Help Designing Layout

Hi Bruce,

I think a few more details would help.

• Which track system would you like to use?
• How will you operate the trains? conventionally or command (DCS or TMCC\Legacy)
• One level or two levels?
• Which operational features are important to you? change direction, cross between lines, a small yard, a passing siding
• What track to scenery ratio would you like? (Do you want a lot of buildings and accessories, landscaping or not a lot)

A 72" wide table will accommodate a maximum radius curve of 060, 063, 064 without easements. That limits you to small scale engines and most all semi-scale.

 

If you already have track and scenic items, what do you have?

 

This will help me and anyone else willing to give it shot to create something interesting for you to consider.

Moonman,

    Thanks for your response. I plan on using USA Standard Gauge Track with MTH switches. Track radius 42 and 57. Would like a passing siding, crossover or some spurs. I plan on using conventional locos. When it comes to buildings and landscaping I really would like a LITTLE mixture of both since my space is limited. I never gave a thought of two levels but I will not rule it out. Hope this helps.

Bruce

Well, I am a little disappointed, since I don't have a standard gauge track library.

That being said, I found that there were no layout plan books and such accumulated.

 

I think the same concepts apply to these large trains. One observation that I did make researching layouts, was that second and third layers were used to make the most of space. One was really appealing as the train traveled through a mountain 4 times on a trip on an elevated section just for that train.

 

The older designs that I did find, made use of 3 switch wyes and reversing loops inside of the outer oval.

 

By the time model railroad publications came about, Lionel had moved on from Std. gauge. Most collectors focused on their engine and car finds and not documenting surviving layouts.

 

So, it's wide open to find the best way to show off these beauties and highlight any structures that you have within the plan.

 

I'll try some shapes that will leave room for the actual track.

Ok, I made some track using USA's specs, so the switch will be the problem. I am using a ross O gauge 042.

 

With everything set on center specs the track width is a little shy using O gauge track. So, I am allowing a little clearance to the edges.

If I place the center to center at 7.25, all should be well.

 

So ideas tomorrow.

Here's a first go. Built a two oval racetrack, then changed it with 087 snake, 072, 057 curves on lower level, 072, 057, 042 on upper level 10" elevated with tunnel at one end, bridge over snake.

 

Keeps those biggies from wigglin' around on 'lil turns.

 

Concept ok?

 

Go flat?

 

Switches and other features will be on top level.

I didn't add the ovals. They are set with the center rail 4.5" from the edge and 7.25 center rail to center rail. here it is.

 

So, I could star with this, no easements and add features to the inside. The MTH 042 switch will cause some fitment issues, unless it's really like the USA 043 and it's just terminology.

Here's a flat version to help you get some direction.

 

057 outer, 043 inner, Ross #4 crossovers, Ross 072 for passing siding.

 

I am not sure if the siding will fit on the outside. Still experimenting.