll down to EAGLE section to see options. Click “reserve today” to go to reservations page if you are ready for that. LOTS of options for a TP guy like you.  

Cheers !!! 🙂👍  
TrainBub

PS Hope you can recover some of those pix or find out if you daughter Did get the 8mm onto utube.

Ok help me out here, I don’t see listings for either a baggage or an obs. But the 8 car set can be had with the (fictional) obs, or NOT. So are the baggage and observation cars sold only with the 8 car set? Right now I am only a seasonal shoe lever carpet fine scale modeler. I am planning on demolition of my HO empire and a simple 8x12ft. O layout and am afraid the train is going to be chasing its tail if I get an 8 car set.

Attachments

Videos (1)
trim.24AF7825-0413-4A1D-8EA1-3E3840C7F52A
Last edited by Griff Murphey

Ok help me out here, I don’t see listings for either a baggage or an obs. But the 8 car set can be had with the (fictional) obs, or NOT. So are the baggage and observation cars sold only with the 8 car set? Right now I am only a seasonal shoe lever carpet fine scale modeler. I am planning on demolition of my HO empire and a simple 8x12ft. O layout and am afraid the train is going to be chasing its tail if I get an 8 car set.

Yes the baggage and Observation car are available Only in the 8 car set. I get the “chasing it’s tail” as I also have only an 8x12 layout. No matter what -  Consider using only one large diesel (like E8) or two smaller ones (like F3s). If you try to use ABAs, you Really run out of room. 4 or 5 cars can work reasonably well with the abbreviated power up front. Leave the other cars in the “yard” or siding or have them for use in a second train - a smaller “local” consist. The cars look nice with 072 but will run with 054. What can really expand you layout options are Curved Turnouts. I use Ross O96/72 and O72/54 to really increase my layout options.

So one choice is splitting the 8 car set for multiple consists.  
The other choice is to build your own consist. Scott’s given us some wonderful “extra” cars to choose from. You are lucky you got that T&P heavyweight Baggage car.  Use it and add what you like/want from the Scott’s long list of “extras”. Pick a chair car or two, a dome chair (T&P had Only One !!!), and a sleeper. The 5BR-Fountain Lounge (TP had 2) is a cool option as it’s kind of an observation car substitute.  Don’t fret the observation car- T&P never had one.
You can build a Very Nice consist with the available choices.
It can work out many ways for you. Lots of options. Choice Is Good !!! 🙂🙂👍👍Cheers !!!! 😀

Last edited by TrainBub

Trainbud

Yes I have seen the revisions and and makes more since to do that for those who want and Observation, the N de M add oms are well . now to be clear I have reserved  the N de M  cars.

I have not reserved the remainder of the cars for a very good reason.  I have already been building a brass Texas Eagle the past 5 years using the De Plains MP kits and some Kemtron kits. The remainder are scratched built from 020" sheet brass and rolled roofs. I am 10 cars into a 15 car train.

So with that comment, it makes no since for me to purchase complete sets with what I have already done. So I will purchase the add ons.

I have only made comments as a heads up for Scott to give you the best accumulate trains for the buck. I have helped him many times over the years on projects that have has gross Eras  made. But some have been very good as they should be. The MP  PA versions were one of them.

So here is another heads for the Observation. The rear emblem is a very heavy casting as you can see by my added photo's You need to push Scott that this be done right.

Regards Bob

Attachments

Images (3)
  • MP RD end Obs Emblem   interior.jpg c
  • mp-po750esw
  • MP Eaqle Observation
Last edited by Bob Harris
@Bob Harris posted:

Trainbud

Yes I have seen the revisions and and makes more since to do that for those who want and Observation, the N de M add oms are well . now to be clear I have reserved  the N de M  cars.

I have not reserved the remainder of the cars for a very good reason.  I have already been building a brass Texas Eagle the past 5 years using the De Plains MP kits and some Kemtron kits. The remainder are scratched built from 020" sheet brass and rolled roofs. I am 10 cars into a 15 car train.

So with that comment, it makes no since for me to purchase complete sets with what I have already done. So I will purchase the add ons.

I have only made comments as a heads up for Scott to give you the best accumulate trains for the buck. I have helped him many times over the years on projects that have has gross Eras  made. But some have been very good as they should be. The MP  PA versions were one of them.

So here is another heads for the Observation. The rear emblem is a very heavy casting as you can see by my added photo's You need to push Scott that this be done right.

Regards Bob

All comments, guidance, and suggestions from Everyone Are Welcome !!!  The goal is to have Scott to be able to produce the Best, Accurate Product Possible !!!!  So thanks for the Observation tail detail comments and pictures.
I admire and appreciate those that have the patience and skills (and time) to build their own cars.
Thanks for ordering the NDM extra car. It all contributes to Scott’s minimum number requirements.
Cheers  
Trainbub

Here’s a sidebar - heads up notice for MP and T&P fans.  
Beth of “Public Delivery Track” will try to get a short run of the MTH Premier CA-1 wood caboose done in MP and T&P. The caboose model is a well done beauty. Check out in “Traditional “ header threads. It’s buried in “freight cars” thread I believe for now. Needs own thread.   Quality MP and T&P caboose are scarce to non existent. Lots of emails to her will help her calibrate support - commerciality of run. I’ll be in for a MP and TP for sure if this flies.   Here’s hoping Beth can pull it off. (And check out her St. Louis-centric TRRA SW 15 (MTH RK) offering on her website!!! Three #s offered.  It’s “a go” ).
Caboose - Another stir the pot effort  
from TrainBub 👍😬😜

Cheers !!! 🙂

Last edited by TrainBub

Good News from Scott !!!! (News / production schedules Posted in SD40-2 thread).
The E-6 will get a second run. Those that missed the MP AB beauty the first time will now have a second chance. This should be helpful for those that won’t reserve the EAGLE passenger offering because there is no 3rd Rail engine to pull it.  FYI - MP had 2 ABs.
Cheers !!!!  
PS. Perhaps we can get even some more mileage out of this if we can get Scott to offer an E6 Jenks Blue version too !!!

Last edited by TrainBub

T&P had a small number of F7A and F7B units (2 of each, as I recall it)  which were equipped for passenger service, and even, at one time, wore the passenger paint scheme.

The primary passenger power on the T&P, though, was its fleet of E7A and E8A units, well cared-for and kept very clean when T&P operated independently -- until MP seized operational control of its profitable Texas subsidiary.

@TrainBub posted:

Good News from Scott !!!! (News / production schedules Posted in SD40-2 thread).
The E-6 will get a second run. Those that missed the MP AB beauty the first time will now have a second chance. This should be helpful for those that won’t reserve the EAGLE passenger offering because there is no 3rd Rail engine to pull it.  FYI - MP had 2 ABs.
Cheers !!!!  
PS. Perhaps we can get even some more mileage out of this if we can get Scott to offer an E6 Jenks Blue version too !!!

Well people this is all well and good on the E6. But remember the Porthole on the forward end o the B unit is location is off by 5 scale feet. Scott knew this and the builder wanted 6 K to correct the tooling. It never got done. So make sure it will get fixed this time or live with it,

Bob harris

Attachments

Images (2)
  • E 6 B Unit froward end
  • E6B-MOPAC-Porthole-Corr1: this was the correction that wasset to Scott, Builyer said  6K to correctt.
Last edited by Bob Harris
@Jtrain posted:

Did the other errors get fixed?

To my Knowledge no they dd not. I was so amendment  about the errors I just sold my 2 sets. I do know that a lot of material was provided for this project  that just went unnoticed. It was always there to far along to make changes.

The Porthole material was provide back in July, and 8 months later when they are in production is when the error was caught for Model review. That is just unacceptable in my book. I personally think the Builder owes Scott the correction on the B unit Porthole for free not charge 6 K

So I surely hope the MP and T&P projects are good as 299 can get you. the tail end observation if it is not doe right, can go south in a real hurry.

Bob Harris

"Well people this is all well and good on the E6. But remember the Porthole on the forward end o the B unit is location is off by 5 scale feet. Scott knew this and the builder wanted 6 K to correct the tooling. It never got done. So make sure it will get fixed this time or live with it,"

Bob Harris

Bob Harris,

Thanks for bringing up the error on the 3 units of Mopac B Units we produced in the first run. I'm sorry you had to dump yours because of the porthole and roof hatch error.  You see, sometimes we have to let an error get through when the error is discovered too late in the production process. Out of 500 units, only a total of 7 were A and B Mopac e6s. I probably spent 5X as much of my time and a lot of money in extra tooling to make the porthole version.  When the error was discovered the tooling was already done, the shells were injected and remaking the tool for these 3 B Units was not feasible.  We had considered hand filling and boring and making a rim casting to fix the problem, but could have damaged the 3 units making them unsalable. There are always errors on both sides of the pond.  All we can do is our best. I'm not going to sacrifice a 20 year relationship with a factory over the location of a porthole on a B unit no less. Glad you were able to pawn off your units. I am sure you woke up every morning thinking about how horrible these models looked.

I do want to thank you and Bill Basden for helping me get the models to the 98% accurate point that they were.



Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
Last edited by sdmann

I’d be happy with any E units in T&P livery. I just spent $689 on a Lionel T&P 4-6-0 which probably could have been dolled up to look a bit like one of the late D-9s. As it is, it’s numbered for the early one without compound cylinders that runs on the Texas State Railroad, and it’s got a coal tender. I hope they changed the boiler color from the proposed lime green. The only thing Texas & Pacific is likely gonna be the lettering on the tender. Beggars can’t be choosers - at least not lovers of a “minor” railroad.

@sdmann posted:

"Well people this is all well and good on the E6. But remember the Porthole on the forward end o the B unit is location is off by 5 scale feet. Scott knew this and the builder wanted 6 K to correct the tooling. It never got done. So make sure it will get fixed this time or live with it,"

Bob Harris

Bob Harris,

Thanks for bringing up the error on the 3 units of Mopac B Units we produced in the first run. I'm sorry you had to dump yours because of the porthole and roof hatch error.  You see, sometimes we have to let an error get through when the error is discovered too late in the production process. Out of 500 units, only a total of 7 were A and B Mopac e6s. I probably spent 5X as much of my time and a lot of money in extra tooling to make the porthole version.  When the error was discovered the tooling was already done, the shells were injected and remaking the tool for these 3 B Units was not feasible.  We had considered hand filling and boring and making a rim casting to fix the problem, but could have damaged the 3 units making them unsalable. There are always errors on both sides of the pond.  All we can do is our best. I'm not going to sacrifice a 20 year relationship with a factory over the location of a porthole on a B unit no less. Glad you were able to pawn off your units. I am sure you woke up every morning thinking about how horrible these models looked.

I do want to thank you and Bill Basden for helping me get the models to the 98% accurate point that they were.



Looks great to me !!!!!

@TrainBub posted:

Looks great to me !!!!!

Yes, I agree.  They look good, and appear close enough to be representative of the prototype, which is what a model should be.  If they are reissued, the existing tooling would be fine.  No need for Scott to pour more money into that investment.  Just go ahead and reissue them with that tooling and paint.  They look good as is.

I would be afraid that if people demand these tooling changes, the expense will be too much and the locomotives will not get reissued.

@Jtrain posted:

Yes, I agree.  They look good, and appear close enough to be representative of the prototype, which is what a model should be.  If they are reissued, the existing tooling would be fine.  No need for Scott to pour more money into that investment.  Just go ahead and reissue them with that tooling and paint.  They look good as is.

I would be afraid that if people demand these tooling changes, the expense will be too much and the locomotives will not get reissued.

I think a yellow paint “tweak” might be in order but beyond that - don’t mess with a good thing !!!!!!! There were Very Few done in run 1.  Don’t Miss getting this time with the cars - no whining will be allowed.

Last edited by TrainBub

EAGLE and MP fans. Scott has posted a second GP run offering. The MP GP did not get enough first run orders to get done. Here’s a second chance to get one done in the later Jenks paint. To my knowledge it has not been done in “O”. (This would undoubtedly be best ever done.)
It would be a great diverse lash up with the coming soon Jenks blue SD40-2.  The GP was used for power in mail/express car trains.
Cheers !!! 😜

@sdmann
Your MoPac E6s look great to me Scott.  When you initially offered them I bought a set of ATSF units.  I wish I could have swung a set of MoPacs at that time too.  I was really hoping you would offer them again. Then I saw this...
mopac E


I checked both the 3rd Rail and the GGD pages and could not find the link to reserve a set of E units.  Can you provide me a link to the reservation page for the E units?

thank you
Kevin

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mopac E
Last edited by T4TT
@T4TT posted:

@sdmann
Your MoPac E6s look great to me Scott.  When you initially offered them I bought a set of ATSF units.  I wish I could have swung a set of MoPacs at that time too.  I was really hoping you would offer them again. Then I saw this...



I checked both the 3rd Rail and the GGD pages and could not find the link to reserve a set of E units.  Can you provide me a link to the reservation page for the E units?

thank you
Kevin

It’ll show up. He’s showing it will be done but I think it’s a bit early as I expect it will be done with a greater E6 run 2. The Q is pretty long right now and I’d wager Scott doesn’t want too much more offered right now.  Of course just IMO !!!!  

@Bob Harris posted:

For those that are interested.   N de M Pullman Operation with the M P Texas Eagle.  I think this will help a lot for car names and car types to have made for the models.

I am offering this as gratis to help the project go forward accurately. enjoy this information.

Bob Harris and others.

wow 2 months and not a reply about the N de M. Does make me unhappy when some thing is provided ad goes unnoticed.

Bob Harris

Last edited by Bob Harris
@sdmann posted:

"Well people this is all well and good on the E6. But remember the Porthole on the forward end o the B unit is location is off by 5 scale feet. Scott knew this and the builder wanted 6 K to correct the tooling. It never got done. So make sure it will get fixed this time or live with it,"

Bob Harris

Bob Harris,

Thanks for bringing up the error on the 3 units of Mopac B Units we produced in the first run. I'm sorry you had to dump yours because of the porthole and roof hatch error.  You see, sometimes we have to let an error get through when the error is discovered too late in the production process. Out of 500 units, only a total of 7 were A and B Mopac e6s. I probably spent 5X as much of my time and a lot of money in extra tooling to make the porthole version.  When the error was discovered the tooling was already done, the shells were injected and remaking the tool for these 3 B Units was not feasible.  We had considered hand filling and boring and making a rim casting to fix the problem, but could have damaged the 3 units making them unsalable. There are always errors on both sides of the pond.  All we can do is our best. I'm not going to sacrifice a 20 year relationship with a factory over the location of a porthole on a B unit no less. Glad you were able to pawn off your units. I am sure you woke up every morning thinking about how horrible these models looked.

I do want to thank you and Bill Basden for helping me get the models to the 98% accurate point that they were.



Wow. Only 7 total Run One with 3 “B”s !!!!  Always interesting to revisit threads !!! All that passed on this offering the first time Now get a “Mulligan” - a second chance - now that the E5,6 run 2 formally announced by Scott. I like the idea of myself being among a select Few that have a MP E6 AB set …. BUT I like even better that it’s being re-offered and should help reservations for the MP EAGLE offering. Those that passed as there were no passenger cars now have no excuse.
Scott should get more reservation on the MP E6 this time. Now we need to get him to offer it in the later Jenks Blue paint scheme in addition to the original blue/cream scheme.
As a reminder -  MP had only 2 AB consists.  
Got to “stir the pot” on this occasionally.  The Q is long and the moving towards production is soooo slooow !!! ☹️
Cheers !!!

Last edited by TrainBub
@Bob Harris posted:

wow 2 months and not a reply about the N de M. Does make me unhappy when some thing is provided ad goes unnoticed.

Bob Harris

Sometimes we post and get a response, sometimes no response. One never knows.
No matter what happens, I “soldier on” on with my goal unchanged. Here - to get the MO EAGLE into production with accurate and numerous pieces. It’s really turned into an Ambitious Offering !!!!   We’ve got Scott offering TWO trains - MP and T&P. They Will have different numbers and names as appropriate. One can choose with a beautiful observation car (not prototypical) or without obs car by Substituting a 14-4 sleeper (prototypical !!!). Extra cars galore offered !!!! Reserve a MP consist and add T&P extras - or T&P consist with MP extras. Add more favorite 14-4 sleepers. There’s Penn and B&O thru sleepers to add. And - AND a NDM sleeper. Right now there’s 8 !!! extra cars offered !!! Some are in the “base” sets, some not. Talk about Lots of Options to build ones Favorite consist - or Consists.  

I don’t think it can get any better than    this !!!!!!!  

I’ve asked everyone to contribute to the offering - continue to do so to make this offering as good as it can be.  It’s never been done like this in “O”.  Let’s make sure this one is the best we can get.  It’s shaping up like it Will Be !!!! Post ideas here but definitely Always email Scott those ideas/info.

Thanks and  
Cheers !!!

PS IMO Only thing lacking now are Jenks blue extra cars.

Last edited by TrainBub

Many thanks to the movers and shakers who do post here. As a T&P fan I appreciate the fact that without this MP- T&P enthusiasm I would not be getting the opportunity to get a T&P train much like the ones I rode as a child. Hopefully eventually we’ll get another run of correct E units in T&P livery. I’m getting a 7 car consist which will be plenty long enough with head end cars!

Many thanks to the movers and shakers who do post here. As a T&P fan I appreciate the fact that without this MP- T&P enthusiasm I would not be getting the opportunity to get a T&P train much like the ones I rode as a child. Hopefully eventually we’ll get another run of correct E units in T&P livery. I’m getting a 7 car consist which will be plenty long enough with head end cars!

Griff,  
If you haven’t reserved one , Consider getting the extra car 5BR/Lounge. There were only 3 - MP had 1, T&P 2 and are not in the “base” set. They may be a bit scarce down the road (prob fewer produced) so you won’t want to miss it.

The production lines are really backed up but eventually we could see the E8s done again. I’d welcome that. As always - email Scott and let him know what you want.

Cheers !!!

Last edited by TrainBub

I am all for having reruns on models locomotives in T&P and MP. But I stress that errors in the first runs should take presence to have these corrected. if some things  be done to enhance a model at cost that doesn't break the bank. I am fully aware of the Porthole B unit on the E6 . SO I do not think that will be done, so we move on.  Same as  the E 7 models for Porthole windows, that world be a new mold die . So you will not get reruns on these  for that model..

The are detail enhancements  that could be done and and the E 8 Gray area up on the side towards the nose is just gross (  see E6  model that is correct )  There are other  such as correct letter size for the numbers  on the ends and lowerside to wards the ends.

These items where provided with correct data for size and placement , but the ball was dropped in the final time to ship the end product be for this was corrected in production. "As it has be told to me it is too late, modes at at the dock "

So we move on from there . Yes the see are nice models,  so a 2nd run should be Per-mo.

So people for now that's my 2 cents , so have at it with your comments.

Bob Harris

Attachments

Images (1)
  • E6-Mopac-AB a
Last edited by Bob Harris
@Bob Harris posted:

I am all for having reruns on models locomotives in T&P and MP. But I stress that errors in the first runs should take presence to have these corrected. if some things  be done to enhance a model at cost that doesn't break the bank. I am fully aware of the Porthole B unit on the E6 . SO I do not think that will be done, so we move on.  Same as  the E 7 models for Porthole windows, that world be a new mold die . So you will not get reruns on these  for that model..

The are detail enhancements  that could be done and and the E 8 Gray area up on the side towards the nose is just gross (  see E6  model that is correct )  There are other  such as correct letter size for the numbers  on the ends and lowerside to wards the ends.

These items where provided with correct data for size and placement , but the ball was dropped in the final time to ship the end product be for this was corrected in production. "As it has be told to me it is too late, modes at at the dock "

So we move on from there . Yes the see are nice models,  so a 2nd run should be Per-mo.

So people for now that's my 2 cents , so have at it with your comments.

Bob Harris

Good comments Bob. I remember being disappointed when the MP E7 was dropped because of portholes/new die would be needed. Well now with the EAGLE coming (eventually), maybe a MP E7 could get “decent” reservations in another E7 rerun. Could happen IMO. Worth a try.   Similar to more reservations for the MP E6 - Because of the EAGLE offering.
Beyond the porthole issue, I anticipate small tweaks to address small issues - like letter sizes etc. A second run allows these issues to be addressed.
Front end costs are already past history (mold, design costs, etc) so I’m hoping in addition to the blue/cream model a Jenks Blue model can be added. (Yah I’m probably a minority but it’s never been done in “O”.) It’s just a different (more simple) paint job, number change,  lettering and added “buzzsaw” on the side.  
 
In your note - what is “Per-mo” ???

Cheers !!! 🙂

@TrainBub posted:

Good comments Bob. I remember being disappointed when the MP E7 was dropped because of portholes/new die would be needed. Well now with the EAGLE coming (eventually), maybe a MP E7 could get “decent” reservations in another E7 rerun. Could happen IMO. Worth a try.   Similar to more reservations for the MP E6 - Because of the EAGLE offering.
Beyond the porthole issue, I anticipate small tweaks to address small issues - like letter sizes etc. A second run allows these issues to be addressed.
Front end costs are already past history (mold, design costs, etc) so I’m hoping in addition to the blue/cream model a Jenks Blue model can be added. (Yah I’m probably a minority but it’s never been done in “O”.) It’s just a different (more simple) paint job, number change,  lettering and added “buzzsaw” on the side.  
 
In your note - what is “Per-mo” ???

Cheers !!! 🙂

Sorry missed typed at 3 am.  Should have been      Premo

The western terminus for B&O National Limited was St. Louis and many passengers continued on southwest and south on the MP Texas EAGLE.  The Golden Gate Depot EAGLE offering has an extra car that is a B&O car painted in MP colors. This is a named car (s).  (B&O is in small letters by the door.)  In continuing my research relative to the B&O National Limited, I’ve found that that there were Numerous, specific named MP cars that were assigned to and ran on the B&O National Limited and they were in EAGLE paint.  These cars are among all the extra sleepers that Scott is offering. I will be making a list of extra car names for Scott to consider and will list cars assigned to the B&O as a subset. For those of us getting a B&O EA set, these specific cars can become the beginning of a National Limited consist that came into St. Louis. (I collect representations of roads that came into St. Louis Union Station). (So sorry no Sunset Models National Ltd). They ran on the MP and B&O. There are also T&P cars that we’re assigned to the B&O.
I’m just starting this compilation. If you are interested from a MO, T&P, or B&O point of view and would want these cars, please email Scott to let him know you will be wanting these specific cars.  
If anyone out there knows of any comparable scenarios with the Pennsylvania RR (beyond the Penn -MP painted cars), please let me know as I don’t have any good sources/references for that road. I’d love to be able to add named cars if they ran on /were assigned to the Penn.

Cheers. 🙂😬😜

Last edited by TrainBub
@rdunniii posted:

Because the newer models are made with slide molds where the sides can be changed.  But the E7s were the first 3rdrail plastic diesels made (10+ years ago) and they had fixed molds back then so would require a whole new set of molds.

Perhaps a future run can finally upgrade the E7 molds. Perhaps other roads can use some detailed tweaks.  An updated Texas Special (Frisco and MKT)  with the “corrugated” sides come to mind. Be nice to have this with horizontal drive and a better detailed pilot.  I think with the EAGLE coming, the MP and T&P models would be in demand.

Last edited by TrainBub
@Bob Harris posted:

For those that are interested.   N de M Pullman Operation with the M P Texas Eagle.  I think this will help a lot for car names and car types to have made for the models.

I am offering this as gratis to help the project go forward accurately. enjoy this information.

Bob Harris and others.

Bob,    
Here’s a belated Thank You !!!! for the linked information !!!!  I occasionally go back thru the EAGLE blog to stay “fresh” with all that’s been mentioned. Sometimes I’ll spot info I’ve overlooked initially - and sure enough I missed your NDM link. It’s good NDM info that is Just Hard To Come By !!!!  Thanks Again !!!!

Cheers !!!

@T4TT posted:

I wish I had more information about the Aztec Eagle.  I have spent way too much time searching the web and have come up with very little.

I am leaning towards the 14-4 option over the observation car.  What would the order of the cars?

baggage
baggage express
chair
dome chair
grill
diner
Sleepers (10-6 Sleeper & 14-4 Sleeper)

How would the last car in the train have been treated?  Would it have had marker lights or an MoPac medallion?  The nice thing about the observation car is that it visually represents the end of the train.  While not prototypical is a beautiful car and for me it "feels" right that passenger trains end with obs cars!   

I really appreciate the knowledge and information shared on this forum!  Thank you!

I might imagine, when used, a last car Might have been a 5 Bedroom / Lounge (it also had a “Fountain”).  Seems like a logical placement - IMO only.  
As an added note - the 5 Br-Lounge cars were assigned to the B&O National Limited for a period of time. (The NL was B&O’s premium train that ran into St Louis Union Station.). In the TRRA Historical Society’s Book “The National Limited” there is a picture of MP 5BR-Lounge in end of train position - replacing a B&O observation car.

Last edited by TrainBub
@TrainBub posted:

Perhaps a future run can finally upgrade the E7 molds. Perhaps other roads can use some detailed tweaks.  An updated Texas Special (Frisco and MKT)  with the “corrugated” sides come to mind. Be nice to have this with horizontal drive and a better detailed pilot.  I think with the EAGLE coming, the MP and T&P models would be in demand.

Typically those roads get around 10-20 orders total.  I like the paint schemes but there just doesn't seem to be the demand.  The E8 was done with the fluting on the side of the Texas Special.  A rare bird to be found now!  It turned out very nice.

@GG1 4877 posted:

Typically those roads get around 10-20 orders total.  I like the paint schemes but there just doesn't seem to be the demand.  The E8 was done with the fluting on the side of the Texas Special.  A rare bird to be found now!  It turned out very nice.

Well - just looking for an “excuse” to get those MP T&P E7s done 🤣🤣🤣😜😜😜I’ll keep trying !!!  
The Texas Special E8’s Are nice. The were offered as a special run by now gone “JD’s Trains”.  I’ve 2. I don’t ever see them offered in the secondary market either.

@TrainBub posted:

Well - just looking for an “excuse” to get those MP T&P E7s done 🤣🤣🤣😜😜😜I’ll keep trying !!!  
The Texas Special E8’s Are nice. The were offered as a special run by now gone “JD’s Trains”.  I’ve 2. I don’t ever see them offered in the secondary market either.

I hope they do get done!  As primarily and CNJ fan, I know the pain of finding very little that is accurate to the road I favor the most.  There are a lot of items painted in CNJ but accurate models are hard to come by. 

Keep advocating and get people to join your cause.  With enough people it can happen.

@GG1 4877 posted:

I hope they do get done!  As primarily and CNJ fan, I know the pain of finding very little that is accurate to the road I favor the most.  There are a lot of items painted in CNJ but accurate models are hard to come by.

Keep advocating and get people to join your cause.  With enough people it can happen.

I’ve upgraded my MP “fleet” with everything Scott has offered - and added never done T&P when offered. The most striking example was with the E6. I had the MTH E6 model. Better than nothing but I cringed at the square windows instead of portholes. Needless to say I jumped at Scott’s beautiful offering - even without GGD passenger cars to go with it. I now push for a MP E6 in Jenks Blue (never done in “O”) and hope the MP SD40-2 gets the numbers needed to be produced.

Last edited by TrainBub

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×